Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 164, 2024 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38475841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare, benign, inflammatory breast disease with an unknown etiology that predominantly affects women of reproductive age. The definitive treatment of GM is currently controversial; an appropriate therapeutic strategy has yet to be identified, and the disease's high recurrence rate remains. This study aims to determine the recurrence rate for each GM treatment strategy to identify the most appropriate treatment modality. METHODS: The search for relevant articles was undertaken using three international databases, including Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. Articles published in English until the end of 2021 evaluating the recurrence rate of GM were included. Using Stata 13.0, the pooled incidence and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the recurrence rate were determined. RESULTS: Sixty-five eligible studies were included in our study. The recurrence rates of systemic steroid use, topical steroid use, antibiotic use, methotrexate use, observation, drainage, excision, antibiotic use and surgery, steroid use and surgery, antibiotic and steroid use, methotrexate and steroid use were 24% (95% CI: 21-27%), 11% (95% CI: 6-21%), 18% (95% CI: 14-22%), 13% (95% CI: 7-22%), 11% (95% CI: 7-17%), 65% (95% CI: 50-78%), 13% (95% CI: 10-16%), 23% (95% CI: 14-36%), 7% (95% CI: 5-11%), 11% (95% CI: 6-18%), and 4% (95% CI: 2-8%), respectively. Drainage had the highest recurrence rate, while combined methotrexate and steroid treatment had the lowest rate. CONCLUSION: The optimal treatment strategy for GM depends on the disease's severity, consequences, and the patient's features. The study results indicate that combination therapy is preferable for minimizing the risk of relapse and reducing treatment complications.


Subject(s)
Granulomatous Mastitis , Female , Humans , Granulomatous Mastitis/drug therapy , Granulomatous Mastitis/surgery , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Steroids , Combined Modality Therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Recurrence
2.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 11(8): 4614-4618, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36352939

ABSTRACT

Introduction: To compare the modified McIndoe versus Davydov vaginoplasty techniques in terms of anatomical results, sexual performance, and satisfaction. Methods: From September 2019 to June 2021, a comparative study was conducted on 20 patients with MRKH syndrome who underwent either McIndoe vaginoplasty (McIndoe group, 10 cases) or Davydov vaginoplasty (Davydov group, 10 cases) in a university-based tertiary care hospital (Imam Khomeini Hospital) in terms of anatomical results, sexual performance, and satisfaction. Functional results were assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Results: All surgical procedures (n = 20) were performed successfully. Patients in the modified McIndoe group were similar to those in the Davydov group in terms of hospital stay and intraoperative complications. However, postoperative complications were higher in the McIndoe group. There were no significant differences in the neovaginal length and width of the two groups at the 6-month follow-up (P > 0.05). Other parameters (duration of mold use and blood transfusion) were similar for all patients in the two groups. At 12 months after surgery, all patients had regular sexual activity. No significant differences were found in either group. Conclusions: In terms of anatomical results, sexual performance, and satisfaction, the two techniques were similar.

3.
Syst Rev ; 11(1): 126, 2022 06 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35718766

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Based on previous studies, it has been hypothesized that tube sterilization may be associated with a lower risk of breast cancer. This study aims to investigate the relationship between tubal ligation and the risk of breast cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant non randomized studies published up to November 2020. Then, we screened the papers to include the eligible papers in the meta-analysis. Finally, we pooled the extracted results of individual studies to estimate the summary effect size. All analyses were done using Stata software version 13 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-four papers were retrieved from PubMed/Medline (160), Scopus (165), and Web of Science (139), and 21 papers from Google Scholar and manual search of references in selected full texts. After the removal of duplicates and screening of the papers, 11 articles (6 cohort and 5 case-control study) were included in the final analysis. The results of cohort (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.97-1.0, I2 = 21.1%) and case control studies (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.62-1.12, I2 = 88.9%) revealed that tubal ligation was not significantly associated with breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: According to our findings, tubal ligation cannot be considered as a risk factor associated with breast cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Sterilization, Tubal , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Risk Factors , Sterilization, Tubal/adverse effects , Sterilization, Tubal/methods
4.
J Biomed Phys Eng ; 12(3): 309-318, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35698541

ABSTRACT

Background: Low back pain is one of the most common problems for pregnant women during pregnancy. Most belts are designed for supporting the surface of the symphysis pubis or upper anterior iliac spine without any support in the lumbar region. Objective: This study aimed to compare the related effects between the new design and the current belt on the pain and function of pregnant women. Material and Methods: In this randomized control trial study, 48 pregnant women with pelvic and lumbar pain participated. The participants were randomly divided into three groups: current belt, modified belt, and control. Pain intensity assessment, pelvic girdle (PG), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaires were utilized at the beginning of the study and three weeks later. Results: The pain intensity decreased more in the modified belt group than in the current belt group. ODI and PG scores decreased in two belt groups after three weeks of follow-up. However, this decrease was greater in the modified belt group, there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: The disability decreased in both groups using the belts, and their function was improved. Accordingly, the use of a modified belt with lumbar and PG support can significantly reduce back and pelvic pain in pregnant women compared to the current pelvic belt.

5.
J Perinat Med ; 50(8): 1067-1072, 2022 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35589674

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common symptoms after cesarean delivery (CD) that affect patients outcomes and satisfaction. The treatment of choice is still evolving, therefore, we aimed to evaluate PONV of combined paracetamol-dexamethasone vs. paracetamol alone. METHODS: This study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial on 100 patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups of paracetamol or combined paracetamol-dexamethasone. Nausea and vomiting score, VAS score of pain, and chill were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The result of this study found that mild nausea 2nd h after surgery in the combined group was lesser than paracetamol group (0.03). However, there was no statistically significant difference in nausea and vomiting score in other periods of time between the two groups. VAS score of pain decreased 12th and 6th h after the surgery in the combined and paracetamol group, respectively. Chilling occurred in two patients of combined group and four patients of paracetamol group (p=0.432). CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone added to paracetamol might not improve pain and vomiting after cesarean delivery comparison with just paracetamol. But it can be effective for reducing the score of nausea after the surgery.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting , Acetaminophen , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Dexamethasone , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Pain , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/drug therapy , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/etiology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Pregnancy
6.
J Wound Care ; 31(3): 244-253, 2022 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35199592

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine the effect of olive cream on the severity of pain and healing of caesarean section wounds. METHOD: This study is a parallel randomised clinical trial that was conducted on women who had caesarean sections at Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital in Arak, Iran. Women were assigned to intervention, placebo and control groups by a block randomisation method. Women in the intervention and placebo groups were asked to use olive cream and placebo cream, respectively, twice a day from the second day after surgery to the tenth day. The wound healing score and pain intensity score were assessed using the REEDA and VAS scales, respectively, before and at the end of the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention group consisted of 34 women, the placebo group of 34 women and the control group of 35 women. We found a statistically significant difference between the intervention and placebo groups, intervention and control groups, and placebo and control groups in terms of the pain intensity (p<0.05 in all three cases). Also, we found a statistically significant difference between the intervention and placebo groups, and intervention and control groups in terms of the scores of wound healing on the tenth day after surgery (p<0.05 in both cases). CONCLUSION: Olive cream can be effective in relieving pain and enhancing caesarean section wound healing, and since no specific side effects were reported, the use of olive cream is recommended.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Olea , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Humans , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Pregnancy , Wound Healing
7.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 26(2): 28-33, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31634871

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting are the most common complaints of patients after any general anesthesia, which are often accompanied by postoperative pain. Previous studies showed that ginger and dexmedmoidine can reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting. Therefore, the effectiveness of ginger was compared with dexmedmoidine for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial study was performed on 92 patients who had abdominal hysterectomy in a double-blind evaluation. In this study, 92 patients were randomly divided into two equal groups of dexmedmotidine and ginger. In the ginger group, 1 gr of ginger was given orally before and after the anesthesia and in the second group, 25 mg of dexmedmotidine was slowly injected before surgery. Finally, after the operation, the questionnaire was completed for patients and the data obtained from the questionnaires were analyzed by SPSS19 software. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the two groups of dexmodetomidine and ginger in terms of scorpion vomiting in recovery and 2 hours after operation. Vomiting scores were significantly lower in the ginger group than dexmodetomidine group (P = .02 and P = .03). However, no significant difference was defined between the two groups 4 hours after operation, and the scoring was reported to be zero in both groups. Moreover, a decreased level of nausea was observed in the ginger group as compared to the of dexmedetomidine group. CONCLUSION: Both dexmedmotidine and ginger are effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting. But the effect of ginger is greater than that of dexmodetomidine.


Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hysterectomy , Plants, Medicinal , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Zingiber officinale , Administration, Oral , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Treatment Outcome
8.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 942, 2019 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31604465

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies on relationship between tubal ligation and endometrial cancer have led to contradictory findings. In several studies, however, a reduced endometrial cancer risk was suggested following tubal ligation. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between tubal ligation and endometrial cancer risk. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies published up to May 30th, 2018. We compared endometrial cancer risk in women with and without tubal ligation in retrieved studies. RESULTS: Two hundred nine studies were initially retrieved from the data bases. After exclusion of duplicates and studies which did not meet inclusion criteria, ten cohort and case-control studies, including 6,773,066 cases, were entered into the quantitative meta-analysis. There was 0.90% agreement between two researchers who searched and retrieved the studies. The summary OR (SOR) was reported using a random effect model. Begg's test suggested that there was no publication bias, but a considerable heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 95.4%, P = 0.001). We pooled the raw number of tables cells (i.e. a, b, c, and d) of eight studies. The SOR suggested that tubal ligation was significantly associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer (SOR = 0.577, 95% CI = 0.420-0.792). Also, given the rare nature of endometrial cancer (< 5%), different effect sizes were considered as comparable measures of risk. Therefore we pooled ten studies and SOR of these studies revealed that tubal ligation was significantly associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer (SOR = 0.696, 95% CI = 0.425-0.966). Besides that, we pooled eight studies in which adjusted effect sizes were reported and a subsequent analysis revealed that the summary estimate of adjusted odds ratio (SAOR) was significant (SAOR = 0.862, 95% CI = 0.698-1.026). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a protective effect of tubal ligation on endometrial cancer risk (approximately 42% lower risk of cancer). It is recommended that studies should be designed to reveal mechanisms of this relationship.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk , Young Adult
9.
J Med Life ; 12(2): 173-177, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31406520

ABSTRACT

Patients feel uncomfortable with cervical manipulation, uterine distension and stimulation of peritoneum during hysterosalpingography (HSG) and experience lower abdominal pain during and after the procedure. Pain during the procedure has a negative effect on the adaptation of patients to treatment and physicians are trying to overcome this unpleasant situation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of midazolam and dexmedetomidine on reducing pain and spasm of fallopian tubes during and after HSG procedure in women with infertility. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 102 patients were randomly divided into two groups, midazolam and dexmedetomidine. The pain was recorded during injection and immediately after injection and 30 minutes after HSG, and then the complications of injection were recorded. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Based on the results presented herein, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of vasovagal reaction, spasticity of the tube and the side of the spastic tube and uterine cavity anomalies (p <0.05). However, the pain showed a significant difference between the two groups during the injection, immediately or at 30 minutes after the procedure (p = 0.0001). The pain in the midazolam group was less than that of dexmedetomidine. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding spasticity (p <0.05). There is a benefit in terms of pain reduction with the use of dexmedetomidine when comparing with midazolam injection. However, dexmedetomidine does not cause side effects in patients and can be used to reduce pain during injection.


Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Hysterosalpingography/adverse effects , Infertility, Female/diagnostic imaging , Midazolam/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Pain/etiology , Young Adult
10.
Med Arch ; 73(1): 15-18, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31097853

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures. Problems such as severe pelvic pain, irregular or heavy bleeding and uterine cancer from those that may be used to treat them no choice but to remove the uterus by surgery. Abdominal pain after abdominal hysterectomy, the most common complaints of patients undergoing this type of surgery is considered. AIM: This study aimed to compare the effects of bupivacaine into the subcutaneous tissue and skin ketamine for pain control after surgery in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy was performed under general anesthesia. METHODS: This study is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 99 women scheduled for TAH referred to tertiary centers was performed. Group A: 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine into the subcutaneous tissue and, Group II: 100 mg ketamine skin and subcutaneous tissue with cc5 volume injection, groups of three: cc5 distilled water was injected into the subcutaneous tissue and. The average duration of analgesia and pain and pain score were recorded. RESULTS: The average duration of analgesia in group K 65.1±8.8, in the bupivacaine group 65.4±8.7 and in the placebo group 57.6±5.5, which, according to P Value≤0.01 is a significant difference between the three groups were observed, so that the pain in the placebo group for a significant period of ketamine and bupivacaine groups is lower, while that between ketamine and bupivacaine in terms of the average duration of analgesia was no significant difference not. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that the use of bupivacaine and ketamine effective in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy tissue and further doses of ketamine and bupivacaine single dose resulted in a significant reduction of postoperative pain patients were compared to the placebo group.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Adult , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Infusions, Subcutaneous , Injections, Subcutaneous , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement
11.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 8(2): 722-727, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30984702

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is defined as a disability in urinary excision after surgery. There are several strategies to prevent POUR, such as tamsulosin, which is a selective antagonist at alpha-1A and alpha-1B-adrenoceptors which reduces the bladder outlet resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic tamsulosin in preventing acute urinary retention and other obstructive urinary symptoms following colporrhaphy surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. A total of 130 patients who were candidates for colporrhaphy were divided into two groups: the intervention group (65 subjects received 0.4 mg tamsulosin in a single dose at the time of sleeping) and the control group (65 subjects received placebo at the same time as the intervention group). The incidence of acute urinary retention and other obstructive urethral symptoms and the mean urination volume after catheterization were recorded 24 h after operation. Patients' demographic and clinical data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software using Chi-square and Fisher's tests. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the incidence of acute urinary retention, decrease in urine flow diameter, and the mean residual urine volume Post Void Residual (PVR) in the bladder, and the incidence of these symptoms decreased in the tamsulosin recipient group. The incidence of other symptoms of acute urinary retention was not significantly different when compared between both the groups. CONCLUSION: It seems that the use of prophylactic tamsulosin is more effective in decreasing the incidence of acute urinary retention, decreasing the PVR in the bladder, and decreasing the diameter of the urine flow in patients after colporrhaphy.

12.
Eur J Transl Myol ; 29(1): 7873, 2019 Jan 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31019659

ABSTRACT

Hysterectomy after cesarean section is the second most commonly used surgery for women in the United States. One of the most common problem after hysterectomy is pain. We decided to compare the effects of dexmedmotidine or ketamine on pain in patients by a double blind randomized clinical trial on 126 female candidates for abdominal hysterectomy in three groups of 42 persons referred to Taleghani hospital in Arak. For the first group, 50 micrograms of intradermal dexmedmotidine were injected, while in the second group, patients were injected with 100 mg of subcutaneous ketamine and the third group received 5 cc normal saline. Data were next analyzed by SPSS version 19. The mean age and body mass index of the patients were not significantly different in the three groups. The mean scores of pain during recovery of patients in ketamine, dexmedmotidine and placebo groups were 4.2±0.77, 2.6±0.89 and 1.3±0.87, respectively (p = 0.001). Scores of pain in patients at 4 and 8 hours after surgery showed also significant differences. In conclusion, ketamine and dexmedmotidine significantly reduce the severity of pain, but ketamine has a lower effect.

13.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 852: 254-264, 2019 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30959049

ABSTRACT

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to evaluate the effect of probiotic and symbiotic supplementation on inflammatory markers among patients with diabetes. Clinical trials were searched using Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science online databases for relevant trials published until April 2018. Two independent investigators evaluated study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included clinical trials. Cochran's Q test and I-square (I2) statistic were used to detect heterogeneity among the included. Data were pooled by using the random-effect model and standardized mean difference (SMD) was considered as the summary effect size. From 986 originally identified publications 18 clinical trials with a total of 1337 patients were included. Findings showed that probiotic and synbiotic supplementation among patients with diabetes significantly decreased tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (SMD = -2.99; 95% CI, -4.77, -1.20; P = 0.001; I2: 96.3), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD = -0.87; 95% CI, -1.27, -0.48; P < 0.001; I2: 90.2); while significantly increased nitric oxide (NO) concentrations (SMD = 1.49; 95% CI, 0.81, 2.16; P < 0.001; I2: 92.1). There were no effects of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels (SMD = -0.65; 95% CI, -1.88, 0.59; P = 0.30; I2: 94.7). In summary, the current meta-analysis demonstrated probiotic and synbiotic supplementation among patients with diabetes significantly decreased CRP and TNF-α, and increased NO levels, but did not affect IL-6 levels.


Subject(s)
Probiotics/pharmacology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Synbiotics , Biomarkers/metabolism , Humans , Inflammation/metabolism
14.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 107, 2019 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30922259

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is the most common medical condition in pregnant women and its complications affect both mother and fetus. The beneficial effects of vitamin D on gestational diabetes have been shown, though data on the effects of co-administration of vitamin D with other nutrients on pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes (GDM) are scarce. This study was aimed to determine the effects of magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation on parameters of inflammation and oxidative stress, and pregnancy outcomes among women with GDM. METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 60 women with GDM not taking oral hypoglycemic agents. Patients were randomly assigned to take magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D supplements (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for 6 weeks. Fasting blood samples were collected from participants at baseline and after the 6-week intervention to measure related biomarkers. RESULTS: Magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (- 1.2 ± 3.5 vs. + 0.8 ± 2.0 mg/L, P = 0.01) and plasma malondialdehyde concentrations (- 0.3 ± 0.3 vs. + 0.3 ± 1.1 µmol/L, P = 0.003), as well as a significant increase in total antioxidant capacity levels (+ 38.2 ± 76.5 vs. -16.3 ± 93.5 mmol/L, P = 0.01), compared to placebo. We found a decreasing trend in newborns' weight (3089.8 ± 519.9 vs. 3346.3 ± 411.1 g, P = 0.05) and the rate of macrosomia (3.3% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.08) in the magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D supplemented women. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings of this study have demonstrated that magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation for 6 weeks to women with GDM may reduce biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress. This study was retrospectively registered on 25 April 2017 in the Iranian website ( www.irct.ir ) for clinical trials registration ( http://www.irct.ir : IRCT201704225623N109).


Subject(s)
Calcium/therapeutic use , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Dietary Supplements , Magnesium/therapeutic use , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Zinc/therapeutic use , Adult , Antioxidants/metabolism , Biomarkers/blood , Birth Weight , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Inflammation , Malondialdehyde/blood , Oxidative Stress , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 35(5): 406-411, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30608001

ABSTRACT

This investigation was conducted to evaluate comparison of myo-inositol and metformin on glycemic control, lipid profiles, and gene expression related to insulin and lipid metabolism in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 53 women with PCOS, aged 18-40 years old. Subjects were randomly allocated into two groups to take either myo-inositol (n = 26) or metformin (n = 27) for 12 weeks. Myo-inositol supplementation, compared with metformin, significantly reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (ß -5.12 mg/dL; 95% CI, -8.09, -2.16; p=.001), serum insulin levels (ß -1.49 µIU/mL; 95% CI, -2.28, -0.70; p<.001), homeostasis model of assessment-insulin resistance (ß -0.36; 95% CI, -0.55, -0.17; p<.001), serum triglycerides (ß 12.42 mg/dL; 95% CI, -20.47, -4.37; p=.003) and VLDL-cholesterol levels (ß -2.48 mg/dL; 95% CI, -4.09, -0.87; p=.003), and significantly increased the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (ß 0.006; 95% CI, 0.002, 0.01; p=.006) compared with metformin. Moreover, myo-inositol supplementation upregulated gene expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) (p=.002) compared with metformin. Overall, taking myo-inositol, compared with metformin, for 12 weeks by women with PCOS had beneficial effects on glycemic control, triglycerides and VLDL-cholesterol levels, and gene expression of PPAR-γ.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression/drug effects , Inositol/pharmacology , Lipid Metabolism/drug effects , Lipids/blood , Metformin/pharmacology , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Blood Glucose , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Inositol/therapeutic use , Insulin/blood , Metformin/therapeutic use , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/blood , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/genetics , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 25(3): 8-12, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29332024

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: One of the most common complications of a Caesarean section (C-section) is postoperative inflammation as well as operative and postoperative pain associated with the surgery. The control and mitigation of pain after surgery is the main goal of anesthesiologists. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the effects of intravenous apotel and remifentanil on postoperative pain control in women undergoing an elective C-section. DESIGN: The research team designed a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: The study was performed at the Taleghani Hospital (Arak, Iran). PARTICIPANTS: Potential participants were 70 patients undergoing an elective C-section. INTERVENTION: Participants were divided randomly into 2 groups, the apotel (A) and remifentanil (R) groups, with 35 participants in each group. The participants in the A group received an infusion of 1 g of apotel to 200 cc of normal saline for 20 min, after anesthesia, the removal of their fetuses, and the clamping of their umbilical cords. The same procedure was followed for the R group (ie, the participants received an infusion of 0.5 µg of remifentanil per kg of body weight per minute after anesthesia), removal of their fetuses, and clamping of their umbilical cords. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain scores were measured 3 times using a visual analogue scale during the recovery period (from anesthesia and pain scores) and at 4 and 12 h after surgery after surgery. Participants' use of narcotics during the 24 h after surgery was recorded. Data analysis was done using SPSS (version 16) statistical software. RESULTS: The pain scores of the R group were lower than those of the A group during the recovery period and a statistically significant difference existed between the pain scores of the 2 groups during that period (P = .01). No statistically significant difference existed between the groups in participants' mean use of narcotic drugs during the 24 h of surgery. Moreover, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups in participants' blood pressures or heart rates during the recovery period or at 4 and 12 h after surgery (P ≥ .05). CONCLUSION: Remifentanil can provide better postoperative pain control than apotel immediately after surgery.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Remifentanil/administration & dosage , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Iran , Pregnancy , Remifentanil/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
17.
Med Arch ; 73(6): 399-403, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32082008

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The labor pain is probably the most severe pain a mother experiences in her lifetime and is usually severe and prolonged in women with pregnancy. AIM: To evaluate the effects of labor epidural and spinal analgesia on the incidence of cesarean section in painless delivery. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on pregnant women aged 37-42 weeks of pregnancy. Female candidates for painless labor were divided into two groups: Epidural Analgesia (EA) and Spinal Analgesia (SA). Patients in the labor epidural group underwent analgesia using marcaine and fentanyl and after fully assuring the normal hemodynamic status of the mother and fetal hearth rate (FHR), labor spinal analgesia was used for other group. RESULTS: The average age of mothers was 27.5 years, their mean gestational age was 39 weeks and their mean weight was determined to be 72 kg. Frequency of cesarean delivery in mothers was found as 12.9%. Significantly, the incidence of cesarean section in the labor epidural analgesia group was higher than the labor spinal analgesia group (P = 0.02). In addition, the mean second phase of delivery in the labor epidural analgesia group was significantly higher than the labor spinal analgesia group (P = 0.03). There was no significant in 1st and 5th min Apgar scores between groups in infants (8.6 and 9.6, respectively). CONCLUSION: Labor epidural analgesia and labor spinal analgesia result in a significant reduction in pain due to normal delivery. Due to the similarity of Apgar and arterial blood gas (ABG) in neonates, labor epidural analgesia may serve as an alternative in childbirth delivery.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/statistics & numerical data , Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods , Anesthesia, Spinal/statistics & numerical data , Apgar Score , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Labor Stage, Second , Adjuvants, Anesthesia/therapeutic use , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Female , Fentanyl/therapeutic use , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy
18.
Biol Trace Elem Res ; 191(1): 54-60, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30565017

ABSTRACT

Synergistic approach of magnesium and vitamin E may benefit clinical symptoms of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) through improving their metabolic profiles and reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. This study was designed to determine the effects of magnesium and vitamin E co-supplementation on hormonal status and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in women with PCOS. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted among 60 women with PCOS, aged 18-40 years old. Participants were randomly divided into two groups to take 250 mg/day magnesium plus 400 mg/day vitamin E supplements or placebo (n = 30 each group) for 12 weeks. Fasting blood samples were taken at baseline and after the 12-week intervention to quantify related variables. Magnesium and vitamin E co-supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in hirsutism (ß - 0.37; 95% CI, - 0.70, - 0.05; P = 0.02) and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (ß - 0.67 mg/L; 95% CI, - 1.20, - 0.14; P = 0.01), and a significant increase in plasma nitric oxide (NO) (ß 3.40 µmol/L; 95% CI, 1.46, 5.35; P = 0.001) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) levels (ß 66.32 mmol/L; 95% CI, 43.80, 88.84; P < 0.001). Overall, magnesium and vitamin E co-supplementation for 12 weeks may benefit women with PCOS on hirsutism, serum hs-CRP, plasma NO, and TAC levels. Clinical trial registration number http://www.irct.ir : IRCT2017082733941N8.


Subject(s)
Magnesium/administration & dosage , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/blood , Vitamin E/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Double-Blind Method , Fasting/blood , Female , Hirsutism/blood , Humans , Inflammation/blood
19.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci ; 6(10): 1862-1867, 2018 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30455763

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study aimed to compare the effect of Dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to lidocaine 5% in spinal anaesthesia to increase post-operative analgesia among women candidates for elective caesarean. METHODS: Eighty-four pregnant women candidates for caesarian were randomly divided into fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine groups. In the first group, 25 µg fentanyl was added to lidocaine 5% while in the second group, 0.5 µg per kilogram Dexmedetomidine was added to lidocaine 5%. After the operation, a pain score of the patients in recovery and within 4, 12 and 24 hours after the operation, the average length of analgesia and the average amount of the analgesics taken within 24 hours and after the operation were recorded. RESULTS: The average length of postoperative anaesthesia and the average amount of the drug taken within the first 24 hours after the operation in fentanyl group was more than the Dexmedetomidine group (P = 0.01). Shivering in Dexmedetomidine group was more common than what was observed in the fentanyl group (P = 0.001). Higher rates of nausea-vomiting were observed in the fentanyl group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fentanyl results in a longer period of postoperative analgesia and less consumption of drugs after the operation. Fentanyl is recommended in caesarian.

20.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci ; 6(9): 1659-1663, 2018 Sep 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30337983

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study was aimed to compare the effects of ondansetron, haloperidol, and dexmedetomidine for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: This randomised clinical trial study was performed on p.patients who were candidates for abdominal hysterectomy referring to Taleghani hospital in Arak. In this study, 114 patients with abdominal hysterectomy were randomly assigned to three groups (ondansetron, haloperidol, and dexmedetomidine) using the cubull randomisation method. RESULTS: The results revealed a significant difference between the three groups of ondansetron, haloperidol and dexmedetomidine in terms of scorpion vomiting in recovery, 2 and 4 hours after surgery, and vomiting score was significantly lower in the ondansetron group compared with the other two groups (P = 0.04; P = 0.02; P = 0.001). There was a significant difference between the three groups of e ondansetron, haloperidol and dexmedetomidine regarding the mean dose of metoclopramide in mg for 24 hours after surgery. Therefore, the dosage of dexmedetomidine in the ondansetron group was less than the other two groups (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: these three drugs are effective in reducing PONV in patients undergoing a hysterectomy. However, the effect of ondansetron was found to be more than the other two drugs in reducing PONV.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...