Seven Days of Voice Rest Post-phonosurgery Is Not Better than 3 days: A Prospective Randomized Short-term Outcome Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to compare the short-term effect of 7 versus 3 days of voice rest (VR) on objective vocal (acoustic) parameters following phonosurgery. METHODS: A prospective randomized study conducted at a tertiary referral medical center. Patients with vocal fold nodules, polyps, or cysts and scheduled for phonosurgery were recruited from the Voice Clinic. They were randomized into groups of 7- or 3-day postoperative VR periods and their voices were recorded preoperatively and at 4-week postoperatively. A mixed linear model statistical analysis (MLMSA) was used to compare pre- and postoperative jitter, shimmer, harmonic-to-noise ratio, and maximum phonation time between the two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were recruited, but only 34 fully complied with the study protocol, and their data were included in the final analysis (19 males, 20 females; mean age: 40.6 years; 17 patients in the 7-day VR group and 16 in the 3-day VR group). The groups were comparable in age, sex, and type of vocal lesion distribution. The preoperative MLMSA showed no significant group differences in the tested vocal parameters. Both groups exhibited significant (p < 0.05) and comparable improvement in all vocal parameters at postoperative week 4. CONCLUSIONS: A VR duration of 7 days showed no greater benefit on the examined vocal parameters than the 3-day protocol 4-week postoperatively. Our results suggest that a 3-day VR regimen can be followed by patients who undergo phonosurgery without compromising the vocal results. Larger-scale and longer-duration studies are needed to confirm our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Effects of carbonation of liquids on penetration-aspiration and residue management.

OBJECTIVE: Carbonation as a sensory enhancement strategy for prevention of aspiration of thin liquids has not been thoroughly studied. The aim of our study was to examine the effect of carbonation on penetration-aspiration and pharyngeal residue in dysphagia patients using Fiber-Optic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and to identify parameters associated with a response to carbonation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of patients undergoing FEES in a dysphagia clinic. Patients were offered 100 cc of dyed water. Penetration-aspiration was scored using the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS). Residue was scored using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPR-SRS). Patients with a PAS ≥ 2 for water were subsequently offered 100 cc of carbonated water. PAS, YPR-SRS and residue clearance were compared between thin and carbonated liquids. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for good response to carbonation. RESULTS: 84 patients were enrolled, 77.4% males, with diverse dysphagia etiologies (58.3% neurogenic, 11.9% radiation-induced, 23.8% deconditioning-induced, and 6% neck surgery induced). Median PAS was 7 (IQR 4-8) for thin liquids and 4.5 (IQR 2-8) for carbonated liquids (P = 0.0001). YPR-SRS was reduced for carbonated compared to thin liquids in the vallecula (1.58 ± 0.83 vs 1.76 ± 0.93, P = 0.001) and piriform sinuses (1.5 ± 0.87 vs 1.67 ± 0.9, P = 0.002). 31 patients had improvement in PAS with carbonation. Deconditioning as a dysphagia etiology was found to predict good response to carbonation on multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Carbonation may prevent aspiration and improve residue management for some patients with dysphagia for liquids. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Dysphagia characteristics in Huntington's disease patients: insights from the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing and the Swallowing Disturbances Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Huntington's disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by increasing dysphagia as the disease progresses. Specific characteristics of the HD dysphagia are not well defined. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the swallowing disturbances of HD patients, to evaluate the feasibility of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in assessing dysphagia in HD patients, and to discern the relation between FEES findings and patients' self-report on dysphagia symptoms and swallowing related quality of life (SWAL-QOL). METHOD: A retrospective case series in a tertiary referral center. All recruited HD patients underwent Bed Side Swallowing Evaluation (BSE), FEES, the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). All completed the Swallowing Disturbances Questionnaire (SDQ) and the SWAL-QOL questionnaire. RESULTS: Fourteen HD patients were recruited. All were able to complete the FEES study. The FEES demonstrated delayed swallowing reflex, solid food residues, and pre/post swallowing spillage in most patients (50%, 53.5%, 83.3%, and 87.5%, respectively). The mean SDQ score was 13.2. Significant correlations were found between the SWAL-QOL fear of eating score; the SDQ oral, pharyngeal, and total scores; and the FEES parameters of pureed and solid food bolus flow time. Significant correlations were also found between the total UHDRS score, the volitional cough score, and the SWAL-QOL disease burden score. CONCLUSION: HD patients exhibit prominent unique oropharyngeal dysphagia features that may serve as a marker of disease progression. The FEES and the SDQ are valuable tools for detecting these features in HD patients with swallowing disturbance.