ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare various methods of bile duct reconstruction in children with choledochal malformation (CM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 99 children with CM over 10-year period. Mini-laparotomy (ML), laparoscopy (LS) and laparotomy (LT) were used. We performed radical CM resection and bile duct reconstruction using Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) and hepaticoduodenostomy (HD). Surgery time, short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: ML was performed in 39 patients, LS - 51 patients, LT - 9 patients. In case of LS, hospital-stay was significantly lower after intracorporeal RYHJ formation compared to extracorporeal technique (p=0.02, Mann-Whitney U-test). Intracorporeal RYHJ requires more time (p=0.0003). Intestinal passage recovered 3 times faster in the ML RYHJ group compared to the LS RYHJ group (p=0.016, Mann-Whitney U-test). ML RYHJ was followed by significantly less duration of postoperative narcotic anesthesia compared to LS HD (3 vs. 4 days, p=0.02, Mann-Whitney U-test). In our study, ML RYHJ has an advantage over LS RYHJ regarding long-term outcomes. HD resulted higher incidence of severe postoperative pancreatitis (p=0.033) that required surgical correction (LT, p=0.043). CONCLUSION: ML RYHJ has some advantages over other methods of bile duct reconstruction. Therefore, we can currently recommend this method as a preferable one.
Subject(s)
Choledochal Cyst , Laparoscopy , Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y/adverse effects , Child , Choledochal Cyst/diagnosis , Choledochal Cyst/surgery , Common Bile Duct , Humans , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an effectiveness of minilaparotomy in the treatment of choledochal malformation (CM) in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included children with CM who underwent surgery from January 2010 to May 2020. All patients were divided into 3 groups depending on surgical approach: minilaparotomy (ML), laparoscopy (LS) and laparotomy (LT). We analyzed surgery time, early postoperative outcomes and cosmetic results. RESULTS: There were 99 patients with CM for 10 years. ML was performed in 39 patients, LS - in 51 patients, and LT - in 9 patients. Significantly (p-value <0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn paired comparison test, p<0.05) less surgery time was observed in ML group. According to Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications, we found a significant prevalence of complications in the LS group (p - 0.018, Kruskal-Wallis test). Moreover, LS was characterized by insignificant (p>0.05) predominance of the most severe complications requiring multiple redo surgeries. CONCLUSION: Currently, open surgery is a "gold standard" in the treatment of children with CM. LS is not preferred in children with CM. ML ensures favorable early outcomes in children with CM.
Subject(s)
Choledochal Cyst , Laparoscopy , Child , Choledochal Cyst/surgery , Common Bile Duct , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparotomy/adverse effects , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The review is devoted to the current classifications of common bile duct malformations, authors' opinion regarding surgical approach and reconstruction of the bile ducts. The authors describe the modern modifications of bile duct reconstructions and estimate their effectiveness. PubMed database, Google Scholar and National Scientific Electronic Library eLIBRARY.ru databases were used. We analyzed the complications in children depending on various reconstructions, anatomical form, timing of reconstructive surgery and early diagnosis of this pathology.