Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res ; 13(1): 44-55, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36406295

ABSTRACT

Objective: This systematic review was aimed to compare ball and locator attachment system on the basis of clinical and biomechanical performance of implant supported overdenture as well as biological and patient related outcomes. Material and methods: Open and free electronic and manual searches were performed in digital databases including MEDLINE via PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials, and Scopus along with some other reliable sources. From the 667 retrieved records, 11 full-text controlled trials were included in this study. Risk of bias was assessed according to RoB 2.0 except for one RCT (economic evaluation), only assessed by CASP checklist. Results: From the 11 retrieved studies, total 183 locator and 219 ball attachments were identified in 452 subjects of 30 yrs-95 yrs of age. Studies provided data about prosthodontic complications or maintenance (replacement or the activation of matrix and patrix part, loss of retention, fracture and relining of the prosthesis, fracture of the attachment and the survival probability), oral health impact profile, soft tissue parameters and periodontal complications, marginal bone loss, patient related outcome and cost of the attachment systems. Only 5 studies were assessed at low risk bias, while other 6 at moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusion: Locator attachment system show lesser complications including loss of retention and lower maintenance appointments, lesser soft tissue, and periodontal complications than the ball attachment. Ball is better in terms of cost effectiveness. In other related outcomes, no significant differences were noted between ball and locator attachment.

2.
J Orthod Sci ; 11: 7, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35754415

ABSTRACT

This systematic review was aimed to test the null hypothesis that coating of orthodontic wires with nanoparticles does not affect the frictional properties at bracket--wire interface. Electronic database searches were performed up to September 2020. In vitro studies were considered for reviewing process. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment was performed during reviewing process. Only qualitative analyses of included literature were done due to the presence of heterogeneity among the studies. Out of 1,068 retrieved records, nine studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and included in this review. Studies were assessed at low risk to high risk of bias according to certain parameters. Wide variety of nanoparticles were used for surface coating of orthodontic wires of variable sizes, shapes, and materials like stainless steel, NiTi, and TMA and placed into the slots of different types of orthodontic brackets to evaluate the alteration in frictional and other mechanical properties. Most of the studies clearly indicate that coating with nanoparticles decreases the friction between wire and bracket interface under specified in vitro conditions. Furthermore, among the nine included studies, only two considered evaluation of effect of coated brackets on frictional and other mechanical properties and results were heterogeneous. The null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded that the wires coated with nanoparticles might offer a novel opportunity to substantially reduce frictional resistance at bracket--wire interface during tooth movement. Further studies are necessary to strengthen the evidence regarding effect of coated brackets on frictional properties.

3.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res ; 11(2): 344-353, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33786298

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was aimed to find out possible predictive variables measured on panoramic radiographs to predict spontaneous eruption of palatally displaced canine (PDC) after interceptive extraction in late mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic database searches were performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane's CENTRAL, Scopus, and in other sources up to June 2020. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, and pre-post prospective studies without control groups were considered for review. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment (by RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, and NHLBI score), and the certainty of evidence evaluation (GRADE approach) were performed during reviewing process. Only qualitative analyses of included literature were done due to presence of between study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of 970 retrieved records, 3 controlled trials and 3 prospective before and after studies without control fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Studies were assessed at low risk to high risk of bias. Overall certainty was moderate to very low. Results shows that PDCs in distal sectors, lower alpha angle, younger subjects, PDCs with less advanced developed root were significantly benefited from interceptive extraction. However, Vertical distance had insignificant roll on eruption prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Interceptive extraction at younger age, mesial canine crown position (sectors), and mesial inclination of PDC (alpha angulation) are the most important variables predicting the spontaneous eruption of palatally displaced canine. Findings of this review can be utilized to make evidence-based decisions for managing PDCs with diverse sectors and mesial inclinations. However, well designed clinical trials are recommended to strengthen the evidence.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL