Forskolin Stimulates Estrogen Receptor (ER) α Transcriptional Activity and Protects ER from Degradation by Distinct Mechanisms.

Estradiol action is mediated by estrogen receptors (ERs), a and ß. Estradiol binding initiates ER-mediated transcription and ER degradation, the latter of which occurs via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Inhibition of proteasome activity prevents estradiol-induced ERα degradation and transactivation. In ER-positive GH3 cells (a rat pituitary prolactinoma cell line), forskolin, acting via protein kinase A (PKA), stimulates ERα transcriptional activity without causing degradation, and proteasome inhibition does not block forskolin-stimulated transcription. Forskolin also protects liganded ERα from degradation. In the current study, we first examined ERα and ERß transcriptional activity in ER-negative HT22 cells and found that forskolin stimulated ERα-, but not ERß-dependent transcription, through the ligand-binding domain (LBD). We also identified four mutations (L396R, D431Y, Y542F, and K534E/M548V) on the ERα LBD that selectively obliterated the response to forskolin. In GH3 cells, transfected ERα mutants and ERß were protected from degradation by forskolin. Ubiquitination of ERα and ERß was increased by forskolin or estradiol. ERα ubiquitination was diminished by a mutated ubiquitin (K48R) that prevents elongation of polyubiquitin chains for targeting the proteasome. Increased ERα ubiquitination was not affected by the deletion of the A/B domain but significantly diminished in the F domain deletion mutant. Our results indicate distinct and novel mechanisms for forskolin stimulation of ERα transcriptional activity and protection from ligand-induced degradation. It also suggests a unique mechanism by which forskolin increases unliganded and liganded ERα and ERß ubiquitination but uncouples them from proteasome-mediated degradation regardless of their transcriptional responses to forskolin.

Women at extreme risk for obesity-related carcinogenesis: Baseline endometrial pathology and impact of bariatric surgery on weight, metabolic profiles and quality of life.

OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to determine baseline endometrial histology in morbidly obese women undergoing bariatric surgery and to assess the surgical intervention's impact on serum metabolic parameters, quality of life (QOL), and weight. METHODS: Women undergoing bariatric surgery were enrolled. Demographic and clinicopathologic data, serum, and endometrium (if no prior hysterectomy) were collected preoperatively and serum collected postoperatively. Serum global biochemical data were assessed pre/postoperatively. Welch's two sample t-tests and paired t-tests were used to identify significant differences. RESULTS: Mean age of the 71 women enrolled was 44.2 years, mean body mass index (BMI) was 50.9 kg/m(2), and mean weight loss was 45.7 kg. Endometrial biopsy results: proliferative (13/30; 43%), insufficient (8/30; 27%), secretory (6/30; 20%) and hyperplasia (3/30; 10%-1 complex atypical, 2 simple). QOL data showed significant improvement in physical component scores (PCS means 33.9 vs. 47.2 before/after surgery; p<0.001). Twenty women underwent metabolic analysis which demonstrated significantly improved glucose homeostasis, improved insulin responsiveness, and free fatty acid levels. Significant perturbations in tryptophan, phenylalanine and heme metabolism suggested decreased inflammation and alterations in the intestinal microbiome. Most steroid hormones were not significantly impacted with the exception of decreased DHEAS and 4-androsten metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery is accompanied by an improved physical quality of life as well as beneficial changes in glucose homeostasis, insulin responsiveness, and inflammation to a greater extent than the hormonal milieu. The potential cancer protective effects of bariatric surgery may be due to other mechanisms other than simply hormonal changes.

A new role for wilms tumor protein 1: differential activities of + KTS and -KTS variants to regulate LHß transcription.

Luteinizing hormone (LH) is synthesized and secreted throughout the reproductive cycle from gonadotrope cells in the anterior pituitary, and is required for steroidogenesis and ovulation. LH contains an α-subunit common with FSH, and a unique LHß subunit that defines biological activity. Basal LHß transcription is low and stimulated by hypothalamic GnRH, which induces synthesis of early growth response protein-1 (Egr1), and stimulates binding of transcription factors Egr1 and steroidogenic factor-1 (SF1) on the promoter. WT1 (Wilms tumor protein1) is a zinc finger transcription factor with an essential role in urogenital system development, and which regulates several reproductive genes via interactions with SF1 or binding to GC-rich elements such as Egr1 binding sites. We investigated a potential role for WT1 in LHß transcription in clonal mouse gonadotrope LßT2 cells. WT1 was present in LßT2 and mouse pituitary cells, and protein bound to the endogenous LHß promoter. Interestingly, mRNAs for WT1(+KTS), which contains a three amino-acid insertion between the 3rd and 4th zinc fingers, and the WT1 (-KTS) variant were both expressed at significant levels. WT1 mRNAs and protein were decreased approximately 50% by GnRH treatment, under conditions where Egr1 mRNA and protein, and LHß transcription, were stimulated. Decreasing expression of mRNA for WT1 (-KTS) decreased stimulation of LHß and Egr1 by GnRH, whereas decreasing both WT1 (-KTS) and (+KTS) increased endogenous LHß transcription, and prevented LHß but not Egr1 stimulation by GnRH, suggesting differing biological activities for the WT1 isoforms. Overexpression of WT1 showed that WT1(-KTS) enhanced LHß promoter GnRH stimulation 2-to-3-fold and required the 3'Egr1 site, but WT1(+KTS) repressed both basal and GnRH-stimulated LHß promoter activity by approximately 70%. Our data suggest that WT1 can modulate LHß transcription, with differential roles for the two WT1 variants; WT1 (-KTS) enhances and WT1 (+KTS) suppresses transcription.

Estrogen modulation of endosome-associated toll-like receptor 8: an IFNα-independent mechanism of sex-bias in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Females of child-bearing age are more resistant to infectious disease and have an increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We hypothesized that estrogen-induced gene expression could establish an immunoactivated state which would render enhanced defense against infection, but may be deleterious in autoimmune development. Using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), we demonstrate enhanced responses with immunogen stimulation in the presence of 17ß-estradiol (E2) and gene array analyses reveal toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) as an E2-responsive candidate gene. TLR8 expression levels are up-regulated in SLE and PBMCs stimulated with TLR8 agonist display a female sex-biased, E2-sensitive response. Moreover, we identify a putative ERα-binding region near the TLR8 locus and blocking ERα expression significantly decreases E2-mediated TLR8 induction. Our findings characterize TLR8 as a novel estrogen target gene that can lower the inflammatory threshold and implicate an IFNα-independent inflammatory mechanism that could contribute to higher SLE incidence in women.

AMP-activated protein kinase is a key intermediary in GnRH-stimulated LHß gene transcription.

GnRH regulation of pituitary gonadotropin gene transcription is critical for fertility, and metabolic dysregulation is associated with reproductive disorders and altered hypothalamic-pituitary responses. Here, we examined signaling pathways in gonadotropes through which GnRH modulates gonadotropin levels, and potential common signaling pathways with insulin. Using LßT2 cells, we show that GnRH rapidly (5 minutes) triggers activating phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) up to 5-fold; this stimulation is enhanced by insulin through increased total AMPKα levels and activity. GnRH also stimulated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and ERK activation, whereas insulin alone stimulated Akt. Inhibition of AMPK activity by compound C, or diminishing AMPK levels by small interfering RNA against AMPKα, prevented GnRH-stimulated transcription of the endogenous LHß gene and transfected LHß promoter. Egr-1 (early growth response-1), a transcription factor required for LHß expression, is synthesized in response to GnRH, and compound C prevents this induction. However, overexpression of Egr-1 in the presence of compound C did not restore GnRH stimulation of LHß, suggesting that AMPK stimulation of transcription also occurs through additional mechanisms or signaling pathways. One such pathway may be JNK activation, because GnRH stimulation of JNK activity and LHß transcription occurs more slowly than stimulation of AMPK activity, and AMPK inhibition by compound C or small interfering RNA also prevented GnRH-stimulated JNK phosphorylation. Finally, in primary mouse pituitary cells, GnRH also stimulates AMPK, and AMPK inhibition suppresses GnRH-stimulated LHß transcription. These studies indicate a novel role for AMPK in GnRH-stimulated transcription in pituitary gonadotropes and a potential common mechanism for GnRH and metabolic modulation of fertility.

Introduction to the year in basic science series...2009.

This year represents the second, of what we expect to be an annual series, of articles based on The Endocrine Society annual meeting presentations that highlight recent advances in vibrant basic science areas in endocrinology. For ENDO 09, two general areas with broad appeal and significance to our members were chosen: neuroendocrinology and G protein-coupled receptors. The invited participants were charged with presenting and discussing important papers that were published approximately during the year leading up to the most recent annual meetings (June 2009) and to put them into broad perspective for the greater endocrine community. Two distinguished members, Jeffrey Blaustein and Robert Millar, continued on last year's successful features by synthesizing the top findings in their fields, and these articles are based on their annual meeting presentations. Interestingly, there were several points of intersection in these topics and chosen papers, as advances in the neuroendocrinology of reproduction have been coupled to identification and/or characterization of additional novel G protein-coupled receptors. In both presentations, fundamental basic science findings deriving from structural studies and signaling pathways are linked to broad endocrine physiology issues and to potential use in clinical treatment and therapeutics.

Differential regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuron activity and membrane properties by acutely applied estradiol: dependence on dose and estrogen receptor subtype.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons are critical to controlling fertility. In vivo, estradiol can inhibit or stimulate GnRH release depending on concentration and physiological state. We examined rapid, nongenomic effects of estradiol. Whole-cell recordings were made of GnRH neurons in brain slices from ovariectomized mice with ionotropic GABA and glutamate receptors blocked. Estradiol was bath applied and measurements completed within 15 min. Estradiol from high physiological (preovulatory) concentrations (100 pm) to 100 nm enhanced action potential firing, reduced afterhyperpolarizing potential (AHP) and increased slow afterdepolarization amplitudes (ADP), and reduced I(AHP) and enhanced I(ADP). The reduction of I(AHP) was occluded by previous blockade of calcium-activated potassium channels. These effects were mimicked by an estrogen receptor (ER) beta-specific agonist and were blocked by the classical receptor antagonist ICI182780. ERalpha or GPR30 agonists had no effect. The acute stimulatory effect of high physiological estradiol on firing rate was dependent on signaling via protein kinase A. In contrast, low physiological levels of estradiol (10 pm) did not affect intrinsic properties. Without blockade of ionotropic GABA and glutamate receptors, however, 10 pm estradiol reduced firing of GnRH neurons; this was mimicked by an ERalpha agonist. ERalpha agonists reduced the frequency of GABA transmission to GnRH neurons; GABA can excite to these cells. In contrast, ERbeta agonists increased GABA transmission and postsynaptic response. These data suggest rapid intrinsic and network modulation of GnRH neurons by estradiol is dependent on both dose and receptor subtype. In cooperation with genomic actions, nongenomic effects may play a role in feedback regulation of GnRH secretion.

Proteasome regulation of dynamic transcription factor occupancy on the GnRH-stimulated luteinizing hormone beta-subunit promoter.

GnRH is the main modulator of LH secretion and transcription of the LH subunit genes in pituitary gonadotropes. The LHbeta gene is preferentially transcribed during pulsatile GnRH stimuli of one pulse/30 min and is thus carefully controlled by specific signaling pathways and transcription factors. We now show that GnRH-stimulated LHbeta transcription is also influenced by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. GnRH-stimulated activity of an LHbeta reporter gene was prevented by proteasome inhibitors MG-132 and lactacystin. Inhibition was not rescued by overexpression of two key transcription factors for LHbeta, early growth response-1 (Egr-1) and steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1). Increased endogenous LHbeta transcription after GnRH treatment was also prevented by MG-132, as measured by primary transcript assays. To investigate possible mechanisms of LHbeta transcriptional inhibition by proteasome blockade, we employed chromatin immunoprecipitation to measure LHbeta promoter occupancy by transcription factors. Without GnRH, binding was low and unorganized. With GnRH, Egr-1 and SF-1 associations were stimulated, cyclic, and coincidental, with a period of approximately 30 min. MG-132 disrupted GnRH-induced Egr-1 and SF-1 binding and prevented phosphorylated RNA polymerase II association with the LHbeta promoter. Egr-1, but not SF-1, protein was induced by GnRH and accumulated with MG-132. Egr-1 and SF-1 were ubiquitinated in gonadotropes and ubiquitinated forms of these factors associated with the LHbeta promoter, suggesting their degradation may be key for LHbeta proteasome-dependent transcription. Together, these results demonstrate that degradation via the proteasome is vital to GnRH-stimulated LHbeta expression, and this occurs in part by allowing proper transcription factor associations with the LHbeta promoter.

Novel actions of estrogen to promote proliferation: integration of cytoplasmic and nuclear pathways.

Both steroids and growth factors stimulate proliferation of steroid-dependent tumor cells, and interaction between these signaling pathways occurs at several levels. Steroid receptors are classified as ligand-activated transcription factors, and steps by which they activate target gene transcription are well understood. Several steroid responses have now been functionally linked to other intracellular signaling pathways, including c-Src or tyrosine kinase receptors. Steroids such as 17beta-estradiol (E2), via binding to cytoplasmic or membrane-associated receptors, were also shown to rapidly activate intracellular signaling cascades such as ERK, PI3K and STATs. These E2-stimulated phosphorylations can then contribute to altered tumor cell function. ER-positive breast cancer cells, in which proliferation is stimulated by E2 and suppressed by antiestrogens, have been of particular interest in dissecting nuclear and cytoplasmic roles of estrogen receptors (ER). In some cell contexts, ER interacts directly with the intracellular tyrosine kinase c-Src and other cytoplasmic signaling and adaptor molecules, such as Shc, PI3K, MNAR, and p130 Cas. Although the hierarchy among these associations is not known, it is clear that c-Src plays a fundamental role in both growth factor and E2-stimulated cell growth, and this may also require other growth factor receptors such as those for EGF or IGF-1. STAT transcription factors represent one pathway to integrate E2 cytoplasmic and nuclear signaling. STAT5 is phosphorylated in the cytoplasm at an activating tyrosine in response to E2 or EGF, and then is translocated to the nucleus to stimulate target gene transcription. E2 stimulates recruitment of STAT5 and ER to the promoter of several proliferative genes, and STAT5 knockdown prevents recruitment of either protein to these promoters. STAT5 activation by E2 in breast cancer cells requires c-Src and EGF receptor, and inhibition of c-Src or EGFR, or knockdown of STAT5, prevents E2 stimulation of several genes and breast cancer cell proliferation. Hyperactivation of the growth factor receptor-c-Src pathway can in some contexts decrease growth responses to E2, or render cells and tumors resistant to suppressive actions of endocrine therapies. Crosstalk between growth factors and steroids in both the cytoplasm and nucleus may thus have a profound impact on complex biological processes such as cell growth, and may play a significant role in the treatment of steroid-dependent breast cancers.

Introduction to The Year in Basic Science series.

This year, in response to member input and suggestions to highlight the vibrant basic science of endocrinology, The Endocrine Society Annual Meeting (ENDO 08) introduced a new feature, The Year in Basic Science series. Among the many interests and strengths of our members, three broad areas were chosen for initial consideration: nuclear receptors, kinase signaling, and hormones and cancer. Speakers were invited to present and discuss important publications during the past year between annual meetings (roughly June to June), and to put these findings into broad perspective for the endocrine community. Three distinguished researchers, Bert O'Malley, Tony Means, and Kate Horwitz, graciously agreed to participate in the inaugural venture, and this series of articles is based on their presentations at ENDO 08. Each individual approached this somewhat daunting task slightly differently. However, all three observed important and often common themes that ultimately link current basic molecular findings to broad translational and clinical problems, including metabolism and energy balance, neuronal migration and synapse formation, long-term memory formation, and endocrine pathology in cancer, reproduction and osteoporosis.

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b, c-Src, and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling play integral roles in estrogen-stimulated proliferation of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells.

17beta-Estradiol (E2) acts through the estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) to stimulate breast cancer proliferation. Here, we investigated the functional relationship between ERalpha and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)5b activity in ER+ MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells after specific knockdown of STAT5b. STAT5b small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibited E2-induced bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation in both cell lines, as well as the E2-induced increase in MCF-7 cell number, cyclin D1 and c-myc mRNA, and cyclin D1 protein expression, indicating that STAT5b is required for E2-stimulated breast cancer proliferation. E2 treatment stimulated STAT5b tyrosine phosphorylation at the activating tyrosine Y699, resulting in increased STAT5-mediated transcriptional activity, which was inhibited by a Y669F STAT5b mutant. E2-induced STAT5-mediated transcriptional activity was inhibited by overexpressing a kinase-defective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), or the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrphostin AG1478, indicating a requirement for EGFR kinase activity. Both E2-induced STAT5b tyrosine phosphorylation and STAT5-mediated transcription were also inhibited by the ER antagonist ICI 182,780 and the c-Src inhibitor PP2, indicating additional requirements for the ER and c-Src kinase activity. EGFR and c-Src kinase activities were also required for E2-induced cyclin D1 and c-myc mRNA. Together, these studies demonstrate positive cross talk between ER, c-Src, EGFR, and STAT5b in ER+ breast cancer cells. Increased EGFR and c-Src signaling is associated with tamoxifen resistance in ER+ breast cancer cells. Here we show that constitutively active STAT5b not only increased basal DNA synthesis, but also conferred tamoxifen resistance. Because STAT5b plays an integral role in E2-stimulated proliferation and tamoxifen resistance, it may be an effective therapeutic target in ER+ breast tumors.

ERbeta in breast cancer--onlooker, passive player, or active protector?

The role of estrogen exposure in breast cancer risk is well-documented, and both estrogen synthesis and actions through the estrogen receptor (ER) have been targeted by therapies to control hormone-dependent breast cancer. The discovery of a second ER form and its therapeutic implications sparked great interest. Both the original ERalpha and the more recently identified ERbeta subtypes bind and respond similarly to many physiological and pharmacological ligands. However, differences in phytoestrogen binding have been noted, and subtype-specific ligands have been developed. Cell-based assays show that ERbeta and its variants are generally less active on gene transcription than ERalpha, and may influence ERalpha activity; however, both gene- and cell-specific responses occur, and nongenomic activities are less well explored. Specific ligands, and methods to disrupt or eliminate receptor subtype expression in animal and cell models, demonstrate that the ERs have both overlapping and distinct biological functions. Overall, in cell-based studies, ERalpha appears to play a predominant role in cell proliferation, and ERbeta is suggested to be antiproliferative. The potential for distinct populations of breast tumors to be identified based on ER subtype expression, and to exhibit distinct clinical behaviors, is of greatest interest. Several studies suggest that the majority of ER-positive tumors contain both subtypes, but that some tumors contain only ERbeta and may have distinct clinical behaviors and responses. Expression of ERbeta together with ERalpha favors positive responses to endocrine therapy in most studies, and additional studies to determine if the addition of ERbeta to ERalpha as a tumor marker is of clinical benefit are warranted. In contrast, the positive association between ERbeta and HER2 expression in high-grade ERalpha-negative breast cancer does not favor positive responses to endocrine therapy. Expression of ERbeta in specific clinical subpopulations, and the potential for therapies targeting ERbeta specifically, is discussed.

Estrogen enhances gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated transcription of the luteinizing hormone subunit promoters via altered expression of stimulatory and suppressive transcription factors.

Transcription of the LH subunit genes is stimulated by GnRH and may be modulated physiologically by steroids such as 17beta-estradiol (E). We found that E treatment amplified GnRH stimulation of the rat LHbeta and alpha-subunit promoters, and expression of the endogenous mRNA, in LbetaT2 gonadotrope cells 2- to 5-fold above GnRH alone. We examined gene expression in LbetaT2 cells after E and/or GnRH treatment, and found that E suppressed expression of transcription factor Zfhx1a, and enhanced GnRH stimulation of Egr-1 mRNA and protein. E effects were abolished in the presence of antiestrogen. Egr-1 is critical for LHbeta expression; however, the role of Zfhx1a, which binds to E-box sequences, was untested. We found E-box motifs in both the rat LHbeta (-381, -182, and -15 bp) and alpha-subunit (-292, -64, -58 bp) promoters. Zfhx1a overexpression suppressed basal and GnRH-stimulated activity of both promoters. Mutation of the alpha-subunit promoter E boxes at either -64 or -58 bp eliminated Zfhx1a suppression, whereas mutation of the -292 bp E box had no effect. Gel shift assays demonstrated that Zfhx1a bound to the -64 and -58, but not -292, bp E-box DNA. Similarly, mutation of LHbeta promoter E boxes at either -381 or -182, but not -15, bp reduced Zfhx1a suppression, correlating with binding of Zfhx1a. The -381 bp LHbeta E box overlaps with an Sp1 binding site in the distal GnRH-stimulatory region, and increased Sp1 expression overcame Zfhx1a suppression. Thus, one mechanism by which E may enhance GnRH-stimulated LH subunit promoter activity is through regulation of both activators and suppressors of transcription.

Luteinizing hormone beta promoter stimulation by adenylyl cyclase and cooperation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone 1 in transgenic mice and LBetaT2 Cells.

Rat luteinizing hormone beta (Lhb) gene transcription is stimulated by hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone 1 (GnRH1), and this response may be modulated by other signaling pathways such as cAMP. Here we characterize the ability of cAMP, alone or with GnRH1, to stimulate Lhb gene transcription in mouse pituitary and clonal gonadotroph cells. Both cAMP and pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating peptide increase GnRH1 stimulation of luciferase activity in pituitaries of mice expressing the rat Lhb-luciferase transgene, suggesting cAMP and GnRH1 pathways interact in vivo. cAMP stimulation of the Lhb-luciferase transgene was similar between females in metestrus and proestrus, but GnRH1 stimulation was greater at proestrus. Additive effects with combined treatments were observed at metestrus and proestrus. Elevated intracellular cAMP stimulated Lhb promoter activity in LbetaT2 clonal gonadotroph cells, alone and with GnRH1. In LbetaT2 cells, cAMP stimulation of the Lhb promoter was eliminated by inhibition of protein kinase A (PKA); GnRH1 stimulation was partially suppressed by either PKA or protein kinase C inhibitors. Only the proximal GnRH1-responsive region of the promoter was required for cAMP stimulation, and mutation of the 3' NR5A1 site diminished the response. Regulation of primary mRNA transcripts from the endogenous Lhb gene by cAMP and GnRH1 correlated with results from the Lhb-luciferase transgene or transfected promoter. Occupancy of the endogenous promoter by EGR1 was increased by GnRH1 with or without forskolin, but forskolin alone had little effect. Thus, cAMP stimulation of Lhb promoter activity, and enhancement of GnRH1 stimulation, occurs in multiple physiological states independent of steroid status, via a PKA-dependent mechanism.

Estrogen receptor-beta: why may it influence clinical outcome in estrogen receptor-alpha positive breast cancer?

In the previous issue of the journal, Lin and coworkers present data demonstrate that increased expression of estrogen receptor (ER)-beta in ER-alpha-positive breast cancer cells antagonizes a defined group of ER-alpha/estrogen stimulated genes that are involved in cell cycle regulation and DNA replication. Similar expression patterns for these genes were found human ER-alpha positive breast tumors expressing higher levels or ER-beta, and this correlated with better clinical outcome. The implications for these data, which suggest that ER-beta is a positive actor and diagnostic marker for therapeutic outcome, are discussed.

Integration of steroid and growth factor pathways in breast cancer: focus on signal transducers and activators of transcription and their potential role in resistance.

The signaling pathways that are critical to the development and growth of breast cancer include those activated downstream of the estrogen receptor (ER) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor family. Many of these pathways, including the signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway, are common to both. The well-described genomic actions of ER involve its role as a transcription factor, either by binding directly to DNA through estrogen response elements, or by tethering to DNA through interaction with other proteins. Nongenomic signaling by the ER involves interaction with membrane-associated signaling proteins such as the c-Src tyrosine kinase and adapter proteins p130Cas and moderator of nongenomic activity of ER. Interactions with the signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway are important in both ER signaling pathways and are critical for estrogen-induced proliferation and tumorigenesis. These mechanisms of signaling cross talk and their role in resistance to antiestrogen therapies are discussed.

Physical and functional interactions between Cas and c-Src induce tamoxifen resistance of breast cancer cells through pathways involving epidermal growth factor receptor and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b.

High expression of the adaptor molecule Cas has been linked to resistance to the antiestrogen tamoxifen, both in tissue culture and in human tumors. The aim of this study was to elucidate the mechanism(s) by which overexpression of Cas confers resistance to tamoxifen. Cas overexpression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells was shown to alleviate both tamoxifen-mediated growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis. This enhancement of cell proliferation/survival occurred in the absence of detectable effects on estrogen receptor (ER) transcriptional activity under conditions where tamoxifen was present, indicating that Cas-dependent tamoxifen resistance is not the result of a switch to an ER-negative phenotype or enhanced responses to the partial agonist activity of tamoxifen. Instead, we present evidence, suggesting that Cas promotes tamoxifen resistance by deregulation of alternative cell proliferation pathways, particularly those mediated through enhanced c-Src protein tyrosine kinase activity arising from Cas/c-Src interactions. Overexpression of Cas was found to drive endogenous c-Src into complex with Cas, a process that has been shown previously to cause up-regulation of c-Src tyrosine kinase activity. MCF-7 cells overexpressing Cas exhibited increased phosphorylation of two c-Src substrates, Tyr845 in the kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 5b. Importantly, Cas-dependent protection from the antiproliferative effects of tamoxifen was reversed by the expression of dominant inhibitory variants of these substrates (Y845F EGFR and COOH-terminally truncated STAT5b). Based on these findings, we suggest that the Cas/c-Src/EGFR/STAT5 signaling axis is a major regulator of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell growth and survival.

Mechanisms for pulsatile regulation of the gonadotropin subunit genes by GNRH1.

The frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GNRH1, or GnRH) pulses secreted from the hypothalamus determine the ratios of the gonadotropin subunit genes luteinizing hormone beta (Lhb), follicle-stimulating hormone beta (Fshb) and the common alpha-glycoprotein subunit gene (Cga) transcribed in the anterior pituitaries of mammals. Fshb is preferentially transcribed at slower GNRH1 pulse frequencies, whereas Lhb and Cga are preferentially transcribed at more rapid pulse frequencies. Producing the gonadotropins in the correct proportions is critical for normal fertility. Currently, there is no definitive explanation for how GNRH1 pulses differentially activate gonadotropin subunit gene transcription. Several pathways may contribute to this regulation. For example, GNRH1-regulated GNRH1-receptor concentrations may lead to variable signaling pathway activation. Several signaling pathways are activated by GnRH, including mitogen-activated protein kinase, protein kinase C, calcium influx, and calcium-calmodulin kinase, and these may be preferentially regulated under certain conditions. In addition, some signaling proteins feed back to downregulate their own levels. Other arms of gonadotroph signaling appear to be regulated by synthesis, modification, and degradation of either transcription factors or regulatory proteins. Finally, the dynamic binding of proteins to the chromatin, and how that might be regulated by chromatin-modifying proteins, is addressed. Oscillations in expression, modification, and chromatin binding of the proteins involved in gonadotropin gene expression are likely a link between GNRH1 pulsatility and differential gonadotropin transcription.

Stimulation of the novel estrogen receptor-alpha intronic TERP-1 promoter by estrogens, androgen, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide, and forskolin, and autoregulation by TERP-1 protein.

The estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) pituitary-specific variant, TERP-1, is regulated dramatically by physiological status. We examined hormonal regulation of the TERP-1 promoter in transient transfection assays in GH3 somatolactotrope cells. We found that 17beta-estradiol (E2), genistein, androgen, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide, and forskolin (FSK) all stimulated TERP-1 promoter activity, whereas progesterone had no effect. ERalpha bound to a palindromic estrogen response element (ERE) and two half-site EREs; mutation of any of these sites decreased basal expression and completely obliterated E2 stimulation. In contrast, mutation of an activator protein-1 site decreased basal and FSK-stimulated promoter activity, but not E2 or androgen stimulation. The pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780 suppressed E2 and genistein, but not FSK or androgen, stimulation. Similarly, mutation of the ERE palindrome or half-site EREs suppressed promoter stimulation by E2 and genistein, but not by androgen or FSK. Because TERP-1 levels regulate ERalpha function on model promoters, we tested TERP-1 modulation of its own and other physiological promoters. TERP-1 suppressed basal and E2-stimulated expression of its own promoter. TERP-1 suppression required the ERE regions of the promoter, and the dimerization domain of TERP-1. TERP-1 overexpression also suppressed E2 stimulation of the progesterone receptor and prolactin promoters. Thus, estrogens, androgen, and FSK can stimulate TERP-1 promoter activity, and increased TERP-1 expression modulates E2 stimulation of physiological promoters. These data suggest that TERP-1 regulation may play a significant role in modifying pituitary ERalpha responses.

Estrogen negatively regulates epidermal growth factor (EGF)-mediated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 signaling in human EGF family receptor-overexpressing breast cancer cells.

Breast cancer cell growth may be stimulated by 17beta-estradiol (E2) or growth factors like epidermal growth factor (EGF). However, tumors typically depend on only one of these pathways and may overexpress either estrogen receptor (ER) or EGF receptor (EGFR) and related family members. Tumors overexpressing EGFR are more aggressive than those expressing ER. Intracellular mediators of these growth-stimulatory pathways are not completely defined, but one potential common mediator of EGF and E2 signaling is the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5). To investigate the role of STAT5 in potential crosstalk between E2 and EGF, MDA-MB231 and SKBr3 breast cancer cells, which are ER-negative and overexpress human EGF family receptors, were used. Introduction of ERalpha and treatment with E2 decreased EGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5b, basal and EGF-induced STAT5-mediated transcription, and EGF-stimulated DNA synthesis in these cells. Suppressive effects of E2-EpsilonRalpha were specific for STAT5, as EGF stimulation of MAPK was unaffected. Deletion/mutation analysis of ERalpha demonstrated that the DNA-binding domain was insufficient, and that the ligand-binding domain was required for these responses. ERalpha transcriptional activity was not necessary for suppression of STAT5 activity. Overexpression of c-Src did not prevent suppression of STAT5 activity by E2 and ERalpha. However, ERalpha did prevent basal increases in STAT5 activity with overexpressed c-Src. In the context of human EGF receptor family overexpression, E2-ER opposes EGF signaling by regulating STAT5 activity. STAT5 may be a crucial point of signaling for both E2 and growth factors in breast cancer cells, allowing targeted therapy for many types of breast tumors.