ABSTRACT
Rabies is an economically important zoonosis. This paper describes the extent of the economic impacts of the disease and some of the types of economic analyses used to understand those impacts, as well as the trade-offs between efforts to manage rabies and efforts to eliminate it. In many cases, the elimination of rabies proves more cost-effective over time than the continual administration of postexposure prophylaxis, animal testing and animal vaccination. Economic analyses are used to inform and drive policy decisions and focus political will, placing economics at the heart of rabies control.
La rage est une zoonose importante au plan économique. Les auteurs décrivent la portée de l'impact économique de la rage et présentent quelques modèles d'analyse économique utilisés pour comprendre ces effets ; ils analysent également les compromis à trouver entre les efforts consacrés à la gestion de la rage et ceux dédiés à son élimination. Dans bien des cas, il est plus rentable sur le long terme d'éliminer la rage que de procéder à la gestion continue de la prophylaxie post-exposition chez l'homme et au dépistage et à la vaccination des animaux. Les analyses économiques servent à documenter et à orienter les décisions concernant les mesures à prendre afin de mobiliser la volonté politique nécessaire, en plaçant l'économie au coeur de la lutte contre la rage.
La rabia es una zoonosis que reviste importancia económica. Los autores exponen la magnitud del impacto económico de la enfermedad y algunas de las modalidades de análisis económico utilizadas para aprehender esas consecuencias, así como el juego de equilibrios entre las medidas de gestión de la rabia y las actividades destinadas a eliminarla. En muchos casos, la eliminación de la enfermedad ofrece a la larga mayor eficacia, en relación con el costo, que la continua labor de administración de profilaxis tras exposición, realización de pruebas en animales y vacunación de estos. Los análisis económicos sirven para fundamentar y encauzar las decisiones de planificación y para aglutinar la voluntad política, haciendo de los aspectos económicos un eje de la lucha contra la rabia.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Politics , Rabies Vaccines/immunology , Rabies/veterinary , Animals , Disease Eradication , Dog Diseases/economics , Dog Diseases/prevention & control , Dogs , Humans , Rabies/economics , Rabies/prevention & control , Rabies Vaccines/economics , ZoonosesABSTRACT
Ontario initiated a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) oral rabies vaccination (ORV) programme in 1989. This study utilized a benefit-cost analysis to determine if this ORV programme was economically worthwhile. Between 1979 and 1989, prior to ORV baiting, the average annual human post-exposure treatments, positive red fox rabies diagnostic tests and indemnity payments for livestock lost to rabies were 2248, 1861 and $246,809, respectively. After baiting, from 1990 to 2000, a 35%, 66% and 41% decrease in post-exposure treatments, animal rabies tests and indemnity payments was observed, respectively. These reductions were viewed as benefits of the ORV programme, whereas total costs were those associated with ORV baiting. Multiple techniques were used to estimate four different benefit streams and the total estimated benefits ranged from $35,486,316 to $98,413,217. The annual mean ORV programme cost was $6,447,720, with total programme costs of $77,372,637. The average benefit-cost ratios over the analysis period were .49, 1.06, 1.27 and 1.36, indicating overall programme efficiency in three of the four conservative scenarios.