Perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines in a predominantly Hispanic patient population from the Texas-Mexico border.

BACKGROUND: Compared with nationwide averages, Hispanic individuals have experienced lower routine vaccination rates and have been disproportionately hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Few, if any, studies have examined the health beliefs surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines and adult vaccines among this population. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to (1) describe perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines in a predominantly Hispanic patient population in a federally qualified health center (FQHC) situated on the United States-Mexico border and (2) compare patient confidence in recommendations made by local clinic and government to obtain adult and COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: A bilingual (English or Spanish) written survey was administered to participants recruited from a convenience sample of patients in waiting areas of 4 clinic sites in an FQHC system on the Texas-Mexico border between March and May 2021. Survey items were derived from the Health Belief Model and captured beliefs surrounding perceived effectiveness, perceived harms, protection from the influenza vaccine, trust in the local clinic, and trust in the government. RESULTS: A total of 58 participants aged 19-90 years, with a mean age of 57.28 years, completed the survey between March and May 2021, with 77.6% of respondents indicating they would accept a COVID-19 vaccine for themselves. Results revealed a trend among older adults in the study cohort to be more likely to trust the government in recommending vaccines than younger adults (r = 0.33, P ≤ 0.05) and a tendency toward higher vaccine acceptance among male survey participants (P = 0.026). The highest correlation that emerged was between perceived trust in local clinic provider and the perceived effectiveness of vaccines (r = 0.74, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Trends related to perceptions of adult vaccines among Hispanic patients extend to the COVID-19 vaccines: especially trust in local clinic providers. Increased age may correlate to higher trust in a government-recommended vaccine. Results highlight the importance of the pharmacist giving the patient a clear recommendation to receive vaccination and strong local clinic messaging.

Medication use practices and perceptions among patients in a U.S.-Mexico border community.

OBJECTIVE: To identify themes surrounding medication use practices and perceptions among individuals from a U.S.-Mexico border community recruited to participate in focus groups. METHODS: This study was conducted in El Paso, TX. Adult participants considered to be at risk for medication therapy problems (i.e., older adults, pregnant or breast-feeding women, parents of young children) were recruited for participation. Focus groups and a survey were used to evaluate perceptions, concerns, and patterns of use of U.S. medications, Mexican medications, and herbal products. RESULTS: A sample of 73 adults, most of whom were Hispanic women (n = 60 [82%]), were recruited for participation in seven focus groups. Across groups, the majority participated in the older adult cohort (n = 42 [58%]), reported having an annual household income of less than $15,000 (n = 57 [78%]), and identified that they had less than a high school education (n = 40 [55%]). Four dominant themes emerged from the participants who completed both the survey and focus groups: (1) a "comfort" level for using a combination of U.S. medications, Mexican medications, and herbal products; (2) customary use of different drug information sources including physicians, Mexican pharmacy staff, U.S. pharmacists, and family members; (3) inconsistent levels of confidence in interpreting, measuring, and using medications; and (4) a sense of frustration regarding medication costs, which led participants to seek alternative options. CONCLUSION: These qualitative results provide an increased understanding of medication use practices and perceptions in this population. Findings such as these can provide guidance and insight into the development of interventions to improve safe and effective medication use.

Evaluation of smoking cessation behaviors and interventions among Latino smokers at low-income clinics in a US-Mexico border county.

A descriptive study of 94 Latino smokers receiving nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in US-Mexico border clinics in El Paso County, Texas was conducted. A baseline questionnaire and two follow-up telephone surveys (8-12 weeks and 6 months) were administered to evaluate smoking habits, behaviors, and cessation interventions. Participants reported an average daily cigarette consumption of 15 cigarettes and smoked within 30 min of waking (44%). Primary motivations for quitting were personal health (95%), family's health (74%), and doctor's advice (71%). Female smokers were more likely to smoke due to being anxious (p=0.012), not being able to sleep (p=0.02), or to feel thin (p=0.002). Male smokers were more likely to smoke when drinking alcohol (p=0.005). Nearly 40% of smokers reported they had never tried to quit before. Medication use at baseline was 82% patch, 53% lozenge, 29% gum, and 24% bupropion (combination therapy permitted). At 8-12 weeks, nearly two-thirds of patients were quit and 44% remained quit at six months. Smoking habits, behaviors, and successful cessation interventions among Latinos in a US-Mexico border community were identified.