Comparison of electrocardiographic analysis for risk of QT interval prolongation using safety pharmacology and toxicological studies.

Testing for possible cardiovascular side effects of new drugs has been an essential part of drug development for years. A more detailed analysis of the electrocardiogram (ECG) to detect effects on ventricular repolarization (effects on the QT interval), as a marker for possible proarrhythmic potential has been added to that evaluation in recent years. State-of-the art evaluation of drug-induced effects on the QT interval have evolved, but due to the complexity of the assessment, the trend in safety pharmacology studies has been to collect large numbers of high quality ECGs to allow for a robust assessment including the influence of heart rate on the QT interval apart from possible drug-induced effects. Since an assessment of the ECG is often included in toxicological studies, one can consider making such an assessment using ECG data from routine toxicological studies. This review summarizes various aspects of both safety pharmacology and toxicology studies with regards to their impact on the quality and quantity of ECG data that one can reasonably derive. We conclude that ECG data from toxicological studies can offer complementary ECG data that can strengthen a risk assessment. However, for the great majority of standard toxicity studies conducted, the ECG data collected do not permit an adequate assessment of drug-induced effects on the QT interval with the sensitivity expected from the ICH S7B guidelines. Furthermore, sponsors should be discouraged from performing any analyses on low quality ECGs to avoid generating misleading data. Substantial improvements in ECG quality and quantity are available, thereby making a QT interval assessment within the context of a standard toxicological study feasible, but these methods may require a larger commitment of resources from the sponsor. From the viewpoint of risk mitigation and limiting the attrition of promising new therapies, a commitment of resources to insure ECG data quality in either toxicology or safety pharmacology studies may be well justified.

Torcetrapib-induced blood pressure elevation is independent of CETP inhibition and is accompanied by increased circulating levels of aldosterone.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) with torcetrapib in humans increases plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels but is associated with increased blood pressure. In a phase 3 clinical study, evaluating the effects of torcetrapib in atherosclerosis, there was an excess of deaths and adverse cardiovascular events in patients taking torcetrapib. The studies reported herein sought to evaluate off-target effects of torcetrapib. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Cardiovascular effects of the CETP inhibitors torcetrapib and anacetrapib were evaluated in animal models. KEY RESULTS: Torcetrapib evoked an acute increase in blood pressure in all species evaluated whereas no increase was observed with anacetrapib. The pressor effect of torcetrapib was not diminished in the presence of adrenoceptor, angiotensin II or endothelin receptor antagonists. Torcetrapib did not have a contractile effect on vascular smooth muscle suggesting its effects in vivo are via the release of a secondary mediator. Treatment with torcetrapib was associated with an increase in plasma levels of aldosterone and corticosterone and, in vitro, was shown to release aldosterone from adrenocortical cells. Increased adrenal steroid levels were not observed with anacetrapib. Inhibition of adrenal steroid synthesis did not inhibit the pressor response to torcetrapib whereas adrenalectomy prevented the ability of torcetrapib to increase blood pressure in rats. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Torcetrapib evoked an acute increase in blood pressure and an acute increase in plasma adrenal steroids. The acute pressor response to torcetrapib was not mediated by adrenal steroids but was dependent on intact adrenal glands.

Relationships between preclinical cardiac electrophysiology, clinical QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development.

OBJECTIVE: To attempt to determine the relative value of preclinical cardiac electrophysiology data (in vitro and in vivo) for predicting risk of torsade de pointes (TdP) in clinical use. METHODS: Published data on hERG (or I(Kr)) activity, cardiac action potential duration (at 90% repolarisation; APD(90)), and QT prolongation in dogs were compared against QT effects and reports of TdP in humans for 100 drugs. These data were set against the free plasma concentrations attained during clinical use (effective therapeutic plasma concentrations; ETPC(unbound)). The drugs were divided into five categories: (1) Class Ia and III antiarrhythmics; (2) Withdrawn from market due to TdP; (3) Measurable incidence/numerous reports of TdP in humans; (4) Isolated reports of TdP in humans; (5) No reports of TdP in humans. RESULTS: Data from hERG (or I(Kr)) assays in addition to ETPC(unbound) data were available for 52 drugs. For Category 1 drugs, data for hERG/I(Kr) IC(50), APD(90), QTc in animals and QTc in humans were generally close to or superimposed on the ETPC(unbound) values. This relationship was uncoupled in the other categories, with more complex relationships between the data. In Category 1 (except amiodarone), the ratios between hERG/I(Kr) IC(50) and ETPC(unbound) (max) ranged from 0.1- to 31-fold. Similar ranges were obtained for drugs in Category 2 (0.31- to 13-fold) and Category 3 (0.03- to 35-fold). A large spread was found for Category 4 drugs (0.13- to 35700-fold); this category embraced an assortment of mechanisms ranging from drugs which may well be affecting I(Kr) currents in clinical use (e.g. sparfloxacin) to others such as nifedipine (35700-fold) where channel block is not involved. Finally, for the majority of Category 5 drugs there was a >30-fold separation between hERG/I(Kr) activity and ETPC(unbound) values, with the notable exception of verapamil (1.7-fold), which is free from QT prolongation in man; this is probably explained by its multiple interactions with cardiac ion channels. CONCLUSIONS: The dataset confirms the widely-held belief that most drugs associated with TdP in humans are also associated with hERG K(+) channel block at concentrations close to or superimposed upon the free plasma concentrations found in clinical use. A 30-fold margin between C(max) and hERG IC(50) may suffice for drugs currently undergoing clinical evaluation, but for future drug discovery programmes, pharmaceutical companies should consider increasing this margin, particularly for drugs aimed at non-debilitating diseases. However, interactions with multiple cardiac ion channels can either mitigate or exacerbate the prolongation of APD and QT that would ensue from block of I(Kr) currents alone, and delay of repolarisation per se is not necessarily torsadogenic. Clearly, an integrated assessment of in vitro and in vivo data is required in order to predict the torsadogenic risk of a new candidate drug in humans.

Methods for assessing endothelin ETA-receptor antagonists in preclinical studies.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been found to be one of the most potent vasoconstrictive peptides known, and is therefore considered to be an important factor in diseases such as hypertension, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, renal diseases, etc. Thus, the development of ET-receptor antagonists may offer a new therapeutic strategy in these fields. In this article, we summarize the method for assessing our compound as a selective ETA-receptor antagonist. Binding assays and in vitro function assays (isolated vessels) were examined for the assessment of in vitro potency, selectivity of the ETA receptor against the ETB receptor, specificity for ET receptors, agonistic activities for ET receptors and the blocking manner of the compound on ET receptors. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human ET receptors and tissue membrane preparations from both human and animals were used for the binding assays. The specificity of the compound against ET receptors was demonstrated using 116 and 9 receptor binding and enzyme assays, respectively. The agonistic activity and potency of the compound at tissue levels were examined using isolated vessels. We also demonstrated the effect of protein binding on the potency of the compound by adding a physiological concentration of serum albumin to the tissue baths. In vivo potency and features of the compound as a selective ETA-antagonist were confirmed using mice, rats and dogs exogenously treated with ET-1 or big ET-1. We also demonstrated the compound's duration of action and pharmacokinetics in animal models and intact animals, respectively. From these experiments, we found a nonpeptide, potent, orally active and long-lasting, highly selective ETA-receptor antagonist.