Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Diabetol ; 57(2): 183-188, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31377925

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To summarize the effects of centralization of diabetic fundus photograph interpretation into a virtual reading center. METHODS: In 2016 Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large, membership-based health plan with an ethnically and racially diverse population, centralized diabetic retinopathy screening into a virtual reading center. Retina screens were based on single field, 45-degree fundus photographs. We compared the accuracy of photography interpretation the year before centralization to the year after using masked reads performed by retina specialists of 1000 randomly selected screens from each time period. RESULTS: In all, 1902 patient screens with adequate quality images were included in the primary analysis. Images from pre-centralization screens were largely read by ophthalmologists (76.2%), while screens post-centralization were mainly read by optometrists (84.6%). Despite being interpreted by readers with lower levels of professional training, the sensitivity of screening increased from 43.9% (95% CI 38.0-49.8%) to 66.0% (95% CI 60.5-71.4%). CONCLUSION: A move to a centralized virtual reading center was associated with improved accuracy of diabetic retinopathy screening.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Mass Screening/standards , Photography/standards , Aged , Cohort Studies , Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Photography/methods , Retina/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...