The expression of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in oesophageal tissues and tumours.

PURPOSE: The most common marker of oxidative DNA damage is 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), which is linked with several malignancies. In the present study we investigated whether DNA damage linked to oxidative stress (as 8-OHdG) is present in Barrett's mucosa with or without associated adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia and in normal controls' squamous mucosa. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We measured 8-OHdG in 51 patients (13 Barrett's metaplasia, six Barrett's oesophagus with high-grade dysplasia, 18 adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus/oesophagogastric junction and 14 normal controls). The amount of DNA damage was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography in oesophagus samples obtained either from endoscopy or as samples from surgery. The median 8-OHdG concentration was expressed as the ratio of 8-OHdG per 10(5) deoxyguanosine. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that 8-OHdG was present in both Barrett's metaplasia with and without dysplasia as well as in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus/oesophagogastric junction. Although the study group was small the amount of 8-OHdG was significantly increased in the distal oesophagus both in Barrett's epithelium 1.26 (0.08-29.47) and in high-grade dysplasia 1.35 (1.04-1.65) as well as in adenocarcinoma of oesophagus/oesophagogastric junction 1.08 (0.59-1.94) compared to controls 0.06 (0-4.08) (p=0.002, p=0.012, p=0.001, respectively). Barrett's patients had no significant difference in 8-OHdG levels between their distal and proximal oesophageal samples. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the presence of oxidative DNA damage in the distal oesophagus of patients with Barrett's oesophagus and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus/oesophagogastric junction. This may have a connection to carcinogenesis in Barrett's oesophagus.

Inoperable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: a comparative clinical study of laser coagulation versus self-expanding metallic stents with special reference to cost analysis.

AIMS: Neither clinical nor financial comparisons yet exist between self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) and laser therapy, concentrating on the treatment of obstructive adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction. The aim of our study was to compare the relative lifetime costs and clinical results of the Nd:YAG laser to those of SEMS as alternative forms of primary palliation of dysphagia for adenocarcinoma near the oesophagogastric junction. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with distal oesophageal or oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas underwent palliative treatment for dysphagia: 32 treated with laser therapy and 20 with SEMS in this retrospective study. The clinical outcome and real cumulative costs as physical units and in financial terms were analysed for these study groups. RESULTS: Although patients palliated with SEMS underwent fewer procedures (1.9+/-1.6 vs 3.4+/-4.0, P=0.0048) and spent less time in endoscopic theatre (38+/-25min vs 118+/-152min, P=0.0048), they spent as many days in hospital (12.9 vs 15.1, P=0.370) and required as high overall costs for therapy (5360 EUR vs 5450 EUR, P=0.679) as those treated with laser therapy. In addition, they had higher morbidity rates (30 vs 6.3%, P=0.043), hospital mortality (20 vs 3.1%, P=0.066), and 30-day mortality (40 vs 3.1%, P=0.0011) than did patients with laser therapy, with no evidence of SEMS being the more effective treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with adenocarcinoma at the distal oesophagus or at the oesophagogastric junction, laser therapy palliates dysphagia effectively with lower morbidity and mortality rates and without increased costs or hospital stays than does use of self-expanding metallic stents.