Differential Effects of Clopidogrel With or Without Aspirin on Platelet Reactivity and Coagulation Activation: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is standard in acute coronary syndrome but confers a bleeding risk. To compare effects of clopidogrel single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with clopidogrel-based DAPT on hemostatic system activation we conducted a randomized clinical trial in 44 volunteers (clopidogrel (d1: 600 mg, d2-6: 150 mg) ± aspirin (100 mg)). Multiple electrode aggregometry-adenosine diphosphate (MEA-ADP) and MEA-arachidonic acid (MEA-AA) triggered aggregometry, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), beta thromboglobulin, p-selectin, thromboxane B2 , d-Dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2 (f1.2), and a phospholipid-dependent clotting time were measured in venous blood. Changes are described by mean differences (Δmean (95% confidence interval (CI)) or geometric mean ratios (95% CI)). DAPT and SAPT comparably and significantly decreased MEA-ADP at 2 hours (-60% vs. -63%; P = 0.35, Δmean -4.9, 95% CI -15.4 to 5.5). At 24 hours (-59% vs. -47%, P = 0.04, Δmean -11.1, 95% CI -21.7 to -0.4]) and 8 days (-61% vs. -53%, P = 0.04, Δmean -11.3, 95% CI -22.0 to -0.6). Both treatments significantly reduced VASP and MEA-AA after 2 hours and 8 days. DAPT inhibited MEA-AA significantly stronger at 2 hours (-77% vs. -30%; P < 0.0001, Δmean -39.6, 95% CI -54.2 to -25.0), at 24 hours (-80% vs. -27%, P < 0.0001, Δmean -47.8, 95% CI -62.3 to -33.3), and 8 days (-79% vs. -27%, P < 0.0001, Δmean -48.9, 95% CI -62.5 to -35.4). Neither treatment significantly influenced beta thromboglobulin or p-selectin. DAPT abolished and SAPT reduced thromboxane B2 after 24 hours and 8 days. The d-Dimer was reduced by DAPT (0.94, 95% CI 0.89-1.00, P = 0.04) at 2 hours but not after 24 hours and 8 days. SAPT did not decrease d-Dimer. Neither treatment affected f1.2. DAPT and SAPT comparably affect platelet and coagulation activation in venous blood.

Morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled IMPRESSION trial.

AIMS: The currently available data indicate a drug-drug interaction between morphine and oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, when administered together. The aim of this trial was to assess the influence of infused morphine on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a single-centre, randomized, double-blind trial, patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenously either morphine (5 mg) or placebo, followed by a 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor. Pharmacokinetics was determined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and ticagrelor antiplatelet effects were measured with up to three different platelet function tests: vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay, multiple electrode aggregometry and VerifyNow. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment was performed in 70 patients (35 in each study group). Morphine lowered the total exposure to ticagrelor and its active metabolite by 36% (AUC(0-12): 6307 vs. 9791 ng h/mL; P = 0.003), and 37% (AUC(0-12): 1503 vs. 2388 ng h/mL; P = 0.008), respectively, with a concomitant delay in maximal plasma concentration of ticagrelor (4 vs. 2 h; P = 0.004). Multiple regression analysis showed that lower AUC(0-12) values for ticagrelor were independently associated with the administration of morphine (P = 0.004) and the presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (P = 0.014). All three methods of platelet reactivity assessment showed a stronger antiplatelet effect in the placebo group and a greater prevalence of high platelet reactivity in patients receiving morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02217878.

Prasugrel overcomes high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome and maintains its antiplatelet potency at 30-day follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess antiplatelet effect of prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel, undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A prospective, platelet reactivity-guided, parallel-group, open-label study including 71 patients pretreated with clopidogrel 600 mg and assigned either to prasugrel (30 mg loading dose, 10 mg maintenance dose; n = 46) or clopidogrel (150 mg maintenance dose for 6 days and thereafter 75 mg maintenance dose; n = 25) regimen, based on vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)-assessed platelet reactivity index (PRI; > 50% vs. ≤ 50%) measured next morning post-PCI. RESULTS: Median PRI value after switch to prasugrel sharply declined at 24 h (70.0 [61.3-75.6] vs. 11.9 [6.8-25.7]%; p < 0.000001) and slightly but significantly rose between 24 h and 30 days (27.9 [15.5-46.8]%; p < 0.0006). In contrast, median PRI values in the clopidogrel group were similar at baseline and at 24 h (25.1 [13.7-40.2] vs. 22.0 [18.4-36.8]%; p = NS) and then modestly rose at 30 days (30.3 [20.4-45.7]%; p < 0.03). The prevalence of HTPR decreased in the prasugrel group between baseline and 24 h measurements (100.0 vs. 4.3%; p < 0.0001). Rates of patients with HTPR at 24 h and 30 days were similar in both groups, so were the tendencies in patterns of platelet inhibition evaluated with multiple electrode aggregometry as compared with the VASP assay. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that prasugrel overcomes HTPR on clopidogrel in the acute phase of interventionally treated ACS and maintains its antiplatelet potency in 30-day follow-up. Potential clinical benefits of personalized antiplatelet prasugrel-based therapy warrant further investigation in clinical ACS trials.

Cangrelor: an emerging therapeutic option for patients with coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic up-to-date review and critical discussion of potential clinical applications of cangrelor based on its pharmacologic properties and the main findings from randomized clinical studies. METHODS: A database search (PubMed, CENTRAL and Google Scholar) by two independent investigators, including proceedings from scientific sessions of ACC, AHA, ESC, TCT and EuroPCR, from January 1998 through December 2013. RESULTS: Cangrelor is a potent, intravenous, direct-acting P2Y12 antagonist with rapid onset and quickly reversible action. In contrast to ticagrelor, cangrelor's interaction with thienopiridines requires termination of cangrelor infusion before switching to clopidogrel or prasugrel. According to randomized trials, a cangrelor-clopidogrel combination is relatively safe and more effective than the standard clopidogrel regimen in both urgent and elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) settings, with the advantage of this drug combination fully evident when the universal definition of myocardial infarction is applied. In contrast to available antiplatelet drugs with delayed onset and offset of action, its favorable properties make cangrelor a desirable agent for ad hoc elective PCI, high risk acute coronary syndromes treated with immediate coronary stenting and for bridging those surgery patients who require periprocedural P2Y12 inhibition. Current evidence on cangrelor therapy is limited by the lack of adequately powered studies assessing cangrelor co-administration either with prasugrel or ticagrelor, suboptimal design of some of the trials favoring cangrelor, potentially attenuated benefits with modern stent design, and finally, by the lack of survival advantage. CONCLUSIONS: With its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages, allowing consistent and strong P2Y12 inhibition, and with its rapid onset and swift reversal of action devoid of need for an antidote, cangrelor might improve clinical outcomes in clopidogrel-treated patients by reducing ischemic events, while maintaining a favorable safety profile. However, further studies, addressing the safety and efficacy of cangrelor on top of novel oral P2Y12 inhibitors, are warranted.

Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel and prasugrel, prevents ADP-induced vascular smooth muscle cell contraction: a placebo-controlled study in rats.

INTRODUCTION: Off-target effects of novel antiplatelet agents due to their potential clinical benefits are currently an area of intensive investigation. We aimed to compare the effects of different P2Y(12) antagonists on the reactivity of vascular smooth muscle cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Wistar rats (n=30) were pretreated with an investigated drug or placebo. Clopidogrel (50mg/kg, n=7), prasugrel (10mg/kg, n=7), ticagrelor (10mg/kg, n=7) or placebo (n=9) were administered orally 12 and 2 hours before experiments. Constrictions of rat tail arteries induced with a stable analogue of adenosine diphosphate (2-MeS-ADP), phenylephrine and arginine vasopressin were measured as an increase in perfusion pressure. Effects of ticagrelor were assessed in the presence of ticagrelor (1µM/L) added to the perfusion solution as this drug reversibly inhibits the P2Y(12) receptor. RESULTS: Pretreatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel did not inhibit 2-MeS-ADP-induced contraction while ticagrelor did. Experiments employing endothelium-deprived arteries provided similar results. Clopidogrel and prasugrel did not influence concentration-response curves in the presence of neither phenylephrine nor arginine vasopressin. The curves obtained for both vasopressors in the presence of ticagrelor and 2-MeS-ADP were shifted to the right with a significant reduction in the maximal response. CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of ticagrelor, in contrast to clopidogrel and prasugrel, prevents adenosine diphosphate-induced contraction of vascular smooth muscle cells in a rat model. Both the clinical significance and detailed mechanism of our findings warrant further investigation.

Diurnal variation in platelet inhibition by clopidogrel.

Morning increase in the occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke and sudden cardiac death is a well-recognized phenomenon, which is in line with a morning enhancement of platelet aggregation. We investigated whether platelet inhibition during clopidogrel and aspirin therapy varies during the day. Fifty-nine consecutive patients (45 men and 14 women) with first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary interventions (pPCI) on dual antiplatelet therapy were prospectively enrolled into the study. Blood samples were collected 4 days after start of clopidogrel treatment at 6.00 a.m., 10.00 a.m., 2.00 p.m. and 7.00 p.m. Arachidonic acid and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation were assessed by impedance aggregometry. Platelet inhibition by clopidogrel was lowest in the midmorning: median ADP-induced platelet aggregation was 55%, 17% and 27% higher at 10.00 a.m. compared to 6.00 a.m., 2.00 p.m. and 7.00 p.m., respectively (p < 0.002). Nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel defined according to the device manufacturer was 2.4-fold more frequent in the midmorning than in the early morning. We observed a more pronounced midmorning increase in ADP-induced platelet aggregation in diabetic patients when compared to non-diabetics. In contrast, no diurnal variation in the antiplatelet effect of aspirin was observed. In conclusion, in patients presenting with STEMI undergoing pPCI, platelet inhibition by clopidogrel is less strong in the midmorning hours. This periodicity in platelet aggregation in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy should be taken into consideration when assessing platelet function in clinical studies.