Vascular Age as a Cardiovascular Risk Marker in Asymptomatic Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

AIM: There is a wide variety of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), even in asymptomatic individuals. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and can be considered as a predictor of cardiovascular risk (CVR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between CIMT-determined vascular age (VA), CVR scores, and thyroid function in asymptomatic patients with T2DM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical laboratory and CIMT parameters were measured in 154 asymptomatic patients with T2DM. The Framingham risk score (FRS) was performed with chronological age (CA) and with VA. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to analyze variables related to CVR reclassification. RESULTS: The use of CIMT-determined VA led to the reclassification of 54 (35.52%) out of 152 asymptomatic T2DM patients, being 20 (37.03%) to a lower categorical risk and 34 (62.96%) to a higher categorical risk according to FRS. The variables that were associated to reclassification to a higher categorical risk were positive family history (FH) of premature coronary artery disease (p=0.046), FH of thyroid disease (p=0.010), use of statins (p=0.027), and free T4 levels (p=0.009). CONCLUSION: VA determined from CIMT allowed the reclassification of the CVR in asymptomatic T2DM patients. FH of premature CAD, FH of known thyroid disease, use of statins, and free T4 levels were associated to a reclassification into a higher risk category. The use of doppler to perform CIMT measure is currently more accessible, especially in a low-middle income country like Brazil. However, further prospective studies must be performed to establish the predictive values of CIMT on atherosclerosis and how thyroid function acts like cardiovascular risk marker on CVR scores.

Vascular or chronological age: which is the better marker to estimate the cardiovascular risk in patients with type 1 diabetes?

AIMS: To evaluate whether using vascular age (VA) instead of chronological age (CA) in the Framingham score would enhance the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study comprising 58 T1D patients and 38 control subjects matched by age, gender and body mass index. To estimate the VA, we used carotid intima-media thickness normality estimation tables that took into account age, gender and ethnic group. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, T1D patients had an older VA with an 8.8-year difference (p < 0.001), a higher CVD risk stratification comparing CA and VA (p < 0.001). In the group of T1D patients, there was a 9.4-year difference between VA and CA (p < 0.001), mainly due to a greater increase in women compared to men (11.2 vs 6.4 years, respectively) and 29.3 % of the patients with T1D increased their CVD risk stratification using VA as a parameter. Still, in the group of T1D patients, women had a higher increase in VA for each 1-year increase in CA than men (1.2 years vs 0.8 years, respectively, p < 0.001). This difference persisted as we compared women with T1D with women in the control group (0.4 years), p = 0.006. CONCLUSIONS: T1D patients have an increased VA, a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. The use of VA age may contribute to the identification of high CVD risk in T1D. In patients with T1D, a younger chronological age, particularly in women, might not be a protective factor for CVD.

Influence of a family history of type 2 diabetes, demographic and clinical data on carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery is a surrogate end point of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Identifying the factors associated with a higher IMT may contribute to the identification of subjects with higher CVD risk. Our objective was to compare the common carotid IMT of type 1 diabetes patients to healthy control subjects. The secondary objective was to determine factors associated with a higher carotid IMT. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study between March 2009 and October 2013, comprising 127 type 1 diabetes patients and 125 control subjects matched by age, gender and body mass index (BMI). Carotid IMT was measured using semi-automated edge detection software. RESULTS: Type 1 diabetes patients had a higher median IMT compared with control subjects (0.538; IQR: 0.500-0.607 vs 0.513 mm; IQR: 0.481-0.557, respectively p = 0.001). Women with type 1 diabetes had a higher median IMT difference compared to the control group (0.537; IQR: 0.495-0.596 vs 0.502 mm; IQR: 0.472-0.543, respectively p = 0.003) than did men with type 1 diabetes (0.547; IQR: 0.504-0.613 vs 0.528 mm; IQR: 0.492-0.575, respectively p = 0.2). Age and diabetes duration had an additive effect on the IMT of type 1 diabetes patients. Multivariate gamma regression model analysis showed that in type 1 diabetes patients, the IMT was associated with age (Exp (ß) = 1.006, p < 0.001), duration of diabetes (Exp (ß) = 1.004, p = 0.001), BMI (Exp (ß) = 1.005, p = 0.021), family history of type 2 diabetes (Exp (ß) = 1.044, p = 0.033), total cholesterol (Exp (ß) = 0.999, p = 0.001) and creatinine clearance (Exp (ß) = 1.000, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type 1 diabetes have increased IMT, a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. The CVD risk may be similar between men and women with type 1 diabetes, suggesting a loss of gender protection. Also, CVD risk may be higher in those with a family history of type 2 diabetes. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the predictive value of these findings and the causal effect between IMT and CVD in patients with type 1 diabetes.