ABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) in comparison to standard coronary calcium score (CCS) acquisition for the evaluation of coronary artery calcification (CAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard CCS acquisition and ULDCT were performed in patients referred for coronary CT angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. CAC in ULDCT was graded subjectively using a four-point scale (from 0, no calcification, to 3, severe calcification) for the complete study and for each individual coronary segment. The summation of all individual coronary segment scores generated an ULDCT total CAC score. ULDCT results were compared to standard Agatston score and sensitivity and specificity of ULDCT were calculated. RESULTS: CCS and ULDCT were performed in 74 patients, with a mean DLP of 77.7 mGy·cm (±12.1) and 9.3 mGy·cm (±0.6), respectively (p<0.001). Coronary calcification was detected in 47 patients (63.5%) in standard CCS acquisition (median Agatston score of 41; interquartile range [IQR]:0263), in comparison to 42 patients (56.8%) in ULDCT (p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the ULDCT total CAC score ≥1 was 80.9% and 85.2%, respectively, with an accuracy of 82.4%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the presence of CAC was 0.87. CONCLUSION: ULDCT shows good sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy for the detection of coronary calcification with a markedly lower radiation dose in comparison to CCS. ULDCT is unlikely to miss coronary calcification in individuals with at least moderate calcium load (Agatston score >100).
