New biomarkers to predict the evolution of in situ breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Genomic studies have shown that gene expression profiles are similar in in situ (CIS) and invasive breast cancers, suggesting that several biofunctional modifications of the transformation process occur before or during the development of CIS lesion. METHODS: We investigated 3 biomarkers in 44 patients with CIS: TG2 (transglutaminase 2), HJURP (Holliday junction recognition protein), and HIF-1α (hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha). RESULTS: TG2 was more highly expressed than the other two markers and significantly more so in stromal than in tumor cells. HIF-1α evaluation showed a higher expression in both tumor and stromal cells in patients with relapsed G3 tumors, indicating a potential role of this marker in CIS evolution. A greater than sevenfold higher risk of relapse (P = 0.050) was observed in patients highly expressing HJURP in stroma and a tenfold higher recurrence risk (P = 0.026) was seen in those with a higher stromal HIF-1α expression. An important increase in risk accuracy (AUC 0.80) was obtained when HIF-1α and HJURP were evaluated together. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited number of relapsed patients, we formulated some hypotheses on the factors responsible for malignant evolution and recurrence which are now being tested in a large case series with a longer follow-up.

Combining cytology, TRAP assay, and FISH analysis for the detection of bladder cancer in symptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to improve the performance of urine cytology in bladder cancer diagnosis. We assessed the diagnostic performance of (i) telomerase activity detected by telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay, (ii) cytology and TRAP assay in parallel, (iii) cytology in parallel with the in-series combination of TRAP assay and FISH analysis, and (iv) the in-series combination of TRAP assay and FISH analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 289 consecutive patients who presented with urinary symptoms at a north Italian hospital between 2007 and 2008. All underwent cystoscopy and cytology evaluation, and conclusive results were available for TRAP assay and FISH analysis. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity were 0.39 and 0.83, respectively, for cytology; 0.66 and 0.72 for TRAP; 0.78 and 0.60 for the combination of cytology and TRAP; 0.78 and 0.78 for the combination of cytology, TRAP, and FISH; and 0.65 and 0.93 for the combination of TRAP and FISH. All differences versus cytology alone were significant (P ≤ 0.011). CONCLUSION: Compared with cytology alone, the combination of cytology, TRAP, and FISH provided the best trade-off between increase in sensitivity and loss in specificity, especially among non-bleeding patients, low-grade cancers, and early-stage cancers.

In vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy of docetaxel and sorafenib combination in human pancreatic cancer cells.

The response of pancreatic cancer to treatments remains unsatisfactory, highlighting the need for more effective therapeutic regimens. Sorafenib, an orally available multikinase inhibitor, is active against different tumors, including pancreatic cancer. We studied the antitumor efficacy of sorafenib in combination with different antitumor drugs currently used in clinical practice in in vitro and in vivo experimental models of human pancreatic cancer. The cytotoxic effect of sorafenib and conventional antitumor drug combinations was evaluated in vitro in human pancreatic cancer cell lines and the efficacy of the most active combination was tested on tumor-bearing mice. Flow cytometric, Western blot and immunohistochemistry analyses were performed to investigate the mechanisms involved in the activity of single drugs and in their interaction when used in combination. Sorafenib showed a strong sequence-dependent synergistic interaction in vitro with docetaxel, which was highly dependent on the drug sequence employed. In vivo, human pancreatic cancer-xenografted mice treated with docetaxel followed by sorafenib reduced and delayed tumor growth, with complete tumor regression observed in half of the mice. This marked antitumor effect resulted in an overall increase in mouse survival of about 70% and in a complete cure in 3 of the 8 treated mice. The strong activity was also accompanied by marked apoptosis induction, inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and downregulation of ERK signalling. Our results show that the docetaxel and sorafenib combination exerts high therapeutic efficacy in experimental models of human pancreatic cancer, indicating a promising antitumor strategy for clinical use.

Activity of endovesical gemcitabine in BCG-refractory bladder cancer patients: a translational study.

Intravesical gemcitabine (Gem) has shown promising activity against transitional cell carcinomas (TCC) of the bladder, with moderate urinary toxicity and low systemic absorption. The present phase II study evaluated the activity of biweekly intravesical treatment with Gem using a scheme directly derived from in vitro preclinical studies. Patients with Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) -refractory Ta G3, T1 G1-3 TCC underwent transurethral bladder resection and then intravesical instillation with 2000 mg Gem diluted in 50 ml saline solution on days 1 and 3 for 6 consecutive weeks. Thirty-eight (95%) of the 40 patients showed persistent negative post-treatment cystoscopy and cytology 6 months after Gem treatment, while the remaining 2 patients relapsed at 5 and 6 months. At a median follow-up of 28 months, recurrences had occurred in 14 patients. Among these, four had downstaged (T) disease, three had a lower grade (G) lesion and three had a reduction in both T and G. Urinary and systemic toxicity was very low, with no alterations in biochemical profiles. In conclusion, biweekly instillation of Gem proved active in BCG-refractory Ta G3, T1 G1-3 TCC. Our results highlight the importance of preclinical studies using in vitro systems that adequately reproduce the conditions of intravesical clinical treatment to define the best therapeutic schedule.

Procalcitonin: a marker of bacteraemia in SIRS.

A number of European studies have documented the ability of procalcitonin (PCT), a novel inflammatory marker, to discriminate patients with sepsis from those with other causes of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The aim of this study was to assess procalcitonin's performance in an Australian intensive care unit (ICU) setting to examine whether it could discriminate between these two conditions. One hundred and twenty-three consecutive adult ICU patients fulfilling criteria for SIRS were enlisted in the study. Over a period of five days, daily serum PCT and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured. At least two sets of cultures were taken of blood, sputum/broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) and urine. Other cultures were taken as clinically indicated. Questionnaires to ascertain clinical suspicion of sepsis were prospectively answered by the ICU senior registrars. PCT values were ten times higher in patients with positive blood cultures; CRP values were also significantly higher in the bacteraemic patients. Both PCT and CRP had a good ability to discriminate bacteraemia from non-infectious SIRS, with the area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for PCT being 0.8 and for CRP being 0.82. However neither PCT or CRP was able to discriminate patients with localized sepsis from those without. Utilizing both tests resulted in a more sensitive screen than either one alone, while PCT was a more accurate diagnostic test for bacteraemia than CRP. The PCT value also differed between those who died in hospital and those who survived. Measurement of PCT alone or in combination with CRP can aid discrimination of septicaemia/bacteriemia with associated SIRS from non-infectious SIRS in an Australian ICU setting.

Quality control for biomarker determination in oncology: the experience of the Italian Network for Quality Assessment of Tumor Biomarkers (INQAT).

Biomarker analysis and evaluation in oncology is the product of a number of processes (including managerial, technical and interpretation steps) which need to be monitored and controlled to prevent and correct errors and guarantee a satisfactory level of quality. Several biomarkers have recently moved to clinical validation studies and successively to clinical practice without any definition of standard procedures and/or quality control (QC) schemes necessary to guarantee the reproducibility of the laboratory information. In Italy several national scientific societies and single researchers have activated -- often on a pilot level -- specific external quality assessment protocols, thereby potentially jeopardizing the clinical reality even further. In view of the seriousness of the problem, in 1998 the Italian Ministry of Health sponsored a National Survey Project to coordinate and standardize the procedures and to develop QC programs for the analysis of cancer biomarkers of potential clinical relevance. Twelve QC programs focused on biomarkers and concerning morphological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, molecular, and immunoenzymatic assays were coordinated and implemented. Specifically, external QC programs for the analytical phase of immunohistochemical p53, Bcl-2, c-erb-2/neu/HER2, and microvessel density determination, of morphological evaluation of tumor differentiation grade, and of molecular p53 analysis were activated for the first time within the project. Several hundreds of Italian laboratories took part in these QC programs, the results of which are available on the web site of the Network (www.cqlaboncologico.it). Financial support from the Italian Government and the National Research Council (CNR) will guarantee the pursuit of activities that will be extended to new biomarkers, to preanalytical phases of the assays, and to revision of the criteria of clinical usefulness for evaluating the cost/benefit ratio.

Prognostic and predictive role of proliferation indices in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer.

In breast cancer, proliferative activity represents one of the biologic processes most thoroughly investigated for its association with tumor progression. In addition to the mitotic activity component of pathologic grading systems, several proliferation indices have provided independent information on prognosis and response to specific treatments in large retrospective studies. Recently, results from treatment protocols prospectively planned to test the clinical utility of proliferative activity have indicated that tumor cell proliferation markers identify two subsets among patients with lymph node-negative cancers: 1) those at a very low risk of relapse and 2) those who will benefit from regimens including antimetabolites. Future efforts should compare the prognostic accuracy of different proliferation markers, confirm preliminary evidence of a relationship between proliferation and response to specific systemic treatments, and standardize assay techniques to facilitate their transfer to general oncology practice.