Cardiovascular disease in women: Executive summary of the expert panel statement of women in cardiology of the hellenic cardiological society.

The perception that women represent a low-risk population for cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) needs to be reconsidered. Starting from risk factors, women are more likely to be susceptible to unhealthy behaviors and risk factors that have different impact on CV morbidity and mortality as compared to men. Despite the large body of evidence as regards the effect of lifestyle factors on the CVD onset, the gender-specific effect of traditional and non-traditional risk factors on the prognosis of patients with already established CVD has not been well investigated and understood. Furthermore, CVD in women is often misdiagnosed, underestimated, and undertreated. Women also experience hormonal changes from adolescence till elder life that affect CV physiology. Unfortunately, in most of the clinical trials women are underrepresented, leading to the limited knowledge of CV and systemic impact effects of several treatment modalities on women's health. Thus, in this consensus, a group of female cardiologists from the Hellenic Society of Cardiology presents the special features of CVD in women: the different needs in primary and secondary prevention, as well as therapeutic strategies that may be implemented in daily clinical practice to eliminate underestimation and undertreatment of CVD in the female population.

Ranolazine for the prevention or treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.

The use of currently available antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation is limited by their moderate efficacy and the considerable proarrhythmic risk. Ranolazine, an antianginal agent, has been reported to possess antiarrhythmic properties, resulting in a reduction of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. We performed a systematic review of the clinical studies reporting the outcome of patients treated with ranolazine for the prevention or treatment of atrial fibrillation in various clinical settings. We searched PubMed and abstracts of major conferences for clinical studies using ranolazine, either alone or in combination with other antiarrhythmic agents for the prevention or treatment of atrial fibrillation. Ten relevant records were identified. These included both randomized trials and retrospective cohort studies concerning the use of ranolazine in different clinical settings; prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome, prevention as well as conversion of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation, sinus rhythm maintenance in drug-resistant recurrent atrial fibrillation and facilitation of electrical cardioversion in cardioversion-resistant patients. A beneficial, mostly modest effect of ranolazine was homogeneously reported in all clinical settings. There were no substantial proarrhythmic effects. No meta-analysis could be performed because for most of the clinical scenarios, there was only one study investigating the effect of ranolazine. Except for one large randomized trial, all the other studies were either relatively small randomized studies or retrospective cohort analyses, which in several cases lacked a control group. This systematic review indicates a modest beneficial effect of ranolazine administered for the prevention or treatment of atrial fibrillation across several clinical settings without substantial proarrhythmic risk.

The use of the multi-electrode duty-cycled radiofrequency ablation catheter PVAC for the ablation of a left atrial tachycardia.

The multi-electrode ablation catheter PVAC is used to simplify pulmonary vein isolation in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. The use of the PVAC in cases of atrial tachycardia has not been reported before. In the present report, we present the use of the PVAC for the ablation of a left atrial tachycardia following pulmonary vein isolation. This case may suggest that the PVAC could ablate some atrial tachycardias without any adjunctive ablation catheter, given its ability to map, pace and apply energy over a relatively broad area.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure are often coexisting major public health burdens. Although several studies have reported partial restoration of systolic left ventricular (LV) function after catheter ablation for AF, the method is not widely applied in patients with LV dysfunction. We reviewed the results of AF ablation in patients with systolic LV dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed was searched for studies published after 2000 reporting original data on AF catheter ablation in adult patients with systolic LV dysfunction. Primary end point was the change of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after catheter ablation; secondary endpoints were the changes of exercise capacity and quality of life after the procedure. We calculated mean difference (MD) of LVEF and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was investigated by I(2) statistic, publication bias with Egger's test. The impact of covariates on LVEF improvement was evaluated with meta-regression analyses. Nine studies with a total of 354 patients with systolic LV dysfunction were analyzed. Study patients were mainly male with mean age 49 to 62 years, LVEF was moderately impaired and ranged in all but 1 study from 35% to 43%. LVEF improved after ablation with a MD of 11.1% (95% CI: 7.1-15.2, P < .001). Heterogeneity among analyzed studies was significant (I(2) = 92.9, P < .001). No potential publication bias was found. In meta-regression analyses, the proportion of patients with coronary artery disease was inversely related with LVEF improvement (P < .0001) whereas there was no association between the LVEF change and the proportion of patients with nonparoxysmal AF or the proportion of patients without AF recurrences during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: AF ablation in patients with systolic LV dysfunction results in significant improvement of LV function, but the extent of this improvement is heterogeneous. Patients with coronary artery disease seem to benefit less than patients with other underlying diseases. These results may be explained by patient selection.

Release of endothelin-1 from human endocardium after radiofrequency catheter ablation and coronary angioplasty: comparative results.

BACKGROUND: Plasma levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) increase after coronary angioplasty (PTCA) due to endothelial injury during the procedure. ET-1 has been found in human endocardial and myocardial cells. It is not known whether ET-1 increases after thermal injury induced by radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA). METHODS: We determined plasma ET-1 levels at baseline, immediately after, and at 2 and 6 h post-procedure in 31 patients undergoing PTCA and 16 patients undergoing RFA. Patients subjected to diagnostic coronary angiography (n=15) or electrophysiology study (n=13) served as controls. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, ET-1 levels increased significantly immediately post-PTCA (55.1+/-20.1 vs. 42.7+/-14.9 pg/ml, p<0.01) and at 2 h post-RFA (98.0+/-11.7 vs. 53.0+/-17.4 pg/ml, p<0.01) and returned to baseline measurements at 2 h post-PTCA and 6 h post-RFA. There was no change of ET-1 levels in the control groups. ET-1 kinetics curve was significantly higher post-RFA compared to post-PTCA (p<0.001). ET-1 immediately post-PTCA correlated with total pressure-time product applied for balloon inflation during the procedure (r=0.56, p<0.01). There was no correlation between ET-1 levels and the number of RFA applications. No patient developed ischemia post-PTCA. There were no complications or arrhythmia recurrences post-RFA. CONCLUSION: Endocardial thermal injury incurred during RFA is another mechanism of endothelin increase apart from mechanical injury of the coronary endothelium during PTCA and represents further evidence for the existence of the peptide in human endocardial endothelial and myocardial cells. ET-1 increase is delayed and more pronounced post-RFA compared to post-PTCA. Despite that, it does not seem to have any clinical impact in the immediate post-RFA period.