Automated contouring, treatment planning, and quality assurance for VMAT craniospinal irradiation (VMAT-CSI).

Purpose: Create a comprehensive automated solution for pediatric and adult VMAT-CSI including contouring, planning, and plan check to reduce planning time and improve plan quality. Methods: Seventy-seven previously treated CSI patients (age, 2-67 years) were used for creation of an auto-contouring model to segment 25 organs at risk (OARs). The auto-contoured OARs were evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and a qualitative ranking by one physician and one physicist (scale: 1-acceptable, 2-minor edits, 3-major edits). The auto-planning script was developed using the Varian Eclipse Scripting API and tested with 20 patients previously treated with either low-dose VMAT-CSI (12 Gy) or high-dose VMAT-CSI (36 Gy + 18 Gy boost). Clinically relevant metrics, planning time, and blinded physician review were used to evaluate significance of differences between the auto and manual plans. Finally, the plan preparation for treatment and plan check processes were automated to improve efficiency and safety of VMAT-CSI. Results: The auto-contours achieved an average DSC of 0.71 ± 0.15, HD95 of 4.81 ± 4.68, and reviewers' ranking of 1.22 ± 0.39, indicating close to "acceptable-as-is" contours. Compared to the manual CSI plans, the auto-plans for both dose regimens achieved statistically significant reductions in body V50% and Dmean for parotids, submandibular, and thyroid glands. The variance in the dosimetric parameters decreased for the auto-plans as compared to the manual plans indicating better plan consistency. From the blinded review, the auto-plans were marked as equivalent or superior to the manual-plans 88.3% of the time. The required time for the auto-contouring and planning was consistently between 1-2 hours compared to an estimated 5-6 hours for manual contouring and planning. Conclusions: Reductions in contouring and planning time without sacrificing plan quality were obtained using the developed auto-planning process. The auto-planning scripts and documentation will be made freely available to other institutions and clinics.

Acute Toxicity of Total Body Irradiation Using Volumetric Arc Therapy With a Focus on the Effect of Lung Dose Rate.

Purpose: To report adverse effects of high dose total body irradiation (TBI) delivered using a volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique and to assess pulmonary toxicity at dose rates of 40 and 100 monitor units per minute (MU/min). Methods and Materials: This retrospective study included patients >18 years old who received ≥8 Gy TBI using a VMAT technique. The TBI dose was prescribed to a planning target volume consisting of a 0.5 cm retraction of the body with the lungs subtracted. The objective function specified planning target volume coverage goals of D100% ≥ 90% and Dmax <130%. A lung dose control structure consisting of a 1 cm retraction of the lung volume was limited to Dmean <75%. Treatments were initially delivered with a dose rate of 40 MU/min for the thoracic isocenters and 100 MU/min for the other isocenters. Beginning in January 2021, a dose rate of 100 MU/min was used for all isocenters. All treatments were administered in 2 Gy fractions delivered twice daily. Acute toxicity was assessed for 30 days after TBI. Results: A total of 29 patients were included in this analysis who received TBI between January 2019 and October 2021. Prescription dose ranged from 8 to 12 Gy. Mean lung dose was 7.9 Gy (SD, 1.4 Gy) for patients treated at 40 MU/min and for patients treated at 100 MU/min 7.1 Gy (SD, 1.3 Gy). Mucositis was the most common grade 3 toxicity and occurred in 10 (34%) patients. Only 1 instance of pneumonitis was observed and occurred in a patient who received a mean lung dose of 10.1 Gy delivered at 40 MU/min. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients who received high dose TBI using a VMAT technique, the composite rate of acute toxicity was not unexpectedly high. We did not observe an increase in lung toxicity after increasing the dose rate of the thoracic isocenters from 40 MU/min to 100 MU/min.

First-Year Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Using a Novel Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy Machine.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to present the first-year experience of treating patients using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a biology-guided radiation therapy machine, the RefleXion X1 system, installed in a clinical setting. Methods and Materials: A total of 78 patients were treated on the X1 system using IMRT and SBRT from May 2021 to May 2022. Clinical and technical data including treatment sites, number of pretreatment kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) scans, beam-on time, patient setup time, and imaging time were collected and analyzed. Machine quality assurance (QA) results, machine performance, and user satisfactory survey were also collected and reported. Results: The most commonly treated site was the head and neck (63%), followed by the pelvis (23%), abdomen (8%), and thorax (6%). Except for 5 patients (6%) who received SBRT treatments for bony metastases in the pelvis, all treatments were conventionally fractionated IMRT. The number of kVCT scans per fraction was 1.2 ± 0.5 (mean ± standard deviation). The beam-on time was 9.2 ± 3.5 minutes. The patient setup time and imaging time per kVCT was 4.8 ± 2.6 minutes and 4.6 ± 1.5 minutes, respectively. The daily machine output deviation was 0.4 ± 1.2% from the baseline. The patient QA had a passing rate of 97.4 ± 2.8% at 3%/2 mm gamma criteria. The machine uptime was 92% of the total treatment time. The daily QA and kVCT image quality received the highest level of satisfaction. The treatment workflow for therapists received the lowest level of satisfaction. Conclusions: One year after the installation, 78 patients were successfully treated with the X1 system using IMRT and/or SBRT. With the recent Food and Drug Administration clearance of biology-guided radiation therapy, our department is preparing to treat patients using positron emission tomography-guidance via a new product release, which will address deficiencies in the current image-guided radiation therapy workflow.

Automating the Treatment Planning Process for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Craniospinal Irradiation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to develop a method to automate the treatment planning process of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) using volumetric modulated arc therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two scripts were developed using the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface to perform auto-plan preparation and optimization. Ten patients (age, 5-44 years) previously treated at our institution with low dose volumetric modulated arc therapy CSI (prescription of 12 Gy) before total body irradiation were selected to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed auto-planning process. Paired t tests compared the dosimetric indices of the auto-plans to the manually generated clinical plans. All plans were normalized to 95% of planning target volume (PTV) coverage with the prescription dose. Two physicians and one physicist were asked to evaluate the manual plans and auto-plans of each patient in a blinded retrospective review and to indicate clinical acceptability and which plans were preferred for treatment. RESULTS: Compared with the manual CSI plans, the auto plans obtained significant reductions in Dmean to the parotids, submandibular glands, larynx, thyroid, and significant reduction in the plan PTV Dmax and D0.03 cc. The standard deviation range of the dosimetric parameters was greatly reduced for auto plans (range, 0.1-1.3 Gy) relative to manual plans (range, 0.4-5.9 Gy) indicating better plan consistency. Among the 10 patients, the auto-plans were preferred over the manual plans 90% of the time by the reviewing experts. The required time for auto-planning was approximately 1 hour compared with estimated 4 or more hours for manual planning. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in planning time without sacrifices in plan quality were obtained using the auto-planning process compared with manual planning. Variation in plan quality was also reduced. The auto-planning scripts will be made freely available to other institutions and clinics.

Improved organ sparing using auto-planned Stanford volumetric modulated arc therapy for total body irradiation technique.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate dosimetric differences between auto-planned volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) total body irradiation (TBI) technique and two-dimensional radiotherapy using anterior-posterial/posterio-anterial beams (2D AP/PA) TBI technique. METHODS: Ten pediatric patients treated with VMAT-TBI on Varian c-arm linac were included in this study. VMAT-TBI plans were generated using our in-house developed and publicly shared auto-planning scripts. For each VMAT-TBI plan, a 2D AP/PA plan was created replicating the institution's clinical setup with the patient positioned at extended source to skin distance (SSD) with a compensator to account for differences in patient thickness, 50% transmission daily lung blocks, and electron chest wall boosts prescribed to 50% of the photon prescription. Clinically relevant metrics were analyzed and compared between the VMAT and 2D plans. RESULTS: All VMAT-TBI plans achieved planned target volume (PTV) D90% ≥ 100% of prescription. VMAT-TBI PTV D90% significantly increased (7.1% ± 2.9%, p < .001) compared to the 2D technique, whereas no differences were observed in global Dmax (p < .2) and PTV V110% (p < .4). Compared to the 2D plans, significant decreases in the Dmean to the lungs (-25.6% ± 11.5%, p < .001) and lungs-1 cm (-34.1% ± 10.1%, p < .001) were observed with the VMAT plans. The VMAT technique also enabled decrease of dose to other organs: kidneys Dmean (-32.5% ± 5.0%, p < .001) and lenses Dmax (-5.3% ± 8.1%, p = .03); and in addition, for 2 Gy prescription: testes/ovaries Dmean (-41.5% ± 11.5%, p < .001), brain Dmean (-22.6% ± 5.4%, p = .002), and thyroid Dmean (-18.2% ± 16.0%, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Superior lung sparing with improved target coverage and similar global Dmax were observed with the VMAT plans as compared to 2D plans. In addition, VMAT-TBI plans provided greater dose reductions in gonads, kidneys, brain, thyroid, and lenses.

Mitigation of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Errors on the Novel RefleXion X1 System Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Within Six Sigma Framework.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to apply the Six Sigma methodology and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to mitigate errors in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning with the first clinical installation of RefleXion X1. Methods and Materials: The Six Sigma approach consisted of 5 phases: define, measure, analyze, improve, and control. The define, measure, and analyze phases consisted of process mapping and an FMEA of IMRT and SBRT treatment planning on the X1. The multidisciplinary team outlined the workflow process and identified and ranked the failure modes associated with the plan check items using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 100 recommendations. Items with the highest average risk priority numbers (RPNs) and severity ≥7 were prioritized for automation using the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI). The "improve" phase consisted of developing ESAPI scripts before the clinical launch of X1 to improve efficiency and safety. In the "control" phase, the FMEA ranking was re-evaluated 1 year after clinical launch. Results: Overall, 100 plan check items were identified in which the RPN values ranged from 10.2 to 429.0. Fifty of these items (50%) were suitable for automation within ESAPI. Of the 10 highest-risk items, 8 were suitable for automation. Based on the results of the FMEA, 2 scripts were developed: Planning Assistant, used by the planner during preparation for planning, and Automated Plan Check, used by the planner and the plan checker during plan preparation for treatment. After 12 months of clinical use of the X1 and developed scripts, only 3 errors were reported. The average prescript RPN was 138.0, compared with the average postscript RPN of 47.8 (P < .05), signifying a safer process. Conclusions: Implementing new technology in the clinic can be an error-prone process in which the likelihood of errors increases with increasing pressure to implement the technology quickly. To limit errors in clinical implementation of the novel RefleXion X1 system, the Six Sigma method was used to identify failure modes, establish quality control checks, and re-evaluate these checks 1 year after clinical implementation.

An independent Monte Carlo-based IMRT QA tool for a 0.35 T MRI-guided linear accelerator.

PURPOSE: To develop an independent log file-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) tool for the 0.35 T magnetic resonance-linac (MR-linac) and investigate the ability of various IMRT plan complexity metrics to predict the QA results. Complexity metrics related to tissue heterogeneity were also introduced. METHODS: The tool for particle simulation (TOPAS) Monte Carlo code was utilized with a previously validated linac head model. A cohort of 29 treatment plans was selected for IMRT QA using the developed QA tool and the vendor-supplied adaptive QA (AQA) tool. For 27 independent patient cases, various IMRT plan complexity metrics were calculated to assess the deliverability of these plans. A correlation between the gamma pass rates (GPRs) from the AQA results and calculated IMRT complexity metrics was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficients. Tissue heterogeneity complexity metrics were calculated based on the gradient of the Hounsfield units. RESULTS: The median and interquartile range for the TOPAS GPRs (3%/3 mm criteria) were 97.24% and 3.75%, respectively, and were 99.54% and 0.36% for the AQA tool, respectively. The computational time for TOPAS ranged from 4 to 8 h to achieve a statistical uncertainty of <1.5%, whereas the AQA tool had an average calculation time of a few minutes. Of the 23 calculated IMRT plan complexity metrics, the AQA GPRs had correlations with 7 out of 23 of the calculated metrics. Strong correlations (|r| > 0.7) were found between the GPRs and the heterogeneity complexity metrics introduced in this work. CONCLUSIONS: An independent MC and log file-based IMRT QA tool was successfully developed and can be clinically deployed for offline QA. The complexity metrics will supplement QA reports and provide information regarding plan complexity.

Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology-guided radiotherapy machine.

PURPOSE: The RefleXion X1 is a novel radiotherapy machine designed for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT). Its treatment planning system (TPS) generates IMRT and SBRT plans for a 6MV-FFF beam delivered axially via 50 firing positions with the couch advancing every 2.1 mm. The purpose of this work is to report the TPS commissioning results for the first clinical installation of RefleXion™ X1. METHODS: CT images of multiple phantoms were imported into the RefleXion TPS to evaluate the accuracy of data transfer, anatomical modeling, plan evaluation, and dose calculation. Comparisons were made between the X1, Eclipse™, and MIM™. Dosimetric parameters for open static fields were evaluated in water and heterogeneous slab phantoms. Representative clinical IMRT and SBRT cases were planned and verified with ion chamber, film, and ArcCHECK@ measurements. The agreement between TPS and measurements for various clinical plans was evaluated using Gamma analysis with a criterion of 3%/2 mm for ArcCHECK@ and film. End-to-end (E2E) testing was performed using anthropomorphic head and lung phantoms. RESULTS: The average difference between the TPS-reported and known HU values was -1.4 ± 6.0 HU. For static fields, the agreements between the TPS-calculated and measured PDD10 , crossline profiles, and inline profiles (FWHM) were within 1.5%, 1.3%, and 0.5 mm, respectively. Measured output factors agreed with the TPS within 1.3%. Measured and calculated dose for static fields in heterogeneous phantoms agreed within 2.5%. The ArcCHECK@ mean absolute Gamma passing rate was 96.4% ± 3.4% for TG 119 and TG 244 plans and 97.8% ± 3.6% for the 21 clinical plans. E2E film analysis showed 0.8 mm total targeting error for isocentric and 1.1 mm for off-axis treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The TPS commissioning results of the RefleXion X1 TPS were within the tolerances specified by AAPM TG 53, MPPG 5.a, TG 119, and TG 148. A subset of the commissioning tests has been identified as baseline data for an ongoing QA program.

Applying 3D-Printed Templates in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer: Simplified Needle Insertion for Optimized Dosimetry.

PURPOSE: In cervical cancer brachytherapy, adding interstitial needles to intracavitary applicators can enhance dosimetry by improving target coverage while limiting normal tissue dose. However, its use is limited to a subset of practitioners with appropriate technical skill. We designed tandem anchored radially guiding interstitial templates (TARGITs) with a 3-dimensional (3D) printing workflow to optimize needle placement and facilitate greater ease-of-use of intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) technique. This study compared dosimetry and procedure characteristics between tandem and ovoid (T&O) implants using TARGIT technique versus non-TARGIT technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing T&O brachytherapy as part of definitive radiation treatment for cervical cancer between February 2017 and January 2021. TARGIT technique was implemented from November 2019 onwards; all prior procedures involved non-TARGIT technique using a no needle or freehand needle approach. Target coverage, dose to organs at risk, and procedure times were evaluated and compared between TARGIT technique and non-TARGIT technique. RESULTS: The cohort included 70 patients with cervical cancer who underwent 302 T&O procedures: 68 (23%) with TARGIT technique and 234 (77%) with non-TARGIT technique, which included 133 no needle and 101 freehand needle implants. TARGIT implants involved longer average procedure times (+6.3 minutes, P < .0001). TARGIT implants achieved a higher mean high-risk clinical target volume V100% than non-TARGIT implants (+4.4%, P = .001), including for large tumors 30 cm3 or greater (+8.1%, P = .002). Average D90 was 4.6 Gy higher and average D98 was 3.2 Gy higher for TARGIT technique compared with non-TARGIT technique (P = .006 and P = .02). Total treatment doses to rectum, bowel, and bladder were not significantly different for TARGIT versus non-TARGIT technique. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-printed TARGIT approach to T&O brachytherapy achieved greater tumor coverage while sparing normal tissues, particularly for large tumor volumes, with only a slight increase in average procedure time. TARGIT represents a creative technological solution for increasing accessibility of advanced IC/IS brachytherapy technique for cervical cancer definitive radiation treatment.

IMRT and SBRT Treatment Planning Study for the First Clinical Biology-Guided Radiotherapy System.

Purpose: The first clinical biology-guided radiation therapy (BgRT) system-RefleXionTM X1-was installed and commissioned for clinical use at our institution. This study aimed at evaluating the treatment plan quality and delivery efficiency for IMRT/SBRT cases without PET guidance. Methods: A total of 42 patient plans across 6 cancer sites (conventionally fractionated lung, head, and neck, anus, prostate, brain, and lung SBRT) planned with the EclipseTM treatment planning system (TPS) and treated with either a TrueBeam® or Trilogy® were selected for this retrospective study. For each Eclipse VMAT plan, 2 corresponding plans were generated on the X1 TPS with 10 mm jaws (X1-10mm) and 20 mm jaws (X1-20mm) using our institutional planning constraints. All clinically relevant metrics in this study, including PTV D95%, PTV D2%, Conformity Index (CI), R50, organs-at-risk (OAR) constraints, and beam-on time were analyzed and compared between 126 VMAT and RefleXion plans using paired t-tests. Results: All but 3 planning metrics were either equivalent or superior for the X1-10mm plans as compared to the Eclipse VMAT plans across all planning sites investigated. The Eclipse VMAT and X1-10mm plans generally achieved superior plan quality and sharper dose fall-off superior/inferior to targets as compared to the X1-20mm plans, however, the X1-20mm plans were still considered acceptable for treatment. On average, the required beam-on time increased by a factor of 1.6 across all sites for X1-10mm compared to X1-20mm plans. Conclusions: Clinically acceptable IMRT/SBRT treatment plans were generated with the X1 TPS for both the 10 mm and 20 mm jaw settings.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy total body irradiation in pediatric and adolescent/young adult patients undergoing stem cell transplantation: Early outcomes and toxicities.

INTRODUCTION: Total body irradiation (TBI) is an important component of many conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), most commonly used in pediatric and adolescent/young adult (AYA) patients. We aimed to evaluate outcomes and toxicities among pediatric and AYA patients treated with TBI utilizing volumetric modulated arc therapy total body irradiation (VMAT-TBI). METHODS: We reviewed pediatric and AYA patients treated with VMAT-TBI at our institution from 2019 to 2021. Data on patient and disease characteristics, treatment details, outcomes and toxicities were collected. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 38 patients, 16 (42.1%) were treated with myeloablative regimens and 22 (57.9%) with nonmyeloablative regimens. Median age was 7.2 years (range: 1-27) and median follow-up was 8.7 months (range: 1-21). Lungs Dmean was 7.3 ± 0.3 Gy for myeloablative regimens (range: 6.8-7.8). Kidneys were spared to average mean dose of 71.4 ± 4.8% of prescription dose. Gonadal sparing was achieved for patients treated for nonmalignant diseases to Dmean of 0.7 ± 0.1 Gy. No patient experienced primary graft failure; one (2.6%) experienced secondary graft failure. The most common grade 1-2 acute toxicities were nausea (68.4%) and fatigue (55.3%). Mucositis was the most common grade 3-4 acute toxicity, affecting 39.5% of patients. There were no cases of pneumonitis or nephrotoxicity attributable to TBI. CONCLUSION: VMAT-TBI offers increased ability to spare organs at risk in pediatric and AYA patients undergoing HSCT, with a favorable acute/subacute toxicity profile and excellent disease control.

Beam commissioning of the first clinical biology-guided radiotherapy system.

This study reports the beam commissioning results for the first clinical RefleXion Linac. METHODS: The X1 produces a 6 MV photon beam and the maximum clinical field size is 40 × 2 cm2 at source-to-axis distance of 85 cm. Treatment fields are collimated by a binary multileaf collimator (MLC) system with 64 leaves with width of 0.625 cm and y-jaw pairs to provide either a 1 or 2 cm opening. The mechanical alignment of the radiation source, the y-jaw, and MLC were checked with film and ion chambers. The beam parameters were characterized using a diode detector in a compact water tank. In-air lateral profiles and in-water percentage depth dose (PDD) were measured for beam modeling of the treatment planning system (TPS). The lateral profiles, PDDs, and output factors were acquired for field sizes from 1.25 × 1 to 40 × 2 cm2 field to verify the beam modeling. The rotational output variation and synchronicity were tested to check the gantry angle, couch motion, and gantry rotation. RESULTS: The source misalignments were 0.049 mm in y-direction, 0.66% out-of-focus in x-direction. The divergence of the beam axis was 0.36 mm with a y-jaw twist of 0.03°. Clinical off-axis treatment fields shared a common center in y-direction were within 0.03 mm. The MLC misalignment and twist were 0.57 mm and 0.15°. For all measured fields ranging from the size from 1.25 × 1 to 40 × 2 cm2 , the mean difference between measured and TPS modeled PDD at 10 cm depth was -0.3%. The mean transverse profile difference in the field core was -0.3% ± 1.1%. The full-width half maximum (FWHM) modeling was within 0.5 mm. The measured output factors agreed with TPS within 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: This study summarizes our specific experience commissioning the first novel RefleXion linac, which may assist future users of this technology when implementing it into their own clinics.

The Stanford Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Total Body Irradiation Technique.

PURPOSE: In this article, we describe the technical aspects of the Stanford volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) total body irradiation (TBI) technique, compare it with other VMAT-TBI techniques, and share our initial experience. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From September 2019 to August 2021, 35 patients were treated with VMAT-TBI at our institution. Treatment planning was performed using in-house developed automated planning scripts. Organ sparing depended on the regimen: myeloablative (lungs, kidneys, and lenses) and nonmyeloablative with benign disease (lungs, kidneys, lenses, gonads, brain, and thyroid). Quality assurance was performed using electronic portal imaging device portal dosimetry and Mobius3D. Robustness was evaluated for the first 10 patients by performing local and global isocenter shifts of 5 mm. Treatment was delivered using image-guided radiation therapy for every isocenter and every fraction. In vivo measurements were performed on the match line between the VMAT and anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior fields and on the testes for the first fraction. RESULTS: The lungs, lungs - 1 cm, and kidneys Dmean were consistently spared to 57.6% ± 4.4%, 40.7% ± 5.5%, and 70.0% ± 9.9% of the prescription dose, respectively. Gonadal sparing (Dmean = 0.69 ± 0.13 Gy) was performed for all patients with benign disease. The average planning target volume (PTV) maximum dose to 1 cubic centimeter (D1cc) was 120.7% ± 6.4% for all patients. The average Gamma passing rate for the VMAT plans was 98.1% ± 1.6% (criterion of 3%/2 mm). Minimal differences were observed between Mobius3D- and Eclipse AAA-calculated PTV Dmean (0.0% ± 0.3%) and lungs Dmean (-2.5% ± 1.2%). Robustness evaluation showed that the PTV Dmax and lungs Dmean were insensitive to small positioning deviations between the VMAT isocenters (1.1% ± 2.4% and 1.2% ± 1.0%, respectively). The average match-line dose measurement indicated patient setup was reproducible (96.1% ± 4.5% relative to prescription dose). Treatment time, including patient setup and beam-on, was 47.5 ± 9.5 min. CONCLUSIONS: The Stanford VMAT-TBI technique, from simulation to treatment delivery, was presented and compared with other VMAT-TBI techniques. Together with publicly shared autoplanning scripts, our technique may provide the gateway for wider adaptation of this technology and the possibility of multi-institutional studies in the cooperative group setting.

Monte Carlo-derived ionization chamber correction factors in therapeutic carbon ion beams.

The accuracy of electromagnetic transport in the GEANT4 Monte Carlo (MC) code was investigated for carbon ion beams and ionization chamber (IC)-specific beam quality correction factors were calculated. This work implemented a Fano cavity test for carbon ion beams in the 100-450 MeV/u energy range to assess the accuracy of the default electromagnetic physics parameters. TheUrbanand theWentzel-VImultiple Coulomb scattering models were evaluated and the impact ofmaxStep,dRover,andfinal rangeparameters on the accuracy of the transport algorithm was investigated. The optimal production thresholds for an accurate calculation offQvalues, which is the product of the water-to-air stopping power ratio and the IC-specific perturbation correction factor, were also studied. ThefQcorrection factors were calculated for a cylindrical and a parallel-plate IC using carbon ions in the 150-450 MeV/u energy range. Modifying the default electromagnetic physics parameters resulted in a maximum deviation from theory of 0.3%. Therefore, the default EM parameters were used for the remainder of this work. ThefQfactors were found to converge for both ICs with decreasing production threshold distance below 5µm. ThefQvalues obtained in this work agreed with the TRS-398 stopping power ratios and other previously reported results within uncertainty. This study highlights an accurate MC-based technique to calculate the combined stopping power ratio and the perturbation correction factor for any IC in carbon ion beams.

Development and evaluation of a GEANT4-based Monte Carlo Model of a 0.35 T MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) linear accelerator.

PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to develop and benchmark a magnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerator head model using the GEANT4 Monte Carlo (MC) code. The validated model was compared to the treatment planning system (TPS) and was also used to quantify the electron return effect (ERE) at a lung-water interface. METHODS: The average energy, including the spread in the energy distribution, and the radial intensity distribution of the incident electron beam were iteratively optimized in order to match the simulated beam profiles and percent depth dose (PDD) data to measured data. The GEANT4 MC model was then compared to the TPS model using several photon beam tests including oblique beams, an off-axis aperture, and heterogeneous phantoms. The benchmarked MC model was utilized to compute output factors (OFs) with the 0.35 T magnetic field turned on and off. The ERE was quantified at a lung-water interface by simulating PDD curves with and without the magnetic field for 6.6 × 6.6  cm 2 and 2.5 × 2.5  cm 2 field sizes. A 2%/2 mm gamma criterion was used to compare the MC model with the TPS data throughout this study. RESULTS: The final incident electron beam parameters were 6.0 MeV average energy with a 1.5 MeV full width at half maximum (FWHM) Gaussian energy spread and a 1.0 mm FWHM Gaussian radial intensity distribution. The MC-simulated OFs were found to be in agreement with the TPS-calculated and measured OFs, and no statistical difference was observed between the 0.35 T and 0.0 T OFs. Good agreement was observed between the TPS-calculated and MC-simulated data for the photon beam tests with gamma pass rates ranging from 96% to 100%. An increase of 4.3% in the ERE was observed for the 6.6 × 6.6  cm 2 field size relative to the 2.5 × 2.5  cm 2 field size. The ratio of the 0.35 T PDD to the 0.0 T PDD was found to be up to 1.098 near lung-water interfaces for the 6.6 × 6.6  cm 2 field size using the MC model. CONCLUSIONS: A vendor-independent Monte Carlo model has been developed and benchmarked for a 0.35 T/6 MV MR-linac. Good agreement was obtained between the GEANT4 and TPS models except near heterogeneity interfaces.

Precision radiotherapy using monochromatic inverse Compton x-ray sources.

PURPOSE: The dosimetric properties of inverse Compton (IC) x-ray sources were investigated to determine their utility for stereotactic radiation therapy. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the egs brachy user code of EGSnrc. Nominal IC source x-ray energies of 80 and 150 keV were considered in this work. Depth-dose and lateral dose profiles in water were calculated, as was dose enhancement in the bone. Further simulations were performed for brain and spine treatment sites. The impact of gold nanoparticle doping was also investigated for the brain treatment site. Analogous dose calculations were performed in a clinical treatment planning system using a clinical 6 MV photon beam model and were compared to the Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Both 80 and 150 keV IC beams were observed to have sharp 80-20 penumbra (i.e., < 0.1 mm) with broad low-dose tails in water. For reference, the calculated penumbra for the 6 MV clinical beam was 3 mm. Maximum dose enhancement factors in bone of 3.1, 1.4, and 1.1 were observed for the 80, 150 keV, and clinical 6 MV beams, respectively. The plan quality for the single brain metastasis case was similar between the IC beams and the 6 MV beam without gold nanoparticles. As the concentration of gold within the target increased, the V12 Gy to the normal brain tissue and D max within the target volume significantly decreased and the conformity significantly improved, which resulted in superior plan quality over the clinical 6 MV beam plan. In the spine cases, the sharp penumbra and enhanced dose to bone of the IC beams produced superior plan quality (i.e., better conformity, normal tissue sparing, and spinal cord sparing) as compared to the clinical 6 MV beam plans. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this work indicate that inverse Compton x-ray sources are well suited for stereotactic radiotherapy treatments due to their sharp penumbra and dose enhancement around high atomic number materials. Future work includes investigating the properties of intensity-modulated inverse Compton x-ray sources to improve the homogeneity within the target tissue.

Characterization of spectral and intensity changes with measurement geometry in various light guides used in scintillation dosimetry.

PURPOSE: To characterize response changes of various light guides used in megavoltage (MV) photon beam scintillation dosimetry as a function of irradiation conditions. Particular emphasis was placed on quantifying the impact of response changes on the Cerenkov light ratio (CLR). METHODS: Intensity and spectral response measurements as a function of dose, depth, and fiber-beam angle were performed with a commercial scintillation detector stripped of its scintillation material and five different custom-made light guides. The core materials of the light guides investigated consisted of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), low- and high-hydroxyl content silica, and polystyrene. Dose levels ranging from 50 monitor units (MU) to 1000 MU, depths ranging from 1 to 20 cm, and fiber-beam angles ranging from 10° to 90° were investigated. All measurements were performed at a photon beam energy of 6 MV. The CLR was calculated by taking the ratio of the responses in the blue to green spectral regions. RESULTS: There was no significant change in the CLR measured with the modified commercial scintillation detector as a function of delivered dose. In addition, increases in the CLR as functions of depth and fiber-beam angle were observed where the maximum changes were 4.2% and 3.6%, respectively. The spectrum measurements showed no observable changes in spectral shape with depth except for the low-hydroxyl content silica fiber. Variations in the measured spectral shape with fiber-beam angle were observed for all fibers investigated. The magnitude of the changes in the spectral shape varied with fiber type, where the silica fibers exhibited the largest changes and the plastic fibers exhibited the smallest changes. Increases in the CLR were observed for the silica fibers with depth and for all fibers with fiber-beam angle. The plastic fibers showed no significant change in the CLR as a function of depth. Increases of 3.1% and 9.5% in the CLR were observed for the high- and low-hydroxyl content silica fibers, respectively, over the range of depths investigated. Variations of 2.3%, 6.1%, 5.1% and 11.9% were observed for the PMMA, polystyrene, high-hydroxyl, and low-hydroxyl content silica fiber CLR values as a function of fiber-beam angle, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The insignificant change in the CLR with delivered dose indicates that a single CLR value over the investigated dose range is sufficient for accurate Cerenkov subtraction. Variations in the stem-effect spectrum shape can occur with changes in irradiation geometry. The magnitude of the changes are governed by the fiber construction and the optical properties of the fiber. The observed spectral shape changes can be explained by a combination of variations in optical path length through the fiber and the fiber fluorescent signal contribution to the stem-effect. These spectral shape variations directly influence the calculated CLR values. This work confirms that careful characterization of scintillation detectors is important as changes in the stem-effect spectrum can cause changes in the CLR. If the CLR changes between the reference and measurement conditions, this could result in an incorrect stem-effect subtraction and reduced measurement accuracy.