ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) appears to be the earliest cardiac disturbance in cirrhosis patients. There are many previous reports reporting the significance of severity of LVDD on the outcome of liver transplantation or TIPS insertion, a few Indian studies have addressed the role of LVDD on survival in decompensated cirrhosis. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of LVDD on the survival of decompensated cirrhotic patients. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 92 decompensated cirrhotic patients from April 2015 to March 2017 at IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India. 2D echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging was used to evaluate cardiac function, as per the American society of echocardiography guidelines. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the effect of LVDD on overall mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-two decompensated cirrhotic patients were evaluated in this prospective cohort study. Twenty-eight out of 92 patients (30%) died due to liver-related complications after a follow-up of 24 months. The decompensated cirrhotic patients with MELD score ≥ 15 had a significantly higher E/e' ratio (11.94 ± 4.24 vs. 8.74 ± 3.32, p < 0.001) suggesting severe LV dysfunction in advanced cirrhosis. Patients with E/e' ratio > 10 had significantly higher MELD score and Child-Pugh score (19.88 ± 7.72 vs. 14.31 ± 5.83; 10.25 ± 1.74 vs. 9.02 ± 1.74, p < 0.01, respectively) as compared to theE/e' ratio < 10 group. In Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis, E/e' ≥ 10 (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.07-6.9, p = 0.03) and serum albumin (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.7, p < 0.01) were found to be independent predictors of mortality in decompensated cirrhotic patients. CONCLUSION: : The presence of LVDD and low serum albumin were independent predictors of mortality in decompensated cirrhotic patients. Hence, LVDD is an indicator of advanced cirrhosis and mortality.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) is a global health problem affecting around 400 million of people worldwide. Two available first-line antiviral drugs are tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and Entecavir (ETV). Till date,there are few published reports from India comparing efficacy of TDF and ETV in CHB cases. Therefore, this present study was carried out with an aim to compare the efficacy of ETV and TDF in patients with nucleos(t)ide naïve CHB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was carried out in 192 treatment naïve CHB cases, who completed 24 months of treatment with either TDF or ETV between March 2015 and August 2017. The primary end point of the study was undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA after 24 months of therapy. RESULTS: Of total 192 patients with CHB, 38 hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 53 HBeAg-negative patients were treated with tenofovir, whereas 40 HBeAg-positive and 61 HBeAg-negative patients were treated with ETV. Pretreatment characteristics at baseline were not statistically different between the TDF and ETV groups. Patients treated with TDF achieved significantly higher complete viral suppression as compared with ETV-treated patients (Log rank: 7.04, P = 0.008) in HBeAg-positive CHB during the 24 months follow-up time; whereas no significant difference in viral suppression rate could be noticed in HBeAg-negative patients (Log rank: 0.98, P = 0.38). Both univariate and multivariate analysis by cox proportional hazard model confirmed that tenofovir had significant rate of complete viral suppression in comparison with ETV in HBeAg-positive patients (P < 0.05); whereas complete viral suppression rates were similar in HBeAg-negative patients. CONCLUSION: In our study, tenofovir had more effective antiviral suppressive effect compared with ETV in HBeAg-positive, nucleos(t)ide-naïve CHB cases.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is emerging as an important cause of liver disease in India. NAFLD is characterized by hepatic steatosis in absence of a significant alcohol use or other known liver disease. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive form of NAFLD which deserves particular attention because it is more prone for development of fibrosis. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of NASH by evaluating necroinflammatory activity and stages of fibrosis. The aim of the study was to analyze liver biopsy specimens and identify risk factors associated with fibrosis in patients of NAFLD in eastern coastal India. METHODS: A total of 216 subjects with fatty liver in ultrasonography (USG) were selected for needle biopsy. Those NAFLD cases showing fibrosis in biopsy were analyzed for risk factors association. RESULTS: Definite NASH was diagnosed in 50 (23.14%), borderline NASH in 66 (30.55%) and not NASH in 100 (46.39%) of cases. Those patients with fibrosis (22%) were taken as cases and those without fibrosis (78%) were taken as controls for risk factor analysis. Age > 40 [odds ratio (OR) 2.01 (1.09-4.04)], female gender [OR 2.74 (1.24-6.05)], body mass index (BMI) > 23 [OR 15.36 (4.59-51.37)] and moderate fatty change in USG [OR 1.89 (1.01-3.62)] were observed as risk factors for progression to fibrosis in NAFLD cases. CONCLUSION: Older age, females, obesity and moderate fatty liver on USG are risk factors for development of fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Patients with these risk factors should be selected for liver biopsy and to be kept for close follow-up.
