Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 12(10): 2268-2273, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38074257

ABSTRACT

Background: Association between the ABO blood group and patient outcomes in COVID-19 patients is still unexplored. A known association may help to understand possible risks in advance to the management of such COVID-19 patients. The present study was designed to test such association if there is any, between the ABO blood group and the severity of COVID-19 patients. Methods: The present hospital-based observational study was conducted at a COVID-19 dedicated tertiary care hospital in North India over a period of six months during the first wave of the pandemic in the country. Five hundred consecutive patients, who tested positive for COVID-19 using RT-PCR on oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swabs, admitted to the hospital were included in the study. ABO and Rhesus (Rh) blood grouping was done on leftover hematology blood samples using gel column agglutination technology. Required clinical details of patients including age, gender, clinical symptoms, comorbidities, outcomes, etc., were obtained from the patient's case sheets. Results: The most common blood group was 'B' (42.8%) followed by 'O' (23.4%), and 'A' (22.4%) while the least common was 'AB' (11.4%). Rh positive was seen in 96.2% while 3.8% were negative. Baseline characteristics were comparable including length of hospital stay, duration of symptoms, and associated comorbid illnesses. The need for intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (P = 0.05) and intubations (P = 0.20) was similar across all four blood groups. Differences in the severity of COVID-19 disease and mortalities among the groups were non-significant. Conclusion: There was no observed association found between the ABO blood group and COVID-19 infection requiring hospitalization, ICU admission, intubation, and outcomes. However, there was a higher proportion of breathlessness and the presence of at least one comorbidity in blood group O as compared to others.

2.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 11(7): 3423-3429, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36387722

ABSTRACT

Background: Our understanding of the pathophysiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is still evolving and is limited for prognostication. The study was performed to predict severity and mortality based on hematology parameters in coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Material and Methods: The study was a single-center retrospective analysis of 240 patients with COVID-19. The hematological parameters were compared between different grades of severity. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve along with the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) methods were used for the analysis. Result: The total leukocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR) were increasing along with an increase in severity; while the absolute lymphocyte count and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) were decreasing (P < 0.001). For prediction of severity and mortality on admission, the NLR, NMR, and LMR were significant (P < 0.001). The NLR, NMR, and LMR had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.86 (95% CI of 0.80-0.91), 0.822 (95% CI of 0.76-0.88), and 0.69 (95% CI of 0.60-0.79), respectively, for severity. While the NLR, NMR, and LMR had an AUROC value of 0.85 (95% CI of 0.79-0.92), 0.83 (95% CI of 0.77-0.89), and 0.67 (95% CI of 0.57-0.78), respectively, for mortality. Conclusion: With the increase in severity there was an increase in the total leukocyte count and absolute neutrophil count while the absolute lymphocyte count decreased. On admission, the cut-off value of NLR >5.2, NMR >12.1, while LMR <2.4 may predict severity and mortality in COVID-19.

3.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 53(2): 167-72, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21087235

ABSTRACT

AIM: To study the aetiology of intellectual disability in patients presenting to hospital and the diagnostic yield of a standardized examination. METHOD: Over a 1-year period, the first three children presenting to the paediatric outpatients department (OPD) on 2 selected weekdays with developmental delay, suspected intellectual disability, or school failure were enrolled for study if they satisfied standard definitions of global developmental delay (GDD), or intellectual disability as tested by scales for Indian children: Developmental Assessment for Indian Infants, Binet Karnat Test, and the Vineland Social Maturity Scale (Malin's Adaptation). Detailed history, and physical and neurological examinations were recorded. An algorithmic approach to investigations was followed. Also, neuroimaging, thyroid function, electroencephalograph, karyotyping, and studies for fragile-X syndrome were conducted. Aetiological diagnosis was considered established only if clinical features were supported by investigations. Clinical features associated with a successful aetiological diagnosis were computed. RESULTS: A total of 122 children were enrolled in a cross-sectional analytic study (mean age 43.5 mo [SD 40.66]; 84 males, 38 females). Of these, a definite aetiology could be assigned in 66 children (54.1%); 17 prenatal, 38 perinatal/neonatal, and 11 postneonatal. Factors associated with reaching a definite diagnosis included younger age at presentation, presence of seizures, microcephaly, adverse neonatal events, and abnormal motor signs. Clinical history and examination gave important clues to the aetiology in 89 (72.9%) patients. Neuroimaging was abnormal in 91 out of 114 children, with aetiological findings in 48 children. INTERPRETATION: Perinatal/neonatal causes predominate as the cause of GDD or intellectual disability in India. The study highlights that a large majority of cases seen here were preventable.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Developing Countries , Developmental Disabilities/etiology , Intellectual Disability/etiology , Adolescent , Algorithms , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Developmental Disabilities/diagnosis , Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology , Developmental Disabilities/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Health Surveys , Humans , India , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intellectual Disability/diagnosis , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Male , Pregnancy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/diagnosis , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/etiology , Risk Factors
4.
Br J Neurosurg ; 24(2): 216-8, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20121535

ABSTRACT

We report a 5-year-old male child with absent rib, hemivertebra, superior lumbar hernia (features of lumbocostovertebral syndrome) and posterior spinal dysraphism, which is the second case in the English literature with such a combination of defects. Radiology and management of the case is discussed.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Ribs/abnormalities , Spinal Dysraphism/surgery , Abnormalities, Multiple/diagnostic imaging , Child, Preschool , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Radiography , Ribs/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Dysraphism/diagnostic imaging , Syndrome , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL