ABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate and compare the sorption and solubility of two different core buildup materials in different pH media for periods of one day, one week, and one month. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Sixty samples were prepared and divided into Group A (30 resin-based samples) and Group B (30 glass ionomer cement (GIC)-based samples). The sorption and solubility of the different materials were calculated by weighing the samples before and after desiccation and media immersion for periods of one day, one week, and one month. Groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, and for different media, the intragroup significance of the mean difference was performed using the Friedmann test and Wilcoxon signed rank test at a significance level of p<0.05. RESULTS: After immersion for different time periods, the resin-based core buildup material (Core X flow) showed less sorption and solubility as compared to the glass ionomer-based core buildup material (Secure Core Z) for all time periods, with a significant difference seen for a time period of one week and one month and being nonsignificant for a time period of one day. CONCLUSION: Core X flow had lower sorption and solubility values when compared to Secure Core Z, as per the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 4049 standards, except for a one-month time period in alkaline media.
ABSTRACT
Background Removing gutta-percha manually can be a challenging task, especially when addressing densely packed root-filling material, particularly in cases where resin-based sealers are employed for obturation. The use of nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments not only effectively shapes the root canal but also efficiently removes the endodontic filling from the curved canal during retreatment. Hence, incorporating rotary NiTi instruments in retreatment cases can alleviate fatigue for both patients and operators. Objectives This study aims to compare the efficacy of Neo-Endo retreatment files, R-Endo retreatment files, and K and H files in the removal of endodontic filling material. Additionally, the remnants of gutta-percha in root canals are evaluated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods A total of 60 extracted first maxillary molar teeth were selected for this study. Canal preparation was conducted using the step-back method up to an apical size of 40 K-file. The obturation process involved the use of gutta-percha points and AH Plus sealer in a lateral compaction technique. Post-operative CBCT scans were taken. The samples were randomly divided according to the retreatment files used: group I included Neo-Endo retreatment files, group II included R-Endo retreatment files, and group III included conventional K-files and Hedstroem files (H-Files). The retreatment procedure was considered complete when the last instrument easily reached the working-length range and was physically clean. A stopwatch was used to record the time taken by each file to remove the obturating material. T1 represented the total time (including irrigation and change of file) required to reach the apex, while T2 indicated the complete removal of materials from the canal with the last instrument. The overall time recorded (TT) was calculated as T1 + T2. The removal process was analyzed with CBCT scans. Results The Neo-Endo retreatment files removed the filling materials better and more quickly than the other files. Conclusions Despite the presence of residual filling material in all samples, the Neo-Endo retreatment files left the least amount of residual filling material and achieved the shortest completion time.