Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 68: 110102, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33129065

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus can cause significant discomfort in parturients and is refractory to conventional antipruritic treatment. This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of the medications used for prevention of intrathecal (IT) morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: A literature search was conducted from 1946 up to October 2019. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared medications used for prevention of pruritus with a control group in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with IT morphine. The primary outcome examined was the incidence of pruritus up to 24 h after cesarean delivery. Dichotomous data were extracted and summarized using odds ratios (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) with Bayesian random effects network meta-analysis model. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate quality of the studies and effect evidence. RESULTS: Of the 26 studies included in the systematic review, 21 studies with a total of 2594 patients were included in the network meta-analysis [prophylaxis, n = 1603 (62%) vs. control, n = 991 (38%)]. These studies investigated seven classes of drugs including serotonin-receptor antagonists, dopamine-receptor antagonists, opioid agonist-antagonists, opioid-receptor antagonists, histamine-receptor antagonists, propofol and celecoxib. The network meta-analysis showed that serotonin-receptor antagonists' prophylaxis [control vs. prophylaxis: 60% vs. 47%; OR (95% CrI): 2.69 (1.43-5.36)] and opioid agonist-antagonists prophylaxis [control vs. prophylaxis: 72% vs. 47%; OR (95% CrI): 4.57 (1.67-12.91)] decreased the incidence of pruritus compared to the control group. Although all included studies were at low risk of bias, the quality of the overall network meta-analysis pooled estimates was low. CONCLUSION: This bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates serotonin-receptor antagonists and opioid agonist-antagonists may prevent pruritus in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine compared to control group. However, further RCTs of adequate power and clearly defined end points are warranted.


Subject(s)
Morphine , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Morphine/adverse effects , Network Meta-Analysis , Pregnancy , Pruritus/chemically induced , Pruritus/epidemiology , Pruritus/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 20(1): 214, 2020 08 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32847522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Shivering is a common side effect in women having cesarean delivery (CD) under spinal anesthesia, which can be bothersome to the patient, and it can also interfere with perioperative monitoring. In several studies, the intrathecal (IT) addition of a lipophilic opioid to local anesthetics has been shown to decrease the incidence of shivering. OBJECTIVE: We performed this network meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of intrathecal lipophilic opioids in preventing the incidence of shivering in patients undergoing CD. METHODS: This review was planned according to the PRISMA for Network Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-NMA) guidelines. An English literature search of multiple electronic databases was conducted. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the incidence of shivering, with study groups receiving either IT fentanyl, sufentanil, or meperidine in women undergoing CD under spinal anesthesia. Quality of the studies was assessed using the modified Oxford scoring system. Using random-effects modeling, dichotomous data were extracted and summarized using odds ratio (OR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI). Statistical analysis was conducted using R studio version 1.0.153 - Inc. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies consisting of 1433 patients (Control group: 590 patients in twenty-one studies; Fentanyl group:199 patients in seven studies; Sufentanil group: 156 patients in five studies; Meperidine group: 488 patients in ten studies) met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review investigating the effect of intrathecal lipophilic opioids in preventing the incidence of shivering in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Methodological validity scores ranged from 3 to 7. The Bayesian mixed network estimate showed the incidence of shivering was significantly lower with IT fentanyl (pooled odds ratio (OR): 0.13; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.04 to 0.35; P = 0.0004) and IT meperidine (OR: 0.12; 95% CrI: 0.05 to 0.29; P < 0.00001), but not with IT sufentanil (OR: 0.37; 95% CrI: 0.11 to 1.22; P = 0.23). The IT fentanyl group had a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative discomfort [Risk Ratio (RR): 0.19; 95% CI: 0.10-0.35; P < 0.00001], the IT sufentanil group had a significantly higher incidence of pruritus (RR: 6.18; 95% CI: 1.18-32.46; P = 0.03) The IT meperidine group had a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative discomfort (2.7% vs. 13.6%; RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.09-0.55; P = 0.001), but there was a significant increase in nausea and vomiting (IT meperidine group vs. Control group: 42.7% vs. 19.4%; RR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.14-5.75; P = 0.02). Meta-regression analysis based on the opioid dose and quality of the study did not impact the final inference of our result. CONCLUSION: IT fentanyl significantly decreased the incidence of shivering in women undergoing CD under spinal anesthesia without increasing maternal adverse events, confirming that routine use in this patient population is a good choice. IT sufentanil did not decrease the incidence of shivering. IT meperidine decreased the incidence and severity of shivering, but its use was also associated with significant nausea and vomiting.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Cesarean Section/methods , Injections, Spinal/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Shivering/drug effects , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Bayes Theorem , Female , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/adverse effects , Humans , Incidence , Injections, Spinal/adverse effects , Network Meta-Analysis , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/chemically induced , Pregnancy , Shivering/physiology , Sufentanil/administration & dosage , Sufentanil/adverse effects
3.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 35(1): 19-24, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31057234

ABSTRACT

The ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure is performed in cases of fetal congenital malformation. The anesthetic management is much more challenging and involves providing profound uterine relaxation, maintenance of Uteroplacental blood flow and fetal anesthesia. The aim of the article is to review the literature and compare the efficacy of both the anesthetic techniques with respect to maternal and fetal outcomes. The literature source for this review was obtained via PubMed, Medline, Google scholar and Cochrane database of systematic reviews until January 2017. In our literature review we found that both GA and Regional anesthesia were successfully described for EXIT procedure but GA was performed in the majority of cases. Consideration for anesthetic technique should be done on a case-by-case basis.

4.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 29(3): 303-7, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24106351

ABSTRACT

Pruritus is a troublesome side-effect of neuraxial (epidural and intrathecal) opioids. Sometimes it may be more unpleasant than pain itself. The prevention and treatment still remains a challenge. A variety of medications with different mechanisms of action have been used for the prevention and treatment of opioid-induced pruritus, with mixed results. The aim of this article is to review the current body of literature and summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms and the pharmacological therapies available to manage opioid-induced pruritus. The literature source of this review was obtained via PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until 2012. The search results were limited to the randomized controlled trials, systemic reviews and non-systemic reviews.

5.
Can J Anaesth ; 55(8): 526-31, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18676388

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Due to cardiovascular and skeletal abnormalities, anesthetic management of parturients with Marfan's syndrome can be particularly challenging. Parturients with aortic root dilatation are at risk for aortic dissection. We describe the anesthetic management of a parturient with Marfan's syndrome and aortic root dilatation, who required general anesthesia for Cesarean delivery. CLINICAL FEATURES: At 26 weeks gestation, a nulliparous woman with Marfan's syndrome presented to the Anesthesia Clinic. Her history revealed asymptomatic aortic root dilatation of 41 mm, and partial correction of scoliosis with Harrington rods. Her cardiologist advised metoprolol, serial echocardiograms, and Cesarean delivery to decrease the risk of aortic dissection. At a multidisciplinary conference, a decision was made to proceed with Cesarean delivery, at term, at the cardiac surgery centre. After placement of arterial and central lines, general anesthesia was induced with remifentanil, propofol, and succinylcholine. Anesthesia was maintained with N(2)O, sevoflurane, and remifentanil (0.02-0.08 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Transesophageal echocardiography examination confirmed stable aortic root dilatation. The patient remained hemodynamically stable. The baby's Apgars were 4 and 8, at one and five minutes, respectively. At the end of the procedure, the patient's trachea was extubated when she was awake. Initial postoperative care was in the intensive care unit. Both mother and baby recovered uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: Peripartum hemodynamic changes can be life-threatening to the parturient with Marfan's syndrome and aortic dilatation. Anesthetic goals for delivery included preparation for possible aortic dissection, and avoidance of increased aortic root shear stress, through careful hemodynamic monitoring, and general anesthesia using remifentanil.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/methods , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods , Aortic Rupture/prevention & control , Cesarean Section/methods , Marfan Syndrome/complications , Pregnancy Complications , Adult , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Aortic Aneurysm/complications , Female , Humans , Parturition , Piperidines , Pregnancy , Remifentanil , Treatment Outcome
6.
Can J Anaesth ; 54(4): 290-5, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17400981

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was undertaken to determine whether a tenfold difference in the rate of intrathecal injection of bupivacaine would affect sensory block level in parturients. Secondary outcomes included onset of block and the incidence of hypotension and nausea. METHODS: Following Research Ethics Board approval, 90 ASA I and II term parturients scheduled for Cesarean delivery were randomized to receive either fast injection (over four seconds, Group F) or slow injection (over 40 sec, Group S) of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg plus morphine 200 microg. Sensory block, motor block, and blood pressure were assessed every minute for the first 15 min, then every five minutes for the next 20 min. All occurrences of nausea, hypotension (decrease in systolic blood pressure > 30%) and ephedrine requirements were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-three patients in Group F and 42 patients in Group S completed the study. No differences in maximum sensory block height (Group F = median T2, interquartile range [T2-T4], Group S = T3 [T2-T4], P = 0.077) or time to achieve block height (F = 9.3 +/- 4.3 min, S = 9.7 +/- 4.7, P = 0.64) were observed. The frequencies of hypotension (Group F = 35/43, Group S = 32/42, P = 0.56), ephedrine utilization (Group F = 32/43, Group S = 26/42, P = 0.21) and nausea (Group F = 15/43, Group S = 16/42, P = 0.76) were similar. CONCLUSION: Rapid intrathecal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine does not affect spread of spinal anesthesia or the incidence of hypotension and nausea in parturients.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Adult , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Bupivacaine/adverse effects , Cesarean Section , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal/methods , Nausea/etiology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Parturition , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL