The clinical significance of cytology versus histology-based diagnosis in small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of cytology versus histology-based diagnosis among patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical records of 443 patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) was performed. All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. Survival data (overall survival) were compared between patients with histology or cytology-based diagnosis in the overall study population as well as after stratification of patients according to disease stage (limited or extensive) at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Distribution of demographics and clinicopathological characteristics among the two groups ("histology" and "cytology") was similar. No statistically significant differences in the survival curves between the "histology" and "cytology" groups were found in the overall study population (log rank test, p=0.237), as well as in the subgroup of patients with limited disease (log rank test, p=0.474). In contrast, patients with histology-based diagnosis had a statistically significant longer survival as compared to those with cytology-based diagnosis in the extensive disease subgroup (log rank test, p=0.031), but this association was not retained after adjusting the analysis for demographics and clinical characteristics via a Cox regression model (HR=1.18, 95% CI: 0.96-1.44, p=0.110). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that the type of diagnostic modality employed (histology or cytology-based) for the establishment of a diagnosis of SCLC may not have a significant effect on the overall survival of patients. Further studies are warranted to further investigate this important, yet rather unexplored, issue.

Feasibility of Induction Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, Cetuximab (TPF-C) Followed by Concurrent Cetuximab Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To report our experience with a sequential regimen of induction TPF-C followed by radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Toxicity and outcome was retrospectively analyzed in 22 patients receiving sequential therapy with induction TPF-C followed by radioimmunotherapy between October 2008 and December 2011. Outcome was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. In addition, we performed mutation analysis for PIK3CA genes and high risk HPV DNA detection using PCR. RESULTS: Mean time of follow-up was 16 months. Six patients were TNM Stage III, 15 patients IV (IVA or IVB), and one patient Stage II with bulky disease. During TPF-C, Grade 3 and 4 toxicities occurred in eight patients, dose modifications in seven, delays in one, and unplanned admissions in five. Clinical tumor response was documented in 18 of the 21 patients who completed at least three cycles of TPF-C with three patients developing complete response and 15 partial responses. Grade 3/4 mucositis was observed in six patients. At a median follow-up of 19 months, 13 patients were alive and nine had died including seven patients as a result of disease persistence or recurrence and two as a result of unrelated causes. PIK3CA mutations were not identified and our two oropharynx cases were HPV negative. CONCLUSION: The combination of induction TPF-C with concurrent cetuximab radioimmunotherapy in patients with locally advanced HNSCC is tolerable, with encouraging efficacy.