Intradetrusor OnabotuliniumtoxinA injection for refractory bladder spasms before vesicovaginal fistula repair.

This is a report of a women who failed 2 surgical repairs of vesicovaginal fistula secondary to refractory bladder spasms. After each surgical procedure - the hysterectomy and subsequent fistula repairs - the patient reported severe bladder spasms refractory to medical management. Our treatment was intradetrusor onabotuliniumtoxinA injections 4 weeks prior to a planned surgical fistula repair. The patient had successful vaginal approach fistula repair and has not required any subsequent overactive bladder (OAB) treatment.

Development of an implant technique and early experience using a novel implantable pulse generator with a quadripolar electrode array at the tibial nerve for refractory overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVES: Tibial nerve stimulation is an effective treatment for overactive bladder (OAB) and has been utilized as an in-person recurring session treatment option for many years. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a long-term implantable device and the method of utilizing a retrograde approach to place the device (a percutaneous implantable pulse generator [pIPG] with integrated quadripolar electrodes) at the tibial nerve (Protect PNS; Uro Medical Corp.). METHODS: A novel retrograde implant technique was developed through multiple cadaveric dissections to percutaneously implant a chronic, wireless, minimally invasive pIPG device with integrated quadripolar electrodes (now licensed to Uro Medical) at the tibial nerve. A proof-of-concept pIPG device approved as part of an FDA IDE was designed to gain early experience in subjects with refractory OAB. The pIPG was implanted in the office under local anesthesia using the novel retrograde approach, and stimulation was activated using an external wireless energy source called a transmitter. Initially, a pilot study was designed to compare outcomes in subjects randomized to either percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or Protect PNS. However, due to the small sample sizes available at this time, it was not possible to compare the two groups. Thus, the purpose of this manuscript is to describe the outcome of subjects who underwent implantation of the Protect PNS system. Twelve-month safety and efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS: Nine subjects were enrolled in the randomized pilot study; 5 to the pIPG group and 4 to PTNS, and all completed the 13-week primary endpoint. Subsequently, two subjects in the PTNS group chose to cross over and have the pIPG implanted after 13 weeks. Outcomes of the seven subjects who underwent implantation of the pIPG are described. No complications related to the office procedure were noted. Two of the older model pIPG devices became nonresponsive at 1 and 4 weeks and were replaced. Six minor adverse events were reported and resolved. Subjects reported improvement in urge urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes, OAB symptoms, and quality of life. Subjects impanted with a pIPG reported a 50% reduction in UUI as early as 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this pilot study suggest that retrograde percutaneous implantation of a pIPG is a safe, minimally invasive one-stage office procedure for treatment for urge incontinence related OAB symptoms, without significant complications after 12 months follow-up. Future studies will be required to compare outcomes among treatment modalities.

A modified Altis® mid-urethral sling that allows immediate post-operative adjustment: experience in 197 patients.

OBJECTIVES: The transobturator mid-urethral Altis® "mini-sling" uses a static and a dynamic anchor on either end of a pulley suture for intraoperative tension adjustment. Given the potential for incorrect tensioning with sling placement, we adopted a modification for post-operative adjustment should stress urinary incontinence (SUI) persist. The objective is to describe technique, rate of postoperative adjustment driven by patient symptoms, and impact of preoperative/intraoperative variables. METHODS: In this single-surgeon experience, retrospective chart review, demographic and clinical data were collected on patients who received the Altis® sling for SUI between 2014 and 2019. We used descriptive statistics and three-group comparison tests to assess difference in variables among tightening, loosening, or no adjustment. RESULTS: Altis® sling placement was performed on 197 female patients with an average age of 58.7 years. Eighty-four percent (165/197) did not receive post-operative adjustment. Of the 32 patients with post-operative adjustment, 8 (4.1%) had loosening and 24 (12.2%) had tightening at an average of 10.5 days post-operatively. All tightening procedures were done in the clinic. Of the 8 patients with post-operative loosening, 6 were performed in clinic and 2 in the operating room. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were not significantly different among tightening, loosening, and no adjustment cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This modification of the Altis® sling provides surgeons with the ability to tighten and loosen the sling for persistent SUI. All tightening and most loosening procedures were able to be performed in the clinic. The ability to easily tighten a sling in the early post-operative period may be a critical advantage.

Concordance Between Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Susceptibility in Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections.

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that multiple genes influence antibiotic susceptibility, but the relationship between genotypic and phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility is unclear. We sought to analyze the concordance between the presence of antibiotic resistance (ABR) genes and antibiotic susceptibility results in urine samples collected from patients with symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Urine samples were collected from patients presenting to 37 geographically disparate urology clinics across the United States from July 2018 to February 2019. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction was used to detect 27 ABR genes. In samples containing at least one culturable organism at a concentration of ≥ 104 cells per mL, pooled antibiotic susceptibility testing (P-AST), which involves simultaneous growing all detected bacteria together in the presence of antibiotic and then measure susceptibility, was performed against 14 antibiotics. The concordance rate between the ABR genes and the P-AST results was generated for the overall group. The concordance rates for each antibiotic between monomicrobial and polymicrobial infection were compared using chi-square test. RESULTS: Results from ABR gene detection and P-AST of urine samples from 1155 patients were included in the concordance analysis. Overall, there was a 60% concordance between the presence or absence of ABR genes and corresponding antimicrobial susceptibility with a range of 49-78% across antibiotic classes. Vancomycin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam showed significantly lower concordance rates in polymicrobial infections than in monomicrobial infections. CONCLUSION: Given the 40% discordance rate, the detection of ABR genes alone may not provide reliable data to make informed clinical decisions in UTI management. However, when used in conjunction with susceptibility testing, ABR gene data can offer valuable clinical information for antibiotic stewardship.

Symptom and Quality of Life Improvements After Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in a Clinical Population of Women With Pelvic Pain and Other Symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate changes in validated symptom scores at intake and discharge in women undergoing pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) for pain and other pelvic floor symptoms. METHODS: Consecutive women starting PFPT during 1 year were reviewed. History, demographics, and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire - Short Form 20 (PFDI) total and domain scores (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6, Urogenital Distress Inventory-6, Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory-8), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and pain levels on a numeric rating scale (NRS) were collected at intake and discharge. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and sign tests. RESULTS: Of 474 women, mean age was 50.3 ± 16.7 years (range, 18-87 years) and the most common indication for PFPT was pelvic pain (208/474; 43.9%). In women with complete data, pretreatment to posttreatment median scores improved on the PFDI (77.3 vs 41.8; P < 0.0001), Urogenital Distress Inventory (37.5 vs 16.0; P < 0.0001), and PFIQ (58.0 vs 19.0; P < 0.0001), and the minimal clinically important difference was met for the PFDI, PFIQ, and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory. Women with primarily pelvic pain (n = 208) achieved significant improvements in PFDI, PFIQ, and NRS scores (P < 0.0001 for all) as well as the minimal clinically important difference for these measures. Pain patients with a history of pelvic surgery (n = 50) also had significant improvements in PFIQ and NRS but not PFDI scores. CONCLUSIONS: Most women referred to PFPT demonstrated symptom improvements as measured by validated instruments.

The clinical rate of antibiotic change following empiric treatment for suspected urinary tract infections.

PURPOSE: To determine the rate of antibiotic change in an outpatient setting following empiric treatment of culture proven UTI and to identify risk factors associated with change. METHODS: Patients with suspected UTI and urine culture were reviewed (January 2016-June 2016). Those with a positive culture were categorized by whether or not they were treated empirically. Empiric treatment was evaluated for associations with clinical-demographic data, symptoms and urinalysis (UA). Antibiotic change was evaluated with clinical-demographic data, urine culture, and resistance patterns. RESULTS: 916 urine cultures (636 patients) were included. 391 (43%) cultures were positive, and 164 (42%) were treated empirically. Clinical-demographic data did not differ between groups. Those treated empirically had more documented UTI symptoms (93 vs 58%, P < 0.001), and UA abnormalities including positive nitrites (51 vs 29%, P < 0.001), 3 + leukocyte esterase (27 vs 19%, P = 0.002) and 3 + blood (13 vs 4%, P = 0.005). Of those treated empirically, 42/164 (26%) required an antibiotic change, and this was associated with immunosuppression (12 vs 2%, P = 0.027) resistance to > 3 antibiotics (33 vs 20%, P = 0.039) and also resistance to fluoroquinolone (50 vs 30%, P = 0.016), monobactam (19 vs 7% P = 0.042) and TMP-SMX (52 vs 19%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-quarter of patients treated empirically required antibiotic change. This was driven largely by bacterial resistance. New technologies allowing rapid bacterial identification and sensitivity may improve patient care.

Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Scores Improve After Prolapse Surgery Regardless of Surgical Approach but Not After Observation Alone.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different surgical procedures on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) scores in women with pelvic organ prolapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women with prolapse were enrolled from 2008 to 2014. Baseline data and outcomes at 1 year were collected including subscales of the PFDI. Patients who had surgery (SGY) within the first year were compared to those who did not (N-SGY). Subanalyses of SGY included vaginal vs abdominal, with or without concurrent hysterectomy (HYST, N-HYST), placement of mesh (MESH, N-MESH), and concurrent posterior repair/perineorrhaphy (POST, N-POST). RESULTS: A total of 233/239 patients underwent surgery in the first year. For SGY vs N-SGY, SGY had significant improvements in PFDI and all subscale scores at 1 year while N-SGY did not. When comparing vaginal to abdominal approach, MESH to N-MESH and HYST to N-HYST, there were no differences between any scores at baseline or 1 year between the groups. However, all within group symptom scores improved from baseline to 1 year (P <.0001 for all). In comparing POST to N-POST, there were no differences between groups at 1 year in PFDI and Urogenital Distress Inventory and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory subscale scores. Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory scores were significantly higher at baseline for POST (P <.0001) but not at 1 year (P = 0.37). All within group scores statistically significant improved at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Women who underwent surgical repair for prolapse had significantly improved overall PFDI and subscale scores regardless of surgical approach and concurrent procedures.

Transvaginal Trigger Point Injections Improve Pain Scores in Women with Pelvic Floor Hypertonicity and Pelvic Pain Conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic pelvic pain in women often requires multimodal treatment regimens. We describe our method of transvaginal trigger point injections (TPIs) and report outcomes using change in pain scores. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of women treated with in-office pelvic floor muscle injections from January 2012 to August 2015. Lidocaine 1% and 2%, bupivacaine 0.5%, or ropivacaine 0.5% with or without the addition of triamcinolone 40 mg was used for the injections. Pain was reported on a 0- to 10-point numerical rating scale before and after injection. Differences in pretreatment and posttreatment pain scores were analyzed after the first injection and after subsequent injections. Repeated-measures analysis was used to determine if any variable affected treatment response. RESULTS: One hundred one women with a mean age of 44 years had a total of 257 separate visits for pelvic floor muscle injections. Triamcinolone was used at 90.2% (230/255) of the TPI visits. After the initial TPI visit, there was significant decrease in total levator numerical rating scale score (maximum score, 20; mean, -6.21 ± 4.7; P < 0.0001), and 77% (70/91) of patients had improved. These significant improvements were noted at all visits 1 through 4 and whether bilateral or unilateral injections were done. Only the total amount of local anesthestic used had a significant effect on the change in total levator pain scores (P = 0.002). Minor adverse effects including leg numbness, dizziness, nausea, bleeding, and headache occurred at 10% of visits. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor muscle injections decrease pain levels in women with pelvic floor dysfunction.

Recovery of urinary function after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical perineal prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has largely replaced open radical prostatectomy in many centers. Radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) is another less invasive approach that has not been widely adopted. RPP offers excellent exposure of the urinary sphincter and bladder neck that may provide good urinary function outcomes. We evaluate urinary function after RALP and RPP. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective radical prostatectomy database was performed. Urinary modules from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Urinary Function (EPIC-UF) questionnaire were used to determine urinary symptoms at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: 753 men underwent RALP (n = 623) or RPP (n = 130). Of these, 558 had complete data and were included in our study (RALP: n = 458, RPP: n = 100). A higher number of patients undergoing RALP than RPP had pelvic lymph node dissection (20.2% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) and cavernosal neurovascular bundle sparing (79.2% vs. 68.4%, p < 0.0001). 558 patients had complete EPIC-UF data. Overall urinary recovery was greater for RALP than RPP at 6 months (p = 0.028). Urinary incontinence and function were also more improved after RALP compared to RPP at 6 months (p = 0.021, p = 0.006). However, no differences in overall, urinary incontinence, or urinary function scores were seen at 12, 18, or 24 months. There was no difference between groups in urinary bother or irritative/obstructive symptoms at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: RALP had more rapid recovery of urinary function at 6 months vs. RPP; at 12-24 months, however, RALP and RPP had similar urinary function recovery in all urinary subdomains.

Additional treatments, satisfaction, symptoms and quality of life in women 1 year after vaginal and abdominal pelvic organ prolapse repair.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate additional treatments, symptoms, satisfaction and quality of life 1 year after vaginal and abdominal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. METHODS: Adult women enrolled in a prospective POP database were reviewed. Baseline and outcomes data 1 year after surgery were collected including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and mailed surveys. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact tests and t tests. RESULTS: Of 222 women, 147 (66%) had vaginal and 75 (34%) had abdominal repair. Vaginal group patients were older (64.1 vs. 59.7 years; p = 0.003), but other demographic characteristics did not differ. Vaginal group patients had lower baseline anterior and apical prolapse grades (anterior 2.7 vs. 3.1, p = 0.003; apical 2.1 vs. 3.1, p < 0.001). Baseline PFDI scores were similar. Scores improved significantly for both groups after 1 year, but 1-year PFDI scores were significantly higher in the vaginal group (45.6 vs. 32.6, p = 0.032). Scores were not different when adjusted for age and prolapse grade (p = 0.24). At 1 year, most patients in the vaginal and abdominal groups reported moderately/markedly improved overall symptoms (72/108 vs. 50/60, p = 0.030) and quality of life (89/101 vs. 54/59, p = 0.601). Most were satisfied with surgery (68/101 vs. 48/59, p = 0.067). Retreatment rates (pelvic floor physical therapy, medications, coping strategies, surgical procedures) were similar (34/109 vs. 15/62, p = 0.381). Vaginal mesh use did not affect additional treatments, patient satisfaction or symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although symptoms improve and most women are satisfied with surgery, about one in four women have additional therapy in the first year after POP repair.

Radiographic Misdiagnoses After Periurethral Bulking Agents.

OBJECTIVES: Injectable urethral bulking agents are commonly used to manage stress urinary incontinence. Urologic or other symptoms may prompt pelvic imaging at a later date, when bulking agents may be visualized and incorrectly interpreted. Our goal was to evaluate the incidence of misdiagnosis and which pathologies were the most common misinterpretations and their frequency. METHODS: All records were reviewed for patients who underwent periurethral injection for stress urinary incontinence for pelvic imaging after treatment from 2005 to 2015. Radiological reports were reviewed for any description potentially related to injection therapy, and descriptive statistics performed. RESULTS: A total of 528 patients underwent injection of a urethral bulking agent. Of these, 79 patients (15%) had a total of 111 additional abdominal or pelvic imaging studies performed with abnormal periurethral findings mentioned. Thirty-nine (35%) of 111 studies were correctly interpreted as urethral bulking agents, and in 72 (65%) of 111 studies, the urethral bulking agents were not correctly identified. The most common misdiagnoses were bladder calcification (26; 23%), urethral diverticulum with stone (12; 11%), periurethral calcification (9; 8%), unknown pelvic density (8; 7%), and mass suspicious for malignancy (6; 5%). CONCLUSIONS: Urethral bulking agents commonly were not mentioned on subsequent imaging but, when commented on, were misinterpreted 65% of the time including worrisome pathologies (diverticulum with stone, unknown mass, and malignancy), requiring subsequent evaluation and potentially procedural/surgical management. It is critical for the ordering clinician to inform the radiologist of this history and for radiologists to consider bulking agents in the differential diagnosis of radiographic findings in this location.

Transvaginal Pelvic Floor Muscle Injection Technique: A Cadaver Study.

INTRODUCTION: Women with pelvic floor dysfunction can have tender areas on vaginal examination, which can be treated with trigger-point injections. There are no publications to evaluate the accuracy of pelvic floor muscle injections. METHODS: Trigger-point injections were performed on 2 fresh cadaveric pelvises using a curved nasal cannula guide and 7-in spinal needle. This was performed using our standard template of 2 sets of injections at the 1-, 3-, and 5-o'clock positions distally and proximally. The first pelvis was dissected to examine dye penetration. Based on these results, we modified our technique and repeated the injections on the second cadaver. We dissected the second pelvis and compared our findings. RESULTS: The 1-o'clock proximal and distal injections stained the obturator internus and externus near the insertion at the ischiopubic ramus. The 3-o'clock injections stained the midbody of the pubococcygeus and puborectalis. The distal 5-o'clock position was too deep and stained the fat of the ischiorectal space. The proximal 5-o'clock injection stained the area of the pudendal nerve. Our goal at the distal 5-o'clock position was to infuse the iliococcygeus muscle, so we shortened the needle depth from 2 to 1 cm beyond the cannula tip. In our second dissection, the distal 5-o'clock injection again stained only the fat of the ischiorectal space. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize the distribution of pelvic floor muscle injections in a cadaver model and confirms the ability to deliver medications effectively to the pelvic floor muscles.

Detailed Cost Analysis of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared to Transvaginal Mesh Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hospital-realized cost difference between transvaginal mesh prolapse repair and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: Consecutive transvaginal mesh prolapse surgery and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy cases from January 2012 to December 2013 were evaluated. Patient clinical and operative data were recorded. The total institutional costs (direct and indirect) for each procedure were obtained and subcategorized by area. Independent sample t tests and chi-squared analysis were performed. RESULTS: One hundred twenty women underwent transvaginal mesh repair whereas 106 underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Body mass index was similar between groups (28.1 vs 27.5) as was midurethral sling placement (50% vs 59%). Robotic patients were younger (61 years vs 67 years., P < .001) and more likely to undergo concomitant hysterectomy (58.5% vs 26.7%). There were similar rates for additional compartment repairs. Amortized costs for robotic purchase and maintenance were included with all depreciated equipment and realized by all patients undergoing surgery. Overall mean robotic operative time was longer with and without hysterectomy (279 minutes vs 174 minutes, P < .001 and 201 minutes vs 91 minutes, P < .001). Mean total costs were higher with robotic technique ($9675 vs $6718, P < .001), primarily driven by anesthesia ($1141 vs $675, P < .001), and operative ($6883 vs $4487, P < .001) costs. No differences for total costs were seen in laboratory fees, recovery room, or inpatient nursing. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal prolapse repair is less costly than robotic sacrocolpopexy. Length of surgery and additional robotic supplies drive the majority of increased operative costs. Costs attributed to robot purchase and maintenance do not uniquely factor into the procedure costs.

Analysis of changes in sexual function in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair with abdominal or vaginal approaches.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To examine changes in sexual function after abdominal and transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair. METHODS: Women enrolled in our prospective, longitudinal prolapse database with abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) or transvaginal (TVR) pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair with or without mesh, between 19 December 2008 through 4 June 2014. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI -20) were mailed preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Patients completed Global Response Assessments to rate their overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Two hundred and four of the 300 women met the inclusion criteria: 74 out of 204 (36 %) had ASC and 130 out of 204 (64 %) had TVR. Seventy-two out of seventy-four ASCs were performed robotically and 2 were open. Baseline demographics were similar except that the ASC patients were significantly younger (60 vs 63, P = 0.019) and had a higher rate of apical repair (77 % vs 55 %). Thirty-six out of seventy-four ASC (48.7 %) and 63 out of 128 TVR patients (49.2 %) were sexually active at baseline (P = 0.94). Sixteen out of thirty-eight ASC (42.1 %) and 18 out 63 TVR patients (28.6 %; P = 0.16) reported dyspareunia at baseline. Seventy-two out of seventy-four ASC (97 %) and 86 out of 130 TVR patients (66 %) had mesh-augmented repairs. There was no difference in sexual activity or dyspareunia between the groups at the 6- or 12-month follow-up. PISQ and PFDI scores improved significantly in both the ASC and TVR groups over time compared with the baseline (p < 0.0001). Most women in the ASC (77.5 %) and TVR (64.8 %) groups were satisfied with the results of prolapse surgery at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual function and pelvic floor symptoms improved in a similar manner in patients after abdominal and transvaginal POP surgery.

Preoperative Urodynamic Parameters (Valsalva Leak Point Pressure and Maximum Urethral Closure Pressure), Urinary Collagen and Plasma Vitamin D Levels as Predictors of Mid Urethral Sling Surgery Outcome.

PURPOSE: To determine the best predictor of the mid urethral sling outcome we calculated the AUC of ROC curves of preoperative parameters, including Valsalva leak point pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure, urinary NTx (N-telopeptide of crosslinked type I collagen) and plasma vitamin D values (D2, D3 and D2 plus D3). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an ancillary study of TOMUS (Trial of Mid-urethral Slings) and the ValUE (Value of Urodynamics Evaluation) trial in which subjects underwent mid urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Valsalva leak point pressure and maximum urethral closure pressure were measured in 427 subjects, whereas NTx, vitamin D2, vitamin D3 and vitamin D2 plus D3 levels were obtained from 150, 116, 115 and 116 subjects respectively. Outcome success was defined using identical outcome (subjective and objective) variables for all subjects. ROC curves with corresponding AUC values were compared. RESULTS: TOMUS and ValUE subjects were significantly different in age, body mass index, UDI (Urogenital Distress Inventory) scores. TOMUS subjects had a lower surgical success rate compared to ValUE subjects (66.3% vs 76.0%, p = 0.03). The AUC values of Valsalva leak point pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure, NTx, and vitamins D2, D3 and D2 plus D3 were 0.542, 0.561, 0.702, 0.627, 0.645 and 0.640, respectively. The AUC of NTx was significantly higher than the AUCs of Valsalva leak point pressure and maximum urethral closure pressure (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary NTx was the best predictor of the mid urethral sling outcome. This test is not only noninvasive, it is also modifiable. Finding ideal modifiable risk factors prior to mid urethral sling surgery should be subject to future investigations.

Clinical Comparison of 2 Trial-of-Void Methods After Outpatient Midurethral Sling Placement.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy, efficiency, and costs of 2 methods of trial of void (TOV) after midurethral sling (MUS) placement. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on women who underwent outpatient MUS between January 2013 and April 2014 by 3 urologists. Patients were excluded if they had a concomitant prolapse repair, hysterectomy, bladder/urethral injury, or any procedure that may prolong recovery room (RR) stay. Trial of void was performed by either (1) bladder instillation, catheter removal in the operating room (OR) fill with attempted void in RR, or (2) bladder instillation and catheter removal with immediate attempted void in the RR fill. Intraoperative, postoperative, and cost data were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-one of 183 women (mean age, 55.9 ± 12 years; mean body mass index, 28.8 ± 5.8 kg/m) met inclusion criteria. Eighty-three had a transobturator sling. Forty-nine (54%) had an OR fill and 42 (46%) had an RR fill; age and body mass index were similar between groups. The OR fill group had shorter median operative time (15 vs 22 minutes; P = 0.003) and median RR time (138 vs 161, P = 0.033). The OR fill and RR fill groups did not differ in TOV failure rate (3/49 vs 6/42; P = 0.29), overall mean LOS (4.96 vs 5.51 hours; P = 0.055), and median RR costs ($627 vs $678; P = 0.065). No patient had urinary retention after successful TOV. CONCLUSIONS: After MUS placement, both OR fill and RR fill TOV methods are effective and efficient with similar TOV failure rates.

Pelvic Prolapse Repair in the Era of Mesh.

Pelvic organ prolapse repair with mesh remains the gold standard for advanced prolapse. There are several surgical approaches available to the pelvic reconstructive surgeon. Prolapse repair can be performed vaginally or abdominally using native tissue or may be augmented with a biologic or mesh patch. In this article, we will review the different approaches to prolapse repair, the role of mesh, and the risks and benefits of each option. Patient selection, surgical technique, and the rationale for using mesh will be explored. Complications from prolapse repair with mesh including dyspareunia, pelvic pain, mesh exposure, and reoperation will be discussed.

The cost of preoperative urodynamics: A secondary analysis of the ValUE trial.

AIMS: Urodynamic studies (UDS) are generally recommended prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), despite insufficient evidence that it impacts treatment plans or outcomes in patients with uncomplicated SUI. This analysis aimed to calculate the cost incurred when UDS was performed as a supplement to a basic office evaluation and to extrapolate the potential savings of not doing UDS in this patient population on a national basis. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis from the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial, a multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial to determine whether a basic office evaluation (OE) is non-inferior in terms of SUI surgery outcomes to office evaluation with addition of urodynamic studies (UDS). All participants underwent an OE; those patients who randomized to supplementary UDS underwent non-instrumented uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and a pressure flow study. Costs associated with UDS were calculated using 2014 U.S. Medicare allowable fees. Models using various patient populations and payor mixes were created to obtain a range of potential costs of performing UDS in patients undergoing SUI surgery annually in the United States. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty women were randomized to OE or OE plus UDS. There was no difference in surgical outcomes between the two groups. The per patient cost of UDS varied from site to site, and included complex cystometrogram $314-$343 (CPT codes 51728-51729) plus complex uroflowmetry $16 (CPT code 51741). Extrapolating these costs for US women similar to our study population, 13-33 million US dollars could be saved annually by not performing preoperative urodynamics. CONCLUSION: For women with uncomplicated SUI and a confirmatory preoperative basic office evaluation, tens of millions of dollars US could be saved annually by not performing urodynamic testing. In the management of such women, eliminating this preoperative test has a major economic benefit.

Change in Overactive Bladder Symptoms After Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women.

OBJECTIVE: To assess change in overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms up to 5 years after surgery and to identify associated predictors of change from baseline. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from three multicenter urinary incontinence (UI) surgical trials of women with stress-predominant mixed UI assigned to Burch colposuspension, autologous fascial sling, or retropubic or transobturator midurethral slings. The primary outcome was improvement of 70% or greater from baseline in symptoms measured by the Urinary Distress Inventory-Irritative subscale. Surgical groups were compared within respective trials. Generalized linear models were fit using 1-year and up to 5-year data. RESULTS: Significant improvements in Urinary Distress Inventory-Irritative scores were reported by each surgical group 1 year after surgery (P<.001). Most women (50-71%) reported improvement in OAB symptoms. Improvements were similar between midurethral sling groups at 1 year (65.5% compared with 70.7%, P=.32; odds ratio [OR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.20 for retropubic compared with transobturator sling) and throughout the 5-year follow-up period. More women reported OAB symptom improvement after Burch compared with pubovaginal sling (67.9% compared with 56.6%, P=.01; OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.10-2.31 for Burch compared with sling); this group difference at 1 year persisted throughout the 5-year follow-up. At 1-year, 50.0-64.3% of patients reported 70% greater improvement in UI. This proportion declined to 36.5-54.1% at 5 years (P<.001). Preoperative use of anticholinergics and urodynamic parameters was not predictive of OAB symptom change after surgery. CONCLUSION: Most women with stress-predominant mixed UI experienced significant improvement in OAB symptoms after incontinence surgery although this initial improvement diminished over time. Obesity blunted symptom improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Secondary surgery after vaginal prolapse repair with mesh is more common for stress incontinence and voiding dysfunction than for mesh problems or prolapse recurrence.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the need for secondary surgical procedures after transvaginal prolapse repair with mesh. METHODS: Women that had prolapse repair (Prolift(®) or Elevate(®)) were reviewed for reoperation and clinical/demographic data such as prior prolapse repair, prolapse grade, operative details, length of stay (LOS) and time to reoperation. Pearson's Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests and Wilcoxon rank tests were used. RESULTS: 77/335 women (23%) had 100 additional procedures. Median (range) time to reoperation was 51 (5-1168) days: four (1%) had primary prolapse surgery at a different site, three (1%) repeat prolapse repair from the same site, 23 (7%) surgery for complications and 50 (15%) had stress urinary incontinence (SUI)/sling-related procedures. When no reoperation versus reoperation groups were compared, mean LOS (1.8 vs. 2.0 days; p = 0.044) and follow-up (228 vs. 354 days; p = 0.002) were longer in the reoperations group; postoperative hemoglobin was lower (10.8 vs. 10.4; p = 0.031). Patients with a prolapse reoperation were 10 years younger (67 vs. 57 years; p = 0.027) than patients that either had a reoperation for other reasons or had no reoperations. Patients with concomitant sling and persistent SUI requiring repeat SUI surgery were older (mean 72 vs. 66 years; p = 0.038), had prior prolapse repair (53 vs. 27%; p = 0.017) and had anterior compartment mesh (84 vs. 56%; p = 0.037); median operative times (78 vs. 104 min; p = 0.008) and mean LOS were shorter (median 1.6 vs. 1.9 days; p = 0.045). For patients without concomitant sling, no demographic or perioperative differences were found between those that did (n = 10) and did not (n = 86) develop de novo SUI that required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Most reoperations were for sling management and SUI; few were for mesh complications or prolapse recurrence.