ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Etranacogene dezaparvovec (EDZ), Hemgenix, is a gene therapy recently approved for people with hemophilia B (PwHB). OBJECTIVE: To estimate long-term clinical impact and cost of EDZ in the United States (US). METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate the long-term impact of introducing EDZ for PwHB over a 20-year time horizon. Factor IX (FIX) prophylaxis comparator was a weighted average of different FIX prophylaxis regimens based on US market share data. We compared a scenario in which EDZ is introduced in the US versus a scenario without EDZ. Clinical inputs (annualized FIX-treated bleed rate; adverse event rates) were obtained from HOPE-B phase 3 trial. EDZ durability input was sourced from an analysis predicting long-term FIX activity with EDZ. EDZ one-time price was assumed at $3.5 million. Other medical costs, including FIX prophylaxis, disease monitoring, bleed management, and adverse events were from literature. The model estimated annual and cumulative costs, treated bleeds, and joint procedures over 20 years from EDZ introduction. RESULTS: Approximately 596 PwHB were eligible for EDZ. EDZ uptake was estimated to avert 11,282 bleeds and 64 joint procedures over 20 years. Although adopting EDZ resulted in an annual excess cost over years 1-5 (mean: $53 million annually, total $265 million), annual cost savings were achieved beginning in year 6 (mean: $172 million annually; total $2.58 billion in years 6-20). The total cumulative 20-year cost savings was $2.32 billion, with cumulative cost savings beginning in year 8. CONCLUSION: Introducing EDZ to treat PwHB is expected to result in cost savings and patient benefit over 20 years. Initiating PwHB on EDZ sooner can produce greater and earlier savings and additional bleeds avoided. These results may be a conservative estimate of the full value of EDZ, as PwHB would continue to accrue savings beyond 20 years.
This analysis assessed the long-term clinical and financial impact of introducing EDZ in the United States of America for people with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B. A decision-analytic model was developed comparing a scenario with EDZ and one without EDZ over 20 years. Introducing EDZ would avert 11,292 bleeds and 64 joint procedures over 20 years and would achieve cumulative cost savings in year 8, with a total cumulative 20-year cost saving of $2.32 billion.
Subject(s)
Factor IX , Hemophilia B , Humans , Hemophilia B/drug therapy , Hemophilia B/economics , United States , Factor IX/economics , Factor IX/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/economics , Genetic Therapy/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Adult , Male , Child , Young Adult , AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Etranacogene dezaparvovec is a recently approved gene therapy for people with hemophilia B (PwHB). Current standard of care is prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) to prevent bleeding. Etranacogene dezaparvovec increases blood FIX levels such that FIX prophylaxis could be eliminated. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budgetary impact of etranacogene dezaparvovec adoption and utilization in a commercial health plan of the United States. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to evaluate the introduction of etranacogene dezaparvovec to treat severe or moderately severe hemophilia B. The model considered a hypothetical 1-million-member plan over a 5-year horizon. FIX therapy prophylaxis use was estimated based on a weighted average of relevant brands using US market share data. A scenario of etranacogene dezaparvovec adoption/utilization was compared with one without etranacogene dezaparvovec utilization. Two etranacogene dezaparvovec uptake (market share growth) analyses were performed: one with gradual uptake and alternatively assuming all eligible PwHB received etranacogene dezaparvovec in year 1. The one-time cost of etranacogene dezaparvovec was assumed to be $3.5 million. Other costs (FIX prophylaxis, disease monitoring, bleed management, and adverse events) were estimated from published literature. All costs were in 2022 US dollars. Bleed and adverse event rates were sourced from the HOPE-B trial comparing etranacogene dezaparvovec to previous FIX therapy prophylaxis. The model estimated annual and per-member per-month costs over 5 years. Secondary analyses were performed considering a 10-year horizon. RESULTS: In the 1-million-member health plan, an estimated 1.8 PwHB were eligible for treatment with etranacogene dezaparvovec. Gradual uptake of etranacogene dezaparvovec resulted in cumulative 5-year budget impact of $848,509 compared with a scenario without etranacogene dezaparvovec. In years 1-5, the incremental annual and per-member per-month costs ranged from $79,824 to $271,435 and from $0.007 to $0.023, respectively. In the alternative uptake analysis, etranacogene dezaparvovec became cost saving annually beginning in year 2 and cumulatively beginning in year 5, for a 5-year savings of $754,844. Secondary analyses over 10 years found both uptake analyses cost saving. Other scenarios considered did not affect results substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing etranacogene dezaparvovec as treatment for PwHB would have a modest budget increase within 5 years after treatment but may become cost saving if all eligible PwHB were treated in year 1. Initiating PwHB on etranacogene dezaparvovec sooner may produce greater overall savings and earlier annual savings. Etranacogene dezaparvovec is a treatment option that may provide overall cost savings for US commercial health plans, which would increase as the plan size increases.
Subject(s)
Budgets , Factor IX , Hemophilia B , United States , Humans , Hemophilia B/economics , Hemophilia B/drug therapy , Hemophilia B/therapy , Factor IX/economics , Factor IX/therapeutic use , Genetic Therapy/economics , Genetic Therapy/methods , Models, Economic , Cost-Benefit AnalysisABSTRACT
Hemophilia B (HB) is a rare, hereditary disease caused by a defect in the gene encoding factor IX (FIX) and leads to varying degrees of coagulation deficiency. The prevailing treatment for people with HB (PWHB) is FIX replacement product. The advent of recombinant coagulation products ushered in a new era of safety, efficacy, and improved availability compared with plasma-derived products. For people with severe HB, lifelong prophylaxis with a FIX replacement product is standard of care. Development of extended half-life FIX replacement products has allowed for advancements in the care of these PWHB. Nonetheless, lifelong need for periodic dosing and complex surveillance protocols pose substantive challenges in terms of access, adherence, and healthcare resource utilization. Further, some PWHB on prophylactic regimens continue to experience breakthrough bleeds and joint damage, and subpopulations of PWHB, including women, those with mild-to-moderate HB, and those with inhibitors to FIX, experience additional unique difficulties. This review summarizes the current challenges faced by PWHB, including the unique subpopulations; identifying the need for improved awareness, personalized care strategies, and new therapeutic options for severe HB, which may provide future solutions for some of the remaining unmet needs of PWHB.
Subject(s)
Hemophilia A , Hemophilia B , Female , Humans , Hemophilia B/drug therapy , Factor IX/genetics , Factor IX/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Blood CoagulationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Congenital hemophilia B is a rare bleeding disorder caused by defects in the gene encoding factor IX (FIX) leading to coagulation deficiency. Recurrent bleeds may cause chronic pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Phase 2 b and 3 single-arm, open-label, single-dose trials assessing etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy for hemophilia B have demonstrated sustained FIX activity levels over observed periods, but long-term durability of the treatment effect has not been established. Using statistical modeling, we estimate long-term durability of FIX activity levels after receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec. METHODS: Participants from Phase 2 b (N = 3; NCT03489291) and 3 studies (N = 52; NCT03569891) were included. Two participants who did not respond to treatment were excluded. FIX activity was assessed by one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time assay. FIX activity levels at Month 6 post-treatment were considered baseline. Bayesian and Frequentist linear mixed models predicted FIX activity levels up to 25.5 years at an individual and population level with pre-treatment adeno-associated virus 5 (AAV5) neutralizing antibody (NAb) status as primary covariate. RESULTS: Bayesian and Frequentist linear mixed models predicted no more than 6/55 (10.91%) observed participants would have FIX activity levels <2% up to 25.5 years post-infusion. Bayesian model-based predictions of future participants suggest >80% would be free from prophylactic FIX replacement products 25.5 years post-infusion. Both models predicted FIX activity levels were not significantly influenced by pre-treatment AAV5 NAb status. CONCLUSIONS: People with hemophilia B receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec would likely achieve durable FIX activity levels and remain free of prophylactic FIX replacement products for up to 25.5 years following single administration. The long-term factor IX durability predictions are based on statistical methods and results in vivo may differ.
Hemophilia B is a rare bleeding condition where blood does not clot properly, causing excessive bleeding. It is caused by a change or mutation to a gene, leading to lower-than-normal levels of a clotting factor, called factor IX. Standard treatment involves replacing missing factor IX through lifelong, regular treatment with factor replacement products. Etranacogene dezaparvovec is a gene therapy developed to replace the faulty gene and increase factor IX activity levels in the blood, thereby reducing bleeding, after one treatment. In clinical trials of etranacogene dezaparvovec, people with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B had stable and long-lasting increases in factor IX activity levels that reached near to the normal range seen in people without hemophilia B.The purpose of this study was to predict whether these increases in factor IX activity levels will last over an extended period of time after receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec.Mathematical predictions showed less than 11% of clinical trial participants would have unacceptable factor IX activity levels (less than 2%) up to 25.5 years after receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec. Further predictions of potential future people with hemophilia B showed that over 80% would not need treatment with factor replacement products 25.5 years after receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec.The goal of treatment is to increase factor IX activity levels into the near-to-normal range in people with hemophilia B and therefore decrease or eliminate bleeding. These results suggest people with hemophilia B receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec would have long-lasting factor IX activity levels and would not need regular factor replacement products for up to 25.5 years following a single treatment of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
Subject(s)
Factor IX , Hemophilia B , Humans , Factor IX/genetics , Factor IX/therapeutic use , Hemophilia B/genetics , Hemophilia B/therapy , Quality of Life , Bayes Theorem , Genetic TherapyABSTRACT
The efficacy and safety of rivipansel, a predominantly E-selectin antagonist, were studied in a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial for vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) requiring hospitalization (RESET). A total of 345 subjects (204 adults and 141 children) were randomized and 320 were treated (162 with rivipansel, 158 with placebo) with an IV loading dose, followed by up to 14 additional 12-hourly maintenance doses of rivipansel or placebo, in addition to standard care. Rivipansel was similarly administered during subsequent VOCs in the Open-label Extension (OLE) study. In the full analysis population, the median time to readiness for discharge (TTRFD), the primary end point, was not different between rivipansel and placebo (-5.7 hours, P = .79; hazard ratio, 0.97), nor were differences seen in secondary end points of time to discharge (TTD), time to discontinuation of IV opioids (TTDIVO), and cumulative IV opioid use. Mean soluble E-selectin decreased 61% from baseline after the loading dose in the rivipansel group, while remaining unchanged in the placebo group. In a post hoc analysis, early rivipansel treatment within 26.4 hours of VOC pain onset (earliest quartile of time from VOC onset to treatment) reduced median TTRFD by 56.3 hours, reduced median TTD by 41.5 hours, and reduced median TTDIVO by 50.5 hours, compared with placebo (all P < .05). A similar subgroup analysis comparing OLE early-treatment with early-treatment RESET placebo showed a reduction in TTD of 23.1 hours (P = .062) and in TTDIVO of 30.1 hours (P = .087). Timing of rivipansel administration after pain onset may be critical to achieving accelerated resolution of acute VOC. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02187003 (RESET), NCT02433158 (OLE).
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Hemoglobinopathies , Volatile Organic Compounds , Adult , Child , Humans , E-Selectin/therapeutic use , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anemia, Sickle Cell/drug therapy , Volatile Organic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Double-Blind MethodABSTRACT
Hemophilia A and B are rare, X-linked bleeding disorders resulting from a partial or total deficiency of functionally active coagulation factor VIII or factor IX, respectively. Endogenous factor levels have traditionally been used to characterize the severity of the disorder, with severe hemophilia considered as circulating levels of factor less than 1% of normal. Identifying patients with severe hemophilia is essential to effective treatment, since these patients are at highest risk of spontaneous life or limb-threatening bleeding and disability resulting from repeated joint bleeding and are most likely to benefit from prophylaxis. However, there is variability in bleeding tendency, even among patients with severe hemophilia. This article will review potential modifiers of hemophilia-associated bleeding other than endogenous factor activity, which may influence bleeding tendencies and complications in hemophilic patients considered to have severe hemophilia. These potential modifiers include physiologic factors, such as elements of the hemostatic system; pathophysiologic factors, such as hemophilic arthropathy, associated inflammation, and angiogenesis; and others, such as seasonal variation, body weight, and physical activity.
Subject(s)
Hemophilia A/physiopathology , Hemorrhage/blood , Hemophilia A/blood , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: SCD is characterized by hemolysis and oxidative stress, resulting in endothelial dysfunction (EDF). Peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT), a noninvasive technology for measuring EDF, utilizes reactive hyperemia following mini-ischemic stress (reactive hyperemia index or RHI). METHODS: The authors studied PAT in 36 SCD children to determine the influence of hemoglobin genotype and treatment on EDF. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Blunted RHI was seen in the majority of children with SCD, especially with increased symptomatology (1.53 and 1.71; p value .032). RHI was not normal in children on chronic transfusion or hydroxyurea. RHI correlated with reticulocyte fraction (Spearman r = -.47, p = .037). PAT merits further exploration as a measure of EDF in SCD.