Where is the nerve? Review of operation note documentation practice for inguinal hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: Careful identification and management of inguinal nerves during inguinal hernia repair is important to avoid iatrogenic injury. Documentation of this practice may inform postoperative clinical management. We set out to investigate how often surgeons identify inguinal nerves and document findings and management in their operation notes. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective review of operation notes at a single district general hospital. We analysed operation notes for documentation of identification and intraoperative management (preservation or sacrifice) of the inguinal nerves (iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, genital branch of genitofemoral nerve). We collected data on the baseline characteristics of the patients, hernia characteristics and primary operating surgeons for subgroup analysis. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. Identification of any inguinal nerves (generic 'nerve') was documented in 17% of operation notes. Documentation in the operation notes of named individual nerves was limited. No documentation of intraoperative management of inguinal nerves was found in 83% of operation notes. Preservation of the inguinal nerves (generic 'nerve') was recorded in 8% and sacrifice recorded in 9% of cases. Subgroup analysis revealed similar incidence of documentation of identification and management of inguinal nerves across grades of primary surgeon, with overall incidence low for all grades. CONCLUSION: This study reveals a lack of appreciation of the importance of documenting identification and management of inguinal nerves in operation notes. Further consideration of the potential implications of poor documentation would be beneficial to improve standards.

Chronic groin pain following open inguinal hernia repair: has consenting practice improved?

INTRODUCTION: Chronic groin pain following inguinal hernia surgery is a common and potentially debilitating complication, and yet patients are infrequently informed of this risk. This leaves surgeons open to negligence claims, especially given recent changes to case law, which for the first time highlighted the need for a more patient-centred approach to risk disclosure. We investigated how these changes have influenced our consenting practice with respect to the disclosure of this risk. METHODS: We compared how often surgeons discussed the risk of chronic groin pain with adults undergoing elective open unilateral inguinal hernia mesh repairs in 2019 and 2009. The first 50 patients in each of these two years were retrospectively compared. Discussions during the initial consultation and on the day of surgery were assessed by reviewing clinic letters, medical notes and consent forms. FINDINGS: The risk of chronic pain was discussed with significantly more patients in 2019 than in 2009 (96% v 54%, p<0.0001). Most of these discussions occurred on the day of surgery (92% v 54%, p<0.0001). Only a few patients had these discussions during their initial consultation (18% v 4%, p<0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Discussing the risk of chronic groin pain has improved significantly over the past 10 years. However, these discussions occur mostly on the day of surgery, which gives patients very little time to weigh up the risk. This potentially invalidates the consent they give for surgery. Patients should be given an opportunity to discuss their operative risks in advance of their operation.

Transanal evisceration of small bowel in two patients with chronic rectal prolapse: case presentation and literature review.

There are fewer than 100 documented cases of transanal small bowel evisceration in the literature. We report two cases of this rare surgical emergency in an 84-year old man and a 79-year old woman. Both patients required urgent laparotomy, resection of ischaemic bowel and transabdominal resection of the rectal defect with colostomy. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Rare imaging and clinical photography are shared to highlight the extreme nature of this condition. We identified 38 relevant cases of reported bowel evisceration through our literature review. Most patients were elderly women with untreated rectal prolapse. Gynaecological comorbidity was another risk factor. The aetiological mechanism is suspected to stem from chronic ischaemic insult to the rectal wall, resulting in thinning and subsequent perforation. Surgical management may consist of primary suture repair of the rectal tear, or a Hartmann's procedure. Timely intervention is essential to minimise patient morbidity and mortality.