ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Parkinson's disease (PD) hampers visual search tasks such as reading, driving, and navigation. We examined expectations from past experiences, guiding cognition and contextual priors, on visual search in PD. METHODS: We compared eye movements as PD and healthy participants searched for a hidden object (target) in cluttered real-world scenes. RESULTS: PD participants prolonged fixation on high-probability (high-prior) locations for the target, consistent across expected and unexpected scenario. Such emphasis on contextual visual priors, evidenced by high fixation duration on high-probability areas, was beneficial when the target was at the expected location but presented challenges when the target was situated in an unlikely place. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to understanding how PD impacts visual search behavior and cognitive processing. The findings indicate that PD alters attention allocation and visual processing by affecting the utilization of contextual visual priors. It provides insights for potential interventions targeting visuo-cognitive deficits in PD patients. Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Reading is a vision-reliant task, requiring sequential eye movements. Binocularly discordant input results in visual sensory and oculomotor dysfunction in amblyopia, which may contribute to reading difficulties. This study aims to determine the contributions of fixation eye movement (FEM) abnormalities, clinical type and severity of amblyopia to reading performance under binocular and monocular viewing conditions. METHODS: Twenty-three amblyopic patients and nine healthy controls were recruited. Eye movements elicited during fixation and reading of preselected passages were collected for each subject using infrared video-oculography. Subjects were classified as having no nystagmus (n = 9), fusion maldevelopment nystagmus (FMN, n = 5), or nystagmus without structural anomalies that does not meet criteria for FMN or infantile nystagmus (n = 9). Reading rate (words/min), the number of forward and regressive saccades (per 100 words) and fixation duration (s) were computed. RESULTS: Amblyopic patients with and without nystagmus exhibited greater vergence and fixation instability. In patients without nystagmus, the instability arises from increased amplitude and velocity of fast and slow FEMs respectively. Amblyopic patients with and without nystagmus exhibited lower reading speeds with increased fixation duration, regressive and progressive saccades than controls in all viewing conditions. Mixed etiology, greater amblyopic eye visual acuity and stereopsis deficits were associated with greater reading difficulties under binocular viewing. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of oculomotor dysfunction and the extent of visual acuity and stereoacuity deficits contribute to reading difficulties in patients with amblyopia, with and without nystagmus. The understanding of reading difficulties is essential to devise accommodations to limit long-term academic and vocational consequences of amblyopia.
Subject(s)
Amblyopia , Dyslexia , Nystagmus, Pathologic , Ocular Motility Disorders , Humans , Amblyopia/complications , Dyslexia/complications , Eye Movements , SaccadesABSTRACT
Microsaccades shift the image on the fovea and counteract visual fading. They also serve as an optimal sampling strategy while viewing complex visual scenes. Microsaccade production relies on the amount of retinal error or acuity demand of a visual task. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of blur induced by uncorrected refractive error on visual search. Eye movements were recorded in fourteen healthy subjects with uncorrected and corrected refractive error while they performed a) visual fixation b) blankscene viewing c) visual search (spot the difference) tasks. Microsaccades, saccades, correctly identified differences and reaction times were analyzed. The frequency of microsaccades and correctly identified differences were lower in the uncorrected refractive error during visual search. No similar change in microsaccades was seen during blank-scene viewing and gaze holding tasks. These findings suggest that visual blur, hence the precision of an image on the fovea, has an important role in calibrating the amplitude of microsaccades during visual scanning.