Delivery of Cancer Care in Ontario, Canada, During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted cancer systems worldwide. Quantifying the changes is critical to informing the delivery of care while the pandemic continues, as well as for system recovery and future pandemic planning. Objective: To quantify change in the delivery of cancer services across the continuum of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study assessed cancer screening, imaging, diagnostic, treatment, and psychosocial oncological care services delivered in pediatric and adult populations in Ontario, Canada (population 14.7 million), from April 1, 2019, to March 1, 2021. Data were analyzed from May 1 to July 31, 2021. Exposures: COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cancer service volumes from the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, defined as April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, were compared with volumes during a prepandemic period of April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020. Results: During the first year of the pandemic, there were a total of 4 476 693 cancer care services, compared with 5 644 105 services in the year prior, a difference of 20.7% fewer services of cancer care, representing a potential backlog of 1 167 412 cancer services. While there were less pronounced changes in systemic treatments, emergency and urgent imaging examinations (eg, 1.9% more parenteral systemic treatments) and surgical procedures (eg, 65% more urgent surgical procedures), major reductions were observed for most services beginning in March 2020. Compared with the year prior, during the first pandemic year, cancer screenings were reduced by 42.4% (-1 016 181 screening tests), cancer treatment surgical procedures by 14.1% (-8020 procedures), and radiation treatment visits by 21.0% (-141 629 visits). Biopsies to confirm cancer decreased by up to 41.2% and surgical cancer resections by up to 27.8% during the first pandemic wave. New consultation volumes also decreased, such as for systemic treatment (-8.2%) and radiation treatment (-9.3%). The use of virtual cancer care increased for systemic treatment and radiation treatment and psychosocial oncological care visits, increasing from 0% to 20% of total new or follow-up visits prior to the pandemic up to 78% of total visits in the first pandemic year. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, large reductions in cancer service volumes were observed. While most services recovered to prepandemic levels at the end of the first pandemic year, a substantial care deficit likely accrued. The anticipated downstream morbidity and mortality associated with this deficit underscore the urgent need to address the backlog and recover cancer care and warrant further study.

The Educational Utility of Blogging for MRI Technologists.

INTRODUCTION: The value of a blog as an educational tool is thought to be underestimated by health care professionals. This research aimed to explore the MRI educational utility of blogs, and to determine who was participating in writing those blogs. It was hoped that this research would increase awareness of alternative education formats that would be useful for MRI technologists. METHODS: Between March and April of 2017, an online blog search was performed using MRI-related keywords. Strict exclusion criteria were then applied. Two coders independently used lean coding to analyse selected blog posts and organized the codes into themes. Data were tested for intercoder reliability. RESULTS: Researchers analysed 39 posts from 9 blogs and identified the following themes: focus on MRI techniques and technologies, knowledge dissemination, sharing of experience, collaborative learning, authorship, and informal writing. Bloggers, self-identified as practitioners or scholars, communicated about research projects and used an informal writing style. Evidence of intentional teaching of MRI-specific content and sharing of professional and personal experiences was found. Communication between authors and readers from most of the MRI professions was observed, with the exception of MRI technologists. CONCLUSIONS: This research found that MRI-related blogs provide a credible and accessible forum for the sharing and discussion of knowledge, experiences, and ideas. Although many MRI professionals author blogs, MRI technologists do not seem to participate in this form of communication. As social media gains in popularity within the medical radiation technologist profession, it is hoped that more MRI technologists will make use of blogging to facilitate learning, collaboration, and communication.