ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether ESWT with a higher energy as an add-on therapy to vacuum-pump followed by manipulation exercises could reduce the penile curvature, pain and improve IIEF-5 score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men aged >18 and <80 years and diagnosed with PD in stable phase with no history of penile surgery or previous ESWT treatment were eligible to participate. They were randomised to either active ESWT (n = 16) or sham ESWT (n = 16). Both groups were treated once a week for five weeks. Each treatment session consisted of 2000 shockwaves at 0.5mJ/mm2. All patients in both groups used a vacuum pump followed by manipulation exercises. RESULTS: Thirty men completed the study protocol. Mean age in the treatment group was 61.7 (SD 8.3) and 63 (SD 7.35) in the control group. After six months, mean change in penile curvature was -12.8 (SD 13) degrees in the treatment group and -6.6 (SD 8.9) in the control group (p = 0.204). Mean IIEF-5 score decreased by 0.17 (SD 3) in the treatment group and 3.06 (SD 5.5) in the control group (p = 0.086) at six-month follow-up. Pain was assessed using both VAS and PDQ and demonstrated no difference between the groups after six months (p = 0.648). CONCLUSION: In the treatment group, we observed a greater but non-significant change in penile curvature and no adverse effects.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have indicated that low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) may improve male erectile dysfunction (ED) of vascular aetiology. AIM: To investigate penile rehabilitation of Li-ESWT in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in men with ED following robotic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: Included were men with ED following nerve-sparing RP with a score <22 in the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. Participants were divided into an active A (n = 20) and a placebo/sham B group (n = 18). They were randomized consecutively upon study entry. Each study arm had one treatment a week for 5 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sexual outcomes were assessed by international validated questionnaires, Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and IIEF-5 at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 38 (n = 38) participants were enrolled; there were no dropouts. A significant increase was observed in IIEF-5 and EHS in group A at both 4 and 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, the mean IIEF-5 score had increased by 3.45 points (P = .026), while the mean EHS score had increased by 0.5 points (P= .019). CONCLUSION: This randomized study indicates that Li-ESWT for ED in men undergone RP might be effective and safe. However, further and more robust research is needed before Li-ESWT can be characterized as a reliable treatment modality. Ladegaard PBJ, Mortensen J, Skov-Jeppesen SM, et al. Erectile Dysfunction A Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (LI-ESWT) in Men With Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy. Sex Med 2021;9:100338.
ABSTRACT
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a novel treatment modality to stimulate tissue regeneration and anti-fibrosis. In this review, we summarise the use of ESWT for erectile dysfunction (ED), diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), Peyronie's disease (PD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and scleroderma. Several randomised clinical trials demonstrate the efficacy of ESWT for vasculogenic ED and DFU, and ESWT may also relieve pain in patients with PD. ESWT is still experimental for CKD and scleroderma. In general, ESWT is associated with few and mild adverse effects.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Erectile Dysfunction , Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy , Penile Induration , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Erectile Dysfunction/therapy , Humans , Male , Penile Induration/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
To monitor wound healing, it is essential to obtain accurate and reliable wound measurements. Various methods have been used to measure wound size including three-dimensional (3D) measurement devices enabling wound assessment from a volume perspective. However, the currently available methods are inaccurate, costly, or complicated to use. As a consequence, we have developed a 3D-wound assessment monitor (WAM) camera, which is able to measure wound size in three-dimension and to assess wound characteristics. The aim of the study was to assess the intrarater and interrater reliability of the 3D wound measurements using the 3D camera and to compare these with traditional measurement methods. Four raters measured 48 wounds using the 3D camera, digital imaging method (2D area), and gel injection into the wound cavity (volume). The data were analyzed using linear mixed effect model. Intraclass and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess intrarater and interrater reliability for the 3D camera and agreement between the methods. The Bland-Altman plots for intrarater reliability showed minor differences between the measurements, especially the 3D area and perimeter measurements. Moreover, ICCs were very high for both the intrarater and interrater reliability for the 2D area, 3D area, and perimeter measurements (ICCs > 0.99), although slightly lower for the volume measurements (ICC = 0.946-0.950). Finally, a high agreement was found between the 3D camera and the traditional methods (2D area and volume) assessed by narrow 95% prediction intervals and high ICCs above 0.97. In conclusion, the 3D-WAM camera is an accurate and reliable method, which is useful for several types of wounds. However, the volume measurements were primarily useful in large, deep wounds. Moreover, the 3D images are based on digital technology and therefore carry the possibility for use in remote settings.
