Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Infect ; 89(2): 106212, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960102

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify specific anaerobic bacteria causing bacteraemia and a subsequent diagnosis of colorectal cancer. METHODS: A nationwide population-based cohort study, which included all episodes of defined specific anaerobic bacteraemia from 2010 (5,534,738 inhabitants) through 2020 (5,822,763 inhabitants) and all cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed from 2010 through 2021 in Denmark. We calculated the incidence and risk of colorectal cancer after bacteraemia with specific anaerobic bacteria using Escherichia coli bacteraemia as reference. RESULTS: Nationwide data on colorectal cancer and specific anaerobic bacteraemia (100% complete, representing 11,124 episodes). The frequencies of colorectal cancer within one year following anaerobic bacteraemia were higher for species, which almost exclusively reside in the colon, such as Phocaeicola vulgatus/dorei (5.5%), Clostridium septicum (24.2%), and Ruminococcus gnavus (4.6%) compared to 0.6% in 50,650 E. coli bacteraemia episodes. Bacteroides spp. had a subhazard ratio for colorectal cancer of 3.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0 to 5.1) and for Clostridium spp. it was 8.9 (95% CI, 6.7 to 11.8, with C. septicum 50.0 [95% CI, 36.0 to 69.5]) compared to E. coli (reference). CONCLUSION: This nationwide study identified specific colorectal cancer-associated anaerobic bacteria, which almost exclusively reside in the colon. Bacteraemia with these bacteria could be an indicator of colorectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Bacteria, Anaerobic , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Denmark/epidemiology , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/microbiology , Bacteria, Anaerobic/isolation & purification , Cohort Studies , Male , Female , Incidence , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Adult
2.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 13(1): 2309969, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258968

ABSTRACT

The emergence of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) has caused concern. Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether these types are associated with an excess risk of severe outcomes when compared with infections caused by vancomycin-susceptible Enterococci (VSE). This cohort study included hospitalized patients in Denmark with Enterococcus faecium-positive blood cultures collected between 2010 and 2019 identified in the Danish Microbiology Database. We estimated 30-day hazard ratio (HR) of death or discharge among VRE compared to VSE patients adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidity. The cohort included 6071 patients with E. faecium BSI (335 VRE, 5736 VSE) among whom VRE increased (2010-13, 2.6%; 2014-16, 6.3%; 2017-19; 9.4%). Mortality (HR 1.08, 95%CI 0.90-1.29; 126 VRE, 37.6%; 2223 VSE, 37.0%) or discharge (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.75-1.06; 126 VRE, 37.6%; 2386 VSE, 41.6%) was not different between VRE and VSE except in 2014 (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.18-2.96). There was no interaction between time from admission to BSI (1-2, 3-14, and >14 days) and HR of death (P = 0.14) or discharge (P = 0.45) after VRE compared to VSE, despite longer time for VRE patients (17 vs. 10 days for VSE, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, VRE BSI was not associated with excess morbidity and mortality. The excess mortality in 2014 only may be attributed to improved diagnostic- and patient-management practices after 2014, reducing time to appropriate antibiotic therapy. The high level of mortality after E. faecium BSI warrants further study.


Subject(s)
Enterococcus faecium , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections , Sepsis , Humans , Vancomycin , Cohort Studies , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Enterococcus , Morbidity , Denmark/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL