Risk of deterministic effects during endovascular aortic stent graft implantation.

Since the 1990s, stent graft implantation for aortic pathology has become an alternative to extensive surgical procedures in some patients. Indeed, many patients with such pathology are now treated endovascularly. Only limited data concerning the risk of a deterministic effect during aortic stent graft implantation are available Accordingly, 179 consecutive patients treated in our institute between October 2002 and July 2008 with endovascular aortic stent grafts were included in this study. Dosimetric data (kerma area product (KAP) and cumulative dose at the interventional reference point (CD(irp))) from radiograph reports were analysed for 172 patients. On a group of 19 patients, GAFCHROMIC XR type dosimetric films were also used to verify the automatic measurements. Readings from the integrated KAP meter were found to be too high and were therefore corrected - KAP to dose area product (DAP) and CD(irp) to entrance skin dose (ESD). Median DAP was 153 Gy cm² (35-700 Gy cm²) and median ESD was 0.44 Gy (0.12-2.73 Gy). Recorded dosimetric quantities were found to be good predictors of the skin dose and highlighted 4 patients (2.3%) who received skin doses that might cause possible deterministic effects. Endovascular stent graft implantation is less invasive than a surgical procedure and is widely used; mid-term results are encouraging. In a small number of patients, deterministic effects can occur even in departments with well-trained staff. Operators should inform the patients of possible skin injury after receiving high doses of ionising radiation and proper support must be available should that occur.

Patient peak skin doses from cardiac interventional procedures.

Interventional cardiac procedures not only lead to significant effective doses for the patient but also can potentially cause deterministic effects on the patient's skin. Information about the peak (maximal) skin doses (PSD) received by patients during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures were collected from three cardiac catheter rooms. Cumulative dose at the interventional reference point (CD(IRP)) was collected for 161 patients and for 16 patients PSD was determined using Gafchromic dosimetry films. The comparison showed that CD(IRP) readings give a useful but conservative estimation of patient peak skin dose as it can lead to a significant overestimation. The median and third quartile values of CD(IRP) were 0.64 and 0.92 Gy, respectively. The 2 Gy threshold for deterministic effects was exceeded in nine patients. A good correlation was found between CD(IRP) and kerma area product measurements while the correlation with fluorography time was very weak.

Is digital better in dental radiography?

In Slovenia, dental radiography was the first field in which projection x-ray imaging using digital detectors was done. At present around 30% of intraoral dental x-ray units use digital detectors. Annual test results were analysed to compare digital systems with film-based ones. The survey results show significantly lower doses of exposure in digital systems. In our opinion digital systems are especially suitable for practitioners who perform a low number of x-ray examinations (e.g. private dentists), because of problems that may arise due to developing a limited number of films. The problem with digital systems could be the ease of deleting an image and performing another examination, the extent of which was not investigated.