Relationship of the 1846G > A Polymorphism of the CYP2D6 Gene to the Equilibrium Concentration Levels of Haloperidol in Patients with Acute Alcoholic Hallucinosis.

Haloperidol is currently used in addictology for the treatment of acute psychotic disorders, including acute alcoholic hallucinosis. The use of haloperidol is often accompanied by the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). There is evidence that CYP2D6 isoenzyme is involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the relationship of 1846G > A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene to the equilibrium concentration levels of haloperidol in patients with acute alcoholic hallucinosis. Material and Methods: The study was conducted on 100 male patients with acute alcoholic hallucinosis (mean age 41.4 ± 14.4 years). The efficacy profile was evaluated using the PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) scale. The safety of therapy was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale and the SAS (Simpson-Angus Scale for Extrapyramidal Symptoms) scale. Genotyping was performed using the real-time polymerase chain reaction (Real-time PCR). Equilibrium plasma concentration levels of haloperidol were investigated using the high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (HPLC with MS/MS). Results: No statistically significant results were obtained during the therapy efficacy assessment (dynamics of the PANSS score: GG genotype (-13.00 [-16.00; -16.00; -11.00]), GA genotype (-15.00 [-16.75; -13.00], p = 0.728). There was a statistically significant difference in safety assessment scores (dynamics of the UKU score: GG genotype (8.00 [7.00; 10.00]), GA genotype (15.00 [9.25; 18.00], p < 0.001); dynamics of the SAS score: GG genotype (11.00 [9.00; 14.00]), GA genotype (14.50 [12.00; 18.00], p < 0.001). The pharmacokinetic study results showed a statistically significant difference: GG (3.13 [2.32; 3.95]), GA (3.89 [2.92; 5.26], p = 0.010). Thus, a study conducted on a group of 100 patients with acute alcoholic hallucinosis demonstrated an association between the 1846G > A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene (rs3892097) and the safety profile of haloperidol therapy. We also revealed the presence of statistically significant difference in the equilibrium concentration levels of haloperidol in patients with the GG and AG genotypes. Conclusion: It can be concluded that patients with the GA genotype have a higher risk of ADRs compared to patients carrying the GG genotype. It is shown that 1846G > A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene (rs3892097) has a statistically significant effect on the equilibrium concentration levels of haloperidol.

Consequences of 1,4-Butanediol Misuse: A Review.

Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), along with its precursors, 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD) and gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), are potent central depressant agents widely illicitly used for their euphoric and relaxant effects. The article presents a review of the literature on the 1,4-BD misuse, the clinical picture of intoxication, development of addiction and delirium. The available evidence shows that 1,4-BD is a substance with its own psychoactive effects, a high addiction potential and potentially severe withdrawal symptoms.

Relationship of CYP3A4*1B Single Nucleotide Polymorphism to the Efficiency and Safety Profiles of Haloperidol in Patients Enduring Acute Alcoholic Hallucinosis.

To date, haloperidol has been widely used to treat patients with acute alcoholic hallucinosis. There is strong evidence that haloperidol therapy is commonly associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The 392A > G polymorphism of the CYP3A4*1B gene (rs2740574) is known to affect the metabolism rates of haloperidol; hence it correlates with both therapy efficacy and safety parameters. Objective: The study objective was to investigate the effect of 392A > G polymorphism of the CYP3A4*1B gene (rs2740574) on the efficacy and safety profiles of haloperidol in patients with acute alcoholic hallucinosis. Methods: This study enrolled 100 male patients suffering from acute alcoholic hallucinosis (mean age 41.4 ± 14.4 years). The efficacy profile of haloperidol was assessed using the PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) validated psychometric scale. The safety profile of therapy was assessed with the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale and the SAS (Simpson-Angus Scale for Extrapyramidal Symptoms) scale. Genotyping was performed using the real-time polymerase chain reaction (Real-time PCR). Results: There were no statistically significant results for the efficacy rates (dynamics of the PANSS score: AA genotype -14.00 [-16.00; -12.00], AG genotype -13.00 [-14.00; -10.50], p = 0.306). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in the safety profiles (dynamics of the UKU score: AA genotype - 9.00 [7.00; 13.00], AG genotype - 8.50 [7.25; 10.50], p = 0.620; dynamics of the SAS score: AA genotype -12.00 [10.00; 16.75], AG genotype - 10.00 [10.00; 12.25], p = 0.321). Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the 392A > G polymorphism of the CYP3A4*1B gene (rs2740574) in patients with acute alcoholic hallucinosis does not affect the efficacy and safety rates of haloperidol therapy.

Association of CYP2D6*4 Polymorphism with the Steady-State Concentration of Haloperidol in Patients with Alcohol-Induced Psychotic Disorders.

Background: CYP2D6 subfamily isoenzymes play an important role in the biotransformation of haloperidol, and their activity may influence the efficacy and safety of haloperidol. The use of haloperidol is often associated with the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as dyskinesia, acute dystonia, and orthostatic hypotension. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between the CYP2D6*4 genetic polymorphism and CYP2D6 activity, as well as haloperidol efficacy and safety rates. Purpose: To evaluate the association of CYP2D6*4 genetic polymorphism with the steady-state concentration of haloperidol in patients with acute alcohol-induced psychotic disorders (AIPDs). Material and methods: The study involved 100 male patients with AIPD (average age 41.4 ± 14.4 years) who received haloperidol by injections in a dose of 5-10 mg/day. The efficacy profile was assessed using a validated psychometric PANSS scale (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale). Therapy safety was assessed using the internationally validated UKU (Side-Effect Rating Scale) and SAS (Simpson-Angus Scale for Extrapyramidal Symptoms) scales. Genotyping was performed with the real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: We revealed the statistically significant results in terms of therapy safety evaluation (dynamics of the UKU scores: (GG) 8.00 [7.00; 10.00], (GA) 15.0 [9.25; 18.0], p < 0.001; dynamics of the SAS scores: (GG) 11.0 [9.0; 14.0], (GA) 14.50 [12.0; 18.0], p < 0.001. Pharmacokinetic study showed a statistically significant difference across the groups with different genotypes: (GG) 3.13 [2.32; 3.95], (GA) 3.89 [2.92; 5.26], p = 0.010. Conclusion: It can be concluded that patients with the GA genotype have a higher risk of ADRs compared to patients who carry the GG genotype. It was shown that CYP2D6*4 genetic polymorphism has a statistically significant effect on the steady-state concentration of haloperidol.

Correlation of 1846G>A Polymorphism of CYP2D6 Gene with Haloperidol Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Alcoholic Hallucinoses.

Background: Previous studies have shown that haloperidol biotransformation occurs with participation of the CYP2D6 isoenzyme. The CYP2D6 gene is highly polymorphic, which may contribute to differences in its activity and in the haloperidol biotransformation rates across different individuals, resulting in variable drug efficacy and safety profiles. Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the correlation of the 1846G> A polymorphism of CYP2D6 gene with the efficacy and safety rates of haloperidol in patients with alcoholic hallucinoses. Material and methods: One hundred male patients received 5-10 mg/day haloperidol by injections for 5 days. The efficacy and safety assessments were performed using the validated psychometric scales PANSS, UKU, and SAS. For genotyping, the real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed. Results: We revealed no statistically significant results in terms of haloperidol efficacy in patients with different genotypes (dynamics of the PANSS scores: (GG) -13.00 [-16.00; -11.00], (GA) -15.00 [-16.75; -13.00], p = 0,728). Our findings revealed the statistically significant results in terms of treatment safety evaluation (dynamics of the UKU scores: (GG) 8.00 [7.00; 10.00], (GA) 15.0 [9.25; 18.0], p < 0.001; dynamics of the SAS scores: (GG) 11.0 [9.0; 14.0], (GA) 14.50 [12.0; 18.0], p < 0.001. Conclusion: These results suggest that genotyping for common CYP3A variants might have the potential to guide benzodiazepine withdrawal treatment. The effect of of the 1846G>A polymorphism of CYP2D6 gene on the safety profile of haloperidol was demonstrated in a group of 100 patients with alcoholic hallucinoses.

Influence of CYP2C19*17 Genetic Polymorphism on the Steady-State Concentration of Escitalopram in Patients with Recurrent Depressive Disorder.

Introduction: Escitalopram is commonly prescribed to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some of them do not show adequate response to treatment with escitalopram, while many of them experience adverse drug reactions. Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of -806C>T polymorphism of CYP2C19 (CYP2C19*17) on the concentration/dose ratio of escitalopram in patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Material and methods: Our study enrolled 267 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age -40.2 ± 16.4 years). Treatment regimen included escitalopram in an average daily dose of 12.5 ± 5.0 mg per day. The efficacy and safety rates of treatment were evaluated using the international psychometric scales. For genotyping, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. Results: Our findings revealed the statistically significant results in terms of both treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMD scores at the end of the treatment course): (CC) 9.0 [7.0; 11.0], (CT) 4.0 [2.0; 6.0] and (TT) 2.0 [1.0; 4.0], p < 0.001; and safety profile (the UKU scores): (CC) 7.0 [7.0; 8.0], (CT) 3.0 [3.0; 4.0] and (TT) 3.0 [2.0; 3.0], p < 0.001. We revealed no statistically significant results for the concentration/dose ratio of escitalopram in patients with different genotypes: (CC) 5.762 [3.939; 9.076], (CT) 5.714 [3.485; 8.533] and (TT) 7.388 [4.618; 10.167], p = 0.268). Conclusion: The CYP2C19*17 genetic variant significantly affected the efficacy and safety profiles of escitalopram in a group of 267 patients with recurrent depressive disorder but did not greatly affect its equilibrium plasma concentration.

Influence of Plasma Concentration of Hsa-Mir-370-3p and Cyp2d6*4 On Equilibrium Concentration of Phenazepam in Patients with Recurrent Depressive Disorder.

Introduction: Phenazepam is commonly administered to patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder. Some proportion of such patients do not show adequate response to treatment regimen containing phenazepam, whereas many of them experience type A adverse drug reactions. Previous studies showed that CYP2D6 IS involved in the biotransformation of phenazepam, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of 1846G>A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the concentration/dose indicator of phenazepam, using findings on enzymatic activity of CYP2D6 (as evaluated by the 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and on CYP2D6 expression level obtained by measuring the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from major depressive disorder. Material and methods: The study enrolled 191 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (age -40.0 ± 16.3 years). Treatment regimen included phenazepam in an average daily dose of 6.0 ± 2.3 mg per day. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the validated psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR Real-time). The activity of CYP2D6 was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6M-THBC/pinoline). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. Results: Our findings didn't reveal the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMA scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 6.0 [4.0; 8.0] and (GA) 6.0 [5.0; 7.8], p > 0.999; the statistical significance in the safety profile was not obtained (the UKU scores): (GG) 3.0 [2.0; 4.0] and (GA) 3.0 [3.0; 3.0], p > 0.999. We didn't reveal a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of phenazepam in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 0.812 [0.558; 1.348] and (GA) 0.931 [0.630; 1.271], p = 0.645). Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't show the statistically significant difference in the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma levels in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 22.5 [16.9; 29.8], (GA) 22.7 [15.7; 31.5], p = 0.695. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the phenazepam efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMA scale scores and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = -0.01, p = 0.866. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.07, p = 0.348. Also we did not reveal the relationship between the CYP2D6 enzymatic activity (as evaluated by 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = -0.14, p = 0.056. At the same time, correlation analysis did not reveal a statistically significant relationship between the phenazepam concentration and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = -0.05, p = 0.468. Conclusion: The effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of phenazepam was not demonstrated in a group of 191 patients with recurrent depressive disorder. At the same time, hsa-miR-370-3p does not remain a promising biomarker for assessing the level of CYP2D6 expression, because it does not correlate with encoded isoenzyme activity.

Impact of the Omics-Based Biomarkers on the Mirtazapine's Steady-State Concentration, Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Affective Disorders Comorbid with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Introduction: Mirtazapine is commonly administered to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some of these patients do not show adequate response to the therapy with mirtazapine, whereas many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Previous research revealed that CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of mirtazapine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, and 5-HTR2A genes on the concentration/dose indicator of mirtazapine and on the CYP3A expression level obtained by measuring the miR-27b plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from a recurrent depressive disorder. Material and Methods: Our study included 108 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age - 35.2 ± 15.1 years). The treatment regimen included mirtazapine in an average daily dose of 45.0 [30.0; 60.0] mg per week. Therapy efficacy was assessed using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP3A was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of the given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6b-HC/cortisol). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. Results: Our study didn't reveal any statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy and safety of the therapy. We also didn't reveal a statistical significance for the concentration/dose indicator of mirtazapine in patients with different genotypes. Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't demonstrate the statistically significant difference in the miR-27b plasma levels in patients with different genotypes. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the mirtazapine efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMD scale scores and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.2, p = 0.46. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.029, p = 0.93. In addition, we didn't reveal the relationship between the CYP3A enzymatic activity and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0,188, p = 0.85. However, the difference in the CYP3A enzymatic activity in carriers of AG and GG genotypes of the 6986A > G polymorphism of CYP3A5 gene has been revealed: (AG) 4.75 [1.28; 7.34] vs (GG) 8.83 [4.73; 13.62], p-value = 0.023. Conclusion: Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, 5-HTR2A gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of mirtazapine was not demonstrated in a group of 108 patients with depressive disorder and alcohol use disorder.

Impact of the Omics-Based Biomarkers on the Fluvoxamine's Steady-State Concentration, Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Affective Disorders Comorbid with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Introduction: Fluvoxamine is commonly administered to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some of these patients do not show adequate response to the therapy with fluvoxamine, whereas many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Previous research revealed that CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of fluvoxamine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, and 5-HTR2A genes on the concentration/dose indicator of fluvoxamine and on the CYP3A expression level obtained by measuring the miR-27b plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from a recurrent depressive disorder. Material and Methods: Our study included 105 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age - 37.5 ± 13.2 years). The treatment regimen included fluvoxamine in an average daily dose of 117.6 ± 44.3 mg per week. Therapy efficacy was assessed using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP3A was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of the given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6b-HC/cortisol). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. Results: Our study didn't reveal any statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy and safety of the therapy. We also didn't reveal a statistical significance for the concentration/dose indicator of fluvoxamine in patients with different genotypes. Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't demonstrate the statistically significant difference in the miR-27b plasma levels in patients with different genotypes. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the fluvoxamine efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMD scale scores and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.012, p = 0.63. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = -0.175, p = 0.30. In addition, we didn't reveal the relationship between the CYP3A enzymatic activity and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.197, p < 0.32. However, the difference in the CYP3A enzymatic activity in carriers of AG and GG genotypes of the 6986A > G polymorphism of CYP3A5 gene has been revealed: (AG) 4.72 [1.18; 8.45] vs (GG) 9.23 [5.12; 15.53], p-value = 0.23. Conclusion: Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, 5-HTR2A gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of fluvoxamine was not demonstrated in a group of 105 patients with depressive disorder and alcohol use disorder.