Use of Intravenous Albumin: A Guideline From the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Albumin is used commonly across a wide range of clinical settings to improve hemodynamics, to facilitate fluid removal, and to manage complications of cirrhosis. The International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines developed guidelines for the use of albumin in patients requiring critical care, undergoing cardiovascular surgery, undergoing kidney replacement therapy, or experiencing complications of cirrhosis. METHODS: Cochairs oversaw the guideline development process and the panel included researchers, clinicians, methodologists, and a patient representative. The evidence informing this guideline arises from a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews, in which multiple databases were searched (inception through November 23, 2022). The panel reviewed the data and formulated the guideline recommendations using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. The guidelines were revised after public consultation. RESULTS: The panel made 14 recommendations on albumin use in adult critical care (three recommendations), pediatric critical care (one recommendation), neonatal critical care (two recommendations), cardiovascular surgery (two recommendations), kidney replacement therapy (one recommendation), and complications of cirrhosis (five recommendations). Of the 14 recommendations, two recommendations had moderate certainty of evidence, five recommendations had low certainty of evidence, and seven recommendations had very low certainty of evidence. Two of the 14 recommendations suggested conditional use of albumin for patients with cirrhosis undergoing large-volume paracentesis or with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Twelve of 14 recommendations did not suggest albumin use in a wide variety of clinical situations where albumin commonly is transfused. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, few evidence-based indications support the routine use of albumin in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. These guidelines provide clinicians with actionable recommendations on the use of albumin.

Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Endotracheal tubes are typically inserted in the operating room using direct laryngoscopy. Video laryngoscopy has been reported to improve airway visualization; however, whether improved visualization reduces intubation attempts in surgical patients is unclear. Objective: To determine whether the number of intubation attempts per surgical procedure is lower when initial laryngoscopy is performed using video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized multiple crossover clinical trial conducted at a single US academic hospital. Patients were adults aged 18 years or older having elective or emergent cardiac, thoracic, or vascular surgical procedures who required single-lumen endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia. Patients were enrolled from March 30, 2021, to December 31, 2022. Data analysis was based on intention to treat. Interventions: Two sets of 11 operating rooms were randomized on a 1-week basis to perform hyperangulated video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy for the initial intubation attempt. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of operating room intubation attempts per surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes were intubation failure, defined as the responsible clinician switching to an alternative laryngoscopy device for any reason at any time, or by more than 3 intubation attempts, and a composite of airway and dental injuries. Results: Among 8429 surgical procedures in 7736 patients, the median patient age was 66 (IQR, 56-73) years, 35% (2950) were women, and 85% (7135) had elective surgical procedures. More than 1 intubation attempt was required in 77 of 4413 surgical procedures (1.7%) randomized to receive video laryngoscopy vs 306 of 4016 surgical procedures (7.6%) randomized to receive direct laryngoscopy, with an estimated proportional odds ratio for the number of intubation attempts of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.28; P < .001). Intubation failure occurred in 12 of 4413 surgical procedures (0.27%) using video laryngoscopy vs 161 of 4016 surgical procedures (4.0%) using direct laryngoscopy (relative risk, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.14; P < .001) with an unadjusted absolute risk difference of -3.7% (95% CI, -4.4% to -3.2%). Airway and dental injuries did not differ significantly between video laryngoscopy (41 injuries [0.93%]) vs direct laryngoscopy (42 injuries [1.1%]). Conclusion and Relevance: In this study among adults having surgical procedures who required single-lumen endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia, hyperangulated video laryngoscopy decreased the number of attempts needed to achieve endotracheal intubation compared with direct laryngoscopy at a single academic medical center in the US. Results suggest that video laryngoscopy may be a preferable approach for intubating patients undergoing surgical procedures. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04701762.

Anesthetic Management of Middle Aortic Syndrome in an Adult: A Case Report.

Middle aortic syndrome (MAS) is a rare disorder characterized by narrowing of the aorta. Depending on the location and extent of aortic narrowing, surgical management may be necessary to prevent long-term sequelae, such as stroke and congestive heart failure. We report a case of MAS and discuss the unique intraoperative anesthetic considerations including hemodynamic monitoring proximal and distal to the aortic narrowing, minimizing the risk of spinal cord ischemia, and utilization of intraoperative dobutamine stress testing to guide surgical management.

Intravenous albumin in cardiac and vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous albumin is commonly utilised in cardiovascular surgery for priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, volume replacement, or both, although the evidence to support this practice is uncertain. The aim was to compare i.v. albumin with synthetic colloids and crystalloids for paediatric and adult patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery for all-cause mortality and other perioperative outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of i.v. albumin compared with synthetic colloids and crystalloids on the primary outcome of all-cause mortality was conducted. Secondary outcomes included renal failure, blood loss, duration of hospital or intensive care unit stay, cardiac index, and blood component use; subgroups were analysed by age, comparator fluid, and intended use (priming, volume, or both). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRT) from 1946 to November 23, 2022. RESULTS: Of 42 RCTs, mortality was assessed in 15 trials (2711 cardiac surgery patients) and the risk difference was 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.01 to 0.01, I2=0%. Among secondary outcomes, i.v. albumin resulted in smaller fluid balance, mean difference -0.55 L, 95% CI -1.06 to -0.4, I2=90% (nine studies, 1975 patients) and higher albumin concentrations, mean difference 7.77 g L-1, 95% CI 3.73-11.8, I2=95% (six studies, 325 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous albumin use was not associated with a difference in morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, when compared with comparator fluids. The lack of improvement in important outcomes with albumin and its higher cost suggests it should be used restrictively. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO; CRD42020171876.

Association between body mass index and difficult intubation with a double lumen tube: A retrospective cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Obesity, defined by the World Health Organization as body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30.0 kg/m2, is associated with adverse outcomes and challenges during surgery. Difficulties during endotracheal intubation, occur in 3-8% of procedures and are among the principal causes of anesthetic-related morbidity and mortality. Endotracheal intubation can be challenging in obese patients due to an array of anatomic and physiologic factors. Double lumen tubes (DLTs), the most commonly used airway technique to facilitate anatomic isolation of the lungs for one lung ventilation. However, DLTs can be difficult to properly position and are also more likely to cause airway injuries and bleeding when compared to conventional single lumen tubes. We investigated the association between BMI and difficult tracheal DLT intubation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: We analyzed electronic records of adults having cardiac and thoracic surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with DLT at the Cleveland Clinic between 2008 and 2021. MEASUREMENTS: BMI, preoperative airway abnormalities and difficult intubation, defined as more than one intubation attempt, was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. MAIN RESULTS: Among 8641 analyzed anesthetics requiring DLT, 1459 (17%) were difficult intubations. After adjusting for confounders, each 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with a marginal increase of difficult intubation, odds ratio (OR) 1.06 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.002, 1.11; P = 0.040). Difficult intubation was not associated with airway abnormalities, estimated OR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.17; P = 0.321). There was no interaction between known airway abnormalities and BMI (P = 0.894). CONCLUSIONS: Difficult intubations with DLT remain common, but BMI is a weak predictor thereof. For example, an increase in BMI from 20 to 40 kg/m2 corresponds to an increase in average absolute risk for difficult intubation from 16 to 19%, which probably is not clinically meaningful.

Incidence, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Preincision Cardiac Arrest in Cardiac Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: We examined the incidence, postoperative outcomes, and patient-related factors associated with preincision cardiac arrest in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively examined adult patients undergoing elective or urgent cardiac surgery at the Cleveland Clinic between 2008 and 2019. The incidence of preincision cardiac arrest, defined as arrest between induction of general anesthesia and surgical incision, was reported. In a secondary analysis, we assessed the association between preincision cardiac arrest and major postoperative outcomes. In a tertiary analysis, we used adjusted linear regression models to explore the association between preincision cardiac arrest and prespecified patient risk factors, including severe left main coronary artery stenosis, left ventricular ejection fraction, moderate/severe right ventricular dysfunction, low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis, and moderate/severe pulmonary hypertension. RESULTS: Preincision cardiac arrests occurred in 75 of 41,238 (incidence of 0.18%; 95% CI, 0.17-0.26) patients who had elective or urgent cardiac surgery. Successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation with return of spontaneous circulation or bridge to cardiopulmonary bypass occurred in 74 of 75 (98.6%) patients. Patients who experienced preincision cardiac arrest had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than those who did not (11% vs 2%; odds ratio [OR] (95% CI), 4.14 (1.94-8.84); P < .001). They were also more likely to suffer postoperative respiratory failure (46% vs 13%; OR [95% CI], 3.94 [2.40-6.47]; P < .001), requirement for renal replacement therapy (11% vs 2%; OR [95% CI], 3.90 [1.82-8.35]; P < .001), neurologic deficit (7% vs 2%; OR [95% CI], 2.49 (1.00-6.21); P = .05), and longer median hospital stay (15 vs 8 days; hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI], 0.68 [0.55-0.85]; P < .001). Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (per 5% decrease) (OR [95% CI], 1.13 [1.03-1.22]; P = .006) and moderate/severe pulmonary hypertension (OR [95% CI], 3.40 [1.95-5.90]; P < .001) were identified as independent risk factors for cardiac arrest. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac arrest after anesthetic induction is rare in cardiac surgical patients in our investigation. Though most patients are rescued, morbidity and mortality remain higher. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and moderate/severe pulmonary hypertension are associated with greater risk for preincision cardiac arrest.

Assessment of Didactic Transesophageal Echocardiography Education During Anesthesia Residency.

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography can be a useful monitor during noncardiac surgery, in patients with comorbidities and/or undergoing procedures associated with substantial hemodynamic changes. The goal of this study was to investigate if transesophageal-echocardiography-related knowledge could be acquired during anesthesia residency. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a prospective observational study was performed in two anesthesiology residency programs. After a 41-week didactic transesophageal-echocardiography-education curriculum residents' exam scores were compared to baseline. The educators' examination was validated against the National Board of Echocardiography's Examination of Special Competence in Advanced Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. RESULTS: After the 41-week course, clinical anesthesia (CA)-3 exam scores increased 12% compared to baseline (P = .03), CA-2 scores increased 29% (P = .007), and CA-1 scores increased 25% (P = .002). Pearson correlation coefficient between the educators' exam score and the special competence exam percentile rank was 0.69 (P = .006). Pearson correlation coefficient between the educators' exam score and the special competence exam scaled score was 0.71 (P = .0045). CONCLUSIONS: The 41-week course resulted in significant increases in exam scores in all 3 CA-classes. While didactic knowledge can be learned by anesthesiology residents during training, it requires significant time and effort. It is important to educate residents in echocardiography, to prepare them for board examinations and to care for the increasingly older and sicker patient population. Further work needs to be done to determine optimal methods to provide such education.

Safety and Benefit of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Liver Transplant Surgery: A Position Paper From the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA).

More anesthesiologists are routinely using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during liver transplant surgery, but the effects on patient outcome are unknown. Transplant anesthesiologists are therefore uncertain if they should undergo additional training and adopt TEE. In response to these clinical questions, the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia appointed experts in liver transplantation and who are certified in TEE to evaluate all available published evidence on the topic. The aim was to produce a summary with greater explanatory power than individual reports to guide transplant anesthesiologists in their decision to use TEE. An exhaustive search recovered 51 articles of uncontrolled clinical observations. Topics chosen for this study were effectiveness and safety because they were a major or minor topic in all articles. The pattern of clinical use was a common topic and was included to provide contextual information. Summarized observations showed effectiveness as the ability to make a new and unexpected diagnosis and to direct the choice of clinical management. These were reported in each stage of liver transplant surgery. There were observations that TEE facilitated rapid diagnosis of life-threatening conditions difficult to identify with other types of monitoring commonly used in the operating room. Real-time diagnosis by TEE images made anesthesiologists confident in their choice of interventions, especially those with a high risk of complications such as use of anticoagulants for intracardiac thrombosis. The summarized observations in this systematic review suggest that TEE is an effective form of monitoring with a safety profile similar to that in cardiac surgery patients.

Value of perioperative inhaled epoprostenol with low tidal volume ventilation for complex endocarditis surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To compare outcomes of patients treated with inhaled epoprostenol and low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass with those who did not receive this medication in the operating room at all, and those who received it as a rescue therapy at the end of the case. METHODS: Retrospective chart review between 2014 and 2017, follow-up included the entire hospital stay. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included, and mean age was 54 years. 78.9% of the patients were male. Procedures included 96% (n = 68) aortic valve replacement, 28% (n = 20) reconstruction of the intravalvular fibrosa, and 13% (n = 9) repair of an endocarditis-related intracardiac fistula. Patients who received epoprostenol (iEpo) (treatment and rescue groups), when compared with the control group had more intra-aortic balloon pump placement (23% vs 2.5%, P = .018), open chest after surgery (32% vs 7.5%, P = .012), and duration of mechanical ventilation (8.3 ± 2.7 vs. 2.4 ± 0.4 days, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of extracorporeal circulatory support (6.5% vs 2.5%, P = .577) and hospital death (13% vs 10%, P = .72). In a subanalysis, hospital death and duration of mechanical ventilation were higher in the recue group when compared with the treatment group (P = .004 and .056, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic application of iEpo with low tidal volume ventilation for an anticipated complex endocarditis operation may contribute to favorable outcome when compared with postoperative epoprostenol rescue.

The role and clinical implications of diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis.

Diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis results primarily from left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis due to chronically elevated left ventricular systolic pressure. Currently, diastolic dysfunction does not have an explicit clinical role in management of patients with aortic stenosis. Studies have shown that improvement in diastolic dysfunction follows left ventricular remodelling after aortic valve replacement and that it occurs gradually or incompletely. Retrospective studies suggest that advanced grades of diastolic dysfunction at baseline are associated with increased mortality and adverse events even after aortic valve replacement. Recent studies have also associated myocardial fibrosis, a hallmark of diastolic dysfunction, with worse outcomes. In addition, these results were independent of the degree of aortic stenosis or valve replacement. Indirect evidence of the role of diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis also comes from paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, where disproportionate left ventricular hypertrophy leads to underfilling of the left ventricle, low-flow state and is associated with worse prognosis. Lastly, a limited number of studies suggest that worse diastolic dysfunction at baseline is detrimental in patients who develop aortic regurgitation after transcatheteraortic valve replacement, due to superimposition of volume overload on a stiff left ventricle. Current major limitations in our understanding of the prognostic role of diastolic dysfunction are the lack of universally accepted classification schemes, its dependence on dynamic loading conditions and the lack of larger prospective studies.