Early tracheostomy and active exercise programmes in adult intensive care patients with severe burns.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy is a strategy often employed in patients requiring prolonged intubation in ICU settings. Evidence suggests that earlier tracheostomy and early active exercise are associated with better patient centered outcomes. Severe burn patients often require prolonged ventilatory support due to their critical condition, complex sedation management and multiple operating room visits. It is still unclear the optimal timing for tracheostomy in this population. METHODS: We conducted a service evaluation where we compared Early Tracheostomy (≤10 days) with Late Tracheostomy (>10 days) in 41 severely burned patients that required prolonged respiratory support. RESULTS: Early Tracheostomy cohort was associated with fewer days of mechanical ventilation (16 vs 33, p = 0.001), shorter hospital length of stay (65 vs 88 days, p = 0.018), earlier first day of active exercise (day 8 vs day 25, p < 0.0001) and higher Functional Assessment for Burns scores upon discharge (32 vs 28, p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Early tracheostomy in patients with severe burns is associated with earlier active exercise, fewer days of ventilation, shorter length of hospital stay and better physical functional independence upon discharge from hospital.

Establishment of a core outcome set for burn care research: development and international consensus.

Objective: To develop a core outcome set for international burn research. Design: Development and international consensus, from April 2017 to November 2019. Methods: Candidate outcomes were identified from systematic reviews and stakeholder interviews. Through a Delphi survey, international clinicians, researchers, and UK patients prioritised outcomes. Anonymised feedback aimed to achieve consensus. Pre-defined criteria for retaining outcomes were agreed. A consensus meeting with voting was held to finalise the core outcome set. Results: Data source examination identified 1021 unique outcomes grouped into 88 candidate outcomes. Stakeholders in round 1 of the survey, included 668 health professionals from 77 countries (18% from low or low middle income countries) and 126 UK patients or carers. After round 1, one outcome was discarded, and 13 new outcomes added. After round 2, 69 items were discarded, leaving 31 outcomes for the consensus meeting. Outcome merging and voting, in two rounds, with prespecified thresholds agreed seven core outcomes: death, specified complications, ability to do daily tasks, wound healing, neuropathic pain and itch, psychological wellbeing, and return to school or work. Conclusions: This core outcome set caters for global burn research, and future trials are recommended to include measures of these outcomes.

The predictive validity of the Functional Assessment for Burns - Critical Care (FAB-CC) score for discharge outcomes in major burns.

INTRODUCTION: Physical function scoring of burn ICU patients is recommended but currently validated scores are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive validity of the FAB -CC for burn ICU patients' discharge outcome. METHODS: All patients underwent daily exercise and FAB -CC screen if they were stable. Two FAB-CC scores were performed; FAB-CC1 on the first day the patient passed the FAB-CC screen, FAB-CC2 within 48 h before ICU discharge. Hospital discharge outcome was defined as transfer for further inpatient rehabilitation or home with social care versus home with no social care. 76 patients' data were entered into the analyses. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to identify variables that predict discharge outcome. RESULTS: Increasing patient age (p = 0.001), duration of ventilation (p = 0.0003), ICU Length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.0001), total hospital LOS (p < 0.0001), presence of cardiopulmonary disease (p = 0.008), neurological disorder (p = 0.0003) and psychiatric illness (p = 0.003) are positively associated with transfer for inpatient rehabilitation or home with social care. Increasing FAB-CC1 (p < 0.0001) and FAB -CC2 (p = 0.0001) are negatively associated with transfer for inpatient rehabilitation or home with social care. The most predictive model for discharge outcome combined the variables patient age, FAB-CC1, FAB-CC2 and psychiatric illness. Patient age (p = 0.01), FAB-CC1 (p = 0.02) and psychiatric illness (p = 0.009) independently predict discharge outcome. CONCLUSIONS: FAB-CC2 is associated with, and FAB-CC1 has predictive validity for, patient hospital discharge outcome. These findings, in conjunction with our earlier work, confirm clinical utility of the FAB-CC for burns ICU patients.

Frailty: an independent predictor of burns mortality following in-patient admission.

INTRODUCTION: Burn injury in the elderly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. It is not uncommon for biological age, or frailty, to differ from chronological age in this patient group and thus predicting individual clinical outcomes remains challenging. It has been previously shown that Rockwood's Clinical Frailty Scale, a global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in older people, can be a useful adjunct for predicting outcomes for elderly patients with burns >10% TBSA. We refine our previous work to investigate the impact of frailty on mortality of elderly patients with thermal burns of any size admitted to a burns unit and explore its role as a meaningful adjunct to the modified Baux score. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of case notes for all patients ≥65years admitted to our burns centre as an in-patient during an 8-year period was performed with standard demographics, burn injury parameters, length of stay and mortality outcomes collected. Measures of frailty were reviewed and statistically analysed to assess the impact of biological aging on clinical outcome in order to assess how the modified Baux score may be developed for the elderly using Frailty Score. RESULTS: 239 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 77years (range: 65-99years) and mean burn size was 14.46% TBSA (Range: 0.1-98% TBSA). The modified Baux and Frailty Score were both independent predictors of mortality (p<0.0001). Increased premorbid Frailty Score was associated with increased in-hospital (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.63-3.34) and one-year mortality (OR: 3.13, 95% CI: 2.22-4.41) independent of burn size compared to the modified Baux Score (IHM OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.07-1.13, 1yr M: OR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05-1.11). The Frailty Score (>3) was a much more sensitive predictor of one-year mortality (Sensitivity: 83.9%; Specificity: 66.4%) than the modified Baux (>97) (Sensitivity: 59.8%; Specificity: 82.9%). A Frailty Score >3 when combined with the modified Baux score demonstrated increased area under ROC curve for both in-hospital (0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94); p=0.02) and one-year (0.88 (95% CI: 0.84-0.92); p=0.02) mortality when compared to the modified Baux alone. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that Frailty Score can be used to independently predict in-hospital and one-year mortality for thermal burns of any size in the elderly admitted as an in-patient to a burns unit. We also find that the Frailty Score can be employed in combination with the modified Baux score to improve mortality prediction. We recommend that Frailty Score is integrated into the modified Baux score and used to focus burn care resources appropriately.

Relationship between multidisciplinary critical care and burn patients survival: A propensity-matched national cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are: firstly, to investigate if admission to specialized burn critical care units leads to better clinical outcomes; secondly, to elucidate if the multidisciplinary critical care contributes to this superior outcome. METHODS: A multi-centre cohort analysis of a prospectively collected national database of 1759 adult burn patients admitted to 13 critical care units in England and Wales between 2005 and 2011. Units were contacted via telephone to establish frequency and constitution of daily ward rounds. Critical care units were categorized into 3 settings: specialized burns critical care units, generalized critical care units and 'visiting' critical care units. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity dose-response analysis were used to calculate risk adjusted mortality. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis shows that admission to a specialized burn critical care service is independently associated with significant survival benefit compared to generalized critical care unit (adjusted OR for in-hospital death 1.81, [95% CI, 1.24, 2.66]) and 'visiting' critical care services (adjusted OR for in-hospital death 2.24 [95% CI, 1.49, 3.38]). Further analysis using propensity dose-response analysis demonstrates that risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rate decreased as the dose of multidisciplinary care increased, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1 (specialized burn critical care units), 1.81 (generalized critical care units) and 2.24 ('visiting' critical care units). CONCLUSIONS: Admission to a specialized burn critical care service is independently associated with significant survival benefit. This is, at least in part, due to care being provided by a fully integrated multidisciplinary team.

Smoke inhalation increases intensive care requirements and morbidity in paediatric burns.

Burn survival has improved with advancements in fluid resuscitation, surgical wound management, wound dressings, access to antibiotics and nutritional support for burn patients. Despite these advancements, the presence of smoke inhalation injury in addition to a cutaneous burn still significantly increases morbidity and mortality. The pathophysiology of smoke inhalation has been well studied in animal models. Translation of this knowledge into effectiveness of clinical management and correlation with patient outcomes including the paediatric population, is still limited. We retrospectively reviewed our experience of 13 years of paediatric burns admitted to a regional burn's intensive care unit. We compared critical care requirements and patient outcomes between those with cutaneous burns only and those with concurrent smoke inhalation injury. Smoke inhalation increases critical care requirements and mortality in the paediatric burn population. Therefore, early critical care input in the management of these patients is advised.

Increasing the utility of the Functional Assessment for Burns Score: Not just for major burns.

The Functional Assessment for Burns (FAB) score is established as an objective measure of physical function that predicts discharge outcome in adult patients with major burn. However, its validity in patients with minor and moderate burn is unknown. This is a multi-centre evaluation of the predictive validity of the FAB score for discharge outcome in adult inpatients with minor and moderate burns. FAB assessments were undertaken within 48 h of admission to (FAB 1), and within 48 h of discharge (FAB 2) from burn wards in 115 patients. Median age was 45 years and median burn size 4%. There were significant improvements in the patients' FAB scores (p<0.0001), 98 patients were discharged home (no social care) and 17 patients discharged to further inpatient rehabilitation or home with social care. FAB 1 score (≤ 14) is strongly associated with discharge to inpatient rehabilitation or home with social care (p=0.0001) and as such can be used to facilitate early discharge planning. FAB 2 (≤ 30) independently predicts discharge outcome to inpatient rehabilitation or home with social care (p<0.0001), increasing its utility to patients with minor and moderate burns.

The utility of microalbuminuria measurements in pediatric burn injuries in critical care.

PURPOSE: Microalbuminuria, as measured by urinary albumin-creatinine ratios (ACRs), has been shown to be a marker of systemic inflammation and an indicator of the potential severity of trauma and critical illness. Severe pediatric burns represent the best model in which to investigate the clinical utility of microalbuminuria. This study aims to ascertain whether ACR measurements have any role in predicting the severity or the intensive care requirements in the critically unwell pediatric burn population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was undertaken within a regional burn center with a dedicated 8-bed burn intensive care unit (ICU). This looked at 8 years of consecutive pediatric burns requiring intensive care support-a total of 63 patients after exclusions. Daily urinary ACR measurements were acquired from all patients. RESULTS: All patients had greater than or equal to 1 ACR measurement out with the reference range, and only 8% (5/63) presented to the ICU with a normal ACR. The median day for the peak ACR measurement was day 4. The relative lack of mortalities (3/63) precluded adequate correlations between ACR and outcomes. Peak and mean ACR values correlate well with length of ICU stay, and the peak ACR also correlates with total length of hospital stay and severity of burn injury as measured by total body surface area burnt and number of organ systems requiring support. No significant differences were found when the patients were stratified by age. The peak ACR measurement was found to be independently predictive of the length of the ICU stay. As such, we have created a predictive model to prove that an ACR that remains less than 12 mg/mmol is predicative of an ICU stay of less than or equal to 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utilities of ACR measurements are demonstrated by their correlation with the severity of injury, length of ICU stay, and requirements for multiple organ support. Albumin-creatinine ratios raised over certain thresholds highlight to the clinician the need for closer observation and the potential deterioration of patients.

Burns ITU admissions: length of stay in specific levels of care for adult and paediatric patients.

Prediction of total length of stay (LOS) for burns patients based on the total burn surface area (TBSA) is well accepted. Total LOS is a poor measure of resource consumption. Our aim was to determine the LOS in specific levels of care to better inform resource allocation. We performed a retrospective review of LOS in intensive treatment unit (ITU), burns high dependency unit (HDU) and burns low dependency unit (LDU) for all patients requiring ITU admission in a regional burns service from 2003 to 2011. During this period, our unit has admitted 1312 paediatric and 1445 adult patients to our Burns ITU. In both groups, ITU comprised 20% of the total LOS (mean 0.23±0.02 [adult] and 0.22±0.02 [paediatric] days per %burn). In adults, 33% of LOS was in HDU (0.52±0.06 days per %burn) and 48% (0.68±0.06 days per %burn) in LDU, while in children, 15% of LOS was in HDU (0.19±0.03 days per %burn) and 65% in LDU (0.70±0.06 days per %burn). When considering Burns ITU admissions, resource allocation ought to be planned according to expected LOS in specific levels of care rather than total LOS. The largest proportion of stay is in low dependency, likely due to social issues.

Physical functional outcome assessment of patients with major burns admitted to a UK Burn Intensive Care Unit.

Determining the discharge outcome of burn patients can be challenging and therefore a validated objective measure of functional independence would assist with this process. We developed the Functional Assessment for Burns (FAB) score to measure burn patients' functional independence. FAB scores were taken on discharge from ICU (FAB 1) and on discharge from inpatient burn care (FAB 2) in 56 patients meeting the American Burn Association criteria for major burn. We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data to measure the progress of patients' physical functional outcomes and to evaluate the predictive validity of the FAB score for discharge outcome. Mean age was 38.6 years and median burn size 35%. Significant improvements were made in the physical functional outcomes between FAB 1 and FAB 2 scores (p<0.0001). 48 patients were discharged home, 8 of these with social care. 8 patients were transferred to another hospital for further inpatient rehabilitation. FAB 1 score (≤ 9) is strongly associated with discharge outcome (p<0.006) and as such can be used to facilitate early discharge planning. FAB 2 score (≤ 26) independently predicts discharge outcome (p<0.0001) and therefore is a valid outcome measure to determine discharge outcome of burn patients.

Cough strength, secretions and extubation outcome in burn patients who have passed a spontaneous breathing trial.

The aim of this study was to develop a clinical prediction model to inform decisions about the timing of extubation in burn patients who have passed a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Rapid shallow breathing index, voluntary cough peak flow (CPF) and endotracheal secretions were measured after each patient had passed a SBT and just prior to extubation. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to identify variables that predict extubation outcome. Seventeen patients failed their first trials of extubation (14%). CPF and endotracheal secretions are strongly associated with extubation outcome (p<0.0001). Patients with CPF ≤60 L/min are 9 times as likely to fail extubation as those with CPF >60 L/min (risk ratio=9.1). Patients with abundant endotracheal secretions are 8 times as likely to fail extubation compared to those with no, mild and moderate endotracheal secretions (risk ratio=8). Our clinical prediction model combining CPF and endotracheal secretions has strong predictive capacity for extubation outcome (area under receiver operating characteristic curve=0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.99) and therefore may be useful to predict which patients will succeed or fail extubation after passing a SBT.

Tracheostomy in burns patients revisited.

OBJECTIVE: The use of tracheostomy in burns patients has been controversial. A retrospective study was conducted to assess the use, complications and outcome of tracheostomy in ventilated adult burns patients. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively regarding the extent of injury in each patient, the indication for tracheostomy, and outcome in terms of length of stay, days of mechanical ventilation, airway and pulmonary complications and survival. Patients were followed until discharge from the unit or death. RESULTS: Comparing patients who received tracheostomy to those who had translaryngeal intubation showed similar age distribution and no significant difference in the total burn surface area (TBSA). The use of tracheostomy was significantly higher in patients with TBSA >60%. Inhalation injury was significantly higher and mean probability of survival (ABSI), significantly lower in patients receiving tracheostomy. Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in HDU/ITU and the incidence of pulmonary sepsis were significantly higher in tracheostomy group patients. However, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Burn survivors with TBSA >60% are more likely to undergo repeated surgery and have burns to the head and neck region, therefore increasing the requirement for tracheostomy. Tracheostomy is a safe procedure with minimal perioperative complications. Late complications in this patient group may be related to duration of intubation and mechanical ventilation and the presence of an airway burn. Tracheostomy was associated with a higher prevalence of chest infection. We suspect that the cause of this is multifactorial, possibly due to a higher incidence of inhalation injury, greater burn size and prolonged mechanical ventilation in this group.

The incidence and outcome of extubation failure in burn intensive care patients.

To identify the incidence and outcome of extubation failure in patients with burn. Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary burn intensive care unit. A review of the casenotes of 132 consecutive adult patients with burn admitted between 2001 and 2005, and requiring mechanical ventilation for >24 hours, was undertaken. Sixty-seven patients underwent extubation and entered data analyses. Extubation failure was defined as reintubation within 48 hours. The outcomes of interest were incidence and cause of extubation failure, duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), length of stay (LOS), and mortality. The patients who succeeded and failed extubation were similar in terms of age, sex, burn size (P = .3), and incidence of inhalation injury (P = .1). Of 67 planned extubations, 20 (30%) failed. DMV (22.5 vs. 4 days; P < .001), intensive care LOS (1.20 vs. 0.41 days/% burn; P < .001), and hospital LOS (1.90 vs. 1.18 days/ % burn; P < .003) were significantly longer in reintubated patients when compared with those who extubated successfully. Extubation outcome, burn size, and age provided the best predictive model for patient outcome (P = .02), but extubation outcome was the only predictor that operated individually (P = .05). The aetiology of extubation failure in 15 (75%) patients was poor pulmonary toilet. The incidence of extubation failure in this homogenous population of patients with burn is higher than general intensive care patients (30% vs. 4-23%). The DMV, lengths of intensive care, and hospital stay are significantly longer in patients who failed extubation. In addition to burn size and age, extubation outcome is an important predictor of intensive care mortality. The indication for reintubation in most patients is poor airway clearance.

Evaluation of the spontaneous breathing trial in burn intensive care patients.

BACKGROUND: The extubation failure rate in our burn patients is 30%. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the 30 min spontaneous breathing trial on extubation outcome in burn patients. METHODS: A prospective, observational study in a burn intensive care unit. All adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation for >24h and meeting the inclusion criteria underwent a 30 min spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Extubation was undertaken after a successful SBT. RESULTS: Of 49 planned extubations, 9 failed (18%), much lower than the 30% extubation failure rate identified prior to the implementation of the SBT. The duration of ventilation was significantly shorter (p=0.04) in the patients who passed a SBT and those who failed extubation were significantly older (p=0.003). The logistic regression analysis identified that age independently predicted extubation outcome. Patients who failed extubation, after a successful SBT, had a significantly longer duration of ventilation (p=0.0001) and ITU length of stay (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of extubation failure was much lower and the duration of ventilation significantly shorter in patients who were extubated after a successful SBT. These findings support the use of the SBT in burn patients. Age independently predicts extubation outcome in burn patients who have passed a SBT.