Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Glob Infect Dis ; 12(2): 101-104, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773998

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative neonatal sepsis is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Mucosal colonization with these organisms in hospitals may predispose neonates to septicemia. AIMS: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and pattern of colonization of neonatal preterm gut with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and identify risk factors associated with colonization. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was a prospective observational study done in a Level 3 neonatal unit of a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Stool samples from preterm babies were collected soon after birth and at 1 and 3 weeks of age after consent. Maternal stool sample was collected within 48 h after the delivery. Predetermined antenatal, neonatal, and environmental risk factors were recorded. Isolation and identification of organisms was done in a standardized manner; antibiotic susceptibility was done by the Kirby-Bauer method and results interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of the babies were colonized by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) at birth, and 100% were colonized by the end of the 1st week. The organisms commonly isolated were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, NFGNB (Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli), Pseudomonas, and Enterobacter. Sixty-eight percent of the babies were colonized with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms, and 5% of the babies were colonized with carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs). In the babies who developed culture-positive sepsis, 21% had concordance of strains in the gut and blood. There was no association between maternal and neonatal colonization. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that neonatal gut is colonized by GNB from birth onward. However, the rate of colonization with CRO is low. An association was also observed between colonization and late-onset sepsis.

2.
J Trop Pediatr ; 63(3): 174-181, 2017 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28369606

ABSTRACT

Background: Several low-cost methods are used in resource-limited settings to provide therapeutic hypothermia in asphyxiated neonates. There is inadequate data about their efficacy and safety. This is a retrospective study comparing two low-cost cooling methods-frozen gel packs (FGP) and phase changing material (PCM). Results: There were 23 babies in FGP and 45 babies in the PCM group. Induction time was significantly shorter with FGP than PCM (45 vs. 90 minutes; p -value < 0.001). Proportion of temperature readings outside the target range was significantly higher (9.8% vs. 3.8%; p -value < 0.001) and fluctuation of core body temperature was wider (standard deviation of target temperature 0.4 °C vs. 0.28 °C) in the FGP group, compared with PCM group. Conclusion: Both FGP and PCM are effective and safe, comparable with standard servo-controlled cooling equipment. PCM has the advantage of better maintenance of target temperature with less nursing input, when compared with FGP.


Subject(s)
Asphyxia Neonatorum/complications , Asphyxia Neonatorum/therapy , Hypothermia, Induced/instrumentation , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/therapy , Body Temperature/physiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced/economics , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/physiopathology , India/epidemiology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...