Forecasting the Effect of the Change in Timing of the ABR Diagnostic Radiology Examinations: Results of the ACR Survey of Practice Leaders.

The results of a survey sent to practice leaders in the ACR Practice of Radiology Environment Database show that the majority of responding groups will continue to hire recently trained residents and fellows even though they have been unable to take the final ABR diagnostic radiology certifying examination. However, a significant minority of private practice groups will not hire these individuals. The majority of private practices expect the timing change for the ABR certifying examinations to affect their groups' function. In contrast, the majority of academic medical school practices expect little or no impact. Residents and fellows should not expect work time off or protected time to study for the certifying examination or for their maintenance of certification examinations in the future.

Subspecialization in radiology and radiation oncology.

Practicing radiologists, radiation oncologists, and trainees were surveyed regarding the current state of subspecialization in practice and in training curricula. The authors present the results of these surveys, establish trends compared with previous survey data, and compare the plans of trainees with current postgraduate practice. Subspecialization is increasing in both radiology and radiation oncology. There remain substantial numbers of practitioners who perform work they deem "general" in nature. The authors also present a method to more accurately measure subspecialization and workload.

American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine.

The benefits of diagnostic imaging are immense and have revolutionized the practice of medicine. The increased sophistication and clinical efficacy of imaging have resulted in its dramatic growth over the past quarter century. Although data derived from the atomic bomb survivors in Japan and other events suggest that the expanding use of imaging modalities using ionizing radiation may eventually result in an increased incidence of cancer in the exposed population, this problem can likely be minimized by preventing the inappropriate use of such imaging and by optimizing studies that are performed to obtain the best image quality with the lowest radiation dose. The ACR, which has been an advocate for radiation safety since its inception in 1924, convened the ACR Blue Ribbon Panel on Radiation Dose in Medicine to address these issues. This white paper details a proposed action plan for the college derived from the deliberations of that panel.

ACR clinical statement on noninvasive cardiac imaging.

Coronary artery disease and other acquired and congenital cardiac diseases are major medical and socio-economic problems. Historically, imaging has had a critical role in the diagnosis and evaluation of acquired and congenital cardiac disease. Advances in computed tomography (CT), with multidetector CT and electron beam CT technology, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, now make it possible to noninvasively image the coronary arteries, cardiac chambers, valves, myocardium, and pericardium and assess cardiac function, and CT and MR imaging are becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of cardiac disease. Radiologists, because of their extensive experience in CT and MR imaging, have an important role in imaging cardiac patients using these modalities. This clinical statement of the ACR discusses various technical and patient safety issues related to cardiac CT and MR imaging, and it suggests appropriate qualifications for radiologists until such time as ACR practice guidelines for the performance of cardiac CT and cardiac MR imaging are written and approved through the usual ACR process. It stresses that the interpreting physician is responsible for examining not only the cardiac structures of interest but also all the visualized noncardiac structures and must report any clinically relevant abnormalities of these adjacent structures.