ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Peripheral artery disease is known to affect males and females in different proportions. Disparate surgical outcomes have been quantified after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, arteriovenous fistula creation, and treatment of critical limb ischemia. The aim of this study is to objectively quantify the sex differences in outcomes in patients undergoing open surgical intervention for aortoiliac occlusive disease. METHODS: Patients were identified in the aortoiliac occlusive disease Vascular Quality Initiative database who underwent aorto-bifemoral bypass or aortic thromboendarterectomy as determined by Current Procedural Terminology codes between 2012 and 2019. Patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Risk differences (RDs) by sex were calculated using a binomial regression model in 30-day and 1-year incidence of mortality and limb salvage. Additionally, incidence of surgical complications including prolonged length of stay (>10 days), reoperation, and change in renal function (>0.5 mg/dl rise from baseline), were recorded. Inverse probability weighting was used to standardize demographic and medical history characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to conduct analyses of the before mentioned clinical outcomes, controlling for known confounders. RESULTS: Of 16,218 eligible patients from the VQI data during the study period, 6538 (40.3%) were female. The mean age, body mass index, and race were not statistically different between sexes. Although there was no statistically significant difference detected in mortality between males and females at 30 days postoperatively, females had an increased crude 1-year mortality with an RD of 0.014 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.02; P value < .001. Males had a higher rate of a postoperative change in renal function with an RD of -0.02 (95% confidence interval, -0.03 to -0.01; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no sex-based mortality difference at 30 days, there was a statistically significant increase in mortality in females after open aortoiliac intervention at 1 year based on our weighted model. Male patients are statistically significantly more likely to have a decline in renal function after their procedures when compared with females. Postoperative complications including prolonged hospital stay, reoperation, and wound disruption were similar among the sexes, as was limb preservation rates at 1 year. Further studies should focus on elucidating the underlying factors contributing to sex-based differences in clinical outcomes following aortoiliac interventions.
ABSTRACT
The RD-X19 is an investigational, handheld medical device precisely engineered to emit blue light through the oral cavity to target the oropharynx and surrounding tissues. At doses shown to be noncytotoxic in an in vitro three-dimensional human epithelial tissue model, the monochromatic visible light delivered by RD-X19 results in light-initiated expression of immune stimulating cytokines IL-1α and IL-1ß, with corresponding inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication. A single exposure of 425 nm blue light at 60 J/cm2 led to greater than 99% reductions against all SARS-CoV-2 strains tested in vitro, including the more transmissible (Alpha) and immune evasive (Beta) variants. These preclinical findings along with other studies led to a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled early feasibility study using the investigational device as a treatment for outpatients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The study enrolled 31 subjects with a positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen test and at least two moderate COVID-19 signs and symptoms at baseline. Subjects were randomized 2:1 (RD-X19: sham) and treated twice daily for 4 days. Efficacy outcome measures included assessments of SARS-CoV-2 saliva viral load and clinical assessments of COVID-19. There were no local application site reactions and no device-related adverse events. At the end of the study (day 8), the mean change in log10 viral load was -3.29 for RD-X19 and -1.81 for sham, demonstrating a treatment benefit of -1.48 logs (95% confidence internal, -2.88 to -0.071, nominal p = 0.040). Among the clinical outcome measures, differences between RD-X19 and sham were also observed, with a 57-h reduction of median time to sustained resolution of COVID-19 signs and symptoms (log rank test, nominal p = 0.044).
