Quality of Care in Hip Fracture Patients: The Relationship Between Adherence to National Standards and Improved Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing the perioperative care of patients with a hip fracture is a key health-care priority. We aimed to determine whether adherence to the Scottish Standards of Care for Hip Fracture Patients (SSCHFP) was associated with improved patient outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from the Scottish National Hip Fracture Audit, we assessed adherence to the SSCHFP in 21 Scottish hospitals over a 9-month period in 2014 and examined the effect of the guidelines on 30 and 120-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and discharge destination. RESULTS: A total of 1,162 patients who were ≥50 years old and admitted with a hip fracture were included. There was a significant association between low adherence to the SSCHFP and increased mortality at 30 and 120 days (odds ratio [OR], 3.58 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.75 to 7.32; p < 0.001] and 2.01 [95% CI, 1.28 to 3.12; p = 0.003], respectively). Low adherence was associated with a reduced likelihood of a short length of stay (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.78; p < 0.0001), but increased odds of discharge to a high-care setting (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.36; p = 0.01). Early physiotherapy input and occupational therapy input were associated with a reduced likelihood of discharge to a high-care setting (OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.98; p = 0.04] and 0.34 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.48; p <0.001], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the SSCHFP is associated with better patient outcomes. These findings confirm the clinical utility of the SSCHFP and support their use as a benchmarking tool to improve quality of care for hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

National audits of hip fractures: Are yearly audits required?

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality to the increasing elderly population. The Scottish Hip Fracture Audit started in 1993 with national audits from 2002. It was a national prospective audit reporting on clinical standards in hip fracture care and produced an annual report. Due to national funding changes the continual audit was discontinued in 2008. In 2013, the MSK Audit Group published a "snapshot" into a 4 month period of hip fracture care in Scotland. Our purpose was to identify whether there had been an initial improvement in hip fracture care and whether this improvement was sustained with the discontinuation of the annual audit. METHODS: The reported outcomes from the annual Scottish Hip Fracture Audit from 2003 to 2008 were compared to the latest MSK Hip Fracture Audit published in 2013. Some data is available from the 2014 MSK Hip Fracture Audit and this was also used for comparison purposes. Local audit co-ordinators at each participating site collected a data-set for all patients admitted with a hip fracture. The case mix variables and management variables were compared for the reported years. RESULTS: The continual audit demonstrated an improvement in the percentage of patients discharged from accident and emergency in 4h (80.5% 2003 vs. 96% 2008) which was not maintained 5 years later. An improvement in the percentage of patients having surgery within 48 h of admission (89.9-98.4%) was also not maintained after 5 years (91.8%). 30 day mortality improved with continual audit, a trend which continued in 2013. The re-introduction of continuous audit in 2014 demonstrated an improvement in accident and emergency waiting times and time to theatre. DISCUSSION: The Scottish Hip Fracture Audit demonstrated improved standards of care until it was discontinued in 2008. The improvement was not sustained throughout all variables with the 2013 audit. With the re-introduction of regular audit, standards once again improved. We would recommend a more regular audit in an effort to not only improve standards of care for patients with a hip fracture but to maintain them.

Outcome after sequential hip fracture in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. As the risk factors for hip fracture often persist after the original injury, patients remain at risk for sequential fractures. Our aim was to report the incidence, epidemiology, and outcome of sequential hip fracture in the elderly. METHODS: Data were collected during the acute hospital stay and at 120 days after admission from twenty-two acute orthopaedic units across Scotland between January 1998 and December 2005. These data were analyzed according to two separate time periods: by six-month intervals up to eight years after the primary fracture and by twenty-day intervals for the first two years after the primary fracture. RESULTS: The risk of sequential fracture was highest in the first twelve months, affecting 3% of surviving patients and decreasing to 2% per survival year thereafter. Survival to twelve months after sequential fracture was 63% compared with 68% for those with a single fracture (p = 0.03). Sequential hip fracture was also associated with greater loss of independent mobility and changes in residential status compared with single fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential hip fracture is a relatively rare injury. Individuals who sustain this injury combination have poorer outcomes both in terms of survival and functional status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Improving patient flow: the impact of consultant work pattern on trauma ward efficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect on trauma ward efficiency of altering consultant shift patterns. DESIGN: Outcome measures were compared for neck of femur fracture patients before and after the consultant rota changed (Feb 2007) from a single day on-call to a full week on-call. SETTING: Patients admitted to Stirling Royal Infirmary with neck of femur fractures. PARTICIPANTS: 359 patients were identified from the Scottish Hip Fracture Audit database for the year preceding the rota change and 379 after. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to surgery for medically fit patients and overall length of stay on the acute trauma ward. RESULTS: Patients were operated on quicker after the rota change (Mann-Whitney U-test, before v after: z=2.67, p=0.008), with a greater percentage being operated within the first 24h (60% before v 78% after; Chi-square test, before v after: χ(1)(2)=19.9, p<0.001). Overall, the length of stay on the acute trauma ward was reduced (Chi-square test, before v after by intervals: χ(3)(2)=21.1, p<0.001). The proportion of patients discharged from the ward within one week increased from 47% before the rota change to 63% after. CONCLUSION: By applying the industry-based methods of 'process management', we have shown that a simple intervention (alteration of consultant shift patterns) has had a significant impact in reducing time to theatre for neck of femur trauma patients and reducing the length of stay on the acute trauma ward. Thus, the 'patient flow' has been made more efficient making more acute trauma beds available for new admissions.

Outlier analysis in orthopaedics: use of CUSUM: the Scottish Arthroplasty Project: shouldering the burden of improvement.

National joint registries have become well established across the world. Most registries track implant survival so that poorly performing implants can be removed from the market. The Scottish Arthroplasty Project was established in 1999 with the aim of encouraging continual improvement in the quality of care provided to joint replacement patients in Scotland. This aim has been achieved by using statistics to engage surgeons in the process of audit. We monitor easily identifiable end points of public concern and inform surgeons if they breach our statistical limits and become "outliers." Outlier status is often associated with poor implants, and our methods are therefore applicable for indirect implant surveillance. The present report describes the evolution of our statistical methodology, the processes that we use to promote positive changes in practice, and the improvements in patient outcomes that we have achieved. Failure need not be fatal, but failure to change almost always is. We describe the journey of both the Scottish Arthroplasty Project and the orthopaedic surgeons of Scotland to this realization.

Eleven years of liver trauma: the Scottish experience.

The aim of this population based study was to assess the incidence, mechanisms, management, and outcome of patients who sustained hepatic trauma in Scotland (population 5 million) over the period 1992-2002. The Scottish Trauma Audit Group database was searched for details of any patient with liver trauma. Data on identified patients were analyzed for demographic information, mechanisms of injury, associated injuries, hemodynamic stability on presentation, management, and outcome. A total of 783 patients were identified as having sustained liver trauma. The male-to-female ratio was 3:1 with a median age of 31 years. Blunt trauma (especially road traffic accidents) accounted for 69% of injuries. Liver trauma was associated with injuries to the chest, head, and abdominal injuries other than liver injury; most commonly spleen and kidneys. In all, 166 patients died in the emergency department, and a further 164 died in hospital. The mortality rate was higher in patients with increasing age (p < 0.001), hemodynamic instability (p < 0.001), blunt trauma (p < 0.001), and increasing severity of liver injury (p < 0.001). The incidence of liver trauma in Scotland is low, but it accounts for significant mortality. Associated injuries were common. Outcome was worse in patients with advanced age, blunt trauma, multiple injuries and those requiring an immediate laparotomy.

Effect of patients' age on management of acute intracranial haematoma: prospective national study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the management of head injuries differs between patients aged > or =65 years and those <65. DESIGN: Prospective observational national study over four years. SETTING: 25 Scottish hospitals that admit trauma patients. PARTICIPANTS: 527 trauma patients with extradural or acute subdural haematomas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to cranial computed tomography in the first hospital attended, rates of transfer to neurosurgical care, rates of neurosurgical intervention, length of time to operation, and mortality in inpatients in the three months after admission. RESULTS: Patients aged > or =65 years had lower survival rates than patients <65 years. Rates were 15/18 (83%) v 165/167 (99%) for extradural haematoma (P=0.007) and 61/93 (66%) v 229/249 (92%) for acute subdural haematoma (P<0.001). Older patients were less likely to be transferred to specialist neurosurgical care (10 (56%) v 142 (85%) for extradural haematoma (P=0.005) and 56 (60%) v 192 (77%) for subdural haematoma (P=0.004)). There was no significant difference between age groups in the incidence of neurosurgical interventions in patients who were transferred. Logistic regression analysis showed that age had a significant independent effect on transfer and on survival. Older patients had higher rates of coexisting medical conditions than younger patients, but when severity of injury, initial physiological status at presentation, or previous health were controlled for in a log linear analysis, transfer rates were still lower in older patients than in younger patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with those aged under 65 years, people aged 65 and over have a worse prognosis after head injury complicated by intracranial haematoma. The decision to transfer such patients to neurosurgical care seems to be biased against older patients.