Factors determining whether diffuse large B-cell lymphoma samples are detected by flow cytometry.

INTRODUCTION: Flow cytometry (FCM) is widely used in the diagnosis of mature B-cell neoplasms (MBN), and FCM data are usually consistent with morphological findings. However, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a common MBN, is sometimes not detected by FCM. This study aimed to explore factors that increase the likelihood of failure to detect DLBCL by FCM. METHODS: Cases with a final diagnosis of DLBCL that were analysed by eight-colour FCM were retrospectively collated. Clinical, FCM, histopathological and genetic data were compared between cases detected and cases not detected by FCM. RESULTS: DLBCL cases from 135 different patients were analysed, of which 22 (16%) were not detected by FCM. In samples not detected by flow cytometry, lymphocytes were a lower percentage of total events (p = 0.02), and T cells were a higher percentage of total lymphocytes (p = 0.01). Cases with high MYC protein expression on immunohistochemistry were less likely to be missed by FCM (p = 0.011). Detection of DLBCL was not different between germinal centre B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes, not significantly affected by the presence of necrosis or fibrosis, and not significantly different between biopsy specimens compared to fine-needle aspirates, or between samples from nodal compared to extranodal tissue. CONCLUSION: The study identifies several factors which affect the likelihood of DLBCL being missed by FCM. Even with eight-colour analysis, FCM fails to detect numerous cases of DLBCL.

Comparison of flow cytometry with other modalities in the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are heterogeneous myeloid malignancies, conventionally diagnosed by cytomorphology and cytogenetics, with an emerging role for flow cytometry. This study compared the performance of a 4-parameter flow cytometry scoring system, the Ogata Score, with other modalities in the diagnosis of MDS. METHODS: Bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsies from 238 patients performed to assess for possible MDS were analysed, and the flow cytometry score was retrospectively applied. The sensitivity and specificity of the flow cytometry score, the aspirate microscopy, the trephine microscopy with immunohistochemistry, and cytogenetic and molecular results were determined relative to the final diagnosis. RESULTS: The medical records of the 238 patients were reviewed to determine the final clinical diagnosis made at the time of the bone marrow examination. This final diagnosis of MDS, possible MDS or not MDS, was based on clinical features and laboratory tests, including all parameters of the bone marrow investigation, except for the flow cytometry score, which was only determined for this study. The flow cytometry score was 67.4% sensitive and 93.8% specific. Aspirate microscopy had higher sensitivity (83.7%) and similar specificity (92.0%), whereas trephine microscopy had similar sensitivity (66.3%) and specificity (89.4%) to flow cytometry. Although the flow cytometry score had a lower sensitivity than aspirate microscopy, in 18 patients (7.6% of the total) the flow cytometry score was positive for MDS, whereas aspirate microscopy was negative or inconclusive. CONCLUSION: The flow cytometry score and trephine microscopy exhibited reasonable sensitivity and high specificity, and complement aspirate microscopy in the assessment of MDS.

Polychromatic flow cytometry is more sensitive than microscopy in detecting small monoclonal plasma cell populations.

BACKGROUND: There is an emerging role for flow cytometry (FC) in the assessment of small populations of plasma cells (PC). However, FC's utility has been questioned due to consistent underestimation of the percentage of PC compared to microscopy. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on bone marrow samples analysed by 8-colour FC. Plasma cell populations were classified as polyclonal or monoclonal based on FC analysis. FC findings were compared with microscopy of aspirates, histology and immunohistochemistry of trephine biopsies, and immunofixation (IFX) of serum and/or urine. RESULTS: FC underestimated PC compared to aspirate and trephine microscopy. The 10% diagnostic cutoff for MM on aspirate microscopy corresponded to a 3.5% cutoff on FC. Abnormal plasma cell morphology by aspirate microscopy and clonality by FC correlated in 229 of 294 cases (78%). However, in 50 cases, FC demonstrated a monoclonal population but microscopy reported no abnormality. In 15 cases, abnormalities were reported by microscopy but not by FC. Clonality assessment by trephine microscopy and FC agreed in 251/280 cases (90%), but all 29 discordant cases were monoclonal by FC and not monoclonal by microscopy. These cases had fewer PC and proportionally more polyclonal PC, and when IFX detected a paraprotein, it had the same light chain as in the PC determined by FC. CONCLUSIONS: FC was more sensitive in detecting monoclonal populations that were small or accompanied by polyclonal PC. This study supports the inclusion of FC in the evaluation of PC, especially in the assessment of small populations. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Polychromatic flow cytometry in the clinical laboratory.

Technological advances in flow cytometry include increasingly sophisticated instruments and an expanding range of fluorochromes. These advances are making it possible to detect an increasing number of markers on a single cell. The term polychromatic flow cytometry applies to such systems that detect five or more markers simultaneously. This review provides an overview of the current and future impact of polychromatic flow cytometry in the clinical laboratory. The use of multiple markers has several advantages in the diagnosis and monitoring of haematological malignancies. Cell populations can be analysed more comprehensively and efficiently, and abnormal populations can be distinguished more readily when normal counterparts are present. Polychromatic flow cytometry is particularly useful in the evaluation of plasma cells, and the role of flow cytometry in the assessment of plasma cell disorders is reviewed in depth. There is improved sensitivity in the assessment of small populations, which is critical in the evaluation of minimal residual disease. Flow cytometry can also play a role in assessment of circulating tumour cells in carcinoma. Introduction of polychromatic flow cytometry is a complex process with many challenges including design of antibody panels and instrument compensation. Developments in data analysis are required to realise the full benefits of the other technical advances. Standardisation of protocols may reduce inter-laboratory variation. While the complexity of polychromatic flow cytometry creates challenges, it has substantial potential to improve clinical analysis.