Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 76
Filter
1.
Acad Pediatr ; 18(8): 957-964, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30077674

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Constipation is commonly diagnosed in our pediatric emergency department (ED). Care has varied significantly, with a heavy reliance on abdominal radiography (AR) for the diagnosis of and inpatient management for bowel cleanout. We implemented a standardized approach to caring for patients presenting to a pediatric ED with symptoms consistent with constipation, emphasizing clinical history, physical examination, less reliance on AR, and standardized home management. METHODS: Using quality improvement (QI) methodology, a multidisciplinary group developed an ED constipation management pathway, encouraging less reliance on AR for diagnosis and promoting home management over inpatient bowel cleanout. The pathway included a home management "gift basket" containing over-the-counter medications and educational materials to promote successful bowel cleanout. Outcome measures included pathway utilization, AR rate, ED cost and length of stay, and ED admission rate for constipation. RESULTS: Within 3 months, >90% of patients discharged home with an ED disposition diagnosis of constipation left with standardized educational materials and home medications. Staff education and feedback, pathway and gift basket changes, and a higher threshold for inpatient management led to significant decreases in AR rate (73.3%-24.6%, P < .001), average per-patient cost ($637.42-$538.85), length of stay (223-196 minutes, P < .001), and ED admission rate (15.3%-5.4%, P < .001), with no concerning missed diagnoses or increases in ED revisit rate. CONCLUSIONS: An ED QI project standardizing the care of pediatric constipation was implemented successfully, leading to a sustainable decrease in resource utilization. The next phase of the project will focus on collaborating with community providers to reduce ED utilization.


Subject(s)
Constipation/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Enema , Laxatives/therapeutic use , Parents/education , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Constipation/diagnosis , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Disease Management , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Hospitalization , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Implementation Science , Infant , Length of Stay , Male , Medical History Taking , Nonprescription Drugs , Patient Education as Topic , Physical Examination , Quality Improvement , Radiography, Abdominal
2.
Cardiol Young ; 28(6): 816-825, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29690945

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our primary goal was to decrease time to resolution of postoperative chylothorax as demonstrated by total days of chest tube utilisation through development and implementation of a management protocol. METHODS: A chylothorax management protocol was implemented as a quality improvement project at a tertiary-care paediatric hospital in July, 2015. Retrospective analysis was completed on patients aged 0-17 years diagnosed with chylothorax within 30 days of cardiac surgery in a pre-protocol cohort (February, 2014 to June, 2015, n=20) and a post-protocol cohort (July, 2015 to March, 2016, n=22).Measurements and resultsPatient characteristics were similar before and after protocol implementation. Duration of mechanical ventilation and cardiac ICU and hospital lengths of stay were unchanged between cohorts. Following protocol implementation, total duration of chest tube utilisation decreased from 12 to 7 days (p=0.047) with a decrease in maximum days of chest tube utilisation from 44 to 13 days. Duration of medium-chain triglyceride feeds decreased from 42 days to 31 days (p=0.01). In total, three patients in the post-protocol cohort underwent additional surgical procedures to treat chylothorax with subsequent resolution of chylothorax within 24 hours. There were no chest tube re-insertions or re-admissions related to chylothorax in either the pre- or post-protocol cohorts. Protocol compliance was 81%. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of a chylothorax management protocol is feasible, and in our small cohort of patients implementation led to a significant decrease in the duration of chest tube utilisation, while eliminating practice variability among providers.


Subject(s)
Chest Tubes/statistics & numerical data , Chylothorax/diagnosis , Chylothorax/therapy , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Chylothorax/etiology , Drainage/methods , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 18(5): 461-468, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28350561

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a quality improvement intervention reduces sternal wound infection rates in children after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: This is a pre- and postintervention quality improvement study. SETTING: A 16-bed cardiac ICU in a university-affiliated pediatric tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy from January 2010 to December 2014 are included. The sternal wound infection rates for primary closure and delayed sternal closure are reported per 100 sternotomies. The hospital-acquired infection records were used to identify preintervention cases, while postintervention cases were collected prospectively. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a sternal wound prevention bundle during the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods for cardiac surgical cases. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the preintervention period, 32 patients (3.8%) developed sternal wound infection, whereas only 19 (2.1%) developed sternal wound infection during the postintervention period (p = 0.04). The rates of sternal wound infection following primary closure were not significantly different pre- and postintervention (2.4% vs 1.6%; p = 0.35). However, patients with delayed sternal closure had significantly lower postintervention infection rates (10.6% vs 3.9%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a sternal wound prevention bundle during the perioperative period was associated with lower sternal wound infection rates in surgeries with delayed sternal closure.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Perioperative Care/standards , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Sternotomy , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Child, Preschool , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/etiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/etiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Patient Care Bundles , Perioperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
AANA J ; 85(3): 181-188, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31566554

ABSTRACT

Adding intravenous (IV) acetaminophen to an opioid-based regimen as multimodal pain management for perioperative pain control in adults undergoing spine surgery can lead to effective pain control, reduce the risk of opioid-related adverse effects, and facilitate postoperative neurologic evaluation for surgical outcomes. This descriptive pilot study investigated the analgesic effect of a single dose of IV acetaminophen administered intraoperatively as routine practice for perioperative pain management for adults undergoing elective spine surgery. A retrospective comparative cohort study compared an IV acetaminophen group with a group not receiving IV acetaminophen for primary outcomes measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and associated secondary outcomes. The IV acet-aminophen group had lower mean VAS scores than the group not receiving IV acetaminophen (4.33 vs 6.22, P = .01, at 60 minutes after entry into the postanesthesia care unit [PACU] for procedure level 4; 2.43 vs 3.11, P = .002, at PACU discharge for procedure level 3). The study did not show consistently lower VAS scores for the IV acetaminophen group vs the group not receiving IV acetaminophen. No difference was found for other secondary outcomes between groups. Future prospective studies are needed to assess the analgesic effects of IV acetaminophen for spine surgery cases.

5.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) ; 5(7): 279-287, 2016 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27366589

ABSTRACT

Objective: To develop a healing index for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) for use in clinical practice, research analysis, and clinical trials. Approach: U.S. Wound Registry data were examined retrospectively and assigned a clear outcome (healed, amputated, etc.). Significant variables were identified with bivariate analyses. A multivariable logistic regression model was created based on significant factors (p < 0.05) and tested on a hold-out sample of data. Out of 13,266 DFUs from the original dataset, 6,440 were eligible for analysis. The logistic regression model included 5,239 ulcers, of which 3,462 healed (66.1%). The 10% validation sample utilized 555 ulcers, of which 377 healed (67.9%). Results: Variables that significantly predicted healing were as follows: wound age (duration in days), wound size, number of concurrent wounds of any etiology, evidence of bioburden/infection, patient age, Wagner grade, being nonambulatory, renal dialysis, renal transplant, peripheral vascular disease, and patient hospitalization for any reason. Innovation: We present a validated stratification system, previously described as the Wound Healing Index (WHI), which predicts healing likelihood of patients with DFUs, incorporating patient- and wound-specific variables. Conclusion: The DFU WHI is a comprehensive and user-friendly validated predictive model for DFU healing. It can risk stratify patients enrolled in clinical research trials, stratify patient data for quality reporting and benchmarking activities, and identify patients most likely to require costly therapy to heal.

6.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S209-21.e6, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212398

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations of patient and injury characteristics with outcomes at inpatient rehabilitation discharge and 9 months postdischarge for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal observational study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients (N=2130) enrolled between 2008 and 2011, admitted for inpatient rehabilitation after index TBI, and divided into 5 subgroups based on rehabilitation admission FIM cognitive score. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rehabilitation length of stay, discharge to home, and FIM at discharge and 9 months postdischarge. RESULTS: Severity indices increased explained variation in outcomes beyond that accounted for by patient characteristics. FIM motor scores were generally the most predictable. Higher functioning subgroups had more predictable outcomes then subgroups with lower cognitive function at admission. Age at injury, time from injury to rehabilitation admission, and functional independence at rehabilitation admission were the most consistent predictors across all outcomes and subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from previous studies of the relations among patient and injury characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes were largely replicated. Discharge outcomes were most strongly associated with injury severity characteristics, whereas predictors of functional independence at 9 months postdischarge included both patient and injury characteristics.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/classification , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Adult , Evidence-Based Practice , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Least-Squares Analysis , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , United States
7.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S235-44, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212400

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' level of effort in occupational, physical, and speech therapy sessions during traumatic brain injury (TBI) inpatient rehabilitation and to evaluate how age, injury severity, cognitive impairment, and time are associated with effort. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Acute TBI rehabilitation programs. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=1946) receiving 138,555 therapy sessions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effort in rehabilitation sessions rated on the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale, FIM, Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score, posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), and Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS). RESULTS: The Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale effort ratings in individual therapy sessions closely conformed to a normative distribution for all 3 disciplines. Mean Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale ratings for patients' therapy sessions were higher in the discharge week than in the admission week (P<.001). For patients who completed 2, 3, or 4 weeks of rehabilitation, differences in effort ratings (P<.001) were observed between 5 subgroups stratified by admission FIM cognitive scores and over time. In linear mixed-effects modeling, age and Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score at admission, days from injury to rehabilitation admission, days from admission, and daily ratings of PTA and ABS score were predictors of level of effort (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' level of effort can be observed and reliably rated in the TBI inpatient rehabilitation setting using the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale. Patients who sustain TBI show varying levels of effort in rehabilitation therapy sessions, with effort tending to increase over the stay. PTA and agitated behavior are primary risk factors that substantially reduce patient effort in therapies.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Occupational Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Physical Exertion , Physical Therapy Modalities/statistics & numerical data , Speech Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Age Factors , Brain Injuries/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/physiopathology , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
8.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S245-55, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212401

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of enteral nutrition (EN) with patient preinjury and injury characteristics and outcomes for patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Nine rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=1701) admitted for first full inpatient rehabilitation after TBI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FIM at rehabilitation discharge, length of stay, weight loss, and various infections. RESULTS: There were many significant differences in preinjury and injury characteristics between patients who received EN and patients who did not. After matching patients with a propensity score of >40% for the likely use of EN, patients receiving EN with either a standard or a high-protein formula (>20% of calories coming from protein) for >25% of their rehabilitation stay had higher FIM motor and cognitive scores at rehabilitation discharge and less weight loss than did patients with similar characteristics not receiving EN. CONCLUSIONS: For patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation after TBI and matched on a propensity score of >40% for the likely use of EN, clinicians should strongly consider, when possible, EN for ≥25% of the rehabilitation stay and especially with a formula that contains at least 20% protein rather than a standard formula.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Brain Injuries/therapy , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Inpatients , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Regression Analysis , Rehabilitation Centers , Treatment Outcome
9.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S282-92.e5, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212404

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the amount and content of group therapies provided during inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI), and to assess the relations of group therapy with patient, injury, and treatment factors and outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive admissions (N=2130) for initial TBI rehabilitation at 10 inpatient rehabilitation facilities (9 in the United States, 1 in Canada) from October 2008 to September 2011. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of sessions that were group therapy (≥2 patients were treated simultaneously by ≥1 clinician); proportion of patients receiving group therapy; type of activity performed and amount of time spent in group therapy, by discipline; rehabilitation length of stay; discharge location; and FIM cognitive and motor scores at discharge. RESULTS: Of the patients, 79% received at least 1 session of group therapy, with group therapy accounting for 13.7% of all therapy sessions and 15.8% of therapy hours. On average, patients spent 2.9h/wk in group therapy. The greatest proportion of treatment time in group format was in therapeutic recreation (25.6%), followed by speech therapy (16.2%), occupational therapy (10.4%), psychology (8.1%), and physical therapy (7.9%). Group therapy time and type of treatment activities varied among admission FIM cognitive subgroups and treatment sites. Several factors appear to be predictive of receiving group therapy, with the treatment site being a major influence. However, group therapy as a whole offered little explanation of differences in the outcomes studied. CONCLUSIONS: Group therapy is commonly used in TBI rehabilitation, to varying degrees among disciplines, sites, and cognitive impairment subgroups. Various therapeutic activities take place in group therapy, indicating its perceived value in addressing many domains of functioning. Variation in outcomes is not explained well by overall percentage of therapy time delivered in groups.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Psychotherapy, Group , Brain Injuries/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Evidence-Based Practice/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services Research , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapy Modalities/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Psychotherapy, Group/statistics & numerical data , Recreation Therapy , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Speech Therapy , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
10.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S293-303.e1, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212405

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of, causes for, and factors associated with readmission to an acute care hospital (RTAC) during inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with TBI admitted consecutively for inpatient rehabilitation (N=2130). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RTAC incidence, RTAC causes, rehabilitation length of stay (RLOS), and rehabilitation discharge location. RESULTS: A total of 183 participants (9%) experienced RTAC for a total of 210 episodes. Of 183 participants, 161 patients experienced 1 RTAC episode, 17 had 2, and 5 had 3. The mean time from rehabilitation admission to first RTAC was 22±22 days. The mean duration in acute care during RTAC was 7±8 days. Eighty-four participants (46%) had ≥1 RTAC episodes for medical reasons, 102 (56%) had ≥1 RTAC episodes for surgical reasons, and 6 (3%) participants had RTAC episodes for unknown reasons. Most common surgical RTAC reasons were neurosurgical (65%), pulmonary (9%), infection (5%), and orthopedic (5%); most common medical reasons were infection (26%), neurological (23%), and cardiac (12%). Any RTAC was predicted as more likely for patients with older age, history of coronary artery disease, history of congestive heart failure, acute care diagnosis of depression, craniotomy or craniectomy during acute care, and presence of dysphagia at rehabilitation admission. RTAC was less likely for patients with higher admission FIM motor scores and education less than high school diploma. RTAC occurrence during rehabilitation was significantly associated with longer RLOS and smaller likelihood of discharge home. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 9% of patients with TBI experienced RTAC episodes during inpatient rehabilitation for various medical and surgical reasons. This information may help inform interventions aimed at reducing interruptions in rehabilitation for RTAC. RTACs were associated with longer RLOS and discharge to an institutional setting.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Canada , Cohort Studies , Disability Evaluation , Evidence-Based Practice , Female , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome , United States
11.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S330-9.e4, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of, causes for, and factors associated with acute rehospitalization during 9 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Multicenter observational cohort. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with TBI (N=1850) admitted for inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrences of proxy or self-report of postrehabilitation acute care rehospitalization, as well as length of and causes for rehospitalizations. RESULTS: A total of 510 participants (28%) had experienced 775 acute rehospitalizations. All experienced 1 admission (510 participants [66%]), whereas 154 (20%) had 2 admissions, 60 (8%) had 3, 23 (3%) had 4, 27 had between 5 and 11, and 1 had 12. The most common rehospitalization causes were infection (15%), neurological (13%), neurosurgical (11%), injury (7%), psychiatric (7%), and orthopedic (7%). The mean time from rehabilitation discharge to first rehospitalization was 113 days. The mean rehospitalization duration was 6.5 days. Logistic regression analyses revealed that older age, history of seizures before injury or during acute care or rehabilitation, history of brain injuries, and non-brain injury medical severity increased the risk of rehospitalization. Injury etiology of motor vehicle collision and high motor functioning at discharge decreased rehospitalization risk. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 28% of patients with TBI were rehospitalized within 9 months of TBI rehabilitation discharge owing to various medical and surgical reasons. Future research should evaluate whether some of these occurrences may be preventable (such as infections, injuries, and psychiatric disorders) and should evaluate the extent to which persons at risk may benefit from additional screening, surveillance, and treatment protocols.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Brain Injuries/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Seizures/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology
12.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S178-96.e15, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212396

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe study design, patients, centers, treatments, and outcomes of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) practice-based evidence (PBE) study and to evaluate the generalizability of the findings to the U.S. TBI inpatient rehabilitation population. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, observational study. SETTING: Ten inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=2130) enrolled between October 2008 and September 2011 and admitted for inpatient rehabilitation after an index TBI injury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Return to acute care during rehabilitation, rehabilitation length of stay, FIM at discharge, residence at discharge, and 9 months postdischarge rehospitalization, FIM, participation, and subjective well-being. RESULTS: The level of admission FIM cognitive score was found to create relatively homogeneous subgroups for the subsequent analysis of best treatment combinations. There were significant differences in patient and injury characteristics, treatments, rehabilitation course, and outcomes by admission FIM cognitive subgroups. TBI-PBE study patients were overall similar to U.S. national TBI inpatient rehabilitation populations. CONCLUSIONS: This TBI-PBE study succeeded in capturing naturally occurring variation in patients and treatments, offering opportunities to study best treatments for specific patient impairments. Subsequent articles in this issue report differences between patients and treatments and associations with outcomes in greater detail.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Educational Status , Evidence-Based Practice , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Therapy , Point-of-Care Systems , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Research Design , Sex Distribution , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
13.
J Pediatr Health Care ; 29(2): 169-80, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25454385

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants and young children. Because of its frequency, a clinical practice guideline for bronchiolitis was implemented in this population in an effort to decrease costs and the number of diagnostic evaluations performed and medications used without increasing length of stay or transfers to the pediatric intensive care unit. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 322 pediatric admissions to a rural community hospital was conducted (169 before guideline implementation and 153 after guideline implementation), and data were categorically stratified into three groups for comparison purposes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, with a p value < .05 defining significance. RESULTS: During the project period, patients with a mean age of 9.6 months were admitted to the hospital with bronchiolitis. Statistically significant decreases in cost per day and decreases in use of antibiotics and chest radiographs were achieved without increasing length of stay or pediatric intensive care unit transfers. DISCUSSION: This project demonstrated feasibility in implementing an evidence-based clinical practice guideline in a rural hospital to improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis/therapy , Guideline Adherence , Hispanic or Latino , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , Bronchiolitis/economics , Bronchiolitis/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Evidence-Based Practice , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
14.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 93(11): 971-86, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24879551

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify patient and clinical factors most strongly associated with a spinal cord injury patient's risk for developing a pressure ulcer (PU) during rehabilitation. DESIGN: This is a prospective observational cohort study conducted at an urban rehabilitation hospital-based specialized spinal cord injury center. The main outcome measure was the onset of a stage 2 or higher PU. RESULTS: Study patients (N = 159) with new (n = 66) and patients with earlier (n = 99) spinal injuries had identical rates at which they acquired a new PU (stage ≥2) in rehabilitation--13.1%. The patients who came to rehabilitation with a PU or myocutaneous flap exhibited a higher rate of developing yet another PU while in rehabilitation (30.2%) than those who came to rehabilitation without an existing PU or flap (6.9%). Logistic regression analysis identified two variables that best predicted a patient's risk at admission for developing a PU during rehabilitation (c = 0.77)--entering rehabilitation with a PU and admission Functional Independence Measure transfers score of less than 3.5. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest risk of developing a new PU in rehabilitation is being admitted with an existing PU followed by admission Functional Independence Measure transfers score of less than 3.5. Using these two variables, one can develop a patient PU risk algorithm at admission that can alert clinicians for the need to enhance vigilance, skin monitoring, and early patient education.


Subject(s)
Length of Stay , Preexisting Condition Coverage , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Rehabilitation Centers , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Adult , Age Factors , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitals, Urban , Humans , Incidence , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Therapy Modalities , Predictive Value of Tests , Pressure Ulcer/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnosis , Spinal Cord Injuries/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Wound Repair Regen ; 21(6): 823-32, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24134202

ABSTRACT

Randomized controlled trials in wound care generalize poorly because they exclude patients with significant comorbid conditions. Research using real-world wound care patients is hindered by lack of validated methods to stratify patients according to severity of underlying illnesses. We developed a comprehensive stratification system for patients with wounds that predicts healing likelihood. Complete medical record data on 50,967 wounds from the United States Wound Registry were assigned a clear outcome (healed, amputated, etc.). Factors known to be associated with healing were evaluated using logistic regression models. Significant variables (p < 0.05) were determined and subsequently tested on a holdout sample of data. A different model predicted healing for each wound type. Some variables predicted significantly in nearly all models: wound size, wound age, number of wounds, evidence of bioburden, tissue type exposed (Wagner grade or stage), being nonambulatory, and requiring hospitalization during the course of care. Variables significant in some models included renal failure, renal transplant, malnutrition, autoimmune disease, and cardiovascular disease. All models validated well when applied to the holdout sample. The "Wound Healing Index" can validly predict likelihood of wound healing among real-world patients and can facilitate comparative effectiveness research to identify patients needing advanced therapeutics.


Subject(s)
Wound Healing , Wounds and Injuries/pathology , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Registries , Terminology as Topic , Treatment Outcome , United States , Wounds and Injuries/classification
16.
Burns ; 39(7): 1374-9, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23663900

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The anabolic agent oxandrolone (OX) has been found to decrease length of stay (LOS) following 20-60% total body surface area (TBSA) burn injury. This study uses the Comprehensive Severity Index (CSI) to control for severity of illness and explores the relationship between OX and LOS in a more broadly selected sample of burn patients and a natural practice setting. METHODS: A practice-based evidence study was conducted at a single regional burn center. Maximum severity of illness (MCSIC) was measured using a burn-specific version of CSI. Data on 167 consecutive surviving patients with TBSA≥15% were analyzed using case-control matching for MCSIC, TBSA, and age. Thirty-eight patients received OX. RESULTS: Median patient age for the entire patient sample was 42.7 years. Using a 1:1 match based upon MCSIC, TBSA, then age, mean LOS for patients who received OX was 33.6 days, as opposed to 43.4 days for those who were not managed with OX (p=0.03). If patients were matched >1:1 for controls: cases, mean LOS was 40.9 days (controls) versus 31.6 days (cases). CONCLUSIONS: OX is associated with shorter LOS after controlling for MCSIC, TBSA, and age. Future comparative effectiveness studies should better define which patients derive the greatest benefits from receipt of OX during their recovery from major burn injury.


Subject(s)
Anabolic Agents/therapeutic use , Burns/drug therapy , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Oxandrolone/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
17.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S106-14, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527767

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of and reasons for missed therapy sessions during inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), and to assess the influence of demographic, medical, and injury factors on the missing of therapy sessions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Six inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with SCI (N=1376) consecutively admitted for inpatient rehabilitation at participating sites; 1032 participants were randomly selected for model development, and 344 participants were selected for model cross-validation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total hours of missed therapy; total minutes missed per week; and reason for missed therapy. RESULTS: Patients missed an average of 153 minutes of therapies per week, or a total of 20 hours over their rehabilitation stay. Common reasons for missing physical, occupational, and speech therapy were lack of patient readiness and medical reasons. Therapeutic recreation sessions were commonly missed because of patient refusal. More missed therapy (for any reason) was predicted by having C5-8 tetraplegia, paraplegia, greater morbidity, higher motor and cognitive functional independence, higher percent of sessions limited by fatigue, violent SCI etiology, longer rehabilitation length of stay, and treatment center. Older age, ventilator use, and percent of sessions limited by spasticity were predictive of less therapy time missed. CONCLUSIONS: On average, patients missed about 2.5 hours of therapy weekly. In view of the potential impact on rehabilitation outcomes and given the potential cost of lost resources, missed therapy deserves further study and administrative attention. In addressing this issue, there may be potential for the rehabilitation facility to intervene to reduce such lost time, including addressing equipment/therapist availability, patient readiness, patient engagement, and center-specific approaches.


Subject(s)
Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Adult , Age Factors , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , United States
18.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S145-53, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527770

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe group therapy utilization in spinal cord injury (SCI) inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Six inpatient rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=1376) receiving initial rehabilitation after traumatic SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time spent in group versus individual therapy for physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), therapeutic recreation (TR), and psychology (PSY) therapies. RESULTS: The majority (98%) of patients participated in at least 1 group therapy session, with 83%, 81%, 80%, and 54% of patients receiving group PT, OT, TR, and PSY, respectively. On average, 24% of treatment sessions and 27% of treatment time was provided in group sessions, with TR providing the greatest percent of its time in groups. Group therapy time and time spent in specific activities varied among patient subgroups with different injury characteristics. Group therapy time also varied widely among centers (range, 1.2-6.6h/wk). Across all injury subgroups, individual and group therapy hours per week were negatively correlated for OT and positively correlated for TR. Patient characteristics, clinician experience, and treatment center predicted 32% of variance in group hours per week. PT and OT strengthening/endurance interventions and TR outings were the most common group activities overall. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of inpatient SCI rehabilitation consists of individual sessions, most patients participate in group therapy, which contributes significantly to total therapy time. Patterns of group utilization fit with functional expectations and clinical goals. A trade-off between group and individual therapy may occur in some disciplines. Utilization of group therapy varies widely among centers, and further study is needed to identify optimal patterns of group therapy utilization.


Subject(s)
Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Therapy/methods , Physical Therapy Modalities , Prospective Studies , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Recreation Therapy/methods , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
19.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S165-74, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527772

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between inpatient and postdischarge rehabilitation services and function, life satisfaction, and community participation 1 year after spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Prospective, observational. SETTING: Six rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with SCI (N=1376). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART), motor FIM (mFIM), and return to work/school at 1 year post-SCI. RESULTS: Demographic and injury characteristics explained 49% of the variance in mFIM and 9% to 25% of the variance in SWLS and CHART social integration, mobility, and occupation scores. Inpatient rehabilitation services explained an additional 2% of the variance for mFIM and 1% to 3% of the variance for SWLS and CHART scores. More time in inpatient physical therapy (PT) was associated with higher mFIM scores; more time in inpatient therapeutic recreation (TR) and social work and more postdischarge nursing (NSG) were associated with lower mFIM scores. More inpatient PT and TR and more postdischarge PT were associated with higher mobility scores; more inpatient psychology (PSY) was associated with lower mobility scores. More postdischarge TR was associated with higher SWLS; more postdischarge PSY services was associated with lower SWLS. Inpatient TR was positively associated with social integration scores; postdischarge PSY was negatively associated with social integration scores. More postdischarge vocational counseling was associated with higher occupation scores. Differences between centers did not explain additional variability in the outcomes studied. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient and postdischarge rehabilitation services are weakly associated with life satisfaction and societal participation 1 year after SCI. Further study of the type and intensity of postdischarge services, and the association with outcomes, is needed to ascertain the most effective use of therapy services after SCI.


Subject(s)
Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Adult , Age Factors , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Sex Factors , Social Participation , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
20.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S75-86, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the amount of variation in short- and medium-term spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation outcomes explained by various comorbidity measures, over and above patient preinjury characteristics and neurologic and functional status. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study of traumatic SCI patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation and followed up at 1 year postinjury. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation and community follow-up at 6 SCI treatment centers. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=1376) included 1032 patients randomly selected for model development and 344 patients selected for cross-validation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rehabilitation length of stay (LOS), return to acute care during rehabilitation, discharge motor FIM, discharge home, rehospitalization after discharge, 1-year return to work/school and 1-year depression symptomatology, motor FIM, and residence. Comorbidity measures used were case-mix groups tier weights, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and the Comprehensive Severity Index (CSI). RESULTS: Multivariable regression analyses, controlling for patient preinjury and injury characteristics, found that the maximum Comprehensive Severity Index (MCSI) was a significant and stronger predictor of LOS, return to acute care during rehabilitation, and 1-year motor FIM compared with the case-mix groups tier weight or the CCI. The admission CSI was a strong predictor of LOS. For rehospitalization after discharge, only the case-mix groups tier weight was significant. No comorbidity measure was significant beyond patient preinjury and injury characteristics for discharge home, discharge motor FIM, living at home, depression symptomatology, major depressive syndrome, and return to work/school. CONCLUSIONS: Patient preinjury and injury characteristics are sufficient to predict most SCI outcomes. For rehabilitation LOS and return to acute care during rehabilitation, one achieves substantially better explanation when taking clinical comorbidity based on the MCSI into account.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Adult , Comorbidity , Depression/psychology , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Patient Readmission , Recovery of Function , Socioeconomic Factors , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/psychology , Time Factors , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL