Can radiation restore immunotherapy response in metastatic melanoma refractory to checkpoint inhibitors: An institutional experience in salvaging immunotherapy resistant disease.

Melanoma is an immunogenically active tumor with abundantly expressed lymphoid infiltration. Immunotherapy(IO) has proven as a promising treatment option for melanoma but treatment resistance remains as an issue in the majority of patients.There is emerging evidence that radiotherapy (RT) could modulate the tumor microenvironment, increase antigen presentation, and augment adaptive antitumor immunity. Our objective is to evaluate overall treatment response and safety in patients with metastatic melanoma who progressed while on IO, and were treated with RT concurrently with IO for progressive sites.

Skeletal muscle is prognostic in resected stage III malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia (low skeletal muscle index, SMI) and myosteatosis (low skeletal muscle radiodensity, SMD) have been associated with worse survival in cancer. This study evaluated associations of body composition with survival in patients with resected stage III melanoma. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of resected stage III melanoma patients in Alberta, Canada from 2007 to 2017. Preoperative CT scans were analyzed to determine SMI and SMD. Cohort-specific SMI and SMD cut-offs that optimally predicted overall survival (OS) were identified through stratification, in addition to testing cut-offs previously established in the literature. Overall (OS), melanoma-specific (MSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined from date of surgery and analysed using multivariable Cox regressions with age, sex, BMI, stage subgroup, ECOG PS, and tumor location as covariates. RESULTS: We included 330 patients in the final analysis. Mean age was 56 years and 62.4% of patients were male. At time of censoring 150 patients (45.6%) had died. Sarcopenia based on literature cut-offs was associated with decreased OS (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.00-2.21, p = 0.016). Using cohort-specific cut-offs, sarcopenic patients also had significantly decreased OS (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.27-2.76, p = 0.002). Myosteatosis defined using cohort-specific cut-offs predicted worse OS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.42-3.25, p < 0.001), MSS (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.40-3.75, p = 0.001) and RFS (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.02-2.27, p = 0.041). Increased BMI ( ≥ 25) and visceral fat index were not significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia and myosteatosis, defined using two sets of cut-offs, are associated with decreased OS and MSS in resected stage III melanoma.

Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

PURPOSE: In the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, durable clinical benefit was demonstrated previously with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab. Here, we report 6.5-year efficacy and safety outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 314), nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 316), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses; n = 315). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab. Secondary end points included objective response rate, descriptive efficacy assessments of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone, and safety. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS; descriptive analysis), which excludes deaths unrelated to melanoma, was also evaluated. RESULTS: Median OS (minimum follow-up, 6.5 years) was 72.1, 36.9, and 19.9 months in the combination, nivolumab, and ipilimumab groups, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, 58.7, and 21.9 months, respectively; 6.5-year OS rates were 57%, 43%, and 25% in patients with BRAF-mutant tumors and 46%, 42%, and 22% in those with BRAF-wild-type tumors, respectively. In patients who discontinued treatment, the median treatment-free interval was 27.6, 2.3, and 1.9 months, respectively. Since the 5-year analysis, no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: These 6.5-year CheckMate 067 results, which include the longest median OS in a phase III melanoma trial reported to date and the first report of MSS, showed durable, improved clinical outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and, in descriptive analyses, with the combination over nivolumab monotherapy.

PD-1 Blockade With Concurrent Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Inoperable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (LA-cSCC), radiotherapy alone (RT) is often the only treatment option with modest tumor response. We report the outcomes of using combination of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and RT in the treatment of inoperable LA-cSCC. The study presents the efficacy and safety data for the patients with LA-cSCC treated with this combination. METHODS: During the period 2018-2020, a total of 7 patients with biopsy proven inoperable LA-cSCC were treated with combination of PD-1 inhibitor cemiplimab and concurrent RT (Cem-RT). The patients were followed up for safety and efficacy of the Cem-RT regimen and the primary endpoints were objective tumor response and toxicity. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 68 years (range, 64-94). All patients had ECOG performance score 0-1. Six patients initially received cemiplimab and concurrent RT was added to PD-1 inhibitor when there was an inadequate therapeutic response. One patient received concurrent Cem-RT. RT with PD-1 antibody was well tolerated. Six patients developed grade ≤2 dermatitis and 1 patient (patient no. 3) developed acute grade 3 skin reaction. During the post-RT follow up, 3 patients discontinued cemiplimab due to significant toxicities. At the time of reporting , 5 patients remain in complete remission. One patient developed lung metastasis and is currently receiving best supportive care. CONCLUSIONS: The Cem-RT combination was safe and well tolerated with significant tumor response suggesting Cem-RT may be a viable therapeutic option for LA-cSCC. Our hypothesis generating data support the rationale for future prospective studies.

Patterns and predictors of relapse in Merkel cell carcinoma: Results from a population-based study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prospective data evaluating the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for Merkel Cell Carcinoma(MCC) is lacking. To better understand the efficacy of adjuvant RT, a population-based patterns of failure study was conducted. METHODS: We identified MCC patients treated from 1988 to 2018.Primary outcome measures were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and MCC-specific survival (MCC-SS). Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) was also calculated. RESULTS: 217 patients with mean age 79 (range: 33-96) were analyzed. The median follow-up was 40 months. Treatments were: surgery(S) alone (n = 101, 45%) or S + RT(n = 116, 55%).Local recurrence (LR) was low in stage I (n = 6, 6.5%) with clear margin of ≥1 cm, negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) without high-risk factors, irrespective of adjuvant RT. Tumor size ≥ 2 cm (HR:2.95; p = 0.024) and immunosuppression(HR:3.98; p = 0.001) were associated with high risk of nodal failure. Adjuvant RT was associated with significant reduction in regional failure (HR:0.36; p = 0.002). Distant metastases (DM) were infrequent in stage I (4/90) and stage II (4/34), compared to stage III (32/93). Adjuvant RT improvedRFS but did not influence MCC-SS and OS. CCI was a significant predictor of OS. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant RT improvedRFS, withoutimpact on MCC-SS and OS. Co-morbidity rather than RT influenced OS. Adjuvant RT may be avoided instage I patients with negative SLNB and no associated high-risk factors. Prophylactic RNI could be considered in stage II with high risk features, inspite of negative SLNB. Stage III patients benefited from adjuvant RNI, but no impact on prevention of DM.

Myosteatosis is prognostic in metastatic melanoma treated with nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: While immunotherapy agents have improved outcomes in metastatic melanoma (MM), predictive biomarkers in these patients are lacking. Parameters identified from body composition analysis, such as low SMD (also termed myosteatosis), may prognosticate MM patients on immunotherapy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 44 MM patients received nivolumab, either as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab. Pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed to determine skeletal muscle density (SMD) in Hounsfield units (HU) and muscle surface area (MSA) in cm2 at L3. MSA was used to determine nivolumab dosing in mg/cm2. RESULTS: Low SMD was associated with worse overall survival (OS) by log rank test (median 12.03 vs. 34.96 months, p = 0.001) and in multivariate analysis when accounting for age, sex, performance status, and number of prior lines of therapy (HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.44-13.42, p = 0.009). Lower nivolumab dosing by MSA was significantly associated with improved OS (median 42.9 vs. 12.3 months, p < 0.001). This association remained significant in multivariate analysis with age, sex, performance status, and number of prior lines of therapy (HR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.30, p = 0.001). Neither SMD nor higher nivolumab dose per MSA were associated with increased incidence of treatment toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Low SMD is prognostic in MM treated with nivolumab immunotherapy. Presence of myosteatosis or higher nivolumab dose based on body composition did not predict treatment toxicity.

A Clinicoepidemiological Study of Melanoma in Young Patients (20 Years of Age or Less) in Alberta, Canada, From 1992 to 2011.

The epidemiological trends of malignant melanoma have been well described in the literature. However, there remains a paucity of population-based studies assessing melanoma epidemiology in our younger patients (20 years of age or less). Other studies indicate that melanoma incidence has risen in pediatric populations over the last several decades and that these tumors may display different clinical characteristics from those arising in adult populations. We conducted a retrospective, population-based analysis of all incident cases of melanoma occurring in young patients aged ≤20 years in Alberta from 1992 to 2011. Information, including patient age, sex, anatomical location, date of diagnosis, histological subtype (if available), level of invasion, and date of death (if applicable), was obtained from the Alberta Cancer Registry. All cases occurring during a 10-year period from 1993 to 2011 have been reviewed. A total of 71 cases were diagnosed during this time (63% female and 37% male). Age range was 0-20 years (mean of 17.5 years). Truncal melanomas made up 36% of cases, while 28% occurred on the lower limbs, 17% on the upper limbs, and 18% in the head and neck region. Average Breslow thickness was 1.97 mm; 67% of tumors were less than 1 mm thick. Unfortunately, 8 of 71 patients died from their disease. Overall, the incidence of melanoma in patients aged ≤20 years appeared to decrease in Alberta in the past 20 years; however, there has been an increase in the thickness of melanoma at diagnosis, which needs to be addressed.

Safety and efficacy of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: results from a North American expanded access program (CheckMate 218).

CheckMate 218, a North American expanded access program (EAP), investigated nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Safety and efficacy, including 2-year survival in clinically relevant patient subgroups, are reported. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and no prior checkpoint inhibitors. Patients received nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (induction) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (maintenance) until progression or unacceptable toxicity or a maximum of 48 weeks. Safety and overall survival (OS) data were collected. This EAP included 754 treated patients from the USA (n = 580) and Canada (n = 174). Median follow-up time was 17.8 months. All-grade and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 96% and 53% of patients and led to treatment discontinuation in 36% and 26% of patients, respectively. OS rates at 12 and 24 months were 82% [95% confidence interval (CI) 79-84] and 70% (95% CI 66-74), respectively. Twenty-four-month OS rates were 63% in patients aged ≥75 years, 56% in patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, 73% in patients with BRAF wild-type tumors, 70% in patients with BRAF mutant tumors, and 56% in patients with mucosal melanoma. In this EAP, nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated high survival rates and safety outcomes consistent with those from randomized clinical trials, further supporting the use of this combination for advanced melanoma across multiple subgroups.

Overall survival at 5 years of follow-up in a phase III trial comparing ipilimumab 10 mg/kg with 3 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported significantly longer overall survival (OS) with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma, with higher incidences of adverse events (AEs) at 10 mg/kg. This follow-up analysis reports a 5-year update of OS and safety. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial included patients with untreated or previously treated unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses. The primary end point was OS. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 61 months, median OS was 15.7 months (95% CI 11.6 to 17.8) at 10 mg/kg and 11.5 months (95% CI 9.9 to 13.3) at 3 mg/kg (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.99; p=0.04). In a subgroup analysis, median OS of patients with asymptomatic brain metastasis was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.0 to 12.8) in the 10 mg/kg group and 5.7 months (95% CI 4.2 to 7.0) in the 3 mg/kg group. In patients with wild-type or mutant BRAF tumors, median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.2 to 17.0) and 33.2 months (95% CI 19.4 to 45.2) in the 10 mg/kg group, and 11.2 months (95% CI 9.2 to 13.8) and 19.7 months (95% CI 11.6 to 25.3) in the 3 mg/kg group, respectively. The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs was 36% in the 10 mg/kg group vs 20% in the 3 mg/kg group, and deaths due to treatment-related AEs occurred in four (1%) and two patients (1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This 61-month follow-up of a phase III trial showed sustained long-term survival in patients with advanced melanoma who started metastatic treatment with ipilimumab monotherapy, and confirmed the significant benefit for those who received ipilimumab 10 mg/kg vs 3 mg/kg. These results suggest the emergence of a plateau in the OS curve, consistent with previous ipilimumab studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01515189.

Anti-PD1-Induced Immune-Related Adverse Events and Survival Outcomes in Advanced Melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: Objective response rates (ORR) appear to be higher in melanoma patients who develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but whether there is a similar association between irAEs and survival remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced melanoma treated with single-agent pembrolizumab or nivolumab in the province of Alberta from June 2014 to May 2017 were identified through the provincial pharmacy database. Chart review identified and categorized all irAEs that occurred while on anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) with patients who developed any irAEs versus those who did not. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and ORR. RESULTS: Among 186 patients, any-grade and grade ≥3 irAEs occurred in 88 (47%) and 27 (15%) patients, respectively; one patient died of pneumonitis. In a landmark analysis excluding patients who died within the first 12 weeks, the median follow-up was 24 months, 20 months in patients without any irAEs and 26 months in patients with irAEs (p = .006). Median OS was 39 versus 23 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; p = .001) for any irAE and no irAE, respectively, and median OS not reached versus 29 months for grade ≥3 irAEs and no grade ≥3 irAEs, respectively. In multivariate analysis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase correlated with reduced OS (HR, 2.34; p = .001), whereas each additional cycle of treatment received (HR, 0.94; p < .001) and development of grade ≥3 irAEs (HR, 0.29, p = .024) were significantly associated with longer OS. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1-associated grade ≥3 irAEs in patients with advanced melanoma is associated with better patient outcomes, including overall survival. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Previous prospective randomized clinical trials demonstrate improved response rates in patients with melanoma who develop select adverse events. The current population-based real-world study in advanced melanoma reports an association with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-induced grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and better patient outcomes, including overall survival. These results suggest that irAEs may be a manifestation of a patient's ability to mount a systemic immune response from PD-1-directed therapies, which may be associated with therapeutic benefit. The finding of irAEs coinciding with clinical benefit from these therapies supposes that these events are, by and large, unavoidable, and the critical management of irAEs remains essential for optimizing patient outcomes.

Body composition is prognostic and predictive of ipilimumab activity in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Body composition is minimally investigated in an immunotherapy era. Specific body composition signals such as myosteatosis may reflect aspects of patients' immunology and thereby their ability to respond to immunotherapies. Ipilimumab is a key checkpoint inhibitor in metastatic melanoma. As an antibody, it may also be more accurately dosed using body composition parameters rather than weight alone. This retrospective study aimed to investigate body composition-based dosing and outcomes. METHODS: Pretreatment computed tomography images from metastatic melanoma, ipilimumab-treated patients from 2009 to 2014 were used to measure myosteatosis [skeletal muscle radiographic density or SMD, in Hounsfield units (HU)] and surface area (cm2 ) as previously described. Cut point analysis determined whether a level of ipilimumab dose and myosteatosis demonstrated differences in progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rates and toxicities. RESULTS: Of 121 identified, 97 patients were evaluable. Baseline demographics included 56 years median age, 60% male participants, and 23.7% with BRAF mutations. SMD analysis identified cut-offs of SMD < 42 in those with BMI < 25 kg/m2 and <20 HU in those with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 , respectively. Low SMD patients had poorer median PFS [2.4 vs. 2.7 months, hazard ratio (HR) 1.76, P = 0.008] and OS (5.4 vs. 17.5 months, HR 2.47, P = 0.001), which remained significant in multivariate modelling. High SMD patients had more immune-related adverse events, better objective response rates (17.9 vs. 3.3%, P = 0.051), and lower baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (21 vs. 39%, P = 0.049). Separately, patients receiving <2.03 mg/cm2 had improved median PFS (3.0 vs. 2.6 months, HR 1.88, P = 0.02) and OS (14.9 vs. 5.7 months, HR 1.98, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Low SMD and receiving >2.03 mg/cm2 are prognostic of poorer melanoma outcomes post ipilimumab. SMD may identify patients with flawed immunology and predict who may better respond to such therapy. Ipilimumab dosing by skeletal muscle index stands in contrast to weight-based dosing and may demonstrate a more accurate method of antibody dosing.

Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone resulted in longer progression-free and overall survival than ipilimumab alone in a trial involving patients with advanced melanoma. We now report 5-year outcomes in the trial. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma to receive one of the following regimens: nivolumab (at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram every 2 weeks); nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram every 2 weeks) plus ipilimumab-matched placebo; or ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram every 3 weeks for four doses) plus nivolumab-matched placebo. The two primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and in the nivolumab group, as compared with the ipilimumab group. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 60 months, the median overall survival was more than 60.0 months (median not reached) in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and 36.9 months in the nivolumab group, as compared with 19.9 months in the ipilimumab group (hazard ratio for death with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. ipilimumab, 0.52; hazard ratio for death with nivolumab vs. ipilimumab, 0.63). Overall survival at 5 years was 52% in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and 44% in the nivolumab group, as compared with 26% in the ipilimumab group. No sustained deterioration of health-related quality of life was observed during or after treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or with nivolumab alone. No new late toxic effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced melanoma, sustained long-term overall survival at 5 years was observed in a greater percentage of patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone than in those who received ipilimumab alone, with no apparent loss of quality of life in the patients who received regimens containing nivolumab. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 067 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01844505.).

Proposed diagnostic and treatment paradigm for high-grade neurological complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as antibodies to cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (ipilimumab) and programmed cell-death 1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) molecules have been used in non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic melanoma, and renal-cell carcinoma, among others. With these agents, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can occur, including those affecting the neurological axis. In this review, high-grade neurological irAEs associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors including cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and myasthenia gravis (MG) are analyzed. Based on current literature and experience at our institution with 4 cases of high-grade neurological irAEs associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (2 cases of GBS, 1 case of meningo-radiculitis, and 1 case of myelitis), we propose an algorithm for the investigation and treatment of high-grade neurological irAEs. Our algorithm incorporates both peripheral nervous system (meningo-radiculitis, GBS, MG) and central nervous system presentations (myelitis, encephalopathy). It is anticipated that our algorithm will be useful both to oncologists and neurologists who are likely to encounter neurological irAEs more frequently in the future as immune checkpoint inhibitors become more widely used.

Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of stage III melanoma: long-term follow-up results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18071 double-blind phase 3 randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Since 2015, adjuvant therapy with ipilimumab is an approved treatment for stage III melanoma based on a significantly prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS). At a median follow-up of 5.3 years, RFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were each significantly prolonged in the ipilimumab group compared with the placebo group, despite a 53.3% (ipilimumab) versus 4.6% (placebo) treatment discontinuation rate due to adverse events. We present now long-term follow-up results of this European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18071 trial. PATIENTS, METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 99 sites randomised 951 patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma (excluding lymph node metastasis ≤1 mm or in-transit metastasis) with adequate resection of lymph nodes to receive intravenous infusions of ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo, every 3 weeks for 4 doses, then every 3 months for up to 3 years. The RFS, DMFS and OS, as reported by the local investigators, were assessed by the intention-to-treat analysis. Among 431 patients randomised at 63 sites and who were still alive at the analysis reported in 2016, recent follow-up information could be obtained for 264 patients. The median OS follow-up was 6.9 years. The RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.88; P < 0.001), DMFS (HR 0.76, 0.64-0.90; P = 0.002) and OS (HR 0.73, 0.60-0.89; P = 0.002) benefit observed in the ipilimumab group was durable with an 8.7% absolute difference at 7 years for OS. The benefit was consistent across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy with ipilimumab prolongs RFS, DMFS and OS significantly. The benefit is sustained long term and consistent across subgroups.

Comprehensive in vitro characterization of PD-L1 small molecule inhibitors.

Blockade of the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) interaction has emerged as a powerful strategy in cancer immunotherapy. Recently, there have been enormous efforts to develop potent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In particular, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and Aurigene Discovery Technologies have individually disclosed several promising PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, whose detailed experimental data are not publicly disclosed. In this work, we report the rigorous and systematic in vitro characterization of a selected set of potent PD-1/PD-L1 macrocyclic peptide (BMSpep-57) and small-molecule inhibitors (BMS-103, BMS-142) from BMS and a peptidomimetic small-molecule inhibitor from Aurigene (Aurigene-1) using a series of biochemical and cell-based assays. Our results confirm that BMS-103 and BMS-142 are strongly active in biochemical assays; however, their acute cytotoxicity greatly compromised their immunological activity. On the other hand, Aurigene-1 did not show any activity in both biochemical and immunological assays. Furthermore, we also report the discovery of a small-molecule immune modulator, whose mode-of-action is not clear; however, it exhibits favorable drug-like properties and strong immunological activity. We hope that the results presented here will be useful in guiding the development of next-generation PD-1/PD-L1 small molecule inhibitors.

Rapid atrophy of cardiac left ventricular mass in patients with non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a systemic catabolic condition affecting skeletal muscle and fat. We aimed to determine whether cardiac atrophy occurs in this condition and assess its association with cardiac function, symptoms, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Treatment naïve metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (n = 50) were assessed prior to and 4 months after commencement of carboplatin-based palliative chemotherapy. Methods included echocardiography for left ventricular mass (LVM) and LV function [LV ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain (GLS), diastolic function], computed tomography to quantify skeletal muscle and total adipose tissue, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), validated questionnaires for dyspnoea and fatigue, plasma biomarkers, tumour response to therapy, and overall survival. RESULTS: During 112 ± 6 days, the median change in LVM was -8.9% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -10.8 to -4.8, P < 0.001]. Quartiles of LVM loss were -20.1%, -12.9%, -4.8%, and +5.5%. Losses of muscle, adipose tissue, and LVM were frequently concurrent; LVM loss > median value was associated with loss of skeletal muscle [odds ratio (OR) = 4.5, 95% CI: 1.4-14.8, P=0.01] and loss of total adipose tissue (OR = 10.0, 95% CI: 2.7-36.7, P < 0.001). LVM loss was associated with decreased GLS (OR = 6.6, 95% CI: 1.9-22.7, P=0.003) but not with LV ejection fraction or diastolic function. In the population overall, plasma levels of C-reactive protein (P=0.008), high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) (P=0.03), and galectin-3 (P=0.02) increased over time, while N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and hs-cTnI did not change over time. C-reactive protein was the only biomarker associated with LVM loss but at the univariate level only. Independent predictors of LVM loss were prior weight loss (adjusted OR = 10.2, 95% CI: 2.2-46.9, P=0.003) and tumour progression (adjusted OR = 14.6, 95% CI: 1.4-153.9, P=0.02). LVM loss was associated with exacerbations of fatigue (OR = 6.6, 95% CI: 1.9-22.7, P=0.003), dyspnoea (OR = 9.3, 95% CI: 2.4-35.8, P<0.001), and deterioration of performance status (OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 1.3-18.3,P=0.02). Patients with concurrent loss of LVM, skeletal muscle, and fat were more likely to deteriorate in all three symptom domains and to have reduced survival (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intense LVM atrophy is associated with non-small cell lung cancer-induced cachexia. Loss of LVM was associated with emerging alterations of GLS, indicating subtle changes in left ventricular function. Longer term studies are needed to assess the full scope of cardiac atrophy and its impact. LVM atrophy arises in conjunction with losses of fat and skeletal muscle and is temporally associated with meaningful declines in performance status, worsening of fatigue, and dyspnoea, as well as poorer tumour response and decreased survival. The specific contribution of LVM atrophy to these outcomes requires further study.

AIHA and Pancytopenia as Complications of Pembrolizumab Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma: A Case Report.

Immunotherapy has been an emerging treatment for metastatic melanoma and several other malignancies since 2015. Hematological immune-mediated adverse effects from immunotherapy are rarely reported but they can cause serious harm to patients. Antibodies such as ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab target different immune checkpoints to promote T cell anti-tumour response. In particular, pembrolizumab is an antibody that inhibits programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) to upregulate tumour suppression. In this report, we present a case of pembrolizumab-induced autoimmune hemolytic anemia and pancytopenia in a patient who was receiving pembrolizumab treatment for metastatic melanoma. This patient has a history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma in 2017. He developed symptomatic AIHA and pancytopenia after receiving 8 cycles of pembrolizumab in 2018. Pembrolizumab treatment was discontinued and he was treated with blood transfusion and prednisone. After 5 months of tapering prednisone treatment, his anemia and pancytopenia have improved toward successful recovery. Cancer patients already face an increased risk of immunosuppression with conventional chemotherapy. This case report also summarized all reported cases of PD-1 inhibitor hematological adverse effects in the treatment of oncological diseases. These incidents reflect the risk of immune-mediated hematologic adverse effects, which should be considered in all patients using immunotherapy.

Hydroxychloroquine is a safe and effective steroid-sparing agent for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis.

Immunotherapy for cancer treatment continues to evolve, and immune checkpoints have proven successful therapeutic targets. With success has come the challenge of managing the commonly associated immune-related toxicities. Arthralgias and arthritis are a common immune-related adverse event (IrAE), well described in the literature (Pardoll Nat Rev Cancer 12:252-264, 2012; Diesendruck and Benhar Drug Resist Updat 30:39-47, 2017; Cappelli et al. Arthritis Care Res 69:1751-1763, 2017; Brahmer et al. J Clin Oncol 36:1714-1768, 2018; Smith and Bass (2017). The optimal management of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced arthritis remains unclear. We describe the first series using hydroxychloroquine as a first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for patients without pre-existing autoimmune disease, who developed arthritis secondary to ICI's. This was a single-center retrospective observational study reporting all patients evaluated by rheumatologists affiliated with the University of Alberta, a large tertiary health care center in Northern Alberta, Canada, deemed to have inflammatory arthritis (IA) following ICIs. We identified 11 patients, without pre-existing autoimmune disease, who developed IA following ICIs. Most patients presented with a symmetrical polyarthritis with both large and small joint involvement. All patients were treated according to the outlined treatment protocol with hydroxychloroquine as a first-line steroid-sparing agent: either as monotherapy or in combination with tapering doses of systemic corticosteroids (3) or intra-articular steroid injections (6). One patient required the addition of methotrexate to control symptoms and none required biologic therapy. There were no reported adverse effects from hydroxychloroquine. Inflammatory arthritis is an important complication of ICIs leading to significant impact on patient quality of life. In our experience, in patients without pre-existing autoimmune disease, hydroxychloroquine is an effective first-line therapy for IA secondary to ICI therapy.

Evaluation of Two Dosing Regimens for Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma: Results From the Phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 511 Trial.

PURPOSE: Nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (NIVO1+IPI3) is approved for first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma in several countries. We conducted a phase IIIb/IV study (CheckMate 511) to determine if nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (NIVO3+IPI1) improves the safety profile of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 360) age 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to NIVO3+IPI1 or NIVO1+IPI3 once every 3 weeks for four doses. After 6 weeks, all patients received NIVO 480 mg once every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was a comparison of the incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events (AEs) between groups. Secondary end points included descriptive analyses of objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The study was not designed to formally demonstrate noninferiority of NIVO3+IPI1 to NIVO1+IPI3 for efficacy end points. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 12 months, incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 AEs was 34% with NIVO3+IPI1 versus 48% with NIVO1+IPI3 ( P = .006). In descriptive analyses, objective response rate was 45.6% in the NIVO3+IPI1 group and 50.6% in the NIVO1+IPI3 group, with complete responses in 15.0% and 13.5% of patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months in the NIVO3+IPI1 group and 8.9 months in the NIVO1+IPI3 group. Median overall survival was not reached in either group. CONCLUSION: The CheckMate 511 study met its primary end point, demonstrating a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3-5 AEs with NIVO3+IPI1 versus NIVO1+IPI3. Descriptive analyses showed that there were no meaningful differences between the groups for any efficacy end point, although longer follow up may help to better characterize efficacy outcomes.