ABSTRACT
The induction of nausea and emesis is a major barrier to maximizing the weight loss profile of obesity medications, and therefore, identifying mechanisms that improve tolerability could result in added therapeutic benefit. The development of peptide YY (PYY)-based approaches to treat obesity are no exception, as PYY receptor agonism is often accompanied by nausea and vomiting. Here, we sought to determine whether glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) agonism reduces PYY-induced nausea-like behavior in mice. We found that central and peripheral administration of a GIPR agonist reduced conditioned taste avoidance (CTA) without affecting hypophagia mediated by a PYY analog. The receptors for GIP and PYY (Gipr and Npy2r) were found to be expressed by the same neurons in the area postrema (AP), a brainstem nucleus involved in detecting aversive stimuli. Peripheral administration of a GIPR agonist induced neuronal activation (cFos) in the AP. Further, whole-brain cFos analyses indicated that PYY-induced CTA was associated with augmented neuronal activity in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN), a brainstem nucleus that relays aversive/emetic signals to brain regions that control feeding behavior. Importantly, GIPR agonism reduced PYY-mediated neuronal activity in the PBN, providing a potential mechanistic explanation for how GIPR agonist treatment reduces PYY-induced nausea-like behavior. Together, the results of our study indicate a novel mechanism by which GIP-based therapeutics may have benefit in improving the tolerability of weight loss agents.
Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents , Peptide YY , Receptors, Gastrointestinal Hormone , Animals , Anti-Obesity Agents/adverse effects , Mice , Nausea/chemically induced , Nausea/drug therapy , Obesity/drug therapy , Peptide YY/adverse effects , Receptors, Gastrointestinal Hormone/agonistsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are effective medications to reduce appetite and body weight. These actions are centrally mediated; however, the neuronal substrates involved are poorly understood. METHODS: We employed a combination of neuroanatomical, genetic, and behavioral approaches in the mouse to investigate the involvement of caudal brainstem cholecystokinin-expressing neurons in the effect of the GLP-1RA exendin-4. We further confirmed key neuroanatomical findings in the non-human primate brain. RESULTS: We found that cholecystokinin-expressing neurons in the caudal brainstem are required for the anorectic and body weight-lowering effects of GLP-1RAs and for the induction of GLP-1RA-induced conditioned taste avoidance. We further show that, while cholecystokinin-expressing neurons are not a direct target for glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), GIP receptor activation results in a reduced recruitment of these GLP-1RA-responsive neurons and a selective reduction of conditioned taste avoidance. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to disclosing a neuronal population required for the full appetite- and body weight-lowering effect of GLP-1RAs, our data also provide a novel framework for understanding and ameliorating GLP-1RA-induced nausea - a major factor for withdrawal from treatment.
Subject(s)
Cholecystokinin/pharmacology , Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide/metabolism , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/metabolism , Animals , Appetite/drug effects , Appetite Depressants/pharmacology , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Exenatide/pharmacology , Female , Glucagon/metabolism , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/pharmacology , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/physiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacology , Insulin/pharmacology , Liraglutide/pharmacology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Neurons/metabolism , Receptors, Gastrointestinal Hormone/metabolismABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Both prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia are associated with inflammatory microenvironments. Inflammation is damaging to tissues, but it is unclear how the inflammatory microenvironment protects specialized epithelial cells that function to proliferate and repair the tissue. The objective of this study is to characterize the cell death and cell survival response of the prostatic epithelium in response to inflammation. METHODS: We assessed induction of cell death (TNF, TRAIL, TWEAK, FasL) and cell survival factors (IGFs, hedgehogs, IL-6, FGFs, and TGFs) in inflamed and control mouse prostates by ELISA. Cell death mechanisms were determined by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence for cleavage of caspases and TUNEL. Survival pathway activation was assessed by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence for Mcl-1, Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and survivin. Autophagy was determined by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence for free and membrane associated light chain 3 (LC-3). RESULTS: Cleavage of all four caspases was significantly increased during the first 2 days of inflammation, and survival protein expression was substantially increased subsequently, maximizing at 3 days. By 5 days of inflammation, 50% of prostatic epithelial cells expressed survivin. Autophagy was also evident during the recovery phase (3 days). Finally, immunofluorescent staining of human specimens indicates strong activation of survival proteins juxtaposed to inflammation in inflamed prostate specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The prostate responds to deleterious inflammation with induction of cell survival mechanisms, most notably survivin and autophagy, demonstrating a coordinated induction of survival factors that protects and expands a specialized set of prostatic epithelial cells as part of the repair and recovery process during inflammation.
