Effect of increased resistance on dynamic compliance assessed by two clinical monitors during volume-controlled ventilation: A test-lung study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of increased respiratory system resistance (RRS) on dynamic compliance (Cdyn) assessed by the NM3 monitor (Cdyn(NM3)) and the E-CAiOV module (Cdyn(ECAiOV)). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective laboratory study. METHODS: A training test lung (TTL) simulated the mechanical ventilation of a mammal with 50 and 300 mL tidal volumes in three conditions of RRS [normal (RBL), moderately increased (R1) and severely increased (R2)] and a wide range of clinically relevant Cdyn. Simulations at increased RRS were paired with simulations at RBL with the same static compliance for comparisons. Pearson's correlation coefficient and concordance correlation coefficient between the measurements at RBL with the ones with increased RRS were calculated. Bland-Altman plots were also used to evaluate the agreement of Cdyn(ECAiOV) and Cdyn(NM3) at RBL (control values) with their paired values at R1 and R2. Relative bias and limits of agreement (LOAs) were calculated and LOAs larger than 30% were considered unacceptable. Trending ability of Cdyn(NM3) and Cdyn(ECAiOV) were evaluated by polar plots. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The effect of increased RRS was more pronounced for Cdyn(ECAiOV) than for Cdyn(NM3). Unacceptable agreement was only observed in Cdyn(NM3) at R2 in the 300 mL simulation (bias = -18.3% and lower LOA = -45%). For Cdyn(ECAiOV), agreement was unacceptable for all tested RRS in both simulations, being the worst at R2 in the 300 mL simulation (bias = -54.7% and lower LOA = -100.2%). Both levels of increased RRS caused poor trending ability for Cdyn(ECAiOV), whereas the same effect was only observed for Cdyn(NM3) at R2. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the presence of increased RRS, Cdyn estimated by the NM3 monitor presented better capability to distinguish between changes in RRS from changes in respiratory system compliance.

Effect of heart rate on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane and hydromorphone.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl at lower (LHR) or higher heart rate (HHR) in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover controlled trial. ANIMALS: A group of six healthy 13-month-old male Beagle dogs weighing 9.9 ± 0.7 kg (mean ± standard deviation). METHODS: Dogs were allocated to two treatments: LHR (HR: 45-75 beats minute-1) and HHR (HR: 100-130 beats minute-1). Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and hydromorphone (0.1 mg kg-1 followed by 0.02-0.10 mg kg-1 hour-1) for both treatments. Glycopyrrolate was administered in HHR to maintain HR within the desired range. Afterwards, fentanyl (20 µg kg-1) was intravenously administered over 5 minutes. Arterial blood samples were collected for plasma fentanyl concentration measurement by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl were compared between treatments and the differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A three-compartment model best fitted the changes in plasma fentanyl concentration. Clearance (CL; mL minute-1 kg-1) was 33.2 (24.0-48.0) and 61.3 (44.5-72.7), maximum concentration (ng mL-1) 33.6 (23.4-36.6) and 20.0 (16.7-28.0), apparent volume of the rapid peripheral compartment (mL kg-1) 436 (352-723) and 925 (499-1887), apparent volume at steady state (mL kg-1) 4064 (3453-6546) and 7195 (5077-8601), cardiac index (CI; mL minute-1 m-2) 2.83 (1.98-3.67) and 4.91 (3.22-6.09) and HR (beats minute-1) 68 (49-72) and 120 (102-129) for LHR and HHR, respectively, with significant differences between treatments. Significant correlations (0.92 and 0.90) were found between CI and CL, and between HR and CL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The increase in HR and the resultant improvement in cardiac output increased fentanyl CL and volume of distribution, which resulted in a decrease in plasma fentanyl concentration in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs.

The effects of lidocaine-prilocaine cream on responses to intravenous catheter placement in cats sedated with dexmedetomidine and either methadone or nalbuphine.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reaction to cephalic intravenous (IV) catheter placement with or without lidocaine-prilocaine cream in cats sedated with dexmedetomidine and methadone or nalbuphine. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blind study. ANIMALS: A group of 24 female mixed breed cats. METHODS: Cats were randomly allocated to one of the two sedation protocols: dexmedetomidine (0.01 mg kg-1) and methadone (0.3 mg kg-1; DEXMET) or dexmedetomidine (0.01 mg kg-1) and nalbuphine (0.3 mg kg-1; DEXNALB). Sedation was scored 30 minutes later using a visual analog scale. Subsequently, a 2 × 3.5 cm area of the antebrachium over the cephalic vein was clipped, and half the cats within each protocol were randomly assigned for topical lidocaine-prilocaine cream (treatment), whereas no cream was applied to other cats (control). After 20 minutes, an attempt was made to place a 24 gauge catheter into the cephalic vein and the reaction of the cats to this procedure was scored using a numeric scale 0-3. Sedation and catheterization reaction scores were compared between sedation protocols and whether cats were administered lidocaine-prilocaine cream or not using the Friedman test followed by the Bonferroni procedure. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Sedation scores were not different between sedation protocols or between treatment and control cats within each protocol. All cats administered lidocaine-prilocaine cream showed no reaction to IV catheter placement. Among the control cats, no response was observed in one cat in DEXNALB. Catheterization reaction score was lower in the treatment cats in both the sedation protocols when compared with their respective controls. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lidocaine-prilocaine cream applied for 20 minutes abolished the reaction to catheterization in cats sedated with dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine or methadone. Facilitation of IV catheter placement occurred within 20 minutes of lidocaine-prilocaine application.

The effect of two doses of fentanyl on chest wall rigidity at equipotent doses of isoflurane in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of two doses of fentanyl upon chest wall rigidity of dogs anesthetized at equipotent doses of isoflurane [1.3 minimum alveolar concentration (MACISO) of each dose of fentanyl]. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective crossover randomized study. ANIMALS: A group of eight male Beagle dogs, approximately 1 year old and weighing 12.1 ± 1.6 kg (mean ± standard deviation). METHODS: The dogs were anesthetized with isoflurane and instrumented for the measurement of esophageal pressure (PESO), flow (V˙) and volume (V). Chest wall elastance (ECW) was estimated by multiple linear regression of the model. PESO(t) = V˙(t) × RCW + V(t) × ECW + EEPESO where t is time, RCW is chest wall resistance and EEPESO is end-expiratory PESO. Chest wall compliance (CCW) was calculated as 1/ECW and normalized to the body weight of each dog (mL cmH2O-1 kg-1). Anesthesia was maintained at 1.3 MACISO for at least 15 minutes and CCW recorded (CCW-ISO). The dogs were randomly assigned to the lower fentanyl dose [loading dose (33 µg kg-1) and infusion (0.2 µg kg-1 minute-1)] or the higher fentanyl dose [loading dose (102 µg kg-1) and infusion (0.8 µg kg-1 minute-1)]. After 60 minutes of fentanyl infusion, CCW was recorded for each dose (CCW-FENT). During fentanyl infusion, the dogs were maintained at equipotent doses of isoflurane (1.3 MACISO for each fentanyl dose). A two-way analysis of variance followed by a Bonferroni test was used to compare CCW-ISO and CCW-FENT in both treatments and CCW-FENT between treatments. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Neither of the fentanyl doses decreased CCW and there was no difference in CCW-FENT between doses. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fentanyl at the studied doses did not result in chest wall rigidity in dogs anesthetized with equipotent doses of isoflurane (1.3 MACISO).

Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of two doses of fentanyl in the presence or absence of bradycardia in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cardiopulmonary effects of low and high doses of fentanyl before and after the correction of bradycardia in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized crossover trial. ANIMALS: Eight healthy male Beagle dogs weighing 11.1 ± 1.3 kg [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] and aged approximately 1 year. METHODS: The dogs were anesthetized with isoflurane [1.3 × minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)] on two occasions and fentanyl was administered intravenously; either low-dose fentanyl, loading dose (33 µg kg-1) and infusion (0.2 µg kg-1 minute-1) or a high-dose, loading dose (102 µg kg-1) and infusion (0.8 µg kg-1 minute-1). Cardiopulmonary variables were measured at three time points in equipotent isoflurane concentrations (1.3 MAC): before fentanyl administration (ISO), during fentanyl-induced bradycardia (ISO-F) and after administration of glycopyrrolate normalized heart rate (ISO-FNHR). Data are mean ± SD. RESULTS: Heart rate and cardiac index (CI) decreased and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) increased at ISO-F in both treatments. Bradycardia and vasoconstriction at ISO-F were greater in high than in low-dose fentanyl (42 ± 7 versus 57 ± 15 beats minute-1 and 3457 ± 1108 versus 2528 ± 968 dyne second cm-5 m-2), respectively. Oxygen delivery index (DO2I) decreased only during high-dose fentanyl. CI and DO2I were higher in both treatments at ISO-FNHR than at ISO-F; however, they were higher only during the high-dose fentanyl than at ISO. SVRI was higher at ISO-F than at ISO and ISO-FNHR in both treatments, and was higher at ISO-F in the high than in the low-dose treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An overall improvement in cardiovascular function of dogs anesthetized with equipotent isoflurane doses (1.3 MAC) was observed after the treatment of bradycardia only with the high-dose fentanyl.

Isoflurane MAC determination in dogs using three intensities of constant-current electrical stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: To compare isoflurane minimum alveolar concentrations (MACs) in dogs determined using three intensities of constant-current electrical stimulation applied at the tail, and thoracic and pelvic limbs, and to compare isoflurane MACs obtained with all combinations of electrical stimulation and anatomic site with those obtained using the tail clamp as the noxious stimulus. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized trial. ANIMALS: Six mixed-breed, adult female dogs aged 1-2 years and weighing 11.1 ± 4.4 kg. METHODS: In each dog, MAC was determined by the bracketing method with the tail clamp (MACTAILCLAMP ), and three electrical currents (10 mA, 30 mA, 50 mA) at three anatomic sites (thoracic limb, pelvic limb, tail). Each MAC achieved with electrical stimulation was compared with MACTAILCLAMP using a mixed-model anova and Dunnett's procedure for multiple comparisons. The effects of current intensity and anatomic site on isoflurane MAC were tested using a mixed-model anova followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Mean MACTAILCLAMP was 1.69%. MACs achieved with currents of 30 mA and 50 mA did not differ independently of anatomic site. When currents of 10 mA were applied to the tail and thoracic limb, resulting MACs were lower than those obtained using currents of 30 mA and 50 mA. Currents of 30 mA and 50 mA provided MACs that did not differ from those of MACTAILCLAMP , whereas a current of 10 mA achieved the same result only for the pelvic limb. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Isoflurane MAC is affected by current intensity and anatomic site. Current intensities of 30 mA and 50 mA provided consistent results when applied to the tail, and thoracic and pelvic limbs that did not differ from those obtained using the tail clamp. Consequently, they can be used in place of the tail clamp in MAC studies in dogs.

Control of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for small animal ventilators.

BACKGROUND: The positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for the mechanical ventilation of small animals is frequently obtained with water seals or by using ventilators developed for human use. An alternative mechanism is the use of an on-off expiratory valve closing at the moment when the alveolar pressure is equal to the target PEEP. In this paper, a novel PEEP controller (PEEP-new) and the PEEP system of a commercial small-animal ventilator, both based on switching an on-off valve, are evaluated. METHODS: The proposed PEEP controller is a discrete integrator monitoring the error between the target PEEP and the airways opening pressure prior to the onset of an inspiratory cycle. In vitro as well as in vivo experiments with rats were carried out and the PEEP accuracy, settling time and under/overshoot were considered as a measure of performance. RESULTS: The commercial PEEP controller did not pass the tests since it ignores the airways resistive pressure drop, resulting in a PEEP 5 cmH2O greater than the target in most conditions. The PEEP-new presented steady-state errors smaller than 0.5 cmH2O, with settling times below 10 s and under/overshoot smaller than 2 cmH2O. CONCLUSION: The PEEP-new presented acceptable performance, considering accuracy and temporal response. This novel PEEP generator may prove useful in many applications for small animal ventilators.