Glucocorticoids Mediate Short-Term High-Fat Diet Induction of Neuroinflammatory Priming, the NLRP3 Inflammasome, and the Danger Signal HMGB1.

The impact of the foods we eat on metabolism and cardiac physiology has been studied for decades, yet less is known about the effects of foods on the CNS, or the behavioral manifestations that may result from these effects. Previous studies have shown that long-term consumption of high-fat foods leading to diet-induced obesity sensitizes the inflammatory response of the brain to subsequent challenging stimuli, causing deficits in the formation of long-term memories. The new findings reported here demonstrate that short-term consumption of a high-fat diet (HFD) produces the same outcomes, thus allowing the examination of mechanisms involved in this process long before obesity and associated comorbidities occur. Rats fed an HFD for 3 d exhibited increases in corticosterone, the inflammasome-associated protein NLRP3 (nod-like receptor protein 3), and the endogenous danger signal HMGB1 (high-mobility group box 1) in the hippocampus. A low-dose (10 µg/kg) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) immune challenge potentiated the neuroinflammatory response in the hippocampus of rats fed the HFD, and caused a deficit in the formation of long-term memory, effects not observed in rats fed regular chow. The blockade of corticosterone action with the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone prevented the NLRP3 and HMGB1 increases in unchallenged animals, normalized the proinflammatory response to LPS, and prevented the memory impairment. These data suggest that short-term HFD consumption increases vulnerability to memory disruptions caused by an immune challenge by upregulating important neuroinflammatory priming and danger signals in the hippocampus, and that these effects are mediated by increases in hippocampal corticosterone.

The danger-associated molecular pattern HMGB1 mediates the neuroinflammatory effects of methamphetamine.

Methamphetamine (METH) induces neuroinflammatory effects, which may contribute to the neurotoxicity of METH. However, the mechanism by which METH induces neuroinflammation has yet to be clarified. A considerable body of evidence suggests that METH induces cellular damage and distress, particularly in dopaminergic neurons. Damaged neurons release danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), which induces pro-inflammatory effects. Therefore, we explored the notion here that METH induces neuroinflammation indirectly through the release of HMGB1 from damaged neurons. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected IP with METH (10mg/kg) or vehicle (0.9% saline). Neuroinflammatory effects of METH were measured in nucleus accumbens (NAcc), ventral tegmental area (VTA) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) at 2h, 4h and 6h after injection. To assess whether METH directly induces pro-inflammatory effects in microglia, whole brain or striatal microglia were isolated using a Percoll density gradient and exposed to METH (0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, or 1000µM) for 24h and pro-inflammatory cytokines measured. The effect of METH on HMGB1 and IL-1ß in striatal tissue was then measured. To determine the role of HMGB1 in the neuroinflammatory effects of METH, animals were injected intra-cisterna magna with the HMGB1 antagonist box A (10µg) or vehicle (sterile water). 24h post-injection, animals were injected IP with METH (10mg/kg) or vehicle (0.9% saline) and 4h later neuroinflammatory effects measured in NAcc, VTA, and PFC. METH induced robust pro-inflammatory effects in NAcc, VTA, and PFC as a function of time and pro-inflammatory analyte measured. In particular, METH induced profound effects on IL-1ß in NAcc (2h) and PFC (2h and 4h). Exposure of microglia to METH in vitro failed to induce a pro-inflammatory response, but rather induced significant cell death as well as a decrease in IL-1ß. METH treatment increased HMGB1 in parallel with IL-1ß in striatum. Pre-treatment with the HMGB1 antagonist box A blocked the neuroinflammatory effects (IL-1ß) of METH in NAcc, VTA and PFC. The present results suggest that HMGB1 mediates, in part, the neuroinflammatory effects of METH and thus may alert CNS innate immune cells to the toxic effects of METH.

High-fat diet consumption disrupts memory and primes elevations in hippocampal IL-1ß, an effect that can be prevented with dietary reversal or IL-1 receptor antagonism.

High-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity is reaching worldwide proportions. In addition to causing obesity, HFDs also induce a variety of health disorders, which includes cognitive decline. Hippocampal function may be particularly vulnerable to the negative consequences of HFD, and it is suspected that 'primed' neuroinflammatory processes may mediate this response. To examine the link between diet, hippocampal function and neuroinflammation, male Wistar rats were fed a medium or HFD. Hippocampal memory function was measured using contextual pre-exposure fear conditioning (CPE-FC). Rats fed a HFD demonstrated impaired memory, an effect that was augmented with longer duration of HFD consumption. HFD-induced memory impairments were linked to potentiated levels of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) protein in the hippocampus 2h after the foot-shock that occurs during CPE-FC. Central IL-1 receptor antagonism, with intracisterna magna (ICM) administration of hIL-1RA prior to the foot-shock prevented the diet-induced memory disruption, suggesting a critical role for IL-1ß in this phenomenon. Additionally, obese animals whose diet regimen was reversed from HFD back to standard chow recovered memory function and did not demonstrate a foot-shock-induced hippocampal IL-1ß increase. Interestingly, dietary reversal neutralized the negative impact of HFD on memory and IL-1ß, yet animals maintained physiological evidence of obesity (increased body mass and serum leptin), indicating that dietary components, not body mass, may mediate the negative effects on memory.

Blocking toll-like receptor 2 and 4 signaling during a stressor prevents stress-induced priming of neuroinflammatory responses to a subsequent immune challenge.

Acute and chronic stressors sensitize or prime the neuroinflammatory response to a subsequent peripheral or central immunologic challenge. However, the neuroimmune process(es) by which stressors prime or sensitize subsequent neuroinflammatory responses remains unclear. Prior evidence suggested that toll-like receptors (TLRs) might be involved in the mediation of primed neuroinflammatory responses, but the role of TLRs during a stressor has never been directly tested. Here, a novel TLR2 and TLR4 antagonist, OxPAPC, was used to probe the contribution of TLRs in the stress sensitization phenomenon. OxPAPC has not previously been administered to the brain, and so its action in blocking TLR2 and TLR4 action in brain was first verified. Administration of OxPAPC into the CNS prior to stress prevented the stress-induced potentiation of hippocampal pro-inflammatory response to a subsequent peripheral LPS challenge occurring 24 h later. In addition, in vivo administration of OxPAPC prior to stress prevented the sensitized pro-inflammatory response from isolated microglia following administration of LPS ex vivo, further implicating microglia as a key neuroimmune substrate that mediates stress-induced sensitized neuroinflammation.

Prior laparotomy or corticosterone potentiates lipopolysaccharide-induced fever and sickness behaviors.

Stimulating sensitized immune cells with a subsequent immune challenge results in potentiated pro-inflammatory responses translating into exacerbated sickness responses (i.e. fever, pain and lethargy). Both corticosterone (CORT) and laparotomy cause sensitization, leading to enhanced sickness-induced neuroinflammation or pain (respectively). However, it is unknown whether this sensitization affects all sickness behaviors and immune cell responses equally. We show that prior CORT and prior laparotomy potentiated LPS-induced fever but not lethargy. Prior CORT, like prior laparotomy, was able to potentiate sickness-induced pain. Release of nitric oxide (NO) from peritoneal macrophages stimulated ex vivo demonstrates that laparotomy, but not CORT sensitizes these cells.