Anaesthesia training designs across Europe: A survey-based study from the trainees committee of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.

BACKGROUND: Anaesthesiology training programs in Europe vary in duration, content, and requirements for completion. This survey-based study conducted by the Trainees Committee of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care explores current anaesthesia training designs across Europe. METHODS: Between May and July 2018, we sent a 41-item online questionnaire to all National Trainee Representatives, members of the National Anaesthesiologists Societies Committee, and Council Representatives of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) of all member countries. We cross-validated inconsistent data with different country representatives. RESULTS: Forty-three anaesthesiologists from all 39 associated ESAIC countries completed the questionnaire. Results showed considerable variability in teaching formats, frequency of teaching sessions during training, and differences in assessments made during and at the end of training. The reported duration of training was 60 months in 59% (n = 23) of participating countries, ranging from 24 months in Russia and Ukraine to 84 months in the UK. CONCLUSION: This study shows the significant differences in anaesthesiology training formats across Europe, and highlights the importance of developing standardised training programs to ensure a consistent level of training and to improve patient safety. This study provides valuable insights into European anaesthesia training, and underlines the need for further research and collaboration to improve requirements.

Survival Predictors in Liver Transplantation: Time-Varying Effect of Red Blood Cell Transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Many attempts have been undertaken to better predict outcome after liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to identify the pre- and intraoperative variables that may influence the survival after liver transplantation, at a single institution. METHODS: Anesthetic records from 543 consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation from June 2006 to June 2014 were reviewed in this retrospective study. Patients undergoing retransplantation were excluded from the analysis, as were patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy. Preoperative variables studied were age, sex, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, primary diagnosis, cold ischemia time, preoperative international normalized ratio, serum albumin, and and hemoglobin levels. Intraoperative variables included were norepinephrine consumption, blood loss, red blood cell transfusion, and surgical time. Variables significant in the univariate analysis with a P value of <.2 were included in a multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: Only red blood cell transfusion (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.29) and female sex (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.10-2.65) were identified as significant independent predictors for survival after liver transplantation. Because of proportionality assumption violation, the multivariate Cox regression model was subsequently upgraded by adding a time-varying interaction between red blood cell transfusion and time since liver transplantation. As a result, we found that at 3 months after liver transplantation, the rate of dying increased 14% (95% CI, 2%-26%) for each unit transfused, and at 6 months it increased 12% (95% CI, 0.3%-24%). CONCLUSIONS: Red blood cell transfusion ceased to influence survival from 1 year onward.