Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 343, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37264358

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity improves physical health and mental well-being and reduces the risk of falling in older adults. The randomized controlled "Prevention by lay-assisted Outdoor-Walking in the Elderly at Risk" POWER-study investigates whether volunteer-supported outdoor-walking improves physical function and quality of life in older people living independently or in nursing homes. This sub-study explores the experiences of older participants and volunteers in relation to their physical and psychosocial well-being as well as the challenges faced by both groups. A further aim was to explore volunteers' experience with people living in nursing homes during the first pandemic lockdown (spring 2020). METHODS: The sub-study was designed as mixed-methods approach consisting of 11 individual semi-structured guide-based interviews (nursing home residents), two focus group interviews (volunteers), and a cross-sectional questionnaire survey (volunteers). The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by content analysis as described by Kuckartz. Topics addressed in the interviews were triangulated by means of a questionnaire. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Participants' evaluation of the intervention was generally positive. Nursing home residents appreciated the social interaction associated with the assisted walking, which motivated them to take part regularly, provided a sense of safety, and caused pleasure on both sides. The impact on physical health status of the nursing home residents of this sub-study varied to a large degree as reported in interviews: in some cases, an improvement in physical performance, a decrease in physical complaints, and an improvement in gait or independence was reported. If not, reference was made to previous or sudden illnesses and the advanced age of the participants. Despite the COVID-19-lockdown and the associated restrictions, about 60% of contacts were still possible and participants planned to continue the assisted walks after the lockdown. CONCLUSION: Volunteers have a positive effect on the quality of life, mobility, and general health of nursing home residents. Even more than the improvement of physical performance, social interaction was seen as helpful. Despite their advanced age, the nursing home residents were curious and open to new contacts. When removing the identified barriers, it might be possible to integrate this program into the long-term everyday life of nursing homes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS-ID: DRKS00015188, date of registration: 31.08.2018.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quality of Life , Humans , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control , Nursing Homes , Walking
3.
Trials ; 17: 180, 2016 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27038798

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians account for the majority of antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory care in Germany. Respiratory diseases are, regardless of effectiveness, often treated with antibiotics. Research has found this use without indication to be caused largely by communication problems (e.g. expectations on the patient's part or false assumptions about them by the physician). The present randomised controlled trial (RCT) study evaluates whether communication training for primary care physicians can reduce the antibiotic prescribing rate for respiratory tract infections. METHODS/DESIGN: The study consists of three groups: group A will receive communication training; group B will be given the same, plus additional, access to an evidence-based point-of-care tool; and group C will function as the control group. The primary endpoint is the difference between intervention and control groups regarding the antibiotic prescribing rate before and after the intervention assessed through routine data. The communication skills are captured with the help of the communication instrument MAAS-Global-D, as well as individual videos of physician-patient consultations recorded by the primary care physicians. These skills will also be regarded with respect to the antibiotic prescribing rate. A process evaluation using qualitative as well as quantitative methods should provide information about barriers and enablers to implementing the communication training. DISCUSSION: The trial contributes to an insight into the effectiveness of the different components to reduce antibiotic prescribing, which will also be supported by an extensive evaluation. Communication training could be an effective method of reducing antibiotic prescribing in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00009566 DATE REGISTRATION: 5 November 2015.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Communication , Education, Medical, Continuing , Inservice Training , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians, Primary Care/education , Primary Health Care/methods , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Clinical Protocols , Drug Prescriptions , Germany , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Research Design , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Video Recording
4.
Transplantation ; 99(5): 1072-7, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25393161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown the effectiveness of comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). At present, it is uncertain whether PR is also effective in the management of patients with various diseases awaiting lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: In a retrospective clinical preanalysis and postanalysis, we investigated the effects of a 5-week inpatient PR in LTx candidates. We compared data of patients with COPD, α-1-antitrypsin deficiency, interstitial lung disease, or cystic fibrosis before and after PR with regard to exercise capacity (6-min walking distance [6MWD]) and health-related quality of life (HRQL; SF36). Multivariate stepwise regression analysis was performed to detect predictors of PR outcome. RESULTS: Eight hundred eleven data sets from consecutive patients referred to our PR center before LTx could be analysed (COPD, 360; α-1-antitrypsin deficiency, 127; interstitial lung disease, 195; cystic fibrosis, 69; other, 60). After PR 6MWD increased by 56 ± 58 m (P < 0.001), the physical summary component of SF36 (0-100) improved by 1.9 ± 8.5 points (P < 0.001), the mental summary component of SF36 by 8.7 ± 13.5 points (P < 0.001). Stepwise regression analysis yielded no relevant predictors of success or nonsuccess of PR with regard to age, sex, disease, body mass index, 6MWD, and HRQL on admission. CONCLUSION: Short-term comprehensive PR can significantly improve exercise capacity and HRQL in LTx candidates to a clinically relevant extent independent of the underlying lung disease. No relevant predictor influencing PR outcome could be detected. Further research is needed to evaluate the relevance of PR before LTx and its impact on clinical outcome after transplantation.


Subject(s)
Exercise Tolerance/physiology , Lung Diseases/rehabilitation , Lung Transplantation , Adult , Aged , Cystic Fibrosis/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/rehabilitation , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/rehabilitation
5.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 20(e1): e91-6, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23599223

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the electronic decision support (eDS) tool 'PReOPerative evaluation' (PROP) on guideline adherence in preoperative assessment in statutory health care in Salzburg, Austria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The evaluation was designed as a non-randomized controlled trial with a historical control group (CG). In 2007, we consecutively recruited 1363 patients admitted for elective surgery, and evaluated the preoperative assessment. In 2008, PROP was implemented and available online. In 2009 we recruited 1148 patients preoperatively assessed using PROP (294 outpatients, 854 hospital sector). Our analysis includes full blood count, liver function tests, coagulation parameters, electrolytes, ECG, and chest x-ray. RESULTS: The number of tests/patient without indication was 3.39 in the CG vs 0.60 in the intervention group (IG) (p<0.001). 97.8% (CG) vs 31.5% (IG) received at least one unnecessary test. However, we also observed an increase in recommended tests not performed/patient (0.05±0.27 (CG) vs 0.55±1.00 (IG), p<0.001). 4.2% (CG) vs 30.1% (IG) missed at least one necessary test. The guideline adherence (correctly tested/not tested) improved distinctively for all tests (1.6% (CG) vs 49.3% (IG), p<0.001). DISCUSSION: PROP reduced the number of unnecessary tests/patient by 2.79 which implied a reduction of patients' burden, and a relevant cut in unnecessary costs. However, the advantage in specificity caused an increase in the number of patients incorrectly not tested. Further research is required regarding the impact of PROP on perioperative outcomes.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Preoperative Care/standards , Adult , Aged , Austria , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/economics , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality Improvement
6.
Health Policy ; 110(2-3): 220-8, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23453595

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The growing movement of innovative approaches to chronic disease management in Europe has not been matched by a corresponding effort to evaluate them. This paper discusses challenges to evaluation of chronic disease management as reported by experts in six European countries. METHODS: We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with key informants from Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Spain involved in decision-making and implementation of chronic disease management approaches. Interviews were complemented by a survey on approaches to chronic disease management in each country. Finally two project teams (France and the Netherlands) conducted in-depth case studies on various aspects of chronic care evaluation. RESULTS: We identified three common challenges to evaluation of chronic disease management approaches: (1) a lack of evaluation culture and related shortage of capacity; (2) reluctance of payers or providers to engage in evaluation and (3) practical challenges around data and the heterogeity of IT infrastructure. The ability to evaluate chronic disease management interventions is influenced by contextual and cultural factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to our understanding of some of the most common underlying barriers to chronic care evaluation by highlighting the views and experiences of stakeholders and experts in six European countries. Overcoming the cultural, political and structural barriers to evaluation should be driven by payers and providers, for example by building in incentives such as feedback on performance, aligning financial incentives with programme objectives, collectively participating in designing an appropriate framework for evaluation, and making data use and accessibility consistent with data protection policies.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Austria , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Denmark , France , Germany , Humans , Netherlands , Quality of Health Care , Spain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...