ABSTRACT
Guanfacine, used as a medication for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), leads to a high incidence of somnolence, in contrast to methylphenidate, which leads to a high incidence of insomnia. The impact of somnolence on continuing guanfacine treatment is unclear. Therefore, we investigated the reasons for discontinuing guanfacine and analyzed the factors associated with discontinuation caused by somnolence. We surveyed 96 patients under guanfacine from July 2017 to December 2021 at the Saga University Hospital. Patients who discontinued guanfacine by the end date of our study were divided into a median early and late group. We compared the reasons for discontinuation in both groups. Of all patients, 47 continued and 49 discontinued guanfacine. A higher percentage of patients discontinued guanfacine caused by somnolence for ≤70 d than for >70 d of treatment (44.0 vs. 8.3%; p = 0.008). When stratified by the concomitant use of other ADHD drugs, somnolence resulted in a higher discontinuation rate for ≤70 d than for >70 d of treatment without concomitant use (55.0 vs. 7.1%; p = 0.009). Nonetheless, concomitant use resulted in no difference. In conclusion, somnolence affects the early discontinuation of guanfacine as an ADHD drug. The combination of methylphenidate or atomoxetine may decrease withdrawal caused by somnolence.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Guanfacine , Guanfacine/adverse effects , Guanfacine/therapeutic use , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Sleepiness , Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Methylphenidate/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Several medications are associated with delirium; however, studies with adequate statistical power are limited, and it is difficult to determine the effects of the various concomitant medications used in clinical practice. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety signals of delirium-associated drugs using a spontaneous adverse event reporting system. METHOD: The JAPIC AERS (Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System pre-processed by the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center) was used for the analysis in this pharmacovigilance study. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) for delirium was adjusted for using multivariate logistic regression analysis with sex, age, indication, and melatonin receptor agonist use, and 22 drug categories were targeted as covariates. RESULTS: After excluding patients with missing information, 7,527,568 patients were included in the study. Delirium signals were detected even after adjusting for covariates in 17 drug categories, including benzodiazepines (adjusted ROR, 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-1.89), opioids (adjusted ROR, 4.42; 95% CI, 4.21-4.64), and tricyclic antidepressants (adjusted ROR, 2.44; 95% CI, 2.20-2.71). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that many drug classes, such as benzodiazepines, are independent risk factors for delirium and strengthen the evidence of an association between delirium and medications.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Reports regarding the association of remdesivir use for the treatment of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) are inconsistent, and the associations between the use of other antivirals and AKI remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigated whether the use of antiviral drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 is a risk factor for the development of AKI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed 176,197 reports submitted to the Japanese Adverse Event Reporting Database between 2020 and 2022. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for AKI that were associated with the use of antiviral drugs in patients with COVID-19 were calculated after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Overall, 5,879 of the reports analyzed were associated with AKI. Signs of AKI were detected with the use of remdesivir [crude ROR (cROR)=2.45; 95%CI=1.91-3.14] and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (cROR=6.07; 95%CI=4.06-9.06). These results were maintained even after adjusting for potential confounders [remdesivir: adjusted ROR (aROR)=2.18; 95%CI=1.69-2.80, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: aROR=5.24; 95%CI=3.48-7.90]. However, when analyzing data stratified by reporting year, the association between remdesivir and AKI appeared to diminish over time and was not sustained. CONCLUSION: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use may be associated with developing AKI. This knowledge may be useful in helping patients with COVID-19 avoid AKI complications.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Adenosine Monophosphate , Alanine , Antiviral Agents , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Ritonavir , SARS-CoV-2 , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use , Adenosine Monophosphate/adverse effects , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Male , Ritonavir/adverse effects , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Aged , Risk Factors , Adult , Drug Combinations , Adenosine/analogs & derivativesABSTRACT
Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affect all organs and are associated with various symptoms. The identification of biomarkers that can predict irAEs may be particularly clinically useful. This study aimed to investigate whether the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) before the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can predict the occurrence of irAEs. We conducted a survey of 111 patients with cancer who were receiving ICI fixed-dose monotherapy at Saga University Hospital from the time each ICI became available until January 2020. We compared the PNI between the patients with and without irAE expression, established a cutoff value for PNI associated with the development of irAEs, and investigated the incidence of irAEs and progression-free survival (PFS) in groups divided by the cutoff value. Patients with irAEs had significantly higher PNI than did those without, and there was a significant association between PNI and irAEs after adjusting for potential factors (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.21). In addition, PNI ≥44.2 was associated with a significantly higher incidence of irAEs (75.0% vs. 35.2%, p = 0.0001) and significantly longer PFS than PNI <44.2 (p = 0.025). In conclusion, pretreatment PNI may be associated with the risk of developing irAEs in patients with advanced recurrent solid tumors. When the PNI is ≥44.2, patient management is important for avoiding serious AEs because while the treatment may be effective, the occurrence of irAEs is a concern.
Subject(s)
Immune System Diseases , Neoplasms , Humans , Nutrition Assessment , Prognosis , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Biomarkers , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Venetoclax, an oral B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor, necessitates dose adjustment when combined with a CYP3A4 inhibitor; however, the dosing regimen remains unclear on adding a CYP3A4 inhibitor after venetoclax administration. CASE SUMMARY: We present a case report of a patient who was simultaneously treated with a CYP3A4 inhibitor and a steady daily dose of venetoclax. A 30-year-old male diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia received a combination of venetoclax and azacitidine as remission induction therapy. He was prescribed 400 mg/day venetoclax at a steady daily dose, with fosfluconazole initiated on day 18. Given that fosfluconazole can induce moderate CYP3A4 inhibitory effects, the venetoclax dosage was reduced to 200 mg/day on the same day. Despite dose reduction, plasma trough levels of venetoclax continued rising gradually. Nearly 10 days were required to decrease blood levels to a steady state. CONCLUSION: The risk of elevated venetoclax blood levels needs to be considered when initiating CYP3A4 inhibitors and reducing venetoclax dosage on the same day.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors , Male , Humans , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Azacitidine , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3AABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Several associations between diabetes mellitus and delirium have been reported; however, they have been inconsistent, and evidence on the effects of antidiabetic medications on delirium is also limited. This study aimed to investigate whether the use of antidiabetic drugs is a risk factor for delirium development. METHODS: Using the Japanese Adverse Event Reporting Database, we analyzed 662,899 reports between 2004 and 2022. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for delirium associated with diabetes and using each antidiabetic medication were calculated after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Overall, 8892 of the reports analyzed were associated with delirium. A comparison of the incidence of delirium between patients with and without diabetes showed no significant difference, with 1.34% in patients without diabetes and 1.37% in those with diabetes. In each antidiabetic medication, signals for delirium were detected for sulfonylurea (crude ROR, 1.35; 95% CI 1.21-1.51) and insulin (crude ROR, 1.28; 95% CI 1.13-1.44). These results were maintained even after adjusting for factors with potential confounders (sulfonylurea: adjusted ROR, 1.75; 95% CI 1.54-2.00, insulin: adjusted ROR, 1.35; 95% CI 1.20-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest no association between diabetes and delirium; however, using sulfonylurea and insulin may be associated with delirium development. Nonetheless, these findings should be validated in future studies.
Subject(s)
Delirium , Diabetes Mellitus , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Japan/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Sulfonylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Insulin , Delirium/chemically induced , Delirium/epidemiology , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsABSTRACT
This study sought to develop a specific and sensitive sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for pharmacokinetic studies of dasatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Anti-dasatinib antibodies were obtained from mice or rabbits by using two partial structures of dasatinib as haptens: 2-amino-N-(2-chloro-6-methylphenyl)-thiazole-5-carboxamide and 2-{4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl}-isonicotinic acid. The best combination of two antibodies for sandwich ELISA of dasatinib was determined using four anti-dasatinib antibodies derived from mice and rabbits. Using two dasatinib-specific rabbit antibodies, we successfully developed an ultra-specific and highly sensitive sandwich ELISA that is hardly affected by the main metabolite of dasatinib. The sandwich ELISA showed a linear detection range from 320 pg/mL to 1000 ng/mL. Serum dasatinib concentrations lower than 320 pg/mL were reproducibly measurable using the sandwich ELISA. The ELISA was specific to dasatinib and there were no cross-reactivities with the major metabolites 4'-hydroxy dasatinib and dasatinib carboxylic acid. The developed sandwich ELISA will be a valuable tool for pharmacokinetic studies of dasatinib. Furthermore, this study revealed that rabbit antibodies can sandwich drug molecules of a smaller size than mouse antibodies in sandwich ELISA.
Subject(s)
Dasatinib , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Animals , Mice , Rabbits , Antibodies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: ICU delirium reportedly contributes to increased mortality attributed to underlying diseases, long-term cognitive decline, and increased healthcare costs. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs), suvorexant and lemborexant, have been suggested for preventing ICU delirium. Although ventilator management is a risk factor for delirium, no study has examined the efficacy of suvorexant and lemborexant in preventing delirium in critically ill patients requiring ventilation. Thus, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of DORA in preventing delirium in critically ill adult patients requiring ventilatory management in the emergency room. METHOD: This retrospective study included patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the emergency room and received ventilator support between January 2015 and April 2022. The HR (95% CI) for delirium development in patients taking DORA was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, which was adjusted for the patient background and concomitant medications. HRs were calculated for patients taking suvorexant and those taking lemborexant using a stratified analysis. RESULTS: Of the 297 patients included in the study, 67 were in the DORA group; 50 were on suvorexant and 17 were on lemborexant. The DORA group had a lower incidence of delirium than the control group (p < 0.0001). The risk of delirium was lower in the DORA group compared the control group (HR, 0.22; 95% CI 0.12-0.40).The risk of developing delirium was lower with suvorexant (HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.11-0.41) and lemborexant (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08-0.81). CONCLUSION: DORA is a promising drug that could have the potential to prevent delirium, and its efficacy in preventing delirium should be tested in randomized controlled trials in the future.
Subject(s)
Delirium , Orexin Receptor Antagonists , Humans , Adult , Adolescent , Orexin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Critical Illness/therapy , Delirium/prevention & control , Delirium/epidemiology , Intubation, IntratrachealABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic drugs may cause delirium, and the risk may vary with each drug. However, related studies have provided inconsistent results. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of antiepileptic drugs is a risk factor for delirium development. METHOD: Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database, we analysed 573,316 reports pertaining to the period from 2004 to 2020. Reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of delirium associated with use of antiepileptic drugs were calculated after adjusting for potential confounders. Furthermore, for each antiepileptic drug, we performed an analysis stratified based on older age and benzodiazepine receptor agonist usage. RESULTS: There were 27,439 reports of antiepileptic drug-related adverse events. Of these, 191 reports were associated with antiepileptic drugs and delirium (crude reporting odds ratio [cROR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-1.93). The use of lacosamide (adjusted reporting odds ratio [aROR], 2.44; 95% CI, 1.24-4.80), lamotrigine (aROR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.05-2.26), levetiracetam (aROR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.35-2.71), and valproic acid (aROR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.16-1.91) was related to a significantly higher reporting odds ratio for delirium, even after adjustment for possible confounding factors. However, when used in combination with benzodiazepine receptor agonists, none of the antiepileptic drugs were found to be associated with delirium. CONCLUSION: Our study's findings suggest that antiepileptic drug usage may be associated with delirium development.
Subject(s)
Delirium , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Receptors, GABA-A , East Asian People , Delirium/chemically induced , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/drug therapyABSTRACT
In this study, an HPLC analysis method using pre-column derivatization with 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate (AQC) was developed for the determination of o-phosphoethanolamine (PEA), which is a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of major depressive disorder, in human plasma sample. After PEA was derivatized with AQC under mild conditions, the obtained derivative was subjected to purification with a titanium dioxide-modified monolithic silica spin column (MonoSpin® TiO). The eluate from the MonoSpin® TiO was directly injected into an amide-type hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) column-equipped HPLC system, and the resulting derivative could be separated on the column under alkaline mobile phase conditions and subsequently detected fluorometrically at excitation and emission wavelengths of 250 and 395 nm, respectively. The limit of detection and limit of quantification for a 10 µL injection volume of PEA were 0.052 and 0.17 µM, respectively. The method was validated at 0.2, 1.0, and 5.0 nmol/mL levels in plasma sample, and the precision values were 2.0-6.6% as relative standard deviation and the correlation coefficient (r) of the calibration curve was 0.9995. Furthermore, applicability of this method was demonstrated by analyzing PEA levels in plasma samples from mental illness patients.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Ethanolamines , Indicators and Reagents , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) may induce a higher risk of developing delirium than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but current evidence is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether anti-ulcer drugs increase delirium risk. METHOD: Data were obtained from the medical records of patients admitted to a hospital due to trauma. We compared the incidence of delirium in patients who received H2RAs and PPIs with that in patients who received no anti-ulcer drugs. RESULTS: A total of 150, 158, and 238 patients received H2RAs, PPIs, and no anti-ulcer drugs, respectively. Delirium incidence was significantly higher in patients who received H2RAs (34.0%) and PPIs (44.9%) than in those who did not receive anti-ulcer drugs (22.3%). Even after adjustment for possible confounding factors, the association between H2RAs and delirium remained (adjusted OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.04-3.05), but that between PPIs and delirium was attenuated (adjusted OR 1.25; 95% CI 0.71-2.23). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that H2RAs are associated with delirium risk. We replicated findings of a previous data-driven study. Clinicians need to consider the effect of delirium in anti-ulcer drug selection.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents , Delirium , Humans , Histamine H2 Antagonists/adverse effects , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hospitalization , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/chemically inducedABSTRACT
Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations and has shown efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. In this study, we created osimertinib-specific antibodies and developed an immunohistochemistry (IHC) for locating the sites of osimertinib action. Moreover, we located osimertinib-protein conjugates in intestinal, dermal, and lung tissues of rats, thereby using our IHC to visualize the sites of the adverse effects of osimertinib, including diarrhea, skin disorder, and interstitial pneumonia. This report is the first to elucidate the localization of the sites of action of osimertinib in the rat intestine, skin, and lung and is expected to help clarify the mechanism of osimertinib-induced adverse effects.
ABSTRACT
Objective: There is limited evidence for the efficacy of the novel dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) suvorexant and lemborexant in preventing delirium. We examined the efficacy of DORAs in preventing delirium in critically ill patients at an advanced emergency and critical care center.Methods: In this retrospective observational study, patients 18 years of age or older admitted to the emergency center between July 2018 and November 2021 with hospitalization duration of at least 72 h were included. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted and log rank tests were performed to compare between patients with and without DORA treatment. Cox regression analyses adjusting for factors associated with delirium risk were also performed.Results: Of the 633 enrolled patients, 82 were treated with suvorexant and 41 with lemborexant. Cox regression analysis showed that, without adjustment, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) for the development of delirium were 0.56 (0.36-0.86) for patients treated with suvorexant and 0.26 (0.11-0.62) for those treated with lemborexant. After adjustment for delirium risk factors, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) remained low at 0.34 (0.20-0.58) for suvorexant and 0.21 (0.08-0.52) for lemborexant.Conclusions: Both suvorexant and lemborexant may be effective in preventing delirium in critically ill adult patients in an advanced critical care center.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Delirium , Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Critical Illness/therapy , Delirium/drug therapy , Orexin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Critical CareABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Findings on the increased mortality risk in individuals with insomnia are inconsistent across studies. Rather than improving insomnia by sleep control, hypnotic use may be one factor in the increased risk of death; however, the effects of hypnotics on mortality remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between all-cause mortality and hypnotic use in a large sample, while adjusting for the effects of comorbidities. METHODS: Overall, 92,527 individuals aged 35-69 years were followed up for mortality in the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study. Regular use of hypnotics was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Since cancer history carries a substantial risk of death and is associated with the treatment of insomnia with hypnotics, participants with a cancer history were excluded. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for all-cause mortality related to hypnotic use were estimated using a Cox proportional hazard model with adjustments for covariates including sleeping hours and comorbidities (body mass index, ischemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes). RESULTS: During the follow-up (mean, 8.4 ± 2.5 years), 1,492 mortalities were recorded, and the prevalence of taking hypnotics was 4.2%. Hypnotic use was associated with significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality, even after adjustment for the covariates (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07-1.63). The association between hypnotic use and all-cause mortality was robust in males (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.15-1.96), and participants aged <60 years (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.21-2.54). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed sex-age specific associations between hypnotic use and all-cause mortality.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Male , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Japan/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Age FactorsABSTRACT
O-Phosphoethanolamine (PEA) is an endogenous substance that is attracting interest as a biomarker for depression, and thus there is a need to develop a simple analytical method that specifically measures PEA. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a simple and specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for PEA. Anti-PEA antibody was obtained by immunizing mice with an antigen conjugated with mercaptosuccinyl bovine serum albumin using m-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide ester (MBS). In this assay, the PEA to be quantified is chemically modified by benzoyl chloride that is allowed to compete with a PEA-MBS-HRP conjugate for binding to a limited amount of an anti-PEA antibody, which was used to coat the wells of a microtiter plate. This ELISA shows a linear range of detection of 0.11-27 µM, and a limit of quantification of 0.144 µM. The anti-PEA antibody showed high affinity for benzoyl PEA. No detectable cross-reactivity was found with benzoyl 2-aminoethanol, O-phospho-l-tyrosine or benzoyl sphingosine-1-phosphate. The values of plasma PEA levels measured by this ELISA were comparable to those measured by HPLC, and a strong correlation was observed between the values determined by the two methods. The developed ELISA should provide a valuable new tool for the quantification of PEA in human plasma.
Subject(s)
Antigens , Ethanolamines , Humans , Mice , Animals , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Serum Albumin, Bovine/chemistryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: There is limited evidence about the nephrotoxicity of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors with concomitant cisplatin (CDDP). We investigated whether combinations of antihypertensive drugs are associated with CDDP-related acute kidney injury (AKI) using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 544,864 reports in the database from 2004 to 2020. A reporting odds ratio (ROR) and confidence interval (CI) with adjustment for potential confounding factors was calculated for AKI for each drug and the combined use of the drugs and CDDP. RESULTS: CDDP, CCBs, and RAS inhibitors were all detected signals for AKI. The ROR in cases with concomitant use of CCBs, RAS inhibitors, and CDDP (adjusted ROR 7.28; 95% CI=5.56-9.54) was higher than that in cases with use of each drug. CONCLUSION: AKI may require more attention when patients receiving CDDP take CCBs and RAS inhibitors together.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The use of hypnotics, especially benzodiazepines (BZs), increases the risk of falls. Regarding the association of orexin receptor antagonists with fall risk, consistent results have not been obtained for suvorexant, and studies of lemborexant have not been reported. Therefore, this study investigated whether orexin receptor antagonists, including lemborexant, increase the risk of falls. METHODS: Data were obtained from the medical records of patients hospitalized at Saga University Hospital in Japan between July 2020 and April 2021. Patients were retrospectively divided into the fall and non-fall groups, and the groups were compared for medication usage. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The fall and non-fall groups included 132 and 6857 patients respectively. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the fall group used hypnotics (40.2% vs. 21.7%; p < 0.0001). Hypnotics remained significantly associated with a higher risk of falls after adjusting for confounders (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-2.48, p = 0.01). In particular, the use of benzodiazepines was associated with a significantly higher risk of falls (adjusted OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.38-3.15, p = 0.0005). Meanwhile, suvorexant use was not linked to the risk of falls, and lemborexant use was associated with a significantly lower risk of falls (adjusted OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.09-0.84, p = 0.02). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The use of hypnotics is a risk factor for falls, but orexin receptor antagonists may represent a safe option for patients requiring hypnotics. Our results provide evidence supporting the safety of these drugs.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Orexin Receptor Antagonists , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Hospitalization , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Orexin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Sunitinib is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This study reports a specific and sensitive competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the pharmacokinetic evaluation of sunitinib. Anti-sunitinib serum was obtained from mice by using N-(2-(diethylamino)ethyl)-5-formyl-2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxamide (DFPC) as a hapten, which has the same substructure as sunitinib, in order to avoid the effects of structural changes in the geometrical isomers of sunitinib. Enzyme labeling of sunitinib with horseradish peroxidase was similarly performed using DFPC. Serum sunitinib concentrations below the limit of quantification of 0.52 ng/mL were reproducibly measurable. This ELISA was speciï¬c for sunitinib (Z- and E-isomers) and showed very low cross-reactivity (0.094%) with its major metabolite, N-desethyl sunitinib. Its analytical applicability was demonstrated by a kinetic study with human liver microsomes. In addition, the levels of sunitinib measured by ELISA in a kinetic study with human liver microsomes were comparable with those measured by HPLC, and there was a strong correlation between the values determined by both methods (y = 1.065x - 51.2, R2 = 0.9804). The developed ELISA provides for the specific and sensitive quantification of sunitinib without the influence of its major metabolite or light-induced geometric isomers. This ELISA will be a valuable tool in pharmacokinetic studies of sunitinib.