Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Gastrectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrectomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Aged , AdultABSTRACT
Background/Aims: Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) is a rare subtype of gastric cancer. We aimed to identify the clinicopathological features and rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM) to investigate the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric LELC confined to the mucosa or submucosa. Methods: We compared the clinicopathological characteristics of 116 early gastric LELC patients and 5,753 early gastric well- or moderately differentiated (WD or MD) tubular adenocarcinoma patients treated by gastrectomy. Results: Compared to WD or MD early gastric cancer (EGC) patients, early LELC patients were younger and had a higher prevalence of proximally located tumors. Despite more frequent deep submucosal invasion (86.2% vs 29.8%), lymphatic invasion was less frequent (6.0% vs 16.2%) in early LELC patients than in WD or MD EGC patients. Among tumors with deep submucosal invasion, the tumor size was smaller, lymphatic invasion was less frequent (6.0% vs 40.2%) and the rate of LNM was lower (10.0% vs 19.4%) in patients with LELC than in those with WD or MD EGC. The overall rate of LNM in early LELC patients was 8.6% (10/116). The risk of LNM in patients with mucosal, shallow submucosal invasive, or deep submucosal invasive LELC was 0% (0/6), 0% (0/10), and 10% (10/100), respectively. Conclusions: Early LELC is a distinct subtype of EGC with more frequent deep submucosal invasion but less lymphatic invasion and LNM than WD or MD EGCs. Endoscopic submucosal dissection may be considered curative for patients with early LELC confined to the mucosa or shallow submucosa, given its negligible rate of LNM.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: When treating undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD-EGC) that is limited to the mucosa (clinically T1a), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be considered if the tumor is 2 cm or less and is not ulcerated. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine the relationships between tumor size and oncological safety of ESD in UD-EGC. METHODS: The pathology reports of Korean patients who were diagnosed with UD-EGC (n = 5286) were retrospectively reviewed. The cumulative incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) according to tumor size was evaluated in subgroups. The tumor-size cut-off was identified as the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of cumulative LNM incidence that did not exceed 1.0%. RESULTS: We identified 1516 patients with non-ulcerated T1a tumors ≤2 cm in size. Among patients without lymphatic invasion, 1.5% (95% CI 0.91-2.16%) had LNM. In patients with poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (PD), LNM increased from 0 to 0.74% based on a tumor size of 1.0 cm. Regardless of tumor size, smaller percentages of undifferentiated-type (UD) and poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) patients experienced LNM than did those with PD. In non-ulcerated mucosal cancer without lymphatic invasion and tumor size ≤0.9 cm, no LNM was observed in patients with UD (95% CI 0-0.53%), PCC (95% CI 0-0.59%), or PD (95% CI 0-0.86%) histologic type. CONCLUSION: In patients diagnosed with non-ulcerated T1a UD-EGC, ESD can be performed if the tumor size is 0.9 cm or less, regardless of histologic type.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Lymphatic Metastasis , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Female , Middle Aged , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Tumor BurdenABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgery plus peri-operative/adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced GC/GEJC, though with unsatisfactory results. dMMR/MSI-high tumors have better prognosis and scant benefit from chemotherapy as compared to pMMR/MSS ones. The differential outcome of therapies in terms of safety and efficacy according to sex is still debated in GC/GEJC patients. METHODS: We previously performed an individual patient data pooled analysis of MAGIC, CLASSIC, ITACA-S, and ARTIST trials including GC/GEJC patients treated with surgery alone or surgery plus peri-operative/adjuvant chemotherapy to assess the value of MSI status. We performed a secondary analysis investigating the prognostic and predictive role of sex (female versus male) in the pooled analysis dataset in the overall population and patients stratified for MSI status (MSI-high versus MSS/MSI-low). Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS: Patients with MSI-high tumors had improved survival as compared to MSS/MSI-low ones irrespective of sex, whereas in those with MSS/MSI-low tumors, females had numerically longer OS and DFS (5-year OS was 63.2% versus 57.6%, HR 0.842; p = 0.058, and 5-year DFS was 55.8% versus 50.8%, HR 0.850; p = 0.0504 in female versus male patients). The numerical difference for the detrimental effect of chemotherapy in MSI-high GC was higher in females than males, while the significant benefit of chemotherapy over surgery alone was confirmed in MSS/MSI-low GC irrespective of sex. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis including four randomized trials highlights a relevant impact of sex in the prognosis and treatment efficacy of MSI-high and MSS/MSI-low non-metastatic GC/GEJC.
Subject(s)
Esophagogastric Junction , Microsatellite Instability , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Sex Factors , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Aged , Chemotherapy, AdjuvantABSTRACT
With the advances in chemotherapy and immunotherapy, a small subset of patients may be eligible for conversion surgery after achieving tumor regression with chemotherapy. This is a retrospective cohort study of 118 patients with stage IV gastric cancer who received palliative chemotherapy and conversion surgery with a negative resection margin at Samsung Medical Center. Baseline features included comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, primary tumor size, biopsy histology, distant metastatic sites, and molecular markers-HER2, MSI/MMR, PD-L1, and EBV. Post-chemotherapy features included BMI, CEA level, chemotherapy regimen, objective response to chemotherapy, and number of preoperative chemotherapy cycles. Post-operational features included tumor size, histologic differentiation and Lauren's classification, pathologic tumor and nodal stages, invasion of lymphatics/vessels/nerves, peritoneal cytology, and the receipt of postoperative chemotherapy. Of 118 patients, 60 patients received total gastrectomy and 58 patients received subtotal gastrectomy. In all, 21 patients achieved a pathologic complete response, and 97 patients achieved downstaging to yp stage I, II, or III. Before conversion surgery, patients received first-line capecitabine/oxaliplatin (62%), HER2 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy (18%), immune checkpoint inhibitors (15%), and inhibitors of MET or VEGFR2 (5%). In the multivariable analysis, BMI at the time of diagnosis, either HER2 positive, high MSI, or deficient MMR, and the use of targeted agents were significant prognostic factors. Conversion surgery could be considered in patients with stage IV gastric cancer regardless of the initial disease burden. BMI and molecular markers are important prognostic factors that can be used to select candidates.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with gastric cancer often encounter impaired quality of life and reduced tolerability to adjuvant treatments after surgery. Weight preservation is crucial for the overall prognosis of these patients, and exercise and supplemental nutrition play the main role. This study is the first randomized clinical trial to apply personalized, treatment stage-adjusted digital intervention with wearable devices in gastric cancer rehabilitation intervention for 12 months, commencing immediately after surgery. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, two-armed, randomized controlled trial and aims to recruit 324 patients from two hospitals. Patients will be randomly allocated to two groups for 1 year of rehabilitation, starting immediately after the operation: a personalized digital therapeutic (intervention) group and a conventional education-based rehabilitation (control) group. The primary objective is to clarify the effect of mobile applications and wearable smart bands in reducing weight loss in patients with gastric cancer. The secondary outcomes are quality of life measured by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and STO22; nutritional status by mini nutrition assessment; physical fitness level measured by grip strength test, 30-s chair stand test and 2-min walk test; physical activity measured by IPAQ-SF; pain intensity; skeletal muscle mass; and fat mass. These measurements will be performed on enrollment and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. Conclusions: Digital therapeutic programs include exercise and nutritional interventions modified by age, body mass index, surgery type and postoperative days. Thus, expert intervention is pivotal for precise and safe calibration of this program. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04907591 (registration date: June 11, 2020; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04907591).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical benefits of the meso-jejunal lymph node (MJLN) dissection in remnant gastric cancer (RGC) patients have not been fully established. Hence, in this retrospective study, we evaluated the survival benefit of MJLN dissection and prognostic significance of MJLN metastasis in RGC patients who underwent gastrojejunostomy reconstruction after their initial gastrectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 391 patients who underwent surgery for RGC at our institution between 1996 and 2019. Among them, 60 patients had MJLN dissection. The index value of the survival benefit gained by dissection of the MJLN was calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis at the MJLN station and the 5-year overall survival rate (5YOS) of patients with metastasis at that station. When the metastatic rate or 5YOS exceeded 10%, dissection was recommended. An index value of dissection greater than 1.0 was considered significant. RESULTS: Total metastatic rate of MJLN was 35% (n = 21/60). Patients with MJLN metastasis had advanced pathologic stage compared to patients in the no-metastasis group (p < 0.001). In T2-T4 RGC patients, the metastatic rate of MJLN was 48.6% (n = 17/35), and their 5YOS was 28.4%. The calculated index value was 13.8. Also, patients with MJLN metastasis had a poorer overall survival than those without metastasis. MJLN metastasis was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival in multivariate analysis (HR 6.77, 95%CI 2.21-20.79, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: MJLN dissection should be considered for advanced RGC patients who underwent gastrojejunostomy after distal gastrectomy during their initial surgery according to the index value.
Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Gastrectomy , Prognosis , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Survival Rate , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There has been no comparison of the prognoses of Korean patients who underwent curative surgery for cancer located at the cardia or subcardia of the stomach. We performed this comparison and further investigated the prognostic significance of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) invasion in patients. METHODS: The medical records of patients (n = 511) who were diagnosed with cardia or subcardia cancer and underwent surgery between January 2010 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were further categorized into four groups for analysis: subcardia gastric cancer (sGC; subcardia cancer without EGJ invasion; n = 97), AEG (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction) type III (subcardia cancer with EGJ invasion, n = 54), AEG type II without EGJ invasion (n = 158), and AEG type II with EGJ invasion (n = 202). We compared the overall survival of the four groups using a gastric cancer staging system and evaluated the prognostic significance of EGJ invasion with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up of patients was 46.0 months (range: 0-124 months). There was significant difference in overall survival curves among the four groups (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in overall survival between the groups with and without EGJ invasion (p < 0.001). Cancers with EGJ invasion were more frequently in the cardia (p < 0.001), had a larger size (p < 0.001), and showed a more advanced pathologic stage (stages II and III; 67.6% versus 33.7%, p < 0.001) than those without EGJ invasion. EGJ invasion and the pathologic stage were significant independent prognostic factors of overall survival in cardia and subcardia cancer patients (hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.32-3.81, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The overall survival between patients with cardia or subcardia cancer was significantly different according to EGJ invasion. EGJ invasion was an independent prognostic factor and should be considered for staging. Additional research is needed to apply this feature to gastric and esophageal cancer classification.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Post-gastrectomy vitamin D deficiency can result in osteoporosis and fractures, which can decrease patient quality of life and increase their socioeconomic burden. However, because there is no consensus around preoperative measurement and regular postoperative monitoring of serum vitamin D [25(OH)vitD] level for gastric cancer patients, we performed a retrospective study with a single high-volume center experience. METHODS: We reviewed a database of 614 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between December 2015 and December 2019. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for 25(OH)vitD deficiency after one year postoperative (n = 546). A linear mixed model was used to evaluate changes between preoperative (n = 585) and postoperative (6 [n = 504] and 12 months [n = 572]) 25(OH)vitD values. RESULTS: Preoperative 25(OH)vitD deficiency occurred in 67.7% of patients with gastric cancer. Patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy for advanced pathologic disease were more likely to be 25(OH)vitD deficient at postoperative year one than those who did not receive chemotherapy (P = 0.005). Postoperative chemotherapy was an independent risk factor along with preoperative 25(OH)vitD level for one year postoperative 25(OH)vitD deficiency (P = 0.002). Meanwhile, there was significant change in 25(OH)vitD level after surgery according to reconstruction (increased in Billroth I group compared to gastrojejunostomy group, P = 0.016), pathologic stage (increased in stage I group, decreased in stage II and III group, P = 0.005), postoperative chemotherapy (increased in non-chemotherapy group, decreased in chemotherapy group, P = 0.001), and season of surgery (increased when the blood tests were performed at summer, decreased when tested in non-summer season, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: More than half of gastric cancer patients had preoperative 25(OH)vitD deficiency, and those who had postoperative chemotherapy were at risk for 25(OH)vitD deficiency one year after surgery. There was a significant change in 25(OH)vitD level after surgery according to reconstruction method and postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative measurement and regular postoperative monitoring should be considered for high-risk patients.
Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Vitamin D Deficiency , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Quality of Life , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications , Vitamin D Deficiency/epidemiology , Vitamin D , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Gastrectomy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While many studies investigated changes in working status in cancer survivors, most studies have been performed in survivors of breast cancer and few studies evaluated factors associated with changes in the working status of cancer survivors comprehensively. We aimed to evaluate the changes in the working status of cancer survivors after diagnosis and socio-demographic, clinical, work-related and psychological factors associated with it. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of adult patients with cancer who were working at the time of diagnosis. A trained interviewer inquired about participants' current working status, including leave of absence, discontinuing, continuing, and changing work. Sociodemographic, clinical, work-related and psychological factors were measured. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with changes in the working status. RESULTS: Among the 730 patients, 29%, 18% and 6% were currently on a discontinued working, leave of absence and had changed jobs, respectively. Patients who discontinued working after cancer diagnosis were more likely to be female, have ≥ $3,000 of monthly family income, not be the principal wage earners for their families and be blue-collar workers. In clinical characteristics, advanced-stage cancer and experienced cancer recurrence was associated with leave of absence and discontinued working. In work-related and psychological factors, stress due to insufficient job control (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 2.26), interpersonal conflict (RRR = 1.86), job insecurity (RRR = 2.63), organizational system (RRR = 3.49), and lack of reward (RRR = 11.76), and less meaning to work were more likely to discontinue working after a cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Occupational health care professionals and other stakeholders need to openly communicate with patients with cancer about potential barriers during the return-to-work trajectory.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Demography , Female , Humans , Male , Return to WorkABSTRACT
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinical significance of preoperative hematological parameters in patients with advanced stomach cancer, and to explore who might benefit from adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared to chemotherapy alone. Among 1032 patients with node-positive stomach cancer who had a confirmed diagnosis after complete D2 resection, and who received adjuvant chemotherapy alone or CCRT, a total of 692 patients was selected using propensity score matching. Among absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), absolute monocyte count (AMC), platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, AMC was the most relevant prognostic factor for overall survival and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.674, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.180-2.376; HR 1.908, 95% CI 1.650-2.695, respectively). In a subgroup with a high ALC, patients treated with adjuvant CCRT had a favorable recurrence-free survival (HR 0.620, 95% CI 0.393-0.980) compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone. Further study is needed to confirm our findings and to develop tailored adjuvant treatment.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Because there are ongoing efforts to identify and develop novel drugs in the treatment of refractory gastric cancer, it is necessary to develop effective preclinical studies. Here, the preclinical efficacy of gastric tumor xenograft (GTX)-derived cell line models for the personalized treatment of gastric cancer was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anti-cancer drugs were scanned with high-throughput screening (HTS) using pre-established GTX-derived cell lines. The efficacy of a selected drug (afatinib) was re-confirmed in vivo and intracellular signaling pathways were investigated in xenograft tumor cell lysates using western blotting. Validation studies, such as cell proliferation and caspase activity assays, were also conducted in vitro with GTX-derived cell lines. RESULTS: HTS indicated that afatinib was effective in one of the five GTX-derived cell lines (GTX-087). A xenograft mouse model was established from GTX-087, and administration of afatinib at 1 mg/20 g body weight/day per oral resulted in tumor-suppressive activity in vivo. The RAS-ERK pathway was inactivated by an increase in Bax and cleaved caspase-3 in this xenograft model. In vitro cell proliferation assay also revealed that afatinib was able to suppress the growth of the GTX-087 cell line. Caspase activity assay confirmed that afatinib had an apoptotic role on GTX-087 and showed that caspase-3/7 activity increased in a time dependent manner. CONCLUSION: The GTX-derived cell line model might be useful for estimating novel drug responses and could be an alternative to patient-derived xenograft animal models.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Stomach Neoplasms , Afatinib/pharmacology , Afatinib/therapeutic use , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Caspase 3 , Cell Line, Tumor , Disease Models, Animal , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Mice , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
The advantages of laparoscopic resection over open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are not conclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative and oncologic outcome of laparoscopic resection for gastric GIST, compared to open surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected database of 1019 patients with gastric GIST after surgical resection at 13 Korean and 2 Japanese institutions. The surgical and oncologic outcomes were compared between laparoscopic and open group, through 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The laparoscopic group (N = 318) had a lower rate of overall complications (3.5% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.024) and wound complications (0.6% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.037), shorter hospitalization days (6.68 ± 4.99 vs. 8.79 ± 6.50, P < 0.001) than the open group (N = 318). The superiority of the laparoscopic approach was also demonstrated in patients with tumors larger than 5 cm, and at unfavorable locations. The recurrence-free survival was not different between the two groups, regardless of tumor size, locational favorableness, and risk classifications. Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor size larger than 5 cm, higher mitotic count, R1 resection, and tumor rupture during surgery were independent risk factors for recurrence. Laparoscopic surgery provides lower rates of complications and shorter hospitalizations for patients with gastric GIST than open surgery.
Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit various degrees of aggression and malignant potential. However, no systematic preoperative evaluation strategy to predict the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs has yet been developed. This study aimed to develop a reliable and easy-to-use preoperative risk-scoring model for predicting high malignancy potential (HMP) gastric GISTs. METHODS: The data of 542 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs who underwent resection were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of HMP. The risk-scoring system (RSS) was based on the predictive factors for HMP, and its performance was validated using a split-sample approach. RESULTS: A total of 239 of 542 (44.1%) surgically resected gastric GISTs had HMP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, location, and surface changes were independent risk factors for HMP. Based on the accordant regression coefficients, the presence of surface ulceration was assigned 1 point. Tumor sizes of 4-6 cm and > 6 cm were assigned 2 and 5 points, respectively. Two points were assigned to cardia or fundus locations. A score of 3 points was the optimal cut-off value for HMP prediction. HMP were found in 19.8% and 82.7% of the low and high-risk groups of the RSS, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting HMP was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.86). Discrimination was good after validation (0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.81). CONCLUSION: This simple RSS could be useful for predicting the malignancy potential of gastric GISTs and may aid preoperative clinical decision making to ensure optimal treatment.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Stomach Neoplasms , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/surgery , Humans , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The appropriate surgical approach for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer remains under discussion. We compared surgical outcomes between transabdominal (TA) and transthoracic (TT) approaches for treating type II EGJ cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 397 type II EGJ cancer patients who underwent surgery from January 2001 to May 2019. We used a 1:3 propensity score-matching method for the analysis. The matching factors were age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, period of operation, and pathologic stage. Matching was performed using the MatchIt package of R 4.0.2. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients in the TT group was matched to 126 patients in the TA group. R0 resection was achieved in both groups and was not statistically different between groups (p = 0.455). In the TA group, the operation time and in-hospital stay length were significantly shorter (p < 0.001) and the intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower than in the TT group (p = 0.011). The postoperative complication rate between the two groups was significantly different (p = 0.003). There was marginal difference in the five-year OS rate (p = 0.049) and significant difference in the five-year DFS (p = 0.039). However, surgical approach was not a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis of OS or DFS. CONCLUSIONS: There was no clear survival benefit of one approach over the other. However, less intraoperative bleeding, lower postoperative complication rate, shorter operation time, and reduced in-hospital stay length were correlated with the TA approach.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/methods , Esophagogastric Junction/surgery , Gastrectomy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Operative Time , Propensity Score , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Benefits of adjuvant treatment in pT1N1 gastric cancer (GC) remain controversial. Additionally, an effective biomarker for early GC is the need of the hour. The prognostic and predictive roles of single patient classifier (SPC) were validated in stage II/III GC. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the role of SPC as a biomarker for pT1N1 GC. METHODS: The present retrospective biomarker study (NCT03485105) enrolled patients treated for pT1N1 GC between 1996 and 2012 from two large hospitals (the Y cohort and S cohort). For SPC, mRNA expression of four classifier genes (GZMB, WARS, SFRP4 and CDX1) were evaluated by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. The SPC was revised targeting pT1 stages and the prognosis was stratified as high- and low-risk group by the expression of SFRP4, a representative epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker. RESULTS: SPC was evaluated in 875 patients (n=391 and 484 in the Y and S cohorts, respectively). Among 864 patients whose SPC result was available, 41 (4.7%) patients experience GC recurrence. According to revised SPC, 254 (29.4%) patients were classified as high risk [123 (31.5%) and 131 (27.1%) in the Y and S cohorts, respectively]. The high risk was related to frequent recurrence in both Y and S cohort (log-rank P=0.023, P<0.001, respectively), while there was no difference byGZMB and WARS expression. Multivariable analyses of the overall-cohort confirmed the high risk of revised SPC as a significant prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR): 4.402 (2.293-8.449), P<0.001] of GC. A significant difference was not detected by SPC in the prognosis of patients in the presence and absence of adjuvant treatment (log-rank P=0.670). CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed the revised SPC as a prognostic biomarker of pT1N1 GC and suggested the use of the revised SPC for early-stage GC as like stage II/III.
ABSTRACT
Collagen is a major component in the tumor microenvironment. This study reveals a novel biomarker candidate, type VII collagen (COL7A1), in patients with gastric cancer. To identify genes differentially expressed in gastric cancer tissue, we analyzed cancerous (n = 20) and noncancerous tissues (n = 13) using a DNA microarray. To perform immunohistochemistry and validate the upregulation of COL7A1 expression, we collected 200 more gastric cancer tissues and 100 normal gastric tissues from 200 randomly selected patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2010 and December 2013. The correlations between COL7A1 expression and clinicopathological parameters and patients' overall survival (OS) were analyzed. In the microarray, COL7A1 was upregulated in gastric cancer tissue compared with normal tissue. In the immunohistochemistry study, COL7A1 was more highly expressed in cancer tissue than in normal tissue (p = 0.001). Patients with intracellular COL7A1 expression had significantly poorer five-year OS than those with only extracellular expression (41.5 versus 69.7%, p = 0.001), and the site of expression was an independent prognostic factor of OS (hazard ratio 2.00, 95% CI 1.26-3.16, p = 0.003). Also, we found a significant association between the COL7A1 immunohistochemistry score and distant metastasis (high versus low, odds ratio 4.45, 95% CI 1.40-14.16, p = 0.011). The site and total immunohistochemistry score of COL7A1 expression in gastric cancer showed prognostic significance for OS and distant metastasis, respectively. COL7A1 could be a novel biomarker with diagnostic and therapeutic value.
Subject(s)
Collagen Type VII/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Female , Gastrectomy/methods , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Lymphatic Metastasis/genetics , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Tumor Microenvironment/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Microsatellite status is a prognostic biomarker in advanced gastric cancer. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the usefulness of microsatellite status in predicting prognosis and response to adjuvant treatment in pT1N1 gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 875 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for pT1N1 gastric cancer at two tertiary hospitals, 838 with available microsatellite instability (MSI) data were included and classified into two groups according to microsatellite status: microsatellite stable (MSS) and MSI-high (MSI-H). Recurrence-free survival rate and risk factors for tumor recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 838 gastric cancer patients, 100 (11.9%) were MSI-H and 307 (36.6%) received adjuvant treatment. During median follow-up of 70 months, 42 (5.0%) patients experienced gastric cancer recurrence; hematogenous recurrences were the most common (45.2%). Recurrence-free survival was similar in the MSS and MSI-H groups (p = 0.27), and adjuvant treatment did not show an oncological benefit over surgery alone for pT1N1 gastric cancer (p = 0.53). On univariate analysis, age, operation period, and Lauren classification were significantly associated with tumor recurrence, while adjuvant treatment and MSI status were not associated with tumor recurrence. On multivariate analysis, MSI status was not associated with tumor recurrence, and adjuvant treatment worsened the tumor recurrence risk [hazard ratio (HR) 2.373, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.125-5.006, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: MSI status may not be a prognostic factor for tumor recurrence or a predictor of response to adjuvant treatment in pT1N1 gastric cancer patients. Considering that the effect of adjuvant treatment to decrease the risk of tumor recurrence is not clear, it may not be indicated in pT1N1 patients.
Subject(s)
Microsatellite Instability , Stomach Neoplasms , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Dietary education is regarded as an important and useful tool for influencing nutritional status. Since long, dietary education has been performed to improve the nutritional status of patients after a gastrectomy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of simplified dietary education on the nutritional status of patients after a gastrectomy. A total of 1,150 patients with gastric cancer underwent surgery between March 2014 and October 2015 at the Samsung Medical Center (SMC). Of these, we used the case-control matching method (1:1 match) by stratifying the factors of age and sex and included 100 patients in each group. The clinicopathologic data of the patients for two years after the gastrectomy were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The educated group (ED, N = 100) was provided with a simplified, ordinary dietary education at regular outpatient clinic visits that occurred at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after gastrectomy and at 1-year intervals thereafter. The clinicopathologic characteristics and nutritional parameters of the educated group (ED) (N = 100) and the non-educated group (NED) (n = 100) were compared. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of clinical characteristics and serological parameters. Nutritional parameters, which included body weight loss, body mass index (BMI) change, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), were also not significantly different between the two groups. Simplified dietary education at regular outpatient clinic visits was ineffective in reducing weight loss after a subtotal gastrectomy. Further research or other methods may be needed to reduce weight loss after a gastrectomy.