Ruling out intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma patients using clinical criteria and abdominal ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: to identify victims of blunt abdominal trauma in which intra-abdominal injuries can be excluded by clinical criteria and by complete abdominal ultrasonography. METHODS: retrospective analysis of victims of blunt trauma in which the following clinical variables were analyzed: hemodynamic stability, normal neurologic exam at admission, normal physical exam of the chest at admission, normal abdomen and pelvis physical exam at admission and absence of distracting lesions (Abbreviated Injury Scale >2 at skull, thorax and/or extremities). The ultrasound results were then studied in the group of patients with all clinical variables evaluated. RESULTS: we studied 5536 victims of blunt trauma. Intra-abdominal lesions with AIS>1 were identified in 144 (2.6%); in patients with hemodynamic stability they were present in 86 (2%); in those with hemodynamic stability and normal neurological exam at admission in 50 (1.8%); in patients with hemodynamic stability and normal neurological and chest physical exam at admission, in 39 (1.5%); in those with hemodynamic stability, normal neurological, chest, abdominal and pelvic physical exam at admission, in 12 (0.5%); in patients with hemodynamic stability, normal neurological, chest, abdominal and pelvic physical exam at admission, and absence of distracting lesions, only two (0.1%) had intra-abdominal lesions. Among those with all clinical variables, 693 had normal total abdominal ultrasound, and, within this group, there were no identified intra-abdominal lesions. CONCLUSION: when all clinical criteria and total abdominal ultrasound are associated, it is possible to identify a group of victims of blunt trauma with low chance of significant intra-abdominal lesions.

Ruling out intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma patients using clinical criteria and abdominal ultrasound / Exclusão de lesões intra-abdominais em vítimas de trauma fechado através de variáveis clínicas e ultrassom abdominal completo

ABSTRACT Objective: to identify victims of blunt abdominal trauma in which intra-abdominal injuries can be excluded by clinical criteria and by complete abdominal ultrasonography. Methods: retrospective analysis of victims of blunt trauma in which the following clinical variables were analyzed: hemodynamic stability, normal neurologic exam at admission, normal physical exam of the chest at admission, normal abdomen and pelvis physical exam at admission and absence of distracting lesions (Abbreviated Injury Scale >2 at skull, thorax and/or extremities). The ultrasound results were then studied in the group of patients with all clinical variables evaluated. Results: we studied 5536 victims of blunt trauma. Intra-abdominal lesions with AIS>1 were identified in 144 (2.6%); in patients with hemodynamic stability they were present in 86 (2%); in those with hemodynamic stability and normal neurological exam at admission in 50 (1.8%); in patients with hemodynamic stability and normal neurological and chest physical exam at admission, in 39 (1.5%); in those with hemodynamic stability, normal neurological, chest, abdominal and pelvic physical exam at admission, in 12 (0.5%); in patients with hemodynamic stability, normal neurological, chest, abdominal and pelvic physical exam at admission, and absence of distracting lesions, only two (0.1%) had intra-abdominal lesions. Among those with all clinical variables, 693 had normal total abdominal ultrasound, and, within this group, there were no identified intra-abdominal lesions. Conclusion: when all clinical criteria and total abdominal ultrasound are associated, it is possible to identify a group of victims of blunt trauma with low chance of significant intra-abdominal lesions.

RESUMO Objetivo: identificar vítimas de trauma fechado de abdome nas quais as lesões intra-abdominais possam ser excluídas por critérios clínicos e por ultrassonografia abdominal completa. Métodos: análise retrospectiva de vítimas de trauma fechado em que se analisou as seguintes variáveis clínicas: estabilidade hemodinâmica, exame neurológico normal à admissão, exame físico do tórax, do abdome e da pelve normais à admissão e ausência de lesões distrativas (Abbreviated Injury Scale >2 em crânio, tórax e/ou extremidades). Em seguida estudou-se o resultado da ultrassonografia no grupo de pacientes com todas as variáveis clínicas avaliadas. Resultados: estudamos 5536 vítimas de trauma fechado. Lesões intra-abdominais com AIS>1 foram identificadas em 144 (2,6%) casos; em pacientes com estabilidade hemodinâmica, estavam presentes em 86 (2%); naqueles com estabilidade hemodinâmica e exame neurológico normal à admissão em 50 (1,8%); nos casos com estabilidade hemodinâmica, exame neurológico e do tórax normais à admissão em 39 (1,5%); em pacientes com estabilidade hemodinâmica e com exame neurológico, do tórax, do abdome e da pelve normais em 12 (0,5%); naqueles com estabilidade hemodinâmica e com exame neurológico, do tórax, do abdome e da pelve normais e ausência de lesões distrativas, em apenas dois (0,1%) pacientes. Nos pacientes com todas as variáveis clínicas, 693 apresentavam ultrassonografia abdominal completa normal e, neste grupo, não foram identificadas lesões intra-abdominais posteriormente. Conclusão: pela somatória de critérios clínicos e ultrassonografia abdominal completa, é possível identificar um grupo de vítimas de trauma fechado com baixa chance de apresentar lesões intra-abdominais significativas.

Trauma mechanism predicts the frequency and the severity of injuries in blunt trauma patients. / Relação entre o mecanismo de trauma e lesões diagnosticadas em vítimas de trauma fechado.

OBJECTIVE: to study the correlation of trauma mechanism with frequency and severity of injuries in blunt trauma patients. METHODS: retrospective analysis of trauma registry in a 15-month period was carried out. Trauma mechanism was classified into six types: occupants of four-wheeled vehicles involved in road traffic accidents (AUTO), pedestrians struck by road vehicles (PED), motorcyclists involved in road traffic accidents (MOTO), falls from height (FALL), physical assault with blunt instruments (ASSA) and falls on same level (FSL). Injuries with AIS>2 were considered severe. One-way ANOVA, Students t and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis, considering p<0.05 significant. RESULTS: trauma mechanism was classified by group for 3639 cases, comprising 337 (9.3%) AUTO, 855 (23.5%) PED, 924 (25.4%) MOTO, 455 (12.5%) FALL, 424 (11.7%) ASSA and 644 (17.7%) FSL. There was significant difference among groups when comparing the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of the head, thorax, abdomen and extremities (p<0.001). Severe injuries in the head and in the extremities were more frequent in PED patients (p<0.001). Severe injuries to the chest were more frequent in AUTO (p<0.001). Abdominal injuries were less frequent in FSL (p=0.004). Complex fractures of the pelvis and spine were more frequent in FALL (p<0.001). Lethality was greater in PED, followed by FALL and AUTO (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: trauma mechanism analysis predicted frequency and severity of injuries in blunt trauma patients.

OBJETIVO: analisar a correlação do mecanismo de trauma com a frequência e a gravidade das lesões. MÉTODOS: análise retrospectiva das informações do registro de trauma em período de 15 meses. O mecanismo de trauma foi classificado em seis tipos: ocupantes de veículo de quadro rodas envolvidos em acidente de tráfego (AUTO), pedestres vítimas de atropelamento (ATRO), motociclistas vítimas de acidentes de tráfego (MOTO), vítimas de quedas de altura (QUED), vítimas de agressão física com instrumentos contundentes (AGRE) e vítimas de queda do mesmo nível (QMN). RESULTADOS: o mecanismo de trauma foi classificado em 3639 casos, sendo 337 (9,3%) AUTO, 855 (23,5%) ATRO, 924 (25,4%) MOTO, 455 (12,5%) QUED, 424 (11,7%) AGRE e 644 (17,7%) QMN. Houve diferença significativa na comparação entre os grupos das médias dos índices do Revised Trauma Score (RTS), do Injury Severity Score (ISS) e da Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) do segmento cefálico, torácico, abdominal e extremidades (p<0,05). Lesões graves em segmento cefálico foram mais frequentes nas vítimas de ATRO, seguidos de AGRE e QUED (p<0,001). Lesões graves em tórax foram mais frequentes em AUTO, seguidos de QUED e ATRO (p<0,001). As lesões abdominais foram menos frequentes nas vítimas de QMN (p=0,004). Lesões graves em extremidades foram mais frequentes em ATRO, seguidos de MOTO e QUED (p<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: com a análise do mecanismo de trauma é possível prever a frequência e a gravidade das lesões em vítimas de trauma fechado.

Relação entre o mecanismo de trauma e lesões diagnosticadas em vítimas de trauma fechado / Trauma mechanism predicts the frequency and the severity of injuries in blunt trauma patients

RESUMO Objetivo: analisar a correlação do mecanismo de trauma com a frequência e a gravidade das lesões. Métodos: análise retrospectiva das informações do registro de trauma em período de 15 meses. O mecanismo de trauma foi classificado em seis tipos: ocupantes de veículo de quadro rodas envolvidos em acidente de tráfego (AUTO), pedestres vítimas de atropelamento (ATRO), motociclistas vítimas de acidentes de tráfego (MOTO), vítimas de quedas de altura (QUED), vítimas de agressão física com instrumentos contundentes (AGRE) e vítimas de queda do mesmo nível (QMN). Resultados: o mecanismo de trauma foi classificado em 3639 casos, sendo 337 (9,3%) AUTO, 855 (23,5%) ATRO, 924 (25,4%) MOTO, 455 (12,5%) QUED, 424 (11,7%) AGRE e 644 (17,7%) QMN. Houve diferença significativa na comparação entre os grupos das médias dos índices do Revised Trauma Score (RTS), do Injury Severity Score (ISS) e da Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) do segmento cefálico, torácico, abdominal e extremidades (p<0,05). Lesões graves em segmento cefálico foram mais frequentes nas vítimas de ATRO, seguidos de AGRE e QUED (p<0,001). Lesões graves em tórax foram mais frequentes em AUTO, seguidos de QUED e ATRO (p<0,001). As lesões abdominais foram menos frequentes nas vítimas de QMN (p=0,004). Lesões graves em extremidades foram mais frequentes em ATRO, seguidos de MOTO e QUED (p<0,001). Conclusão: com a análise do mecanismo de trauma é possível prever a frequência e a gravidade das lesões em vítimas de trauma fechado.

ABSTRACT Objective: to study the correlation of trauma mechanism with frequency and severity of injuries in blunt trauma patients. Methods: retrospective analysis of trauma registry in a 15-month period was carried out. Trauma mechanism was classified into six types: occupants of four-wheeled vehicles involved in road traffic accidents (AUTO), pedestrians struck by road vehicles (PED), motorcyclists involved in road traffic accidents (MOTO), falls from height (FALL), physical assault with blunt instruments (ASSA) and falls on same level (FSL). Injuries with AIS>2 were considered severe. One-way ANOVA, Students t and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis, considering p<0.05 significant. Results: trauma mechanism was classified by group for 3639 cases, comprising 337 (9.3%) AUTO, 855 (23.5%) PED, 924 (25.4%) MOTO, 455 (12.5%) FALL, 424 (11.7%) ASSA and 644 (17.7%) FSL. There was significant difference among groups when comparing the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of the head, thorax, abdomen and extremities (p<0.001). Severe injuries in the head and in the extremities were more frequent in PED patients (p<0.001). Severe injuries to the chest were more frequent in AUTO (p<0.001). Abdominal injuries were less frequent in FSL (p=0.004). Complex fractures of the pelvis and spine were more frequent in FALL (p<0.001). Lethality was greater in PED, followed by FALL and AUTO (p<0.001). Conclusion: trauma mechanism analysis predicted frequency and severity of injuries in blunt trauma patients.

Severity and treatment of "occult" intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma victims.

BACKGROUND: to assess the severity and treatment of "occult" intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma victims. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of charts and trauma register data of adult blunt trauma victims, admitted without abdominal pain or alterations in the abdominal physical examination, but were subsequently diagnosed with intra-abdominal injuries, in a period of 2 years. The severity was stratified according to RTS, AIS, OIS and ISS. The specific treatment for abdominal injuries and the complications related to them were assessed. RESULTS: Intra-abdominal injuries were diagnosed in 220 (3.8%) out of the 5785 blunt trauma victims and 76 (34.5%) met the inclusion criteria. The RTS and ISS median (lower quartile, upper quartile) were 7.84 (6.05, 7.84) and 25 (16, 34). Sixty seven percent had a GCS≥13 on admission. Injuries were identified in the spleen (34), liver (33), kidneys (9), intestines (4), diaphragm (3), bladder (3) and iliac vessels (1). Abdominal injuries scored AIS≥3 in 67% of patients. Twenty-one patients (28%) underwent laparotomy, 5 of which were nontherapeutic. The surgical procedures performed were splenectomy (8), suturing of the diaphragm (3), intestines (3), bladder (2), kidneys (1), enterectomy/anastomosis (1), ligation of the common iliac vein (1), and revascularization of the common iliac artery (1). Angiography and embolization of liver and/or spleen injuries were performed in 3 cases. Three patients developed abdominal complications, all of which were operatively treated. There were no deaths directly related to the abdominal injuries. CONCLUSION: Severe "occult" intra-abdominal injuries, requiring specific treatment, may be present in adult blunt trauma patients.

Predictors of "occult" intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: to assess predictors of intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma patients admitted without abdominal pain or abnormalities on the abdomen physical examination. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of trauma registry data, including adult blunt trauma patients admitted from 2008 to 2010 who sustained no abdominal pain or abnormalities on physical examination of the abdomen at admission and were submitted to computed tomography of the abdomen and/or exploratory laparotomy. Patients were assigned into: Group 1 (with intra-abdominal injuries) or Group 2 (without intra-abdominal injuries). Variables were compared between groups to identify those significantly associated with the presence of intra-abdominal injuries, adopting p<0.05 as significant. Subsequently, the variables with p<0.20 on bivariate analysis were selected to create a logistic regression model using the forward stepwise method. RESULTS: A total of 268 cases met the inclusion criteria. Patients in Group I were characterized as having significantly (p<0.05) lower mean AIS score for the head segment (1.0 ± 1.4 vs. 1.8 ± 1.9), as well as higher mean AIS thorax score (1.6 ± 1.7 vs. 0.9 ± 1.5) and ISS (25.7 ± 14.5 vs. 17,1 ± 13,1). The rate of abdominal injuries was significantly higher in run-over pedestrians (37.3%) and in motorcyclists (36.0%) (p<0.001). The resultant logistic regression model provided 73.5% accuracy for identifying abdominal injuries. The variables included were: motorcyclist accident as trauma mechanism (p<0.001 - OR 5.51; 95%CI 2.40-12.64), presence of rib fractures (p<0.003 - OR 3.00; 95%CI 1.47-6.14), run-over pedestrian as trauma mechanism (p=0.008 - OR 2.85; 95%CI 1.13-6.22) and abnormal neurological physical exam at admission (p=0.015 - OR 0.44; 95%CI 0.22-0.85). CONCLUSION: Intra-abdominal injuries were predominantly associated with trauma mechanism and presence of chest injuries.

Implementation of the trauma registry as a tool for quality improvement in trauma care in a brazilian hospital: the first 12 months.

OBJECTIVE: to analyze the implementation of a trauma registry in a university teaching hospital delivering care under the unified health system (SUS), and its ability to identify points for improvement in the quality of care provided. METHODS: the data collection group comprised students from medicine and nursing courses who were holders of FAPESP scholarships (technical training 1) or otherwise, overseen by the coordinators of the project. The itreg (ECO Sistemas-RJ/SBAIT) software was used as the database tool. Several quality "filters" were proposed to select those cases for review in the quality control process. RESULTS: data for 1344 trauma patients were input to the itreg database between March and November 2014. Around 87.0% of cases were blunt trauma patients, 59.6% had RTS>7.0 and 67% ISS<9. Full records were available for 292 cases, which were selected for review in the quality program. The auditing filters most frequently registered were laparotomy four hours after admission and drainage of acute subdural hematomas four hours after admission. Several points for improvement were flagged, such as control of overtriage of patients, the need to reduce the number of negative imaging exams, the development of protocols for achieving central venous access, and management of major TBI. CONCLUSION: the trauma registry provides a clear picture of the points to be improved in trauma patient care, however, there are specific peculiarities for implementing this tool in the Brazilian milieu.

Comparative analysis of the frequency and the severity of diagnosed lesions between pedestrians struck by motor vehicles and other blunt trauma mechanisms victims.

OBJECTIVE: to compare the frequency and the severity of diagnosed injuries between pedestrians struck by motor vehicles and victims of other blunt trauma mechanisms. METHODS: retrospective analysis of data from the Trauma Registry, including adult blunt trauma patients admitted from 2008 to 2010. We reviewed the mechanism of trauma, vital signs on admission and the injuries identified. Severity stratification was carried using RTS, AIS-90, ISS e TRISS. Patients were assigned into group A (pedestrians struck by motor vehicle) or B (victims of other mechanisms of blunt trauma). Variables were compared between groups. We considered p<0.05 as significant. RESULTS: a total of 5785 cases were included, and 1217 (21,0%) of which were in group A. Pedestrians struck by vehicles presented (p<0.05) higher mean age, mean heart rate upon admission, mean ISS and mean AIS in head, thorax, abdomen and extremities, as well as lower mean Glasgow coma scale, arterial blood pressure upon admission, RTS and TRISS. They also had a higher frequency of epidural hematomas, subdural hematomas, subarachnoid hemorrhage, brain swelling, cerebral contusions, costal fractures, pneumothorax, flail chest, pulmonary contusions, as well as pelvic, superior limbs and inferior limbs fractures. CONCLUSION: pedestrian struck by vehicles sustained intracranial, thoracic, abdominal and extremity injuries more frequently than victims of other blunt trauma mechanism as a group. They also presented worse physiologic and anatomic severity of the trauma.

Predictors of "occult" intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma patients / Indicadores de lesões intra-abdominais "ocultas" em pacientes vítimas de trauma fechado admitidas sem dor abdominal ou alterações no exame físico do abdome

Objective: to assess predictors of intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma patients admitted without abdominal pain or abnormalities on the abdomen physical examination. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of trauma registry data, including adult blunt trauma patients admitted from 2008 to 2010 who sustained no abdominal pain or abnormalities on physical examination of the abdomen at admission and were submitted to computed tomography of the abdomen and/or exploratory laparotomy. Patients were assigned into: Group 1 (with intra-abdominal injuries) or Group 2 (without intra-abdominal injuries). Variables were compared between groups to identify those significantly associated with the presence of intra-abdominal injuries, adopting p<0.05 as significant. Subsequently, the variables with p<0.20 on bivariate analysis were selected to create a logistic regression model using the forward stepwise method. Results: A total of 268 cases met the inclusion criteria. Patients in Group I were characterized as having significantly (p<0.05) lower mean AIS score for the head segment (1.0±1.4 vs. 1.8±1.9), as well as higher mean AIS thorax score (1.6±1.7 vs. 0.9±1.5) and ISS (25.7±14.5 vs. 17,1±13,1). The rate of abdominal injuries was significantly higher in run-over pedestrians (37.3%) and in motorcyclists (36.0%) (p<0.001). The resultant logistic regression model provided 73.5% accuracy for identifying abdominal injuries. The variables included were: motorcyclist accident as trauma mechanism (p<0.001 - OR 5.51; 95%CI 2.40-12.64), presence of rib fractures (p<0.003 - OR 3.00; 95%CI 1.47-6.14), run-over pedestrian as trauma mechanism (p=0.008 - OR 2.85; 95%CI 1.13-6.22) and abnormal neurological physical exam at admission (p=0.015 - OR 0.44; 95%CI 0.22-0.85). Conclusion Intra-abdominal injuries were predominantly associated with trauma mechanism and presence of chest injuries.

Objetivo: avaliar os indicadores de lesões intra-abdominais em vítimas de trauma fechado admitidas sem dor abdominal ou alterações no exame físico do abdome. Método: estudo retrospectivo das vítimas de trauma fechado com idade superior a 13 anos, admitidas no período de 2008-2010. Selecionamos para estudo todos que foram submetidos à tomografia computadorizada de abdome e/ou laparotomia exploradora e que, à admissão, não apresentavam dor abdominal ou alterações ao exame físico do abdome. Os doentes foram separados em: Grupo 1 (com lesões intra-abdominais) e Grupo 2 (sem lesões intra-abdominais). As variáveis foram comparadas entre os grupos, considerando p<0,05 como significativo. Em um segundo passo, selecionamos as variáveis com p<0,20 na análise bivariada para criar modelo de regressão logística pelo método forward stepwise. Resultados: foram incluídos 268 casos. Os doentes com lesão abdominal caracterizaram-se por apresentar, significativamente (p<0,05), menor média de AIS em segmento cefálico (1,0 ± 1,4 vs. 1,8 ± 1,9), bem como, maior média de AIS em tórax (1,6 ± 1,7 vs. 0,9 ± 1,5) e de ISS (25,7 ± 14,5 vs. 17,1 ± 13,1). A frequência de lesões abdominais foi significativamente maior nas vítimas de atropelamentos (37,3%) e motociclistas (36%) (p<0,001). A regressão logística construiu um modelo utilizando as seguintes variáveis: motociclista como mecanismo de trauma (p<0,001- OR=5,51; IC95% 2,40-12,64), presença de fraturas de costelas (p<0,003 - OR=3,00; IC95% 1,47-6,14), atropelamento como mecanismo de trauma (p=0,008 - OR=2,85; IC95% 1,13-6,22) e exame físico neurológico anormal a admissão (p=0,015 - OR=0,44; IC95% 0,22-0,85). Conclusão: as lesões intra-abdominais foram relacionadas principalmente com o mecanismo de trauma e a presença de lesões torácicas.

Degloving injuries of trunk and limbs: comparison of outcomes of early versus delayed assessment by the plastic surgery team.

OBJECTIVE: to analyze cases of degloving of the trunk and limbs, comparing outcomes of early versus delayed assessment by the plastic surgery team. METHODS: we conducted a retrospective analysis of medical charts. Patients comprised two groups: Group I - early assessment, performed within 12 hours post trauma; and Group II - delayed assessment, performed more than 12 hours post trauma. We defined primary grafting as the use of skin from the traumatized skin flap. We excluded cases involving hands, feet or genitalia. RESULTS: there were 47 patients treated with degloving injuries between 2002 and 2010. The mean body surface area affected was 8.2%. Lower limbs were the most frequently affected site (95.7%), whether alone or in association with lesions to other sites. Delayed assessment by the plastic surgery team occurred in 25 cases. Mean hospital stay was 36.1 days for Group I and 57.1 days for Group II (p=0.026). Regarding the number of surgical operations (skin grafts), Group I received a mean of 1.3, while Group II underwent 1.6 (p=0.034). CONCLUSION: based on length of hospital stay and number of operations in trauma patients with degloving of the trunk and limbs, plastic surgery assessment should be carried out early.

Degloving injuries of trunk and limbs: comparison of outcomes of early versus delayed assessment by the plastic surgery team / Desenluvamentos de tronco e membros: comparação dos resultados da avaliação precoce ou tardia pela cirurgia plástica

OBJECTIVE: To analyze cases of degloving of the trunk and limbs, comparing outcomes of early versus delayed assessment by the plastic surgery team. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical charts. Patients comprised two groups: Group I - early assessment, performed within 12 hours post trauma; and Group II - delayed assessment, performed more than 12 hours post trauma. We defined primary grafting as the use of skin from the traumatized skin flap. We excluded cases involving hands, feet or genitalia. RESULTS: There were 47 patients treated with degloving injuries between 2002 and 2010. The mean body surface area affected was 8.2%. Lower limbs were the most frequently affected site (95.7%), whether alone or in association with lesions to other sites. Delayed assessment by the plastic surgery team occurred in 25 cases. Mean hospital stay was 36.1 days for Group I and 57.1 days for Group II (p=0.026). Regarding the number of surgical operations (skin grafts), Group I received a mean of 1.3, while Group II underwent 1.6 (p=0.034). CONCLUSION: Based on length of hospital stay and number of operations in trauma patients with degloving of the trunk and limbs, plastic surgery assessment should be carried out early.

OBJETIVO: Analisar os casos de desenluvamentos de tronco e membros, comparando os resultados da avaliação precoce ou tardia pela equipe de cirurgia plástica. MÉTODOS: Análise retrospectiva de prontuários. Os pacientes foram separados em dois grupos: Avaliação precoce - Grupo I (realizada no intervalo de até 12 horas após o trauma) e Avaliação tardia - Grupo II (realizada mais de 12 horas após o trauma). Definiu-se como enxertia primária aquela realizada com pele proveniente do retalho traumático. Foram excluídos os casos com acometimento de mãos, pés ou genitália. RESULTADOS: Foram atendidos 47 pacientes. A superfície corporal lesada média foi 8,2%. Os membros inferiores foram os locais mais acometidos, em 95,7%, isoladamente ou em associação com lesões em outros locais. A avaliação da Cirurgia Plástica foi solicitada tardiamente em 25 casos. Observou-se tempo médio de internação de 36,1 dias para o grupo I e de 57,1 para o grupo II (p=0,026). Em relação ao número de cirurgias (enxertias de pele), observou-se média de 1,3 no grupo I e 1,6 no grupo II (p=0,034). CONCLUSÃO: Em doentes politraumatizados, vítimas de desenluvamento de tronco e membros, podemos concluir, no que se refere ao tempo de internação e número de operações, que a avaliação da Cirurgia Plástica deve ser precoce.

Comparative analysis between identified injuries of victims of fall from height and other mechanisms of closed trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the lesions diagnosed in victims of falls, comparing them with those diagnosed in other mechanisms of blunt trauma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of trauma protocol charts (prospectively collected) from 2008 to 2010, including victims of trauma over 13 years of age admitted to the emergency room. The severity of injuries was stratified by the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Variables were compared between the group of victims of falls from height (Group 1) and the other victims of blunt trauma (Group 2). We used the Student t, chi-square and Fisher tests for comparison between groups, considering the value of p <0.05 as significant. RESULTS: The series comprised 4,532 cases of blunt trauma, of which 555 (12.2%) were victims of falls from height. Severe lesions (AISe"3) were observed in the extremities (17.5%), in the cephalic segment (8.4%), chest (5.5%) and the abdomen (2.9%). Victims of Group 1 had significantly higher mean age, AIS in extremities / pelvis, AIS in the thoracic segment and ISS (p <0.05). The group 1 had significantly (p <0.05) higher incidence of tracheal intubation on admission, pneumothorax, hemothorax, rib fractures, chest drainage, spinal trauma, pelvic fractures, complex pelvic fractures and fractures to the upper limbs. CONCLUSION: Victims of fall from height had greater anatomic injury severity, greater frequency and severity of lesions in the thoracic segment and extremities.

Comparative analysis between identified injuries of victims of fall from height and other mechanisms of closed trauma.

OBJECTIVE: to identify predictors of death in blunt trauma patients sustaining pelvic fractures and, posteriorly, compare them to a previously reported series from the same center. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of trauma registry data, including blunt trauma patients older than 14 y.o. sustaining pelvic fractures admitted from 2008 to 2010. Patients were assigned into group 1 (dead) or 2 (survivors). We used Student's t, qui square and Fisher's tests for statistical analysis, considering p<0.05 as significant. Posteriorly, we compared predictors of death between both periods. RESULTS: Seventy-nine cases were included. Mean RTS, ISS and TRISS were, respectively, 6.44 + 2.22, 28.0 + 15.2 e 0.74 + 0.33. Nineteen patients died (24,0%). Main cause of death was hemorrhage (42,1%). Group 1 was characterized by (p<0.05) lower systolic blood pressure and Glasgow coma scale means on admission, higher heart rate, head AIS, extremity AIS and ISS means, as well as, higher frequency of severe head injuries and complex pelvic fractures. Comparing both periods, we notice that the anatomic and physiologic severity of injury increased (RTS and ISS means). Furthermore, there was a decrease in the impact of associated thoracic and abdominal injuries on the prognosis and an association of lethality with the presence of complex pelvic fractures. CONCLUSION: There were significant changes in the predictors of death between these two periods. The impact of thoracic and abdominal associated injures decreased while the importance of severe retroperitoneal hemorrhage increased. There was also an increase in trauma severity, which accounted for high lethality.

Comparative analysis between identified injuries of victims of fall from height and other mechanisms of closed trauma / Análise comparativa entre as lesões identificadas em vítimas de queda de altura e de outros mecanismos de trauma fechado

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the lesions diagnosed in victims of falls, comparing them with those diagnosed in other mechanisms of blunt trauma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of trauma protocol charts (prospectively collected) from 2008 to 2010, including victims of trauma over 13 years of age admitted to the emergency room. The severity of injuries was stratified by the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Variables were compared between the group of victims of falls from height (Group 1) and the other victims of blunt trauma (Group 2). We used the Student t, chi-square and Fisher tests for comparison between groups, considering the value of p <0.05 as significant. RESULTS: The series comprised 4,532 cases of blunt trauma, of which 555 (12.2%) were victims of falls from height. Severe lesions (AISe"3) were observed in the extremities (17.5%), in the cephalic segment (8.4%), chest (5.5%) and the abdomen (2.9%). Victims of Group 1 had significantly higher mean age, AIS in extremities / pelvis, AIS in the thoracic segment and ISS (p <0.05). The group 1 had significantly (p <0.05) higher incidence of tracheal intubation on admission, pneumothorax, hemothorax, rib fractures, chest drainage, spinal trauma, pelvic fractures, complex pelvic fractures and fractures to the upper limbs. CONCLUSION: Victims of fall from height had greater anatomic injury severity, greater frequency and severity of lesions in the thoracic segment and extremities. .

OBJETIVO: analisar as lesões diagnosticadas nas vítimas de queda de altura, comparando-as com as diagnosticadas em outros mecanismos de trauma fechado. MÉTODOS: estudo retrospectivo dos protocolos de trauma (coletados prospectivamente) de 2008 a 2010, incluindo as vítimas de trauma fechado com idade superior a 13 anos, admitidas na sala de emergência. A gravidade das lesões foi estratificada pelo Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) e Injury Severity Score (ISS). As variáveis foram comparadas entre o grupo de vítimas de quedas de altura (Grupo 1) e as demais vítimas de trauma fechado (Grupo 2). Empregamos os testes t de Student, qui-quadrado e Fisher para a comparação entre os grupos, considerando o valor de p<0,05 como significativo. RESULTADOS: foram analisados 4532 casos de trauma fechado, sendo que 555 (12,2%) foram vítimas de quedas de altura. As lesões graves (AISe"3) foram observadas em extremidades (17,5%), em segmento cefálico (8,4%), torácico (5,5%) e em abdome (2,9%). As vítimas do grupo 1 apresentaram, significativamente (p<0,05), maior média etária, de AIS em extremidades/pelve, de AIS em segmento torácico e de ISS. O grupo 1 também apresentou, significativamente (p<0,05), maior frequência de intubação orotraqueal na admissão, pneumotórax, hemotórax, fraturas de costelas, drenagem de tórax, trauma raquimedular, fraturas de pelve, fraturas complexas de pelve e de fraturas em membros superiores. CONCLUSÃO: As vítimas de queda de altura apresentaram maior gravidade anatômica do trauma, maior frequência e gravidade de lesões em segmento torácico e em extremidades. .

Comparative analysis between identified injuries of victims of fall from height and other mechanisms of closed trauma / Análise comparativa dos fatores preditivos de morte em vítimas de trauma fechado com fraturas pélvicas

OBJECTIVE: to identify predictors of death in blunt trauma patients sustaining pelvic fractures and, posteriorly, compare them to a previously reported series from the same center. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of trauma registry data, including blunt trauma patients older than 14 y.o. sustaining pelvic fractures admitted from 2008 to 2010. Patients were assigned into group 1 (dead) or 2 (survivors). We used Student's t, qui square and Fisher's tests for statistical analysis, considering p<0.05 as significant. Posteriorly, we compared predictors of death between both periods. RESULTS: Seventy-nine cases were included. Mean RTS, ISS and TRISS were, respectively, 6.44 + 2.22, 28.0 + 15.2 e 0.74 + 0.33. Nineteen patients died (24,0%). Main cause of death was hemorrhage (42,1%). Group 1 was characterized by (p<0.05) lower systolic blood pressure and Glasgow coma scale means on admission, higher heart rate, head AIS, extremity AIS and ISS means, as well as, higher frequency of severe head injuries and complex pelvic fractures. Comparing both periods, we notice that the anatomic and physiologic severity of injury increased (RTS and ISS means). Furthermore, there was a decrease in the impact of associated thoracic and abdominal injuries on the prognosis and an association of lethality with the presence of complex pelvic fractures. CONCLUSION: There were significant changes in the predictors of death between these two periods. The impact of thoracic and abdominal associated injures decreased while the importance of severe retroperitoneal hemorrhage increased. There was also an increase in trauma severity, which accounted for high lethality. .

OBJETIVO: analisar os fatores preditivos de morte nas vítimas de trauma fechado com fraturas pélvicas. MÉTODOS: análise retrospectiva dos dados de registro de trauma, incluindo as vítimas trauma fechado com fraturas de pelve e idade superior a 14 anos. Os que faleceram formaram o grupo 1 e, os sobreviventes, o grupo 2. Utilizamos os testes t de Student, Fisher e Qui-quadrado para a análise estatística, considerando p<0,05 como significativo. Posteriormente comparamos os fatores preditivos de morte entre os períodos estudados. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 79 doentes. As médias do RTS, ISS e TRISS foram, respectivamente, 6,44 + 2,22; 28,0 + 15,2 e 0,74 + 0,33. Houve 19 óbitos (24%). A causa principal foi o choque hemorrágico (42,1%). Os que morreram apresentaram, significativamente (p<0,05), menor média de pressão arterial sistólica e escala de Glasgow à admissão, maior média de frequência cardíaca à admissão, AIS segmento cefálico, AIS em extremidades e ISS, como também, maior frequência de lesões graves em segmento cefálico e de fraturas complexas de pelve. O período mais recente se caracterizou por maior gravidade anatômica e fisiológica da amostra, como também, diminuição do impacto das lesões associadas (tórax e abdome) sobre a letalidade. Ao contrário do observado anteriormente, houve relação significativa entre a complexidade da fratura de pelve e letalidade. CONCLUSÃO: Houve diferença significativa entre os dois períodos, representada por aumento na gravidade da amostra e maior impacto da hemorragia retroperitoneal como causa de morte. .

Identifying severe abdominal injuries during the initial assessment in blunt trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive factors of severe abdominal injuries (SAI) identified in the initial assessment of blunt trauma victims. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from blunt trauma victims older than 13 years undergoing abdominal computed tomography and/or laparotomy was carried out. Serious injuries were considered with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) greater than or equal to three. Variables were compared between both A (SAI) and B (no SAI). We conducted an initial univariate statistical analysis to identify the variables associated with the presence of SAI. From these we selected those that had p<0.20 and could be evaluated on admission of the patient for multivariate analysis (logistic regression). RESULTS: The sample consisted of 331 cases and 140 (42.3%) patients had abdominal injuries. Of these, 101 (30.5%) had abdominal injury with AIS e" 3 (Group A). In univariate analysis, conditions significantly associated with the SAI (p<0.05): systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the pre-hospital setting (p = 0.019), SBP at admission (p<0.001), heart rate at admission (p = 0.047), altered physical examination of the abdomen (p <0.001) and the presence of pelvic fractures (p = 0.006). The following variables were significantly and independently correlated with the presence of severe abdominal injuries: SBP at admission (p = 0.034), altered abdominal physical examination (p<0.001), lower limb fracture (p<0.044), motorcycle accident as mechanism of injury (p = 0.017) and positive FAST (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: the variables present at baseline were significantly associated with the presence of SAI: SBP, physical examination, altered abdominal examination, presence of open fractures of the lower limb, motorcycle accident and positive FAST.

Comparative analysis of trauma characteristics between elderly and superelderly.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics of trauma in the elderly under and over 80-years-old. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of protocols of blunt trauma victims aged over 70 years. Individuals aged between 70 and 79 years were included in group I, those aged 80 years or greater in group II. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t, chi-square and Fisher tests, considering p <0.05 as significant. RESULTS: The study included 281 patients (group I-149, group II-132). The age ranged between 70 and 99 years (79.1 + 6.7 years), with 52.3% male. Group II had lower average abdomen AIS (0.10 + 0.59 vs. 0.00 + 0.00, p = 0.029), lower incidence of male victims (59.1% vs. 44 , 3%, p = 0.013), higher incidence of falling from standing height (44.3% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.028) and lower frequency of upper limb fractures (9.4% vs. 2.3 %, p = 0.010) than Group I. There was no significant difference in comparison of other variables between the groups. CONCLUSION: Trauma in the elderly is a serious public health problem, with a tendency to progressive worsening with population aging. Data from this study help us with a clearer picture of trauma in the over-80 elders, a subgroup that deserves special attention.

Análise comparativa das características do trauma entre idosos com idade superior e inferior a 80 anos / Comparative analysis of trauma characteristics between elderly and superelderly

OBJETIVO: comparar as características do trauma entre idosos e "superidosos". MÉTODOS: análise retrospectiva dos protocolos de vítimas de trauma fechado com idade igual ou superior a 70 anos. Os idosos de idade entre 70 e 79 anos foram incluídos no grupo I, os de idade igual ou maior de 80 anos no grupo II. Análise estatística foi realizada através dos testes t de Student, qui-quadrado e Fisher, considerando p<0,05 significativo. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos no estudo 281 doentes (grupo I-149; grupo II-132). A idade variou de 70 a 99 anos (79,1 ± 6,7 anos), sendo 52,3% do sexo masculino. Os superidosos se caracterizaram por apresentar menor média de AIS em abdome (0,10 ± 0,59 vs. 0,00 ± 0,00; p=0,029), menor frequência de vítimas do sexo masculino (59,1% vs. 44,3%; p=0,013), maior frequência de queda da própria altura (44,3% vs. 65,2%; p=0,028) e menor frequência de fraturas de membros superiores (9,4% vs. 2,3%; p=0,010). Não observamos diferença significativa na comparação das demais variáveis entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: O trauma em idosos é um grave problema de saúde pública, com tendência à piora progressiva pelo envelhecimento da população. Os dados deste estudo nos auxiliam com uma visão mais clara do trauma nos superidosos, um subgrupo que merece atenção especial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics of trauma in the elderly under and over 80-years-old. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of protocols of blunt trauma victims aged over 70 years. Individuals aged between 70 and 79 years were included in group I, those aged 80 years or greater in group II. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t, chi-square and Fisher tests, considering p <0.05 as significant. RESULTS: The study included 281 patients (group I-149, group II-132). The age ranged between 70 and 99 years (79.1 + 6.7 years), with 52.3% male. Group II had lower average abdomen AIS (0.10 + 0.59 vs. 0.00 + 0.00, p = 0.029), lower incidence of male victims (59.1% vs. 44 , 3%, p = 0.013), higher incidence of falling from standing height (44.3% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.028) and lower frequency of upper limb fractures (9.4% vs. 2.3 %, p = 0.010) than Group I. There was no significant difference in comparison of other variables between the groups. CONCLUSION: Trauma in the elderly is a serious public health problem, with a tendency to progressive worsening with population aging. Data from this study help us with a clearer picture of trauma in the over-80 elders, a subgroup that deserves special attention.

Identificação de lesões abdominais graves na avaliação inicial das vítimas de trauma fechado / Identifying severe abdominal injuries during the initial assessment in blunt trauma patients

OBJETIVO: avaliar os fatores preditivos de lesões abdominais graves (LAG) identificáveis na avaliação inicial das vítimas de trauma fechado. MÉTODOS: análise retrospectiva dos dados das vítimas de trauma fechado com idade superior a 13 anos submetidas à tomografia computadorizada do abdome e/ou laparotomia exploradora. Consideramos como graves as lesões com Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) maior ou igual a três. As variáveis foram comparadas entre os grupos A (LAG) e B (Sem LAG). Realizou-se inicialmente uma análise estatística univariada para identificar as variáveis associadas à presença de LAG. Destas, foram selecionadas para a análise multivariada (regressão logística) as que tivessem p<0,20 e pudessem ser avaliadas na admissão do doente. RESULTADOS: a amostra foi composta por 331 casos, sendo que 140 (42,3%) pacientes apresentaram lesões abdominais. Destes, 101 (30,5%) tinham lesão abdominais com AIS > 3 (Grupo A). Na análise univariada, associaram-se significativamente às LAG (p<0,05): pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) no pré-hospitalar (p=0,019), PAS à admissão (p<0,001), frequência cardíaca à admissão (p=0,047), exame físico do abdome alterado (p<0,001) e presença de fraturas de pelve (p=0,006). As seguintes variáveis se relacionaram significativamente e independentemente com a presença de lesões abdominais graves: PAS à admissão (p=0,034), exame físico abdominal alterado (p<0,001), fratura exposta de membro inferior (p<0,044), "motociclista" como mecanismo de trauma (p=0,017) e FAST positivo (p<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: das variáveis presentes na avaliação inicial, se associaram significativamente com a presença de LAG: PAS, exame físico abdominal alterado, presença de fratura exposta de membro inferior, "motociclista" como mecanismo de trauma e FAST positivo.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of severe abdominal injuries using variables present in the initial assessment of blunt trauma patients. METHOD: retrospective analysis of charts and trauma data bank information including blunt trauma patients older than 13 y.o. who underwent abdominal assessment by computed tomography and/or laparotomy in a period of 18 months, starting in June 2008. Severity stratification was carried out with trauma indices (RTS, AIS, ISS and TRISS). Abdominal injuries were considered "severe" ifAIS > 3. Variables were compared between patients with SAI (group A) and without SAI (group B). Statistical analysis was carried out usingunivariate analysisinitially. We selected for logistic regression variables that would be present in the initial assessment (IA variables) and, additionally, had p<0.20 in the initial statistical analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty one patients were included. Abdominal injuries were present in 140 (42.3%), being considered severe in 101 (30,5%) (Group A).Univariate analysis showed that variables significantly associated with SAI (p<0.05) in the initial analysis were: pre hospital Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure (SAP) (p=0.019), admission SAP (p<0.001), admission heart rate (p=0.047), positive abdominal physical exam on admission(p<0.001) and pelvic fractures (p=0.006). Logistic regression identified five independent factors related to SAI (IA variables): SAP (p=0.034), positive abdominal physical exam (p<0.001), open lower limbs fractures (p<0.044), motorcyclist as trauma mechanism (p=0.017) and positive FAST (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: IA variables significantly associated with SAI were SAP, positive abdominal physical examination, open lower limbs fractures, motorcyclist as mechanism of trauma and positive FAST.

Predictors of abdominal injuries in blunt trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of abdominal injuries in victims of blunt trauma. METHOD: retrospective analysis of trauma protocols (collected prospectively) of adult victims of blunt trauma in a period of 15 months. Variables were compared between patients with abdominal injuries (AIS>0) detected by computed tomography or/and laparotomy (group I) and others (AIS=0, group II). Student's t, Fisher and qui-square tests were used for statistical analysis, considering p<0.05 as significant. RESULTS: A total of 3783 cases were included, with a mean age of 39.1 ± 17.7 years (14-99), 76.1% being male. Abdominal injuries were detected in 130 patients (3.4%). Patients sustaining abdominal injuries had significantly lower mean age (35.4 + 15.4 vs. 39.2 + 17.7), lower mean systolic blood pressure on admission (114.7 + 32.4 mmHg vs. 129.1 + 21.7 mmHg), lower mean Glasgow coma scale (12.9 + 3.9 vs. 14.3 + 2.0), as well as higher head AIS (0.95 + 1.5 vs. 0.67 + 1.1), higher thorax AIS (1.10 + 1.5 vs. 0.11 + 0.6) and higher extremities AIS (1.70 ± 1.8 vs. 1.03 ± 1.2). Patients sustaining abdominal injuries also presented higher frequency of severe injuries (AIS>3) in head (18.5% vs. 7.9%), thorax (29.2% vs. 2.4%) and extremities (40.0% vs. 13.7%). The highest odds ratios for the diagnosis of abdominal injuries were associated flail chest (21.8) and pelvic fractures (21.0). CONCLUSION: Abdominal injuries were more frequently observed in patients with hemodynamic instability, changes in Glasgow coma scale and severe lesions to the head, chest and extremities.