ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) includes a wide array of procedures. The purpose of this study was to develop a classification for VPI procedures and to describe variations in how they are performed.Design/participants/setting/outcomes: We completed an in-depth review of the literature to develop a preliminary schema that encompassed existing VPI procedures. Forty-one cleft surgeons from twelve hospitals across the USA and Canada reviewed the schema and either confirmed that it encompassed all VPI procedures they performed or requested additions. Two surgeons then observed the conduct of the procedures by surgeons at each hospital. Standardized reports were completed with each visit to further explore the literature, refine the schema, and delineate the common and unique aspects of each surgeon's technique. RESULTS: Procedures were divided into three groups: palate-based surgery; pharynx-based surgery; and augmentation. Palate-based operations included straight line mucosal incision with intravelar veloplasty, double-opposing Z-plasty, and palate lengthening with buccal myomucosal flaps. Many surgeons blended maneuvers from these three techniques, so a more descriptive schema was developed classifying the maneuvers employed on the oral mucosa, nasal mucosa, and muscle. Pharynx-based surgery included pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty, with variations in design for each. Augmentation procedures included palate and posterior wall augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive schema for VPI procedures was developed incorporating intentional adaptations in technique. There was substantial variation amongst surgeons in how each procedure was performed. The schema may enable more specific evaluations of surgical outcomes and exploration of the mechanisms through which these procedures improve speech.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Reduction mammaplasty is an effective and safe treatment option for adults with symptomatic macromastia, but there are few data regarding outcomes in adolescents. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term psychosocial impact, satisfaction, and safety of reduction mammaplasty when performed during adolescence. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a single pediatric plastic surgeon's experience with reduction mammaplasty from 2018 to 2021 in patients aged ≤18 years. Patients completed the preoperative and postoperative "Satisfaction with Breasts" and "Psychosocial Well-being" sections of the BREAST-Q survey. Clinical variables gathered included age, weight, BMI, complication profile, specimen resection weight, and follow-up duration. RESULTS: In total, 41 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean converted Rasch scores for BREAST-Q "Satisfaction with Breasts" and "Psychosocial Well-being" increased significantly following reduction mammaplasty ("Satisfaction with Breasts": preoperative, 24.1 vs postoperative, 92.6; "Psychosocial Well-being": preoperative, 37.7 vs postoperative, 90.4; P < .001). Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) was associated with lower preoperative "Psychosocial Well-being" scores (obese, 29.7 vs nonobese, 43.3; P < .001) but a greater improvement in score following surgery (obese, +63.9 vs nonobese, +44.9; P < .001). Specimen weight ≥1000 grams was also associated with greater improvement in score on the "Psychosocial Well-being" section (≥1000 grams, +58 vs <1000 grams, +49.7; P = .046). Overall complication rate was 31.7% while the major complication rate was 2.4%. Mean specimen resection weight was higher in patients who experienced complications (1141.3 grams vs 836.8 grams, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction mammaplasty during adolescence predictably improves both short-term satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being while demonstrating a favorable short-term complication profile.
Subject(s)
Mammaplasty , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Female , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/psychology , Breast/surgery , Hypertrophy/surgery , Hypertrophy/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Obesity/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The timing of extubation following placement of mandibular distractors in the setting of Pierre Robin sequence is variable across institutional algorithms. Postoperative maintenance of intubation allows for an improvement in airway dimension and tongue positioning before extubation, theoretically decreasing the impact of postoperative airway edema. Maintenance of intubation, however, is not without risk. The authors analyze their institutional experience with neonatal mandibular distraction followed by immediate extubation to assess feasibility and safety profiles. METHODS: A 4-year retrospective review of patients diagnosed with Pierre Robin sequence who underwent mandibular distraction within the first 3 months of life was performed. Patients intubated preoperatively were excluded. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients (73 percent) were extubated immediately, whereas 14 patients (27 percent) remained intubated. No differences between these groups were found when comorbidities, cleft pathology, preoperative respiratory support, or grade of view on direct laryngoscopy were analyzed. Case duration greater than 120 minutes, operation start time after 3 pm, and the subjective designation of a difficult airway by the anesthesiologist were associated with maintaining intubation (p < 0.05). Eight patients (21 percent) in the extubated group required an increase in respiratory support in the postoperative interval. Four of these patients (11 percent) required reintubation. Increased postoperative respiratory support was more likely in patients with certain comorbidities and higher preoperative respiratory support requirements (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The authors' data suggest that immediate extubation following neonatal mandibular distraction is feasible in patients who are not intubated preoperatively. Careful consideration should be given to patients who require significant respiratory support preoperatively and in those with certain comorbidities. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction , Osteogenesis, Distraction , Pierre Robin Syndrome , Airway Extubation/adverse effects , Airway Obstruction/surgery , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Mandible/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/adverse effects , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Pierre Robin Syndrome/complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We have previously shown the efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in pediatric cleft palatoplasty for proof of concept (POC). We sought to validate the efficacy of ERAS when expanded to patients of variable age and complexity undergoing primary palatoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Between April 2017 and December 2018, 100 patients were collected prospectively for the expanded assessment (ERAS2) and POC (ERAS1) and compared to historical controls both independently and in aggregate (ERAS(T)). We compared patient demographics, perioperative narcotic administration, length of stay (LOS), and rates of return to service (RTS). RESULTS: Despite increased complexity, total narcotic usage (morphine equivalents normalized per weight) during each phase of care was significantly greater in controls when compared to ERAS1, ERAS2, or ERAST, respectively (intraoperative: 0.44 mg/kg vs 0.013 mg/kg vs 0.016 mg/kg vs 0.014 mg/kg; postanesthesia care unit: 0.061 mg/kg vs 0.006 mg/kg vs 0.007 mg/kg vs 0.007 mg/kg; postoperative: 0.389 mg/kg vs 0.009 mg/kg vs 0.026 mg/kg vs 0.017 mg/kg). ERAS1 and ERAS2 groups each demonstrated a decrease in LOS (-36.6%, -26.3%) when compared to controls. Overall, application of ERAS led to a 95.7% reduction in narcotic administration and a 31.7% decrease in LOS when compared to controls. The incidence of RTS was higher in ERAS2 (13.0%) when compared to ERAS1 (2.1%) or controls (2.4%), with the strongest independent predictor being a positive perioperative respiratory viral panel (PRVP). CONCLUSIONS: Application of ERAS to palatoplasty patients of advanced age and complexity evidenced consistency with respect to decreased perioperative narcotic administration and shortened LOS. A positive PRVP was found to be an independent predictor of RTS even when ERAS was applied.
Subject(s)
Cleft Palate , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Child , Cleft Palate/surgery , Humans , Length of Stay , Postoperative PeriodABSTRACT
AIMS: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to improve patient outcomes in numerous adult surgical populations, but there are few known standards for their use in pediatric patients. To assess the effectiveness in pediatric craniofacial surgery, we present our results following the application of a modified ERAS protocol for patients undergoing primary palatoplasty. METHODS: A modified ERAS program was developed and implemented in a multidisciplinary manner. The primary components of the protocol included: (1) administration of gabapentinoids, (2) minimal perioperative narcotic use, and (3) post-operative pain control using nonnarcotic first-line agents. Fifty patients were collected prospectively, assigned to the modified ERAS protocol and compared to historic controls. We reviewed patient demographics, narcotic use, length of stay (LOS), oral intake, and complication rates. RESULTS: Between April 2017 and June 2018, 50 patients underwent palatoplasty under the modified ERAS protocol. The mean age (control: 9.7â±â2.3 months; ERAS: 9.9â±â1.6 months), weight (8.8â±â1.3âkg; 8.6â±â1.3âkg), and comorbidities did not vary between the groups. ERAS patients evidenced an increase in oral intake normalized per LOS (22.3âmL/h vs 15.4âmL/h). Total narcotic usage (morphine equivalents) during each phase of care was greater in the controls compared with ERAS (Intraop: 3.71âmg vs 0.12âmg; PACU: 0.51âmg vs 0.05âmg; Postop: 2.6âmg vs 0.07âmg). The implementation of this protocol led to a 36.6% decrease in LOS (1.83 days vs 1.16 days) without an increase in perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a modified ERAS protocol provided effective perioperative pain control allowing narcotic minimization, increased post-operative oral intake, and a shorter LOS without an increased complication rate.
Subject(s)
Cleft Palate/surgery , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay , Postoperative PeriodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mandibular distraction is effective for relieving airway obstruction in Robin sequence; however, mid-term dental and nerve-related complications have not been adequately studied. METHODS: Records were reviewed for patients with a single distraction in infancy using internal devices. Follow-up was 5 years or longer. Craniofacial dysmorphic syndromes and those affecting facial nerve function were excluded. Part I involved a review of dental records, whereas Part II involved assessment of inferior alveolar and marginal mandibular nerve function in returning patients with the use of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane cold stimulation and photography, respectively. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Dental records were complete in 44 patients (median follow-up, 7.3 years; range, 5.4 to 13.2 years). First permanent molar injury was seen in 42 of 88 half-mouths (48 percent); 32 of 42 (76 percent) were restorable. Primary second molar damage and ankylosis were observed in 12 of 88 (14 percent) and one of 88 half-mouths (1 percent), respectively. Mandibular second premolar absence was noted unilaterally in eight of 36 patients (22 percent) and bilaterally in six of 36 patients (17 percent). A mean 1.2 ± 0.95 operative rehabilitations were required. Nerve testing was completed in 20 patients (median follow-up, 8.7 years; range, 5.5 to 13.2 years). Complete absence of cold sensation was noted in one of 40 half-mouths (2.5 percent), whereas lower lip depressor weakness was seen in six of 40 half-mouths (15 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Infant distraction is highly successful in averting tracheostomy; however, dental and nerve-related complications remain underreported. Regular follow-up with a pediatric dentist and early recognition of injury is essential. Although inferior alveolar nerve injury appears infrequent (2.5 percent), permanent lower lip depressor weakness is more common than previously reported (15 percent of sides). CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/surgery , Mandible/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/adverse effects , Pierre Robin Syndrome/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Tooth, Deciduous/innervation , Adolescent , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Photography , Pierre Robin Syndrome/complications , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Video RecordingABSTRACT
Maxillary hypoplasia that necessitates surgical advancement affects approximately 25% of patients born with cleft lip and palate. Syndromic conditions such as Crouzon may also be accompanied by significant maxillary hypoplasia. Severe maxillary hypoplasia can result in airway obstruction, malocclusion, proptosis, and facial disfigurement. For optimal stability, severe hypoplasia is best addressed with maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Twenty-two patients (15 boys, 7 girls, ages 6-16 years, mean age 10 years) with severe midface hypoplasia underwent midface distraction with new internal maxillary distraction (IMD) device at our institution. Total distraction distances ranged from 15 to 30 mm. There were no major complications, and all of them had improvement in functional and aesthetic parameters. There were 2 minor complications and 2 patients failed to distract the full distance because of converging vectors. Early maxillary distraction in patients with severe midface hypoplasia is a useful technique to provide interval correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia before skeletal maturity and definitive orthognathic surgery is contemplated, and it is a good tool to improve occlusion, aesthetics, and self-perception in younger patients.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Maxilla/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/instrumentation , Adolescent , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Cleft Lip/diagnosis , Cleft Palate/diagnosis , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Residents and physicians frequently find themselves in leadership roles. Current residency curricula focus on the development of clinical knowledge and technical skills. A previous survey of Penn State Dermatology graduates demonstrated the perceived need and benefit of a formalized leadership curriculum in this selected group. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify and measure the perceived need and benefit of formalized leadership training and investigate opinions regarding leadership theory from the perspective of dermatology residency program directors and chief residents nationally. METHODS: A survey containing 26 questions related to leadership theory and training were mailed to all US dermatology residency programs. RESULTS: In all, 91% of program directors and chief residents agreed that leadership skills could be taught through observation and training. A total of 78% of respondents agreed that leadership training is important during dermatology residency training. In all, 66% agreed that a formalized leadership curriculum would help residents become better resident supervisors and physicians. Only 13% reported having a formalized leadership curriculum. Participants most frequently reported learning leadership through observation and modeled behavior. A total of 15% of chief residents believed their faculty did not effectively model leadership, whereas only 2% of the program directors believed the same (P = .01). LIMITATIONS: In all, 62% (68/109) of programs surveyed returned at least one response from the program director or chief resident. A total of 39% (42/109) had responses from both the program director and the chief resident. Because of the voluntary nature of the survey, response bias could not be excluded. CONCLUSION: Most program directors and chief residents believe leadership skills can be cultivated through observation and training. Leadership curriculum is not part of most residency programs.