Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 27
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 11(2): 356-368.e5, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563781

ABSTRACT

The drug allergy practice parameter was developed to provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions. It was last updated in 2010. With the growth of research and evidence-based data since then, experts came together to update the practice parameter with a focus on sections that the work group deemed to have significant changes (or were not addressed) in the previous practice parameter. This review is a focused update on aspects of the practice parameter deemed to have the greatest impact on clinical practice and includes significant updates on diagnosis of antibiotic allergy including penicillin, cephalosporin, sulfonamide, fluoroquinolone, and macrolide allergies. Other topics include the evolution in our management approach to patients with aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug allergy, diagnostic testing for delayed drug hypersensitivity and allergy to chemotherapeutics and biologics, and the key consensus-based statements for clinical practice. Specifically, the updated practice parameter helps allergists understand the place of 1- or 2-step drug challenges that are valuable tools often without the need for skin testing in many clinical situations. A proactive approach to delabeling penicillin allergy as well as unnecessary avoidance of safe antibiotic alternatives for patients with proven penicillin allergy is emphasized. New guidance is provided on management of patients with different phenotypes of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity reactions. Approaches to delayed drug hypersensitivity and use of delayed intradermal and patch testing for specific phenotypes are reviewed. Lastly, practical approaches to management of patients with reactions to chemotherapeutics and biologics are discussed.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Hypersensitivity , Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Penicillins/adverse effects , Skin Tests , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Aspirin
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 7(6): 1876-1885.e3, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30878711

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ten percent of the population claims an allergy to penicillin, but 90% of these individuals are not allergic. Patients labeled as penicillin-allergic have higher medical costs, longer hospital stays, are more likely to be treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, and develop drug-resistant bacterial infections. Most penicillin skin test reagents are not approved by the Food and drug Administration or readily available to evaluate patients labeled penicillin-allergic. OBJECTIVE: To determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of the Penicillin Skin Test Kit containing the major allergenic determinant (penicilloyl polylysine), a minor determinant mixture (penicillin G, penicilloate, penilloate), and amoxicillin, produced according to Food and Drug Administration standards. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label investigation of penicillin skin testing using the Penicillin Skin Test Kit. Skin test-negative subjects were challenged with 250 mg amoxicillin, whereas skin test-positive patients were not challenged. The primary end point was NPV of the Penicillin Skin Test Kit, defined as the percentage of subjects with negative skin test results who did not experience an IgE-dependent reaction within 72 hours of amoxicillin challenge. RESULTS: In total, 455 patients with a history of penicillin allergy underwent skin testing and 63 (13.8%) had 1 or more positive test results; 65% of the positive test results were to the minor determinant mixture and/or amoxicillin alone. In the per protocol group of 373 skin test-negative subjects, 8 developed potential IgE-dependent reactions following oral amoxicillin challenge, translating to an NPV of 97.9% (95% CI, 95.8-99.1; P < .0001). All but 1 of the reactions was mild or moderate, and most subjects who required treatment received only antihistamines. CONCLUSIONS: The Penicillin Skin Test Kit, containing all relevant penicillin allergenic determinants, demonstrated very high NPV. Removal of a penicillin allergy label in a large majority of currently mislabeled patients has substantial personal and public health implications.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Penicillins/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Skin Tests , Young Adult
8.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 121(5): 517-518, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30389082
9.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 37(4): 643-662, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28965632

ABSTRACT

Ten percent of patients report penicillin allergy, but more than 90% of these individuals can tolerate penicillins. Skin testing remains the optimal method for evaluation of possible IgE-mediated penicillin allergy and is recommended by professional societies, as the harms for alternative antibiotics include antimicrobial resistance, prolonged hospitalizations, readmissions, and increased costs. Removal of penicillin allergy leads to decreased utilization of broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as fluoroquinolones and vancomycin. There is minimal allergic cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins. IgE-mediated allergy to cephalosporins is usually side-chain specific and may warrant graded challenge with cephalosporins containing dissimilar R1 or R2 group side chains.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Cephalosporins/immunology , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Penicillins/immunology , beta-Lactams/immunology , Animals , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Cross Reactions , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Penicillins/therapeutic use , beta-Lactams/therapeutic use
14.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 14(9): 459, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25142495

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic allergies are frequently reported in both adult and pediatric populations. While a detailed drug history is essential in the evaluation of antibiotic allergy, the history is typically insufficient to determine the presence of a drug allergy. The most readily available diagnostic testing for evaluating antibiotic allergies are drug skin testing and drug challenges. This review will focus on updates in the evaluation of antibiotic allergy utilizing immediate skin tests, delayed intradermal testing, drug patch tests, and drug challenges for both adults and children with histories of antibiotic allergies.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Macrolides/adverse effects , Penicillins/adverse effects , Skin Tests , Adult , Child , Humans , Intradermal Tests , Patch Tests , Predictive Value of Tests
18.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 125(2 Suppl 2): S126-37, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20176256

ABSTRACT

Drug allergy is one type of adverse reaction to drugs and encompasses a spectrum of hypersensitivity reactions with heterogeneous mechanisms and clinical presentations. A thorough history is essential to the management of drug allergy. Laboratory testing has a very limited role in the management of drug allergy. Graded dose challenges and procedures to induce drug tolerance might be required in patients with drug allergy when there is a definite need for a particular agent. Management of reactions to specific agents, including beta-lactam antibiotics, sulfonamides, local anesthetics, radiocontrast media, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and biologic modifiers, will be discussed in further detail.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/physiopathology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/therapy , Humans , Medical History Taking , beta-Lactams/adverse effects
20.
Med Clin North Am ; 90(1): 233-60, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16310532

ABSTRACT

Allergic drug reactions compose a small percentage of ADRs, yet they are commonly encountered in clinical practice, and physicians are taught routinely to question patients about these reactions during history taking. Among antibiotics, the immunochemistry of penicillins has been elucidated,leading to the development of validated skin test reagents to diagnose type 1 allergy. Currently, the temporary commercial unavailability of Pre-Pen makes accurate penicillin skin testing impossible; however, this important skin test reagent is expected to become available sometime in 2006. Type 1 allergies to most other drugs lack comparable diagnostic tests, and their diagnosis is therefore driven by the patient's history. When readministration of medications to which patients report previous reactions is indicated, it may be almost always successfully accomplished by means of either graded challenge or desensitization.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL