Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 123
Filter
1.
EuroIntervention ; 15(5): 420-426, 2019 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147307

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Quantitative aortography using videodensitometry is a valuable tool for quantifying paravalvular regurgitation after TAVI, especially in the minimalist approach - without general anaesthesia. However, retrospective assessment of aortograms showed moderate feasibility of assessment. We sought to determine the prospective feasibility of quantitative aortography after a protocol of acquisition. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a multicentre registry in Japan, Canada, the Netherlands and Germany including consecutive patients with Heart Team indication to undergo TAVI over a median period of 12 months. Operators performed final aortograms according to a pre-planned projection (either by CT or visually - Teng's rule). An independent core laboratory (Cardialysis) analysed all images for feasibility and for regurgitation assessment. From the four centres included in the present analysis, a total of 354 patients underwent TAVI following the acquisition protocol and all the aortograms were analysed by the core lab. The analyses were feasible in 95.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.2% to 97.5%) of the cases. This rate of analysable assessment was significantly higher than the feasibility in previous validation studies, such as in the RESPOND population (95.5% vs. 57.5%, p<0.0001). No differences were observed among different planning strategies (CT 96.5% vs. Teng's rule 93%, p=0.159; or Circle 98.5% vs. 3mensio 95.8% vs. Teng's rule 93%, p=0.247). CONCLUSIONS: ASSESS-REGURGE showed a high feasibility of assessment of regurgitation with quantitative aortography with protocoled acquisition. This may be of great importance for quantifying regurgitation in TAVI procedures (optimisation, guidance of post-dilatation), and in future clinical trials, in order to address sealing features of novel devices for TAVI objectively. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03644784.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Aortography , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 12(9): 805-819, 2019 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31072504

ABSTRACT

The Academic Research Consortium (ARC) and the Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative have recently published updated clinical and angiographic endpoint definitions for percutaneous coronary intervention trials. The aim of this document is to provide practical guidance to facilitate and harmonize the implementation of those definitions in randomized trials or registries, as well as to foster consistency among independent adjudication committees. The authors compared the ARC-2 and Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative definitions to identify areas of consistency, complex scenarios, and definitions in need of further standardization. Furthermore, the authors compared the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction with the ARC-2 definition of myocardial infarction. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions definition of periprocedural myocardial infarction was also compared with the ARC-2 definition and the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. An in-depth assessment was done for each individual clinical endpoint to guide clinical investigators on reporting and classifying clinical adverse events. Finally, the authors propose standard streamlined data capture templates for reporting and adjudicating death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, stent or scaffold thrombosis, and bleeding.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/therapy , Endpoint Determination/standards , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/standards , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Research Design/standards , Coronary Angiography/standards , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Disease/mortality , Coronary Thrombosis/etiology , Coronary Thrombosis/mortality , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/mortality , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Stents/standards , Terminology as Topic , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
EuroIntervention ; 15(4): e362-e369, 2019 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30066672

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the SUPRAFLEX sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with the XIENCE everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with respect to target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months in a non-inferiority trial in a "real-world" patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prospective, randomised, 1:1 balanced, controlled, single-blind, multicentre study comparing clinical outcomes at 12 months between SUPRAFLEX and XIENCE in an "all-comers" patient population, comprising a total of 1,430 enrolled subjects with symptomatic coronary artery disease who qualify for percutaneous coronary interventions at 23 centres in Europe. The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of the device-oriented composite endpoint target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation) of the SUPRAFLEX group to the XIENCE group at 12 months post procedure. Secondary endpoints include the patient-oriented composite endpoint, target vessel failure, mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularisation and stent thrombosis rates (ARC classification). CONCLUSIONS: The TALENT trial aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of the thin-strut SUPRAFLEX compared to the current standard of care (XIENCE EES) in patients with atherosclerotic lesions. This will provide valuable information on the impact of this thin-strut device in an all-comers population.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Drug-Eluting Stents , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Absorbable Implants , Europe , Everolimus , Humans , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Sirolimus , Stents , Treatment Outcome
4.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 111(2): 193-202, 2018 Aug.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30183986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Balloon post-dilatation (BPD) is often needed for optimizing transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation, since paravalvular leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with poor outcome and mortality. Quantitative assessment of PVL severity before and after BPD is mandatory to properly assess PVL, thus improving implantation results and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate a quantitative angiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) by videodensitometry before and after BPD. METHODS: Videodensitometric-AR assessments (VD-AR) before and after BPD were analysed in 61 cases. RESULTS: VD-AR decreased significantly from 24.0[18.0-30.5]% to 12.0[5.5-19.0]% (p < 0.001, a two-tailed p < 0.05 defined the statistical significance). The relative delta of VD-AR after BPD ranged from -100% (improvement) to +40% (deterioration) and its median value was -46.2%. The frequency of improvement, no change, and deterioration were 70% (n = 43), 25% (n = 15) and 5% (n = 3), respectively. Significant AR (VD-AR > 17%) was observed in 47 patients (77%) before and in 19 patients (31%) after BPD. CONCLUSIONS: VD-AR after THV implantation provides a quantitative assessment of post-TAVI regurgitation and can help in the decision-making process on performing BPD and in determining its efficacy.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Aortography , Densitometry , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Severity of Illness Index , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Video Recording
5.
Catheter. cardiovasc. interv ; 92(5): 945-953, Nov. 2018. tab, ilus
Article in English | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, CONASS, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1223467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore the rate, the determinants of success, and the hemodynamic impact of balloon postdilatation (BPD) of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (SE-THVs) Background: BPD is commonly used to optimize valve expansion and reduce paravalvular leakage (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) without clearly knowing its hemodynamic benefits. METHODS: Patients (n 5 307) who received a SE-THV were stratified according to whether a BPD was performed or not. Patients who received BPD were stratified according to the severity of PVL remaining after BPD into two groups: Successful BPD ( mild PVL 1 BPD) and Failed BPD (moderate-severe PVL 1 BPD). RESULTS: BPD was performed in 121 patients (39.4%) and was successful in 106 patients (87.6% of attempts). A ratio of the postdilatation balloon diameter to the annulus diameter 0.95 was an independent predictor of BPD failure (OR: 10.72 [2.02-56.76], P 5 .005). Peak transvalvular pressure gradient (PG) was lower in the Successful BPD group (14[12-22] mm Hg) than in the Failed BPD group (18[16-23] mm Hg, P 5 .029), and did not rise in either group during follow-up (median [IQR], 364[161-739] days). CONCLUSION: BPD was performed in 39% of patients who received a SE-THV, and was successful in the majority of attempts. BPD failure was more likely in patients with a small postdilatation balloon-to-annulus diameter ratio. Effective BPD improved THV hemodynamic performance, and this was maintained in the intermediate-term post-TAVI.


Subject(s)
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Hemodynamics , Aortic Valve
6.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 111(2): 193-202, Aug. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-950218

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background: Balloon post-dilatation (BPD) is often needed for optimizing transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation, since paravalvular leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with poor outcome and mortality. Quantitative assessment of PVL severity before and after BPD is mandatory to properly assess PVL, thus improving implantation results and outcomes. Objective: To investigate a quantitative angiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) by videodensitometry before and after BPD. Methods: Videodensitometric-AR assessments (VD-AR) before and after BPD were analysed in 61 cases. Results: VD-AR decreased significantly from 24.0[18.0-30.5]% to 12.0[5.5-19.0]% (p < 0.001, a two-tailed p < 0.05 defined the statistical significance). The relative delta of VD-AR after BPD ranged from -100% (improvement) to +40% (deterioration) and its median value was -46.2%. The frequency of improvement, no change, and deterioration were 70% (n = 43), 25% (n = 15) and 5% (n = 3), respectively. Significant AR (VD-AR > 17%) was observed in 47 patients (77%) before and in 19 patients (31%) after BPD. Conclusions: VD-AR after THV implantation provides a quantitative assessment of post-TAVI regurgitation and can help in the decision-making process on performing BPD and in determining its efficacy.


Resumo Fundamento: A pós-dilatação com balão (PDB) é normalmente necessária para otimização do implante da válvula cardíaca transcateter (THV), uma vez que o "escape" ou leak paravalvar (PVL) após implante de valva aórtica transcateter está associada com desfecho ruim e mortalidade. A avaliação quantitativa da gravidade do PVL antes e após a PDB é mandatória para se avaliar adequadamente o PVL e, assim, melhorar os resultados e os desfechos do implante. Objetivo: Investigar uma avalição angiográfica quantitativa da regurgitação aórtica (RA) por videodensitometria (VD-RA) antes e após a PDB. Métodos: Resultados da VD-RA antes e após a PDB foram analisados em 61 casos. Resultados Houve diminuição significativa da VD-RA de 24,0(18,0-30,5)% para 12,0(5,5-19,0)% (p < 0,001; p < 0,05 bilateral foi definido como significância estatística). O delta relativo de VD-RA após a PDB variou de -100% (melhora) a +40% (piora) e o valor mediano foi -46,2%. As frequências de melhora, ausência de mudança, e piora foram 70% (n = 43), 25% (n = 15) e 5% (n = 3), respectivamente. Observou-se RA significativo (VD-RA > 17%) em 47 pacientes (77%) antes e em 19 pacientes (31%) após a PDB. Conclusões: A VD-RA após o implante de THV possibilita a avaliação quantitativa da regurgitação pós-TAVI, e pode auxiliar na tomada de decisão quanto à realização ou não da PDB, bem como na avaliação de sua eficácia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Video Recording , Severity of Illness Index , Aortography , Densitometry , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects
7.
Circ J ; 82(9): 2317-2325, 2018 08 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29973472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated the relationship between intraprocedural angiographic and echocardiographic AR severity after TAVI, and the clinical robustness of angiographic assessment. Methods and Results: In 74 consecutive patients, the echocardiographic circumferential extent (CE) of the paravalvular regurgitant jet was retrospectively measured and graded based on the VARC-2 cut-points; and angiographic post-TAVI AR was retrospectively quantified using contrast videodensitometry (VD) software that calculates the ratio of the contrast time-density integral in the LV outflow tract to that in the ascending aorta (LVOT-AR). Seventy-four echocardiograms immediately after TAVI were analyzable, while 51 aortograms were analyzable for VD. These 51 echocardiograms and VD were evaluated. Median LVOT-AR across the echocardiographic AR grades was as follows: none-trace, 0.07 (IQR, 0.05-0.11); mild, 0.12 (IQR, 0.09-0.15); and moderate, 0.17 (IQR, 0.15-0.22; P<0.05 for none-trace vs. mild, and mild vs. moderate). LVOT-AR strongly correlated with %CE (r=0.72, P<0.0001). At 1 year, the rate of the composite end-point of all-cause death or HF re-hospitalization was significantly higher in >mild AR patients compared with no-mild AR on intra-procedural echocardiography (41.5% vs. 12.4%, P=0.03) as well as in patients with LVOT-AR >0.17 compared with LVOT-AR ≤0.17 (59.5% vs. 16.6%, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: VD (LVOT-AR) has good intra-procedural inter-technique consistency and clinical robustness. Greater than mild post-TAVI AR, but not mild post-TAVI AR, is associated with late mortality.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortography/methods , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Patient Readmission , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
8.
Circ J ; 82(7): 1943-1950, 2018 06 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29760325

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical robustness of contrast-videodensitometric (VD) assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been demonstrated. Correct acquisition of aortic root angiography for VD assessment, however, is hampered by the opacified descending aorta and by individual anatomic peculiarities. The aim of this study was to use preprocedural multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) to optimize the angiographic projection in order to improve the feasibility of VD assessment.Methods and Results:In 92 consecutive patients, post-TAVI AR (i.e., left ventricular outflow tract [LVOT] AR) was assessed on aortic root angiograms using VD software. The patients were divided into 2 groups: The first group of 54 patients was investigated prior to the introduction of the standardized acquisition protocol; the second group of 38 consecutive patients after implementation of the standardized acquisition protocol, involving MSCT planning of the optimal angiographic projection. Optimal projection planning has dramatically improved the feasibility of VD assessment from 57.4% prior to the standardized acquisition protocol, to 100% after the protocol was implemented. In 69 analyzable aortograms (69/92; 75%), LVOT-AR ranged from 3% to 28% with a median of 12%. Inter-observer agreement was high (mean difference±SD, 1±2%), and the 2 observers' measurements were highly correlated (r=0.94, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of computed tomography-guided angiographic image acquisition has significantly improved the analyzability of the angiographic VD assessment of post-TAVI AR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Humans , Observer Variation , X-Rays
9.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 92(5): 945-953, 2018 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29520970

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore the rate, the determinants of success, and the hemodynamic impact of balloon postdilatation (BPD) of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (SE-THVs) BACKGROUND: BPD is commonly used to optimize valve expansion and reduce paravalvular leakage (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) without clearly knowing its hemodynamic benefits. METHODS: Patients (n = 307) who received a SE-THV were stratified according to whether a BPD was performed or not. Patients who received BPD were stratified according to the severity of PVL remaining after BPD into two groups: Successful BPD (≤mild PVL + BPD) and Failed BPD (moderate-severe PVL + BPD). RESULTS: BPD was performed in 121 patients (39.4%) and was successful in 106 patients (87.6% of attempts). A ratio of the postdilatation balloon diameter to the annulus diameter ≤0.95 was an independent predictor of BPD failure (OR: 10.72 [2.02-56.76], P = .005). Peak transvalvular pressure gradient (PG) was lower in the Successful BPD group (14[12-22] mm Hg) than in the Failed BPD group (18[16-23] mm Hg, P = .029), and did not rise in either group during follow-up (median [IQR], 364[161-739] days). CONCLUSION: BPD was performed in 39% of patients who received a SE-THV, and was successful in the majority of attempts. BPD failure was more likely in patients with a small postdilatation balloon-to-annulus diameter ratio. Effective BPD improved THV hemodynamic performance, and this was maintained in the intermediate-term post-TAVI.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/prevention & control , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Balloon Valvuloplasty , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Hemodynamics , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Balloon Valvuloplasty/adverse effects , Brazil , Female , Humans , Male , Prosthesis Design , Recovery of Function , Registries , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 19(6): 690-693, 2018 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28950368

ABSTRACT

Aims: Patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are challenging to evaluate using conventional imaging techniques, such as standard echocardiography (SE). The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the potential of contrast echocardiography (CE) for the evaluation of the left ventricle (LV). Methods and results: This prospective study included 14 ambulatory patients (mean age 58 ± 9 years, 79% male) with a LVAD (all HeartMate 3, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA). Nine (64%) patients had an ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and 5 (36%) had a non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. All patients underwent SE and CE using intravenous administration of Sonovue contrast agent (Bracco, Milan, Italy). The echocardiograms were assessed by three observers, using a standard 17-segment model of the LV. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was assessed using the biplane Simpson method. The contrast agent was well tolerated by all patients, without any side effects. Overall, SE allowed visualization of 57% of LV segments (135/238) and CE allowed visualization of 79% of LV segments (187/238), P < 0.001. Per patient, SE resulted in visualization of 9.6 ± 5.2 segments and CE was able to visualize 13.4 ± 5.8 segments (P < 0.001). Administration of contrast agent significantly improved the assessment of LVEDV (feasibility SE: 36% vs. CE: 79%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Routine use of a contrast agent appears safe when used in patients having a new third generation LVAD and may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography in these patients. LV size determination can be obtained more often due to improved LV visualization using contrast agent.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography/methods , Heart-Assist Devices , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Aged , Cardiomyopathies/surgery , Cohort Studies , Feasibility Studies , Female , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Heart Failure/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Patient Safety , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
11.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 19(2): 157-167, 2018 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28064153

ABSTRACT

Aims: The Lotus and SAPIEN3 are second-generation transcatheter heart valves, which are designed to minimize paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to compare both devices for valve performance and with emphasis on PAR by independent core laboratory analysis. Methods and results: A total of 162 (79 Lotus and 83 SAPIEN3) consecutive patients (51% female, 80 ± 8 years, Logistic EuroSCORE 14.8 ± 9.4%) who underwent TAVR because of aortic stenosis were included. Patients with aortic valve-in-valve treatment were excluded. Pre-discharge echocardiograms were analysed by an independent core laboratory using the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria. There were no differences in baseline and procedural characteristics, except for a larger aortic annulus and sizing indices in SAPIEN3-treated patients and frequency of post-dilatation (0% in Lotus and 13.1% in SAPIEN3). Both valves have similar mean residual gradient, indexed effective orifice area and Doppler velocity index when adjusted to valve size. The frequency of mild (13.9% vs. 31.3%) and at least moderate (1.3% vs. 3.6%) PAR was less after Lotus than after SAPIEN3 implantation (P = 0.02). Multi-slice computed tomography-based annulus and left ventricular outflow tract diameters, calcification and percentage of oversizing were not different between those with or without mild or more PAR. On multivariate analysis, the use of Lotus valve was associated with less (odds ratio OR, 0.41, P = 0.03) occurrence of PAR. Conclusion: Overall, haemodynamic performance was comparable between the Lotus and SAPIEN3 valves. Lotus valve required less oversizing and was associated with less PAR than SAPIEN3.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods , Prosthesis Design , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Cohort Studies , Echocardiography, Doppler/methods , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Prosthesis Failure , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Treatment Outcome
12.
Circulation ; 137(9): 891-906, 2018 02 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28847897

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to derive and validate a novel risk score for early right-sided heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device implantation. METHODS: The EUROMACS (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support) was used to identify adult patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation with mainstream devices. Eligible patients (n=2988) were randomly divided into derivation (n=2000) and validation (n=988) cohorts. The primary outcome was early (<30 days) severe postoperative RHF, defined as receiving short- or long-term right-sided circulatory support, continuous inotropic support for ≥14 days, or nitric oxide ventilation for ≥48 hours. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Covariates found to be associated with RHF (exploratory univariate P<0.10) were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model. A risk score was then generated using the relative magnitude of the exponential regression model coefficients of independent predictors at the last step after checking for collinearity, likelihood ratio test, c index, and clinical weight at each step. RESULTS: A 9.5-point risk score incorporating 5 variables (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class, use of multiple inotropes, severe right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography, ratio of right atrial/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, hemoglobin) was created. The mean scores in the derivation and validation cohorts were 2.7±1.9 and 2.6±2.0, respectively (P=0.32). RHF in the derivation cohort occurred in 433 patients (21.7%) after left ventricular assist device implantation and was associated with a lower 1-year (53% versus 71%; P<0.001) and 2-year (45% versus 58%; P<0.001) survival compared with patients without RHF. RHF risk ranged from 11% (low risk score 0-2) to 43.1% (high risk score >4; P<0.0001). Median intensive care unit stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 4-15 days) versus 24 days (interquartile range, 14-38 days) in patients without versus with RHF, respectively (P<0.001). The c index of the composite score was 0.70 in the derivation and 0.67 in the validation cohort. The EUROMACS-RHF risk score outperformed (P<0.0001) previously published scores and known individual echocardiographic and hemodynamic markers of RHF. CONCLUSIONS: This novel EUROMACS-RHF risk score outperformed currently known risk scores and clinical predictors of early postoperative RHF. This novel score may be useful for tailored risk-based clinical assessment and management of patients with advanced HF evaluated for ventricular assist device therapy.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart-Assist Devices , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prosthesis Implantation , Registries , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Research Design , Survival Analysis
13.
EuroIntervention ; 13(12): e1410-e1417, 2017 12 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29061548

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The Xeltis aortic valve leaflets are made from a bioabsorbable supramolecular polymer that guides the tissue to restoring itself. It is mounted on a self-expanding nitinol frame that includes three feelers and a native leaflet clipping mechanism. We sought to investigate the acute valve performance in a preclinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 33 sheep, 26 mm Xeltis aortic valves were transapically implanted in a 23 mm native annulus. Aortography (analysable, n=28) and echocardiography (analysable, n=20) images were acquired immediately after implantation of the Xeltis aortic valve to assess the acute device performance. On echocardiography, transvalvular peak pressure gradient (PG) was 7.4 (IQR: 6.0-8.9) mmHg, mean PG was 4.0 (IQR: 3.0-5.0) mmHg, and effective orifice area was 2.2 (IQR: 1.6-2.5) cm2. Trace (n=6), mild (n=2) and no (n=12) transvalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) were seen. Likewise, no paravalvular AR was detected in 7 cases, whereas trace, mild and moderate were seen in 7, 5 and 1 cases, respectively. On quantitative videodensitometric AR (VD-AR) assessment, a median value of 6% (IQR: 1-12%) of AR was seen. Three cases had a VD-AR superior to 17%, which has a prognostic significance. Out of these three cases, two had echocardiographic assessment available, which showed mild and moderate paravalvular regurgitation due to inadequate leaflet clipping. CONCLUSIONS: In a transapical ovine model, the novel restorative transcatheter aortic valve with bioabsorbable leaflets demonstrated good haemodynamic performance comparable to commercially available devices. The highly porous polymeric leaflets demonstrated good competence immediately after implantation with no cases having >mild transvalvular AR.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Aortic Valve/physiology , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Tissue Scaffolds , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Animals , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography , Hemodynamics , Regeneration , Sheep
14.
EuroIntervention ; 13(AA): AA68-AA77, 2017 Sep 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28942388

ABSTRACT

The current standard of treatment of valvular diseases with severe functional and/or clinical consequences is the repair or replacement of the valve, which is usually surgical or, in specific scenarios, percutaneous. The available prosthetic valves, however, are not a magic bullet in the physicians' arsenal for the management of valvular diseases, since the age-dependent structural valve deterioration (SVD) and the need for prolonged systemic anticoagulation in the case of metallic prosthetic valves are not inconsequential during the lifespan of a patient with an implanted prosthetic valve. Based on decades of research combining the scientific disciplines of supramolecular chemistry, electrospinning and regenerative medicine, endogenous tissue restoration has emerged as a very promising domain to provide this magic bullet, in the form of valves, which enables functional restoration by the body itself. The concept of a restorative material that will set the framework for the creation of a new, endogenous valve is very appealing and, recently, proof of concept studies have been completed at both preclinical and clinical levels. These studies have shown favourable pathologic, anatomic and haemodynamic characteristics compared to currently available prosthetic valves, in sheep and in young children undergoing right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction, and may represent an alternative to the bioprosthesis made of xenopericardial tissue. The present manuscript reviews the rationale, background knowledge and historic development of endogenous tissue restoration and presents preliminary data about the Xeltis valve, which appears to have the potential to make restorative valve therapy a reality in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Animals , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Prosthesis Design
15.
EuroIntervention ; 13(11): 1288-1295, 2017 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28691911

ABSTRACT

AIMS: In the minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era, the usage of transoesophageal echocardiography has become restricted. Conversely, aortography has gained clinical ground in quantifying prosthetic valve regurgitation (PVR) during the procedure. In a mock circulation system, we sought to compare the contrast volume required and the accuracy of aortographic videodensitometric PVR assessment using a synchronised diastolic and standard (non-synchronised) injection aortography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Synchronised diastolic injection triggered by the signal stemming from the mock circulation was compared with standard non-synchronised injection. A transcatheter heart valve was implanted and was deformed step by step by advancing a screw perpendicularly to the cage of the valve in order to create increasing PVR. Quantitative measurement of PVR was derived from time-density curves of both a reference area (aortic root) and a region of interest (left ventricle) developed by a videodensitometric software. The volume of contrast required for the synchronised diastolic injection was significantly less than in the non-synchronised injection (8.1 [7.9-8.5] ml vs. 19.4 [19.2-19.9] ml, p<0.001). The correlation between the two methods was substantial (Spearman's coefficient rho ranging from 0.991 to 0.968). Intraobserver intra-class correlation coefficient for both methods of injection was 0.999 (95% CI: 0.996-1.000) for the synchronised diastolic and 0.999 (95% CI: 0.996-1.000) for the non-synchronised injection group. The mean difference in the rating was 0.17% and limits of agreement were ±1.64% for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A short synchronised diastolic injection enables contrast volume reduction during aortography without compromising the accuracy of the quantitative assessment of PVR using videodensitometry.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortography/methods , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Models, Anatomic , Models, Cardiovascular , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Diastole , Humans , Injections , Observer Variation , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Reproducibility of Results
16.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 18(6): 648-653, 2017 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28369281

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Paravalvular aortic leakage (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a complication with potentially severe consequences. The relation between native aortic root calcium burden, stent frame eccentricity and PVL was not studied before. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two-hundred-and-twenty-three consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI with a Medtronic CoreValve System© and who had available pre-discharge transthoracic echocardiography were studied. Echocardiographic stent inflow frame eccentricity was defined as major-minor diameter in a short-axis view >2 mm. PVL was scored according to the updated Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) recommendations. In a subgroup of 162 (73%) patients, the calcium Agatston score was available. Stent frame eccentricity was seen in 77 (35%) of patients. The correlation between the Agatston score and stent frame eccentricity was significant (ρ = 0.241, P = 0.003). Paravalvular leakage was absent in 91 cases (41%), mild in 67 (30%), moderate in 51 (23%), and severe in 14 (6%) cases. The correlation between stent frame eccentricity and PVL severity was significant (ρ = 0.525, P < 0.0001). There was a relation between particular eccentric stent frame shapes and the site of PVL. CONCLUSION: Calcification of the aortic annulus is associated with a subsequent eccentric shape of the CoreValve prosthesis. This eccentric shape results in more PVL, with the localization of PVL related to the shape of stent frame eccentricity.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography, Doppler, Color/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/therapy , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Calcinosis/surgery , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Stents , Survival Rate , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods
17.
Echocardiography ; 34(2): 199-209, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28240430

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The feasibility and accuracy of an automated adaptive algorithm (Heart Model) for the quantification of left heart chamber volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction has been reported earlier. An improved version of the algorithm is available, and we aimed to test its accuracy compared with manual 3D echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Apical 3D transthoracic datasets were obtained in 67 patients. Acquisitions covering ventricles and atria were performed for analysis using the automated software (Heart Model, Philips Healthcare). In addition, acquisitions focused on the left ventricle were acquired for left ventricle manual 3D measurements (QLAB 10 3DQA, Philips Healthcare). Automated results using endocardial contouring settings at 50% showed a strong correlation with manual 3D measurements (r=.84-.97). Left ventricular end-diastolic volumes were underestimated (bias -5.9 mL, LOA ±38.5 mL), with no significant differences in other parameters. Intra-observer variability using the automated algorithm was zero for all parameters given the lack of human interaction. Manual corrections of the automatic algorithm introduced small but significant differences in volumes but not in ejection fraction when compared with automatic results. Manually corrected results of the automatic algorithm were not significantly different from those obtained with manual 3D echocardiography, except for a small underestimation of left atrial volumes (bias -2.1 mL, LOA ±15.2 mL). CONCLUSIONS: The current improved version of the automated adaptive algorithm is accurate for the assessment of left heart chamber volumes, albeit a small underestimation of left ventricular end-diastolic volume is seen, when compared with manual 3D echocardiography.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional/methods , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Algorithms , Feasibility Studies , Female , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology
18.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 90(4): 650-659, 2017 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28109043

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate a new angiographic method for aortic regurgitation (AR) severity assessment in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: AR after TAVI is common but challenging to quantitate, especially in the cath-lab. METHODS: In 228 patients, AR was quantitated before and after TAVI by echocardiography and by video-densitometric analysis of aortograms. Contrast time-density curves for the aortic root (the reference region) and the left ventricular outflow tract, LVOT were generated. LVOT-AR was calculated as the area under the curve of the LVOT as a fraction of the area under the curve of the reference region. RESULTS: LVOT-AR was 0.10 ± 0.08, 0.13 ± 0.10 and 0.28 ± 0.14 in none-trace, mild and moderate-severe post-TAVI AR as defined by echocardiography (P < 0.001) and a cutpoint of >0.17 corresponded to moderate-severe AR on echocardiography (area under the curve = 0.84). At follow-up (median, 496 days), patients with LVOT-AR ≤ 0.17 showed a significant reduction of LV mass index (LVMi; 121 [95-148] vs. 140 [112-169] g/m2 , P = 0.009) and the prevalence of LV hypertrophy (LVH; 64 vs. 88%, P = 0.001) compared to baseline. In patients with LVOT-AR > 0.17, LVMi (149 [121-178] vs. 166 [144-188] g/m2 , P = 0.14) and the prevalence of LVH (74 vs. 87%, P = 0.23) did not show a significant change. Compared to patients with LVOT-AR ≤ 0.17, those with LVOT-AR > 0.17 had an increased 30-day (16.4% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.035) and one year mortality (32.9 vs. 14.2%, log rank P value = 0.001; HR: 2.690 [1.461-4.953], P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LVOT-AR > 0.17 corresponds to greater than mild AR as defined by echocardiography and predicts impaired LV reverse remodeling and increased early and midterm mortality after TAVI. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortography/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Area Under Curve , Brazil , Densitometry , Echocardiography, Doppler, Color , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Registries , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
19.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 18(6): 697-706, 2017 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27354344

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) provides definitive valve replacement through a minimally invasive procedure. In the setting of TMVR, it remains unclear how relevant the differences between different mitral annular (MA) diameters are. We sought to define a simplified and reproducible method to describe the MA size. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) studies of 47 patients, 3D MA perimeter (P3D) was annotated. The aorto-mitral continuity was excluded from MA contour either by manual annotation (yielding a saddle-shape model) or by simple truncation at the medial and lateral trigones (yielding a D-shape model). The method of the least squares was used to generate the projected MA area (Aproj) and perimeter (Pproj). Intercommissural (IC) and septolateral (SL) diameters, Dmean = (IC diameter + SL diameter)/2, area-derived diameter (DArea = 2 x √(A/π)) and perimeter-derived diameter (DPerimeter = P/π) were measured. MA eccentricity, height, and calcification (MAC) were assessed. Thirty studies were re-read by the same and by another observer to test intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Patients (age, 75 ± 12 years, 66% males) had a wide range of mitral regurgitation severity (none-trace in 8%, mild in 55%, moderate-severe in 37%), MA size (area: 5-16 cm2), eccentricity (-8-52%), and height (3-11 mm). MAC was seen in 11 cases, in whom MAC arc occupied 26 ± 20% of the MA circumference. DArea (36.0 ± 4.0 mm) and DPerimeter (37.1 ± 3.8 mm) correlated strongly (R2 = 0.97) and were not significantly different (P = 0.15). The IC (39.3 ± 4.6 mm) and the SL (31.4 ± 4.5 mm) diameters were significantly different from DArea (P < 0.001) while Dmean (35.4 ± 4.0 mm) was not (P = 0.5). The correlation of DArea was stronger with Dmean (R2 = 0.96) than with IC and SL diameters (R2 = 0.69 and 0.76, respectively). The average difference between DArea and Dmean was +0.6 mm and the 95% limits of agreement were 2.1 and -0.9 mm. Similar results were found when the D-shape model was applied. All MA diameters showed good reproducibility with high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.93-0.98), small average bias (0.37-1.1 mm), and low coefficient of variation (3-7%) for intra- and inter-observer comparisons. Reproducibility of DArea was lower in patients with MAC. CONCLUSION: MA sizing by CTA is readily feasible and reproducible. Dmean is a simple index that can be used to infer the effective MA size.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment Outcome
20.
EuroIntervention ; 13(1): 60-68, 2017 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993754

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intermediate-term clinical impact of aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using a novel quantitative angiographic method taking into account the influence of pre-existing AR. METHODS AND RESULTS: AR after TAVI was quantified in 338 patients (age 82 [78-86] years; 55% male) and the influence on intermediate-term all-cause mortality was evaluated. In 228 aortograms, AR was quantitated using a dedicated videodensitometric method focused in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT-AR). Patients with LVOT-AR >0.17 had a significantly increased all-cause mortality at three years, compared with patients who had LVOT-AR ≤0.17 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-2.86, p=0.032). Taking the influence of pre-existing AR into account, patients with post-procedural LVOT-AR >0.17 and ≤mild pre-existing AR had a significantly increased mortality at two years, compared to patients with LVOT-AR >0.17 and >mild pre-existing AR (HR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.16-5.58, p=0.029). In those with >mild pre-existing AR (n=70), post-TAVI LVOT-AR >0.17 was not associated with increased mortality (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.31-1.91, p=0.578). CONCLUSIONS: AR after TAVI could be quantitated utilising LVOT-AR. The cut-point of >0.17 indicates a significant AR pertaining to increased intermediate-term mortality, especially in those with no significant pre-existing AR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/surgery , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...